logo
Opinion: Trump and the promise of peace

Opinion: Trump and the promise of peace

Yahoo04-06-2025
President Donald Trump may be the only person standing between Iran, Israel and an apocalyptic war of biblical proportions. At the outset of such a war, strikes on nuclear facilities would expose entire populations to toxic chemical plumes and radioactive materials. Nuclear disasters know no boundaries: think Chernobyl and Fukushima on steroids.
At a press conference in late May, President Trump confirmed rumors that he called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay military strikes against Iran. Citing progress in the nuclear negotiations, he characterized strikes at this juncture as 'very inappropriate.'
No one can claim that Trump's resistance to war and his moral revulsion at bloodshed lack a foundation in fact, faith, reason or history. As he told Esquire magazine in August 2004, a year after the Iraq invasion:
'What was the purpose of this whole thing? Hundreds and hundreds of young people killed. And what about the people coming back with no arms and legs? Not to mention the other side. All those Iraqi kids who've been blown to pieces. And it turns out that all of the reasons for the war were blatantly wrong. All this for nothing!'
A similar antipathy for war is evident in Trump's approach to a nuclear deal with Iran. While not opposed to strikes as a last resort, Trump told reporters that he prefers an agreement that includes a rigorous verification regime to prevent Tehran from acquiring a bomb.
'I want it [to be a] very strong agreement where we can go in with inspectors, we can take whatever we want, we can blow up whatever we want, but nobody getting killed. We can blow up a lab, but nobody is gonna be in a lab, as opposed to everybody being in the lab and blowing it up.'
If only the leaders of Iran and Israel were as concerned as Trump about the costs and precedents set by strikes on nuclear sites.
In 'The Ayatollah's Nuclear Gamble: The Human Cost of Military Strikes,' a study published by Omid for Iran and the Hinckley Institute, Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was warned about the human cost of his nuclear gamble. Based on the available information, the study estimated that between 7,000 and 11,000 people — scientists, workers, soldiers and staff — at Iran's nuclear facilities would be killed or injured immediately. If only 5% of the 371 metric tons of uranium hexafluoride held at the Isfahan facility were to become airborne, with prevailing winds at 9.4 miles per hour, a toxic plume could expose approximately 240,000 residents in Isfahan alone within an hour. It concluded that 'the contamination of air, water, and soil from the thermal impact of strikes on nuclear plants would be immediate, vast, and, for the most part, irreversible.'
The regional effects would be catastrophic. Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed told journalist Tucker Carlson that strikes on the Bushehr nuclear plant would render the sea 'entirely contaminated' and put all Gulf countries at risk: 'No water, no fish … nothing. No life!' he warned.
Israel is also at risk. In December 2021, the Jerusalem Post reported that the Islamic Republic claimed to have successfully simulated 'attacks on the Dimona nuclear plant using 16 ballistic missiles and five suicide drones.'
Bemoaning the specter of 'the first radiological war in history,' Bennet Ramberg, a former State Department official, likened the effects of a successful strike on the Dimona reactor to 'a substantial radiological weapon or dirty bomb.' In his seminal study, he noted that 'the relative economic dislocation, population relocation, and immediate and lingering psychological trauma could be significant.'
In a major address in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on May 13, 2025, President Trump offered Iran, Israel and the other players in the region an exit ramp. He lamented the disastrous Western interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq — the hubris of neo-cons and nation-builders — promising an era of peace and prosperity rooted in pragmatism and profit:
'Before our eyes, a new generation of leaders is transcending the ancient conflicts and tired division of the past, and forging a future where the Middle East is defined by commerce, not chaos; where it exports technology, not terrorism; and where people of different nations, religions and creeds are building cities together — not bombing each other out of existence.'
President Trump may never win the Nobel Peace Prize. However, he has captured the imagination of Iranians and Israelis who want an end to the region's wars. Rather than rushing into a war, Iranians, held hostage by a cult of death and martyrdom, want Trump to prioritize peace and prosperity. With a national trucker strike spreading across 150 cities in Iran, the Iranian people would say yes to a broader Iran deal that would enable them to reclaim their stolen sovereignty, security, democracy and dignity.
As Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeated time and time again, the Iranian people are our friends and partners. They are the ones who hold the keys to regional peace and stability that can save the lives of innocent Israelis and Palestinians, not the radical Shi'a clerics who seek war and destruction.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scottish policing will be ‘seriously affected' by Trump visit, says police body
Scottish policing will be ‘seriously affected' by Trump visit, says police body

