Dating site accused of catfishing users with 'free' use
The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission alleges US-based eHarmony breached consumer law by misleading customers about pricing, renewal, and the duration of memberships since at least 2019.
People who sign up for free subscriptions can complete an 80-question compatibility quiz, but can only see blurred profile photos of other members and cannot engage in ongoing communication, the ACCC claims.
The only options free members have are liking other profiles, receiving and sending a single reply to a premium member, using the "icebreaker feature", and sending a virtual smiley.
This is despite the company advertising itself as a "free dating" platform across five of its webpages, ACCC barrister Oren Bigos told the Federal Court.
He referred to headings on eHarmony's website which read, "Free dating site for Australian singles", "free dating site in Australia, eHarmony is your best choice", "Go beyond simple swipes with our free dating experience", and an orange button which read "join free today".
"What was available free of charge on the basic membership is a very limited service and ability to interact with other members," Dr Bigos said on Monday.
eHarmony's barrister Michael Hodge said of those six pages relied by the ACCC, four were different versions of the same page.
When customers signed up for premium memberships, they are given a false impression that the paid period is for six, 12 or 24 months, the watchdog alleges.
Unsuspecting users were caught off guard when their subscriptions automatically renewed at the end of their period with no reminders and often at hefty costs since sign-up discounts were not carried over.
"Once auto-renewal happens, users are stuck with that amount. They can't apply for refund," Dr Bigos said.
He claims the site's subscription page did not mention auto-renewal and that it only appears in small grey text towards the end.
But Mr Hodge referred to evidence showing four out of every five subscribers turn off auto-renewal, inferring users read and understood the terms before they signed up.
The ACCC alleges eHarmony failed to display accurate minimum and total prices during the purchase process by failing to inform consumers of a mandatory additional fee if they wanted to pay monthly.
Users were allegedly charged an extra $3 on top of the advertised price when they opted to pay on a monthly basis.
"It is not possible to purchase a 12-month plan and pay only the advertised (price) each month because an additional mandatory fee is charged if a consumer chooses to pay monthly," Dr Bigos said.
The ACCC also said the dating site failed to display a single total price users could expect to pay should they sign up, rather they only specified a monthly charge.
eHarmony is also accused of misleading customers about their ability to sign up for and cancel premium subscriptions within one month, through headlines reading, "try before you buy" and "you might want to start off with a one month subscription to give us a try".
Dr Bigos said the service only offered six, 12 and 24-month options and it was not possible for consumers cancel after one month.
Mr Hodge contends information on the site's other pages makes clear what the possible subscription options are and that cancellation refers to any account with eHarmony.
The ACCC is seeking penalties, costs and consumer redress.
A popular dating website is accused of catfishing users with misleading claims about costs to use its service and cancellation options.
The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission alleges US-based eHarmony breached consumer law by misleading customers about pricing, renewal, and the duration of memberships since at least 2019.
People who sign up for free subscriptions can complete an 80-question compatibility quiz, but can only see blurred profile photos of other members and cannot engage in ongoing communication, the ACCC claims.
The only options free members have are liking other profiles, receiving and sending a single reply to a premium member, using the "icebreaker feature", and sending a virtual smiley.
This is despite the company advertising itself as a "free dating" platform across five of its webpages, ACCC barrister Oren Bigos told the Federal Court.
He referred to headings on eHarmony's website which read, "Free dating site for Australian singles", "free dating site in Australia, eHarmony is your best choice", "Go beyond simple swipes with our free dating experience", and an orange button which read "join free today".
"What was available free of charge on the basic membership is a very limited service and ability to interact with other members," Dr Bigos said on Monday.
eHarmony's barrister Michael Hodge said of those six pages relied by the ACCC, four were different versions of the same page.
When customers signed up for premium memberships, they are given a false impression that the paid period is for six, 12 or 24 months, the watchdog alleges.
Unsuspecting users were caught off guard when their subscriptions automatically renewed at the end of their period with no reminders and often at hefty costs since sign-up discounts were not carried over.
"Once auto-renewal happens, users are stuck with that amount. They can't apply for refund," Dr Bigos said.
He claims the site's subscription page did not mention auto-renewal and that it only appears in small grey text towards the end.
But Mr Hodge referred to evidence showing four out of every five subscribers turn off auto-renewal, inferring users read and understood the terms before they signed up.
The ACCC alleges eHarmony failed to display accurate minimum and total prices during the purchase process by failing to inform consumers of a mandatory additional fee if they wanted to pay monthly.
Users were allegedly charged an extra $3 on top of the advertised price when they opted to pay on a monthly basis.
"It is not possible to purchase a 12-month plan and pay only the advertised (price) each month because an additional mandatory fee is charged if a consumer chooses to pay monthly," Dr Bigos said.
