logo
Work-from-home more prevalent in Bay Area than rest of US and world, surveys show

Work-from-home more prevalent in Bay Area than rest of US and world, surveys show

Bay Area white-collar workers are spending about three days a week in the office, and survey results show most companies do not plan to mandate more days in the workplace, new data show.
Nearly two-thirds of office-based employees attended workplaces on three consecutive days: Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, according to a survey by the Bay Area Council of 236 companies with mostly white-collar workforces.
When the council first began surveying companies about remote work, in October 2021, the average number of days in office was 2.3.
About 40% of companies responding to the February survey said they had mandated increased in-office days over the previous six months, but only 22% said they planned to boost the number over the following six months.
However, larger firms, with 1,000 or more employees, were considerably more likely to say they would add mandatory office days over the next half year, said Abby Raisz, research director at the Economic Institute of the Bay Area Council, which represents businesses including major Silicon Valley tech companies Google, Meta and Apple.
Among companies making efforts to bring workers back to offices, some ask and some tell, with differing results, Raisz said.
'Overwhelmingly we found that those that require employees to come in feel like their policy is very effective,' Raisz said. 'When they request, it's less effective.'
The data comes as local and state government return-to-work mandates spark pushback. In Oakland, unionized city workers had been ordered to work four days in offices starting in early April, but the mandate was delayed until June 2, while San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie delayed a similar four-day order from April 28 to Aug. 18, according to local media reports. Gov. Gavin Newsom's order mandating four days in the office for state workers has riled employees and a state workplace regulator.
The COVID-19 pandemic upended working life and companies' employment models after the outbreak pushed office-based workers to their homes, leading many to develop a strong appreciation for commute-free employment. However, as the pandemic waned, many companies backed away from remote work, with Mountain View, California-based digital-advertising giant Google in 2022 ordering most employees back to the office three days a week and others taking similar action.
Bobby Khullar works for an engineering, design and construction company in Walnut Creek, California, that requires in-office work three or four days a week.
'It's decent, but if I had my druthers it would definitely be working from home,' said Khullar, 50. His meetings are typically via video with clients, and there's no real need to be in an office, he said.
'If the cameras are on, you just have to get the top half of yourself ready to go and you're fine,' Khullar said.
A recent global survey of thousands of workers in 40 countries found that America trails only Canada in the number of people working from home.
The average number of days worked remotely in the U.S. was 1.8 in the period between November and February, slightly lower than Canada's two days, according to the Global Survey of Working Arrangements, co-conducted by Stanford University economics professor Nick Bloom.
Those numbers reflect the 'hybrid' model that has become widespread in English-speaking countries after the pandemic.
'Hybrid working from home is just so profitable for firms,' said Bloom, who collaborated on the survey with other researchers from the U.S., Europe and Mexico. 'It reduces recruitment and retention costs without any productivity impact.' Mixing remote with office work is 'here to stay,' Bloom concluded.
