logo
As Iranian missiles approached a US base, one nation stepped in to avert a wider war in West Asia

As Iranian missiles approached a US base, one nation stepped in to avert a wider war in West Asia

Economic Times2 days ago

Live Events
19 missiles in the air, a ceasefire on the line
A phone call, and a breakthrough
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
On the evening of June 23, when Iranian missiles raced toward the largest American military base in the Gulf, senior Qatari officials were deep in high-level talks about defusing regional tensions.They didn't expect the conflict to reach their doorstep — until the walls began to shake.According to Qatar's foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari, defense personnel interrupted a meeting with the Qatari Prime Minister in Doha on Monday with urgent warnings: Iranian missiles were incoming. Moments later, the thunder of interceptors filled the skies above the Qatari capital, Ansari told CNN.The attack came days after U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and pushed the region to the brink of a broader war.Gulf capitals braced for impact. In Kuwait, shelters were opened. In Bahrain, roads were closed. Some residents in Dubai and Abu Dhabi rushed to buy supplies or book flights out.At Al Udeid Air Base , the largest U.S. installation in the region, American military personnel had already begun evacuating. Qatar, meanwhile, activated its early warning radar system and scrambled 300 troops to deploy Patriot missile batteries. 'Towards the end it was very clear… Al Udeid Base was going to be targeted,' a Qatari defense official told CNN.At around 7 p.m. local time, radar confirmed that Iranian missiles were airborne. According to Al-Ansari, Qatar's military intercepted seven missiles over the Persian Gulf, and another eleven over Doha. A single missile struck an uninhabited area near Al Udeid, causing minimal damage.U.S. President Donald Trump later said that 14 missiles had been fired, but Qatar's account put the number at 19. Al-Ansari told CNN the missile defense operation was 'Qatari-led', though coordinated with U.S. forces.While Tehran had warned Gulf nations months earlier that any U.S. attack on Iranian territory would make American bases across the region 'legitimate targets,' Al-Ansari said no specific warning was given ahead of this strike. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reportedly reiterated that stance in Istanbul just one day earlier, telling Gulf counterparts that retaliation was imminent if the U.S. escalated.After the attack, Iran's National Security Council said the strikes posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar and its noble people.' But Al-Ansari dismissed speculation that Qatar had quietly allowed the strike in exchange for a future diplomatic opening.'We do not take it lightly for our country to be attacked by missiles from any side,' he told CNN. 'I would not put my daughter under missiles coming from the sky just to come out with a political outcome. This was a complete surprise to us.'Just as Qatar's leadership was weighing how to respond, a call came from President Trump to Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. Trump relayed that Israel was willing to agree to a ceasefire, and asked Qatar to relay that message to Iran.'As we were discussing how to retaliate to this attack… this is when we get a call from the United States that a possible ceasefire, a possible avenue to regional security had opened,' Al-Ansari said.The country's chief negotiator, Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Al-Khulaifi, reached out to Tehran. Simultaneously, Prime Minister Al Thani spoke to U.S. Vice President JD Vance. With both channels active, a deal was quickly arranged.'All options were on the table that night,' Al-Ansari recalled. 'But we also realized that was a moment that could create momentum for peace in a region that hasn't been there for two years now.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK High Court Rules F-35 jet parts exports to Israel are lawful despite humanitarian concerns
UK High Court Rules F-35 jet parts exports to Israel are lawful despite humanitarian concerns

Economic Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

UK High Court Rules F-35 jet parts exports to Israel are lawful despite humanitarian concerns