The ACCC also said the dating site failed to display a single total price users could expect to pay should they sign up, rather they only specified a monthly charge.
eHarmony is also accused of misleading customers about their ability to sign up for and cancel premium subscriptions within one month, through headlines reading, "try before you buy" and "you might want to start off with a one month subscription to give us a try".
Dr Bigos said the service only offered six, 12 and 24-month options and it was not possible for consumers cancel after one month.
Mr Hodge contends information on the site's other pages makes clear what the possible subscription options are and that cancellation refers to any account with eHarmony.
The ACCC is seeking penalties, costs and consumer redress.
A popular dating website is accused of catfishing users with misleading claims about costs to use its service and cancellation options.
The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission alleges US-based eHarmony breached consumer law by misleading customers about pricing, renewal, and the duration of memberships since at least 2019.
People who sign up for free subscriptions can complete an 80-question compatibility quiz, but can only see blurred profile photos of other members and cannot engage in ongoing communication, the ACCC claims.
The only options free members have are liking other profiles, receiving and sending a single reply to a premium member, using the "icebreaker feature", and sending a virtual smiley.
This is despite the company advertising itself as a "free dating" platform across five of its webpages, ACCC barrister Oren Bigos told the Federal Court.
He referred to headings on eHarmony's website which read, "Free dating site for Australian singles", "free dating site in Australia, eHarmony is your best choice", "Go beyond simple swipes with our free dating experience", and an orange button which read "join free today".
"What was available free of charge on the basic membership is a very limited service and ability to interact with other members," Dr Bigos said on Monday.
eHarmony's barrister Michael Hodge said of those six pages relied by the ACCC, four were different versions of the same page.
When customers signed up for premium memberships, they are given a false impression that the paid period is for six, 12 or 24 months, the watchdog alleges.
Unsuspecting users were caught off guard when their subscriptions automatically renewed at the end of their period with no reminders and often at hefty costs since sign-up discounts were not carried over.
"Once auto-renewal happens, users are stuck with that amount. They can't apply for refund," Dr Bigos said.
He claims the site's subscription page did not mention auto-renewal and that it only appears in small grey text towards the end.
But Mr Hodge referred to evidence showing four out of every five subscribers turn off auto-renewal, inferring users read and understood the terms before they signed up.
The ACCC alleges eHarmony failed to display accurate minimum and total prices during the purchase process by failing to inform consumers of a mandatory additional fee if they wanted to pay monthly.
Users were allegedly charged an extra $3 on top of the advertised price when they opted to pay on a monthly basis.
"It is not possible to purchase a 12-month plan and pay only the advertised (price) each month because an additional mandatory fee is charged if a consumer chooses to pay monthly," Dr Bigos said.
The ACCC also said the dating site failed to display a single total price users could expect to pay should they sign up, rather they only specified a monthly charge.
eHarmony is also accused of misleading customers about their ability to sign up for and cancel premium subscriptions within one month, through headlines reading, "try before you buy" and "you might want to start off with a one month subscription to give us a try".
Dr Bigos said the service only offered six, 12 and 24-month options and it was not possible for consumers cancel after one month.
Mr Hodge contends information on the site's other pages makes clear what the possible subscription options are and that cancellation refers to any account with eHarmony.
The ACCC is seeking penalties, costs and consumer redress.
A popular dating website is accused of catfishing users with misleading claims about costs to use its service and cancellation options.
The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission alleges US-based eHarmony breached consumer law by misleading customers about pricing, renewal, and the duration of memberships since at least 2019.
People who sign up for free subscriptions can complete an 80-question compatibility quiz, but can only see blurred profile photos of other members and cannot engage in ongoing communication, the ACCC claims.
The only options free members have are liking other profiles, receiving and sending a single reply to a premium member, using the "icebreaker feature", and sending a virtual smiley.
This is despite the company advertising itself as a "free dating" platform across five of its webpages, ACCC barrister Oren Bigos told the Federal Court.
He referred to headings on eHarmony's website which read, "Free dating site for Australian singles", "free dating site in Australia, eHarmony is your best choice", "Go beyond simple swipes with our free dating experience", and an orange button which read "join free today".
"What was available free of charge on the basic membership is a very limited service and ability to interact with other members," Dr Bigos said on Monday.
eHarmony's barrister Michael Hodge said of those six pages relied by the ACCC, four were different versions of the same page.
When customers signed up for premium memberships, they are given a false impression that the paid period is for six, 12 or 24 months, the watchdog alleges.
Unsuspecting users were caught off guard when their subscriptions automatically renewed at the end of their period with no reminders and often at hefty costs since sign-up discounts were not carried over.