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Scottish policing will be ‘seriously affected' by Trump visit, says police body

Policing across Scotland will be 'seriously affected' by the visit of US President Donald Trump, the head of a police body has said. Mr Trump is expected to touch down in Scotland on Friday ahead of a four-day stay at his golf clubs in South Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire. The president – whose mother was born on the Isle of Lewis before emigrating to America – will meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during the visit, as well as Scottish First Minister John Swinney. The policing operation required to handle both the visit and any protests that may spring up as a result of it will be huge, with Police Scotland seeking officers from other areas of the UK for support. Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland on Wednesday, David Kennedy, the general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation – the body which represents rank-and-file police officers – said: 'Anyone who says it won't affect it (policing in Scotland), I can't believe that's the case. 'It will affect it. 'You may be waiting in the past for so many hours for a police officer to arrive, that could double now, you may be waiting for more time for them to arrive. 'Obviously, emergency calls will take priority, but it will affect communities in Scotland. 'We've been asking long and weary to have more police officers in our communities in Scotland and all this does is take them away from that at this time.' Asked if the quality of policing will be impacted by the visit, Mr Kennedy added: 'It will be seriously affected, it has to be. 'There's not enough police officers for it not to be affected.' Concerns have also been raised about the cost of the policing operation, with officers likely to cancel rest days to ensure adequate staffing. But speaking to the PA news agency on Tuesday, Mr Swinney said talks are ongoing between Police Scotland and the Scottish and UK governments on funding, asserting that policing in Scotland will not be put in a 'detrimental position' as a result. Mr Kennedy also reiterated calls from Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond for those seeking to protest to do so peacefully. 'All I would ask is for protesters to remember the police officers that are there to protect them, make sure that any protests are safe and are free from violence, that is all the police officers want. 'We are used to policing protests in this country, we do it very well, and I hope the protesters realise that police officers in Scotland are friendly and we just want people and the public to be safe.'

The director of national intelligence's assertions about what's coming next didn't really add up.
The director of national intelligence's assertions about what's coming next didn't really add up.

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The director of national intelligence's assertions about what's coming next didn't really add up.

Tulsi Gabbard teased the release of 'further documents tomorrow' after Barack Obama's office firmly shut down her 'ridiculous' claims that he conspired to subvert the 2016 election. The director of national intelligence appeared on Newsmax Tuesday night to defend her allegations against Obama administration officials, after various analyses cast them as deeply misleading and thin. She dropped a report on Friday claiming to have uncovered a 'treasonous conspiracy' by Obama-era officials to play up Russian election interference claims that 'laid the groundwork for a years-long coup' against Trump. Obama's office issued a rare rebuke on Tuesday, dismissing the allegations as 'ridiculous' and a weak attempt at distraction' as MAGA is roiled by the Jeffrey Epstein controversy.

The More Deals Trump Gets, The More Confidence Markets Gain
The More Deals Trump Gets, The More Confidence Markets Gain

Bloomberg

time10 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

The More Deals Trump Gets, The More Confidence Markets Gain

The world's investors are enjoying a confidence boost after months of uncertainty as President Donald Trump finally starts signing trade deals. Global stocks extended a record and risk-sensitive currencies strengthened after a trade agreement with Japan contained lower tariffs than Trump had threatened earlier this month. The big picture takeaway seems to be a light at the end of a negotiating tunnel that will further fuel investor optimism that the worst of their fears on trade are behind them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store