Raisz said remote work has gained and maintained traction in the Bay Area because major industries like technology involve large numbers of jobs that can be done from home. Also, many companies recognize that many employees live far from the office, with time-consuming and costly commutes, and offer flexible schedules, Raisz said. That gives workers more power to leave jobs that force them into the office more than they would like, she said.
Sharon He of San Francisco, who works for a New York-based insurance firm, helped get her auditing team exempted from a companywide order to work at least four days a week in an office.
'We couldn't hire anybody with that policy,' said He, 31. 'We need to be competitive.'
In Silicon Valley, 'hybrid seems to have won out,' Bloom said by email this week. 'The large majority of tech and finance firms out here are hybrid, typically having folks come into the office 2 or 3 days a week,' Bloom said. 'Managers and employees are happy with this, and it seems to be sufficient days to get work done and push through on productivity. Fully remote has become pretty rare, with a few folks lingering on from the pandemic and some elite coders.'
Meanwhile, furor is growing over a March executive order by Newsom mandating four office days a week for state workers. Newsom in his order — to take effect July 1 — cited 'enhanced collaboration, cohesion, creativity and communication' and better opportunities for mentorship, supervision and accountability when employees work together from the office.
But on April 17, the state Public Employment Relations Board that oversees union-related laws covering state employees issued a preliminary finding alleging Newsom's office broke state law by failing to meet and confer with an engineers union — which filed a complaint about the order — before he issued it. The matter is to go before an administrative law judge.
And foes of the order, as of Thursday, had crowd-funded more than $16,000 to erect a billboard in Sacramento showing a laughing Newsom with the words, 'Think traffic is bad now? Wait until July 1st.'
Newsom's office referred questions to the state's human resources department, which declined to comment.
The number of people doing their jobs from home varies widely around the world, the Global Survey of Working Arrangements found. In Latin American countries where workers were surveyed, the rate of working from home was much lower than in the U.S., with an average of one day in Mexico and 1.4 days in Brazil. Asian countries had the lowest rates, with China, Japan and South Korean workers spending on average less than one day a week remote. In India, the working-from-home average came in at 1.6 days a week.
In a January presentation to the American Economics Association, Bloom broke down working-from-home by industry, saying finance and insurance workers did the most remote work, at about 2.4 days a week, with information workers — including some tech employees — following close behind at about 2.3 days. In retail, hospitality and food services, which require many on-site workers, the average was less than one day a week.
Bloom highlighted the commuting issue that has driven much of the conflict between employees and employers, telling the economists' group that workers save 70 minutes on average every day they do their jobs from home. Another 10 minutes a day of time savings comes from being able to work without showering, donning fresh clothing, shaving or putting on makeup, Bloom said.
Bloom also noted that remote work has hollowed out the downtowns of many U.S. cities. In the San Jose area, only about 51% of seats in offices were occupied as of April 16, and in the San Francisco area, only about 43% of space was occupied, Kastle Systems, which generates office-occupancy numbers using data from people using badges to enter their workplaces, reported this week.
'Folks selling office space are not happy,' Bloom noted.
___
© #YR@ MediaNews Group, Inc.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Demands Republicans Crack Down on Nonprofits That Protest ICE
Trump Demands Republicans Crack Down on Nonprofits That Protest ICE