Despite concerns over potential breaches of international law in Gaza, the UK High Court has ruled lawful the government's continued export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel. This decision follows a legal challenge by human rights groups, arguing the exports violate international obligations. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in International 1. Harry and Meghan to play key roles in King Charles' funeral despite Royal tensions London's High Court has ruled that the UK government's decision to continue exporting components for F-35 fighter jets to Israel is lawful, even though the court acknowledged the risk that these parts could be used in ways that breach international humanitarian law in legal challenge was brought by Al-Haq , a Palestinian human rights group, with support from organizations including Amnesty International, Oxfam , and Human Rights Watch. They argued that supplying F-35 parts violated Britain's obligations under international law, especially the Geneva Conventions, given evidence of civilian harm in the ongoing conflict in UK government had partially suspended 30 out of 350 arms export licenses to Israel in September 2024, following concerns about their possible use in breaches of international law. However, licenses related to F-35 components were exempted. The government defended this carve-out by citing the UK's participation in a global supply chain for the F-35, a program involving the US, Israel, and NATO partners. Officials argued that halting these exports would disrupt international security cooperation and undermine allied confidence in the UK's their 72-page ruling, Justices Stephen Males and Karen Steyn stated that the matter was 'a highly sensitive and political question' best left to the executive branch, which is accountable to Parliament and the electorate, not the courts. The judges concluded that the UK's role in the multinational F-35 program is a matter of national and international security, and not for judicial rights groups expressed disappointment and are considering an appeal, but for now, the UK's exports of F-35 jet parts to Israel will continue under the current policy.

UK High Court Rules F-35 jet parts exports to Israel are lawful despite humanitarian concerns
UK High Court Rules F-35 jet parts exports to Israel are lawful despite humanitarian concerns

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

UK High Court Rules F-35 jet parts exports to Israel are lawful despite humanitarian concerns

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel London's High Court has ruled that the UK government's decision to continue exporting components for F-35 fighter jets to Israel is lawful, even though the court acknowledged the risk that these parts could be used in ways that breach international humanitarian law in legal challenge was brought by Al-Haq , a Palestinian human rights group, with support from organizations including Amnesty International, Oxfam , and Human Rights Watch. They argued that supplying F-35 parts violated Britain's obligations under international law, especially the Geneva Conventions, given evidence of civilian harm in the ongoing conflict in UK government had partially suspended 30 out of 350 arms export licenses to Israel in September 2024, following concerns about their possible use in breaches of international law. However, licenses related to F-35 components were exempted. The government defended this carve-out by citing the UK's participation in a global supply chain for the F-35, a program involving the US, Israel, and NATO partners. Officials argued that halting these exports would disrupt international security cooperation and undermine allied confidence in the UK's their 72-page ruling, Justices Stephen Males and Karen Steyn stated that the matter was 'a highly sensitive and political question' best left to the executive branch, which is accountable to Parliament and the electorate, not the courts. The judges concluded that the UK's role in the multinational F-35 program is a matter of national and international security, and not for judicial rights groups expressed disappointment and are considering an appeal, but for now, the UK's exports of F-35 jet parts to Israel will continue under the current policy.

Make the deal!
Make the deal!

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Make the deal!

India and the United States are trying to make a big trade deal. If it works, it could really help India's factories and give people more jobs. That would also take pressure off farming, where most people still work but don't earn much. Right now, the US buys a lot of things from India — 18% of all Indian exports. But if they don't make a deal soon, taxes (called tariffs) on Indian goods in the US will go up a lot. That would make Indian products more expensive, and fewer people would buy them. The US also wants a deal. It has too much wheat, corn, and apples that China doesn't want anymore. So both countries need each other. Even President Trump said a deal with India could happen soon. India's finance minister said, 'Yes, we'd love a big, beautiful deal!' But there are problems too. India has a lot of poor farmers, and letting in cheaper American farm and dairy products might hurt them. Also, India doesn't want genetically modified (GM) crops from the US, and that's a big issue. Still, not doing a deal could be worse. It would be harder for India to compete with countries like China and Vietnam. A deal could bring more foreign money and help Indian factories grow. That means more people could leave farming and get better jobs. Also, if India is too tough in talks, it might hurt the friendship between the two countries in other areas like defence. Other countries, like Canada, are making changes to keep trade talks with the US going. India should move fast too. The Indian government has already made some smart moves, like lowering taxes on American cars. And Prime Minister Modi had a good meeting with Trump earlier this year. Both sides want to grow their trade a lot by 2030. So, while India should protect its farmers, it also needs to think about the future — more factory jobs could be the real help they need. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store