"Once auto-renewal happens, users are stuck with that amount. They can't apply for refund," Dr Bigos said.
He claims the site's subscription page did not mention auto-renewal and that it only appears in small grey text towards the end.
But Mr Hodge referred to evidence showing four out of every five subscribers turn off auto-renewal, inferring users read and understood the terms before they signed up.
The ACCC alleges eHarmony failed to display accurate minimum and total prices during the purchase process by failing to inform consumers of a mandatory additional fee if they wanted to pay monthly.
Users were allegedly charged an extra $3 on top of the advertised price when they opted to pay on a monthly basis.
"It is not possible to purchase a 12-month plan and pay only the advertised (price) each month because an additional mandatory fee is charged if a consumer chooses to pay monthly," Dr Bigos said.
The ACCC also said the dating site failed to display a single total price users could expect to pay should they sign up, rather they only specified a monthly charge.
eHarmony is also accused of misleading customers about their ability to sign up for and cancel premium subscriptions within one month, through headlines reading, "try before you buy" and "you might want to start off with a one month subscription to give us a try".
Dr Bigos said the service only offered six, 12 and 24-month options and it was not possible for consumers cancel after one month.
Mr Hodge contends information on the site's other pages makes clear what the possible subscription options are and that cancellation refers to any account with eHarmony.
The ACCC is seeking penalties, costs and consumer redress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
27 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
This $215b Asian investor just went private. Two Aussies are in charge
Two Australians have taken charge at ESR, one of the Asia-Pacific region's largest property investors with a $215 billion portfolio and which has just been taken private by a consortium led by US group Starwood Capital. Under the new ownership, ESR's newly promoted top executive, in the role of president, is Phil Pearce. Previously the group's deputy chief executive and also running ESR's Australian operations, Pearce will now be responsible for ESR's day-to-day operations. He joined the group in 2017 and is well-known in the property industry, after senior positions at Goodman Group and roles at Ascendas REIT in Singapore and AMP Capital.
The Age
27 minutes ago
- The Age
Corona heiress is on edge about her $12.5 billion beer fortune
In February, Pablo and Tresalia CEO Perez joined Santiago on the board of the Spanish branch of fitness company Barry's Bootcamp, as it raised extra capital without disclosing the financing source. Pablo, the elder of the two, is also a managing director at Tresalia and helps to oversee its private equity division, according to his LinkedIn profile. 'This is not a small family office – it's a small investment management firm,' said Christina Wing, co-founder of Wingspan Legacy Partners, which advises ultra-wealthy families. 'If the people she hired match her strategy, it's a perfect set-up.' Aramburuzabala declined to comment for this story, as did her son Pablo. Santiago didn't respond to a request for comment. Aramburuzabala was thrust into the spotlight when her father, Pablo, died of cancer in 1995 at age 63. With no son as his heir-apparent, his death left a leadership vacuum in a business culture traditionally dominated by men. Loading 'The world caved in on us,' she told The New York Times in a 2002 interview. 'Friends, enemies, boyfriends – everyone wanted control. Less than a month after my father died, we had people coming to tell us that he had left them in charge, and that they were going to manage things for us.' At issue was the family's stake in Grupo Modelo, the Mexico City-based brewer that Aramburuzabala's grandfather co-founded in 1925. It grew quickly, acquiring Mexican competitors while rolling out new brands. In 1979, it introduced Corona to the US market for the first time, where it eventually became the top-selling imported beer. Budweiser maker Anheuser-Busch began to buy shares of Grupo Modelo in the early 1990s, eventually acquiring about half of the Mexican brewer. Quickly proving herself an adept negotiator, Aramburuzabala helped lead talks to sell the noncontrolling stake. She became vice chair of Grupo Modelo in 1996, the same year she founded Tresalia. After Belgian brewing giant InBev acquired Anheuser-Busch, the combined behemoth bought the remaining 50 per cent of Grupo Modelo in 2013, paying some $US20 billion. Aramburuzabala helped convince other shareholders to approve the deal after Anheuser-Busch InBev upped its offer price. While the exact stake the Aramburuzabala family held at the time isn't clear, it was among three major groups of shareholders to profit from the windfall. Maria Asuncion Aramburuzabala used part of the proceeds to buy AB InBev shares and joined the company's board along with Valentin Diez Morodo, another descendant of a Grupo Modelo co-founder. 'I don't want to be that typical leader that did everything and then at some point there's a hole and it goes sideways.' Maria Asuncion Aramburuzabala Overall, the Aramburuzabala family pocketed at least $US3 billion through Grupo Modelo stake sales, according to Bloomberg's wealth index. Three allies Aramburuzabala, who has an accounting degree from the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico, is among a growing population of ultra-wealthy women who've established their own family offices, though few set them up as long ago as the beer heiress. Tresalia – a portmanteau of Tres Aliadas, or Three Allies, for Aramburuzabala's sister, mother and herself – has over the years invested in and exited businesses like Mexican media company Grupo Televisa, fashion brand Tory Burch and data centre operator Kio Networks. Loading It has also stayed close to the fortune's origins in the consumer space, allocating to consumer-goods giant Kraft Heinz and riding the multibillion-dollar coffee bet of JAB Holding alongside other billionaire shareholders of AB InBev such as Alejandro Santo Domingo, the head of Colombia's richest family. Aramburuzabala stepped down as a director of AB InBev in 2023 after serving a decade on the company's board. She also resigned as a director of beauty company Coty earlier this year, leaving her without any board roles at listed companies. She's now spending more time on her hobbies such as travel and animal photography. Her passions also include deep-sea diving, an interest she has passed on to her sons, who both describe themselves as ocean explorers.
