logo
Rival protests face off outside London migrant hotel

Rival protests face off outside London migrant hotel

Anti-immigrant and anti-racism demonstrators faced off in London in the latest in a series of protests outside hotels housing asylum-seekers.
Several hundred protesters waving Union Jacks gathered outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in central London, calling for it to stop housing migrants.
Chants including "scum" and "Britain is full" were directed at the hotel.
Police separated the demonstrators from a larger group of counter-protesters chanting "refugees are welcome here," as people inside the hotel watched from windows.
Protests against migrants have taken place in recent weeks in Epping, a town on the outskirts of London where an asylum-seeker was accused of sexual assault, and in a smattering of other towns in England.
Protesters say they are concerned about the safety risk posed by the migrants, many of them young men who have recently arrived in Britain in dinghies across the English Channel.
The demonstrations have drawn local people, but have also been attended, and in some cases organised, by far-right groups.
The protests come a year after several days of anti-immigrant rioting across England and Northern Ireland. Crowds in more than two dozen towns attacked hotels housing migrants, as well as mosques, police stations and a library. Some rioters targeted non-white people and threw bricks and fireworks at police.
The summer 2024 violence was sparked when three girls were stabbed to death at a summer dance class in the town of Southport, and online misinformation identified the attacker as a recently arrived migrant.
In fact, killer Axel Rudakubana was a British-born 17-year-old.
Experts and community groups warn that the mix of anger, fear, misinformation and political agitating that fuelled that violence could erupt again, though protests this summer have been small and largely peaceful.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Detective who collared murderer Murdoch reveals how he linked cases
Detective who collared murderer Murdoch reveals how he linked cases

9 News

time7 hours ago

  • 9 News

Detective who collared murderer Murdoch reveals how he linked cases

Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here The South Australian detective who collared outback killer Bradley Murdoch has spoken for the first time. Geoff Carson told 9News how he linked a mystery man in the Riverlands to the monster who killed Peter Falconio and shares his theory on what Murdoch did with the backpacker's body. Now retired, Carson was the small-town cop who solved a national mystery. Now retired, Geoff Carson was the small-town cop who solved a national mystery. (Nine) "At the start of the new century, it was the most talked about crime at the time, who would've done such a brazen act," he said. The breakthrough began with a single phone call. "He says, 'I don't care what you're doing, I need to see you right now', and he said the name of his daughter and he said that she'd been raped." In South Australia's Riverland, a woman and her 12-year-old daughter had been abducted by a violent monster. They were bound and gagged, and put in the back of a truck that belonged to Murdoch. The South Australian detective who collared outback killer Bradley Murdoch has spoken for the first time. (Nine) After a 20-hour ordeal, the victims were paid for their silence and let go. When Carson took their statement, something clicked. "Little pocket notebook, I wrote down, halfway down the page, Falconio, then a question mark, it just rang to me straight way," Carson said. The previous year British backpackers Falconio and Joanne Lees had been ambushed along a remote stretch of highway in the Northern Territory. Lees escaped into the scrub after being bound with the same cable ties as the Riverland victims. "In 40 years of policing I hadn't come across someone who'd done that before, so it was a unique type of behaviour, I thought," Carson said. When Murdoch was arrested over the abduction of the mother and daughter, Carson made contact with the Northern Territory. Peter Falconio was shot dead in the NT. (Nine) "I said I reckon I got your fella," he said. But NT Police had already crossed Murdoch off their list. So Carson took matters into his own hands. He bundled up cigarette butts and milk cartons marked with the killer's DNA, evidence that would lead to a match and a warrant for Murdoch's arrest. For the Riverland rapes a jury found there wasn't enough evidence to convict Murdoch. But on the day he was acquitted police were waiting at Adelaide's Supreme Court. The monster was charged for an outback murder. But Carson remains determined to solve that mystery once and for all. He says he was given one clue, a remark Murdoch had made to a friend. "He said to this old fella, 'If I was ever going to get rid of a body, I'd put it into the grate off on the side of the road, like the flood mitigation, bury it in one of those because no one would ever find it, no one would ever dig in there'," Carson said. Falconio's remains may still be missing but the case isn't closed. The reward for information was recently raised to $500,000. "Anyone who has lost a loved one wants to be able to put that loved one to rest," Carson said. "They want to know that they are finally at peace, the Falconio's haven't got that." police South Australia murder crime national Australia CONTACT US

Australia should recognise Palestine. To not do so only rewards Israel's crimes
Australia should recognise Palestine. To not do so only rewards Israel's crimes

