
Capitalism and Its Critics by John Cassidy review – brilliant primer on leftwing economics
So it has always been. Every time we have teetered close to the precipice, big government has swooped down to save the day. The name of the game is 'managed capitalism' and it has been a going concern for more than 200 years. This is the theme of John Cassidy's new book, a marvellously lucid overview of capitalism's critics, written in good old-fashioned expository prose – if at times a touch workmanlike compared with some of his subjects, such as exhilarating stylists Marx and Carlyle.
Half of the book is given over toMitteleuropa (where we meet Karl Polanyi and Rosa Luxemburg, both of whom are having a bit of a moment these days), India (JC Kumarappa, Gandhi's crony and pioneer of ecological economics), and Latin America (whose dependency theorists argued that the developed world was scooping up the benefits of rising productivity at the developing world's expense). Cassidy steers clear of the theoretical thickets of György Lukács and Louis Althusser as well as of the more idiosyncratic anti-capitalist paths taken by Milovan Djilas and José Carlos Mariátegui. Still, it would be churlish to complain about omissions in a book that finds room for 50 potted biographies. This is by far the best primer I have read on the luminaries of the economic left.
Early socialists, Cassidy shows, had little faith in government and equated the state with upper-class corruption. Many of them were sentimentalists or oddballs. The utilitarian socialist William Thompson, for one, thought it was possible to kill the 'passion for individual accumulation' simply by substituting cooperation for competition; the humans he describes sound suspiciously like Sims characters. Carlyle's anti-capitalism ('Mammon-worship is a melancholy creed'), meanwhile, led him to a pro-slavery position.
We owe the left as we know it to Marx and Engels, who railed against financialisation and monopolisation – the 'concentration of capital' – and defended planning and public ownership. The collapse of capitalism that they foresaw, however, never came to pass. From their vantage point of 1840, wages had flatlined even as profits had soared over the previous 50 years. This immiseration would surely bring about the system's downfall. Yet the following century reversed the trend: wages rose faster than profits, and capitalism found new champions among the workers.
Unlike the factory-owning Engels, Keynes was no class traitor: 'The class war will find me on the side of the educated bourgeoisie.' His mid-century magic formula, low interest rates and tax-and-spend, led to astonishing growth and stability in the short run. Rachel Reeves could benefit from his counsel for countercyclical spending: 'the engine which drives Enterprise is not Thrift but Profit'.
But Keynes, as Paul Sweezy complained, treated the economy as if it were a machine that could be sent for repair. There were 'political aspects of full employment' that Keynes had ignored, Sweezy's Marxist comrade Michał Kalecki elaborated. Low unemployment meant enhanced labour power, so more strikes and higher wages and inflation. A capitalist backlash would ensue, he predicted.
That is precisely what happened in the 70s. Milton Friedman made the case for a 'natural rate of unemployment', by which he meant that more unemployment was needed in order to destroy labour power and push down wages. This confirmed Marx's observation that a 'reserve army' of desperate jobless workers was the best weapon capital had to cripple unionism. Where Nixon could call himself a Keynesian, his successors Carter and then Reagan turned to neoliberalism.
High interest rates and anti-union legislation followed. After a brief mid-century egalitarian blip in which economic growth exceeded the rate of return on capital, the opposite has once again become true in our own gilded age. This was Thomas Piketty's insight, demonstrated with the sophistication of statistics, in his Capital in the Twenty-First Century.
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
Cassidy, a staff writer at the New Yorker, is generous in his judgments, and even in his indictments. There is not a single snide remark in these pages. He plays his cards close to his chest, but I suspect he might confess to being a Keynesian. A clue lies in his conclusion – 'capitalism can be reformed' – which reminded me of Fredric Jameson's witticism that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than to imagine the end of capitalism.