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Demands Republicans Crack Down on Nonprofits That Protest ICE

President Donald Trump voiced support Saturday for new legislation aiming to punish groups linked to the June protests in Los Angeles against the administration's aggressive immigration raids and arrests. The legislation, offered by Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), would make nonprofits involved in supposedly 'organizing the riots' ineligible for federal funding or tax-exempt status. At the center of the proposed bill is an immigrants rights group based in L.A. that denies any wrongdoing and says the accusations are false. 'CONGRESSMAN KEVIN KILEY'S, 'NO TAX DOLLARS FOR RIOTS' legislation, should be passed immediately,' Trump posted on Truth Social on Saturday. 'I am hereby instructing my Administration not to pay ANY money to these radicalized groups, regardless of the legislation. They get paid to incite riots, burn down or destroy a city, then come back to the trough to get money to help rebuild it. NO MORE MONEY!!!' The text of the bill has not been publicly released. Kiley framed the protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a threat. 'The violence we have witnessed in Los Angeles is a threat to the safety of our communities and federal officers, and it undermines democracy by obstructing the policies of a duly elected president from being implemented.' Kiley said in a statement. 'We need better tools to deter and punish this lawless and anti-democratic behavior.' The anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles began this month in response to the Trump administration's campaign of worksite immigration raids and courthouse arrests, which is reportedly being conducted at the demand of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. Authorities have used flash-bang grenades, rubber bullets, and pepper balls on protesters, who have largely been non-violent. Trump used the protests as the basis for federalizing and deploying thousands of National Guard troops as well as hundreds of Marines. 'We have the IRS here that's helping us track how these violent protesters are funded,' Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said. 'What NGO is out there? What unions? What other individuals may be funding these violent perpetrators?' Kiley argues the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) 'played a pivotal role in enabling the riots.' He alleges that the group broadcast federal officers' locations in real-time, and that several of the officers were assaulted with bricks and Molotov cocktails. Two people were charged with possession of Molotov cocktails, but there is no evidence they were tied to CHIRLA. 'They're saying the most vicious lies [about] who we are and what we do,' CHIRLA's Executive Director Angélica Salas told CBS News. 'My bill,' Kiley said Thursday on the House floor, 'will assure that an organization like this whose officers are convicted of assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers, or of organizing, promoting, and encouraging participating in or carrying on a riot… loses their nonprofit status and is ineligible for federal funding going forward,' Earlier this month, Sen. Josh Hawley, (R-Mo.), who is chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, launched an investigation into CHIRLA's 'alleged role in financing and materially supporting the coordinated protests and riots' in Los Angeles. 'While peaceful protest is a cornerstone of American democracy, these demonstrations have escalated into lawless mob actions,' he wrote in a letter to the organization demanding more information. He noted that CHIRLA reportedly 'received $34 million in state funding.' Their 2023 tax return shows they received this amount in government grants. The organization previously had a $450,000 contract with the Department of Homeland Security for 'citizenship education and training.' DHS said it terminated this contract and intended to withhold $101,000 in funds that had not yet been paid to the group. 'Credible reporting now suggests that your organization has provided logistical support and financial resources to individuals engaged in these disruptive actions,' Hawley said. 'Let me be clear: Bankrolling civil unrest is not protected speech. It is aiding and abetting criminal conduct.' Salas, who leads CHIRLA, was a speaker at a press conference on June 6, when the first protests against ICE began, but that seems to be the extent of the group's involvement. 'Our community is under attack and is being terrorized,' she told the crowd. 'These are workers, these are fathers, these are mothers, and this has to stop. Immigration enforcement that is terrorizing our families throughout this country and picking up our people that we love must stop now.' She remains steadfast. 'We categorically reject any allegation that our work as an organization now and during the past 39 years providing services to immigrants and their families violates the law,' Salas said in a statement. 'Our mission is rooted in non-violent advocacy, community safety, and democratic values. We will not be intimidated for standing with immigrant communities and documenting the inhumane manner that our community is being targeted with the assault by the raids, the unconstitutional and illegal arrests, detentions, and the assault on our First Amendment rights.' More from Rolling Stone Trump Admin Says ICE Agents are the Real Victims Amid Violent Immigration Raids Trump's Military Birthday Parade 'Illegally' Used Hit Song: Cease-and-Desist Letter Florida GOP Hawks Merch for Brutal 'Alligator Alcatraz' Migrant Detention Camp Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

What is Canada's digital services tax — and why does Trump dislike it so much?
What is Canada's digital services tax — and why does Trump dislike it so much?

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What is Canada's digital services tax — and why does Trump dislike it so much?