Sydney Morning Herald

time16 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Australia should recognise Palestine. To not do so only rewards Israel's crimes

Australia was among the first countries to recognise the state of Israel, but regrettably looks set to be among the last to recognise the state of Palestine. Three-quarters of the world – more than 140 countries – already recognise Palestine is a state, as does the United Nations. Australia's close allies may soon follow, including France, the United Kingdom and Canada. The momentum is driven by horror at Israel's relentless destruction in Gaza, the failure of more than 30 years of negotiations for a two-state solution since the Oslo Accords in 1993, Israel's persistent denial of Palestinian self-determination, de facto annexation of Palestinian land in the West Bank by illegal Israeli settlements and the extremism of the Netanyahu government. Also, no-one believes that the United States is an honest broker for peace, having fuelled Israeli war crimes with an endless supply of weapons and even threatening to seize Gaza. Current moves are a long-overdue circuit-breaker in a century of conflict when everything else has failed. The Palestinians were first promised a state over a century ago. A 1947 United Nations proposal to divide the British Mandate of Palestine into two states did not go to plan. Israel unilaterally declared statehood in 1948 after an insurgency against the British, terrorism against civilians and even assassination of UN officials. It established effective control and independence after a war with invading Arab countries. Australia recognised Israel within six months. The Palestine Liberation Organisation declared Palestine a state in 1988. International law does not prohibit unilateral declarations, as by Kosovo in 2008, but they do not create a state unless legal criteria are met. According to classical international law, statehood is a test of power. A state exists if it has a defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government, an ability to enter into foreign relations and relative independence from other states. Palestine largely meets these. There is international consensus that its territory is presumptively defined by the pre-1967 war borders, encompassing the West Bank, including East Jerusalem and Gaza. The precise borders remain to be agreed, but this has never been fatal to the existence of states, many of whom disagree with neighbours about borders. There is a core national population of Palestinian residents, potentially supplemented by Palestinian refugees returning from abroad, and excluding almost 700,000 Israeli settlers. There is a clear capacity to enter into foreign relations. Palestine engages diplomatically with other states, is an observer state in the United Nations, and makes treaties with other states.

Australia should recognise Palestine. To not do so only rewards Israel's crimes
Australia should recognise Palestine. To not do so only rewards Israel's crimes

The Age

time16 hours ago

  • The Age

Australia should recognise Palestine. To not do so only rewards Israel's crimes

Australia was among the first countries to recognise the state of Israel, but regrettably looks set to be among the last to recognise the state of Palestine. Three-quarters of the world – more than 140 countries – already recognise Palestine is a state, as does the United Nations. Australia's close allies may soon follow, including France, the United Kingdom and Canada. The momentum is driven by horror at Israel's relentless destruction in Gaza, the failure of more than 30 years of negotiations for a two-state solution since the Oslo Accords in 1993, Israel's persistent denial of Palestinian self-determination, de facto annexation of Palestinian land in the West Bank by illegal Israeli settlements and the extremism of the Netanyahu government. Also, no-one believes that the United States is an honest broker for peace, having fuelled Israeli war crimes with an endless supply of weapons and even threatening to seize Gaza. Current moves are a long-overdue circuit-breaker in a century of conflict when everything else has failed. The Palestinians were first promised a state over a century ago. A 1947 United Nations proposal to divide the British Mandate of Palestine into two states did not go to plan. Israel unilaterally declared statehood in 1948 after an insurgency against the British, terrorism against civilians and even assassination of UN officials. It established effective control and independence after a war with invading Arab countries. Australia recognised Israel within six months. The Palestine Liberation Organisation declared Palestine a state in 1988. International law does not prohibit unilateral declarations, as by Kosovo in 2008, but they do not create a state unless legal criteria are met. According to classical international law, statehood is a test of power. A state exists if it has a defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government, an ability to enter into foreign relations and relative independence from other states. Palestine largely meets these. There is international consensus that its territory is presumptively defined by the pre-1967 war borders, encompassing the West Bank, including East Jerusalem and Gaza. The precise borders remain to be agreed, but this has never been fatal to the existence of states, many of whom disagree with neighbours about borders. There is a core national population of Palestinian residents, potentially supplemented by Palestinian refugees returning from abroad, and excluding almost 700,000 Israeli settlers. There is a clear capacity to enter into foreign relations. Palestine engages diplomatically with other states, is an observer state in the United Nations, and makes treaties with other states.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store