Sydney Morning Herald
27 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Corona heiress is on edge about her $12.5 billion beer fortune
In February, Pablo and Tresalia CEO Perez joined Santiago on the board of the Spanish branch of fitness company Barry's Bootcamp, as it raised extra capital without disclosing the financing source. Pablo, the elder of the two, is also a managing director at Tresalia and helps to oversee its private equity division, according to his LinkedIn profile. 'This is not a small family office – it's a small investment management firm,' said Christina Wing, co-founder of Wingspan Legacy Partners, which advises ultra-wealthy families. 'If the people she hired match her strategy, it's a perfect set-up.' Aramburuzabala declined to comment for this story, as did her son Pablo. Santiago didn't respond to a request for comment. Aramburuzabala was thrust into the spotlight when her father, Pablo, died of cancer in 1995 at age 63. With no son as his heir-apparent, his death left a leadership vacuum in a business culture traditionally dominated by men. Loading 'The world caved in on us,' she told The New York Times in a 2002 interview. 'Friends, enemies, boyfriends – everyone wanted control. Less than a month after my father died, we had people coming to tell us that he had left them in charge, and that they were going to manage things for us.' At issue was the family's stake in Grupo Modelo, the Mexico City-based brewer that Aramburuzabala's grandfather co-founded in 1925. It grew quickly, acquiring Mexican competitors while rolling out new brands. In 1979, it introduced Corona to the US market for the first time, where it eventually became the top-selling imported beer. Budweiser maker Anheuser-Busch began to buy shares of Grupo Modelo in the early 1990s, eventually acquiring about half of the Mexican brewer. Quickly proving herself an adept negotiator, Aramburuzabala helped lead talks to sell the noncontrolling stake. She became vice chair of Grupo Modelo in 1996, the same year she founded Tresalia. After Belgian brewing giant InBev acquired Anheuser-Busch, the combined behemoth bought the remaining 50 per cent of Grupo Modelo in 2013, paying some $US20 billion. Aramburuzabala helped convince other shareholders to approve the deal after Anheuser-Busch InBev upped its offer price. While the exact stake the Aramburuzabala family held at the time isn't clear, it was among three major groups of shareholders to profit from the windfall. Maria Asuncion Aramburuzabala used part of the proceeds to buy AB InBev shares and joined the company's board along with Valentin Diez Morodo, another descendant of a Grupo Modelo co-founder. 'I don't want to be that typical leader that did everything and then at some point there's a hole and it goes sideways.' Maria Asuncion Aramburuzabala Overall, the Aramburuzabala family pocketed at least $US3 billion through Grupo Modelo stake sales, according to Bloomberg's wealth index. Three allies Aramburuzabala, who has an accounting degree from the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico, is among a growing population of ultra-wealthy women who've established their own family offices, though few set them up as long ago as the beer heiress. Tresalia – a portmanteau of Tres Aliadas, or Three Allies, for Aramburuzabala's sister, mother and herself – has over the years invested in and exited businesses like Mexican media company Grupo Televisa, fashion brand Tory Burch and data centre operator Kio Networks. Loading It has also stayed close to the fortune's origins in the consumer space, allocating to consumer-goods giant Kraft Heinz and riding the multibillion-dollar coffee bet of JAB Holding alongside other billionaire shareholders of AB InBev such as Alejandro Santo Domingo, the head of Colombia's richest family. Aramburuzabala stepped down as a director of AB InBev in 2023 after serving a decade on the company's board. She also resigned as a director of beauty company Coty earlier this year, leaving her without any board roles at listed companies. She's now spending more time on her hobbies such as travel and animal photography. Her passions also include deep-sea diving, an interest she has passed on to her sons, who both describe themselves as ocean explorers.