In the last few weeks and months, U.S. President Donald Trump has given a number of rationales for escalating the trade dispute between Canada and the United States. On Friday, he zeroed in on Canada's digital services tax — a new levy expected to cost the largest American tech giants billions of dollars in the coming years after it kicks in on Monday. International trade lawyer William Pellerin was only shocked the U.S. president didn't bring it up sooner. "It's actually quite surprising that it took them this long to make a big stink about this issue," Pellerin, who works for McMillan LLP, told CBC News Network on Friday. "If the U.S. was going to take a run at this and really has had a beef with Canada on this issue for a really long time, they really had no choice but to escalate that issue at the last minute now." Here's what you need to know about the tax, which has been a thorn in the side of the Canada-U.S. relationship for years. Canada's digital services tax (DST) affects mega companies that offer digital services — like online advertising or shopping — and earn more than $20 million in revenue from Canadian sources. Giant companies like Amazon, Apple, Airbnb, Google, Meta and Uber will be taxed three per cent on the money they make from Canadian users and customers. The levy has been in place since last year, but the first payments are due starting Monday. It's retroactive to 2022, so companies will end up with a $2-billion US bill due by the end of July. Revenue is one big benefit. The Parliamentary Budget Office estimated last year that the tax would bring in more than $7 billion over five years. The Liberals first promised the tax during the federal election in 2019 under former prime minister Justin Trudeau, but it was delayed for years because a number of other nations wanted to work together on one, overarching digital taxation plan that could be applied in multiple countries. As the delays dragged on, Canada went ahead with its own tax plan. Aside from revenue, Ottawa has pitched the DST as a way to bring the tax code up to date and capture revenues earned in Canada by firms located abroad. The United States has been hostile to the tax from the beginning because it largely affects American tech giants. Officials have argued the tax discriminates against American companies and Congress, notoriously divided between Democrats and Republicans, found a moment of common ground in criticizing Canada's plan. The Computer & Communications Industry Association has estimated U.S. companies could pay as much as $1 billion a year in tax if the measure remains on the books. A number of industry experts — from lawyers to cross-border groups and commerce associations — have warned for years that the tax would strain the relationship between Canada and the U.S., with one going so far as to predict in 2023 that the tax alone would be to blame for a trade war. WATCH | Trump says he's ending talks with Canada over DST: Canadian and U.S. business groups, organizations representing U.S. tech giants and American lawmakers all signed letters in recent weeks calling for the tax to be eliminated or paused. But Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the legislation was passed by Parliament, and Canada would be "going ahead" with the tax. Pellerin, the international trade lawyer, said he suspects the federal government will avoid changing its plan because it's taken a strategy of avoiding knee-jerk reactions to Trump's negotiation tactics. "The Trump administration is not known for negotiating quietly in the back rooms or in the hallways of power … so I don't think this is unexpected," he said. Trump says he's pulling back from the bilateral trade discussions because Canada plans to move ahead with its DST on Monday, a move he described online as "a direct and blatant attack on our country." The move put the 30-day deadline to reach an agreement in the trade dispute into doubt. The Biden administration also opposed the tax, but tried to resolve the issue differently: It asked Canada for dispute settlement consultations under the Canada-United States-Mexico-Agreement (CUSMA) last August. That consultation period ended in November without the Biden administration taking the case to the next step, but there is no time limit on when the U.S. could pick that plan back up — so the CUSMA route is still available to the current administration if Trump wanted to move away from his current tactic. Yes. France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom all have tax regimes in place, to name a few.

QuantumScape (QS) Jumps 34.9% Anew on Cell Production Milestone
QuantumScape (QS) Jumps 34.9% Anew on Cell Production Milestone

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

QuantumScape (QS) Jumps 34.9% Anew on Cell Production Milestone

QuantumScape Corporation (NYSE:QS) is one of the . Quantumscape extended its winning streak to a third straight day on Thursday, jumping by another 34.92 percent to close at $7.65 apiece as investors continued to gobble up shares after achieving a cell production milestone. According to QuantumScape Corporation (NYSE:QS), it achieved an important milestone in its baseline cell production capabilities with the integration of the advanced Cobra separator process. Cobra forms the foundation of its high-throughput, continuous-flow separator production platform with its ability to offer 25x improvement in heat treatment speed. It is designed to enable faster, more energy-efficient production with a smaller equipment footprint compared with earlier processes. 'By significantly improving throughput and shrinking the equipment footprint, Cobra gives us a powerful path forward for commercializing our next-generation battery technology,' said QuantumScape Corporation (NYSE:QS) CEO Siva Sivaram. A line of electric vehicles parked in front of a research & development building in San Jose, California. For his part, QuantumScape Corporation (NYSE:QS) co-founder and CTO Tim Holme said that the advancement is crucial to bringing the company's high-performance solid-state battery platform to market at gigawatt scale. While we acknowledge the potential of QS as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store