Capitalism and Its Critics by John Cassidy is published by Allen Lane (£35). To support the Guardian, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Average house price forecast to jump £86,300 by 2029
House price growth expectations have been reduced for this year amid wider global uncertainties, according to a forecast. But the potential for house price growth over the next five years has been upgraded, due to a more relaxed approach to mortgage affordability tests, according to the predictions from property firm Savills. It expects to see house prices across Britain rise by 1.0% on average across this year and by 24.5% over the next five years. Previously, it had forecast house prices to increase by 4.0% this year, with a 23.4% rise over the next five years. Recent economic and geopolitical uncertainty has contributed to a weaker first half of 2025 than previously anticipated, Savills said. It said market activity in 2025 had also been complicated by how buyers reacted to stamp duty changes, with a surge in activity early in the year as buyers rushed to beat the deadline. Stamp duty applies in England and Northern Ireland. However, many mortgage lenders have recently made changes which potentially allow people to borrow more. Savills said the more relaxed approach to mortgage affordability tests should support both house prices and the number of house sales. Based on its new forecast, it expects the average house price to increase £86,300 by 2029. It is forecasting an average house price of £448,600 by the end of 2029, up from an average of £362,300 by mid-year in 2025. Lucian Cook, head of residential research at Savills, said: 'Interest rates have fallen as expected, giving buyers a bit more financial capacity than they had a year ago. 'But a lot has changed over the last six months. Greater geopolitical uncertainty – including tariffs and trade wars – has made predicting the precise path of further cuts more challenging.' Savills said it expects concerns over the prospect of future tax increases to weigh most heavily on the top end of the market. Mr Cook continued: 'Recent easing of mortgage regulations, including more flexibility on affordability stress tests and higher allowances for loans above 4.5 times income, is likely to boost transaction volumes, particularly by helping more first-time buyers get on the ladder.' House sales across 2025 are projected to reach 1.04 million by the year end, in line with previous forecasts. While elevated supply levels may temper price growth, Savills said that it maintains a positive outlook for 2025 overall despite the slow start. Emily Williams, director of research at Savills, said: 'We anticipate that buyer demand will pick up heading into early autumn, particularly among first-time buyers and mortgaged home movers, driven by an expected base rate cut in August and a more competitive mortgage market.' Land Registry and Nationwide Building Society data was used for part of the research. Here is the revised house price forecast from Savills for growth over the five-year period between 2025 and 2029: North West, 31.2% Scotland, 29.4% Wales, 28.2% Yorkshire and the Humber, 28.2% West Midlands, 27.6% North East, 26.4% South East, 20.4% South West, 20.4% East Midlands, 20.3% East of England, 19.2% London, 15.3%.


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Minimum level of retirement income needed to prevent surge in pensioner poverty, MPs warn
Ministers should ensure a retired people have a minimum level of income to prevent a surge in pensioner poverty, MPs have warned. It comes after the work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said Britain faced a 'tsunami of pensioner poverty' without major reform to the system as she opened the door to an increase in the state pension age. Age UK has found that two million pensioners are already in poverty, with the number expected to rise. Now MPs on the Commons Work and Pensions Committee say a new national strategy to tackle the problem among older people is needed. They have urged the government to set and deliver a minimum level of retirement income, enough for a "dignified, socially acceptable standard of living" in later life. The report also warns that, as people age, the health and social care systems risk becoming unsustainable if ministers fail to tackle the effect poverty has on ill-health. Among the worrying long-term trends that "threaten to undermine pension adequacy", are people renting into later life, the report adds. It also calls for ministers to ensure those entitled to pensions credits of up to £4,000 a year receive them. Current take up is under 70 per cent, with an estimated 700,000 households missing out. Receiving pension credit can also help older people access other benefits such as housing benefit, council tax support, the warm homes discount, a free TV licence, and help with their dental treatment. The report warns: "After a decline in pensioner poverty in the 2000s, the number of pensioners in relative low income started to rise again from 2010. This has been exacerbated by increases in the cost of living since 2021." It continued: "In practice, this means cutting back on essentials, like food, energy use and seeing friends, in an attempt to manage costs. Health experts explained the implications for health. Financial hardship can accelerate the ageing process, making it more likely that an older person will enter hospital or need care." Debbie Abrahams, the Labour MP who chairs the committee, said: "To boost incomes, the government needs to come up with a strategy to increase pension credit take-up. It's a scandal that so many have missed out for so many years, often through an aversion to claiming benefits altogether, or lack of support.' She added: "Ultimately, the government should decide what it thinks is enough for a dignified retirement, and then work to ensure that all pensioners are on at least that level. "Faced with a combination of high energy costs, ill-health and ever higher rates of pensioners in more costly privately rented accommodation, tackling pensioner poverty is not simply a DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) issue. So, we're calling for a nationwide, cross-government strategy for an ageing society that should be rooted in equity and wellbeing." On Tuesday, chancellor Rachel Reeves said that a review into raising the state pension age is needed to ensure the system was "sustainable and affordable". The state pension age is currently 66, but will rise to 67 by 2028. A government spokesperson said: "Supporting pensioners is a top priority, and thanks to our commitment to the triple lock, millions will see their yearly state pension rise by up to £1,900 by the end of this parliament. "We have also run the biggest-ever campaign to boost pension credit take-up, with nearly 60,000 extra pensioner households being awarded the benefit, worth on average around £4,300 a year. "But we know there is a real risk that tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, which is why we are reviving the Pension Commission, to tackle the barriers that stop too many people from saving." Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said: "We warmly welcome this thoughtful and wide-ranging select committee report, which comes closer to providing a thorough and progressive strategic overview of the issues facing older people on low incomes and proposing workable solutions than anything successive governments have produced in recent years.'


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Senate even more afraid of Trump-Epstein fallout than Mike Johnson's House is: ‘We've got enough to do'
The House of Representatives broke for August recess a day earlier than expected on Wednesday after Speaker Mike Johnson shut the doors to block moves from Democrats seeking to disclose government files on sex-trafficking financier Jeffrey Epstein. Johnson had a very specific reason to dismiss the House early — a bipartisan discharge petition, which would allow them to force a vote on the release. 'I think it is to sort of try to let the air out of the balloon on the Epstein issue,' Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), who teamed up with California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna on the effort, told The Independent. But if Johnson and House GOP leadership feared the end result of that discharge petition, the Senate does not want to deal with it at all. 'I hope we don't waste our time on that,' said Sen. John Cornyn. 'We've got enough to do,' the Texas Republican told The Independent Wednesday. Cornyn is not entirely wrong. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump said that he wanted the Senate to cancel its August recess to confirm his nominees. The Senate also needs to begin to tee-up the spending bills to avoid a government shutdown in September. The Senate typically sees the House as childish and full of petty grievances. But there's another reason Cornyn, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, specifically would not want to be in the Trump-Epstein blast radius: he faces a potentially bruising primary challenge against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a hardline — albeit scandal-ridden — MAGA candidate. Any harsh questioning or a vote for the files would likely imperil Cornyn's reelection bid. But he's not the only Republican senator dodging the issue. Sen. Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, noted that the Judiciary Committee brings the U.S. attorney general to testify annually. 'Now that, maybe that's not going to happen before September, so we're going to have these Epstein files,' he told The Independent. Grassley said he didn't know the next steps the courts would take, but the disclosures might lead to questions from the committee. On Wednesday, judges in Florida and New York rejected Department of Justice requests at the urging of Trump to unseal grand jury transcripts tied to Epstein, who was found dead by hanging in his New York City jail cell in 2019, in what has been ruled a suicide. This came after Trump had requested AG Pam Bondi unseal them after a Wall Street Journal report that he allegedly sent a bawdy hand-drawn message to Epstein for his 50th birthday party, a report Trump has denied and over which he filed a $10 billon lawsuit against the WSJ, parent company News Corp and founder Rupert Murdoch. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), another member of the Judiciary Committee, expressed some openness to having convicted Epstein accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell — who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for grooming girls and young women to be trafficked by her on-and-off boyfriend — testify before Congress. 'Whatever the bottom line is, I'm in favor of releasing it. So I think that, you know, DOJ ought to release everything that they possibly can, and I'm all for having Maxwell testify,' Hawley said. Hawley, a Yale-educated lawyer and archconservative, also suggested a joint committee made up of House members and senators. One of the few senators who has kept an eye on Epstein is Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA). In 2017, Kaine grilled Alex Acosta, Trump's then-nominee to be labor secretary, about the time he was the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and gave Epstein a lenient plea deal in 2008. Under the 2008 non-prosecution agreement, Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges in Florida of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. That allowed him to avert a possible life sentence, instead serving 13 months in a work-release program. 'Why was the sweetheart deal cut? I never understood that, and I never understood why President Trump nominated the guy who cut the sweetheart deal to be his cabinet secretary,' Kaine told The Independent. Kaine, who was Hillary Clinton's running mate against Trump in 2016, also expressed openness to Hawley's idea of a joint committee. 'I think a white House can shorten circuit, all that by just doing what they've said they're going to do, and releasing the files,' he said. Unsurprisingly, Republican Trump antagonist Sen. Thom Tillis of North carolina, who announced he would not seek re-election and told The Independent last week that the administration should 'release the damn files' said he wanted to see more. 'There was much made about it,' he told The Independent. 'So one of two things are true, not so much should be made of it. Or there things that we should probably know, as long as it doesn't harm the privacy of victims, people that are not actually involved in the investigation.' For now, the Senate will not have to worry about that, given the House is out. But it will be a looming question when the House returns.