Top Democratic Lawyer, 3 Others Leave Paul Weiss To Start New Firm: Reports
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Months after Paul Weiss reached a settlement with the Trump administration, four senior partners at the firm are leaving to start their own practice, according to The New York Times and Bloomberg Law.
Why It Matters
The partners' exit comes several months after Paul Weiss settled with the Trump administration to avoid having to face the consequences—legal or otherwise—of Trump's March executive order terminating all federal government contracts with the firm and revoking the security clearances of its lawyers.
Trump's executive order targeting the firm specified that it was being singled out because one of its lawyers, Mark Pomerantz, investigated Trump's business dealings when he was in the Manhattan district attorney's office.
Demonstrators outside the law offices of Paul Weiss in New York on Tuesday, April 22, 2025, are protesting the firm's agreement to do free legal services for the Trump administration.
Demonstrators outside the law offices of Paul Weiss in New York on Tuesday, April 22, 2025, are protesting the firm's agreement to do free legal services for the Trump administration.
Ted Shaffrey/AP
What To Know
One of the four partners leaving is Karen Dunn, a top Democratic lawyer who helped then Vice President Kamala Harris and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with debate preparation during their presidential campaigns, according to The New York Times.
Dunn also spearheaded a multi-million dollar lawsuit against the organizers of the far-right "Unite The Right" protest in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017, Bloomberg reported.
Another partner exiting Paul Weiss is Jeannie Rhee, who worked as a prosecutor on the special counsel Robert Mueller's team, which investigated Russia's interference in the 2016 election and whether the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its efforts.
The other two partners leaving the firm are Bill Isaacson, a well-known antitrust lawyer, and Jessica Phillips, who once clerked for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, The Times reported.
Paul Weiss came under fire after it settled with Trump to sidestep fighting his March executive order. As part of the arrangement, the firm agreed to scrap its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies, as well as provide $40 million worth of pro bono services to support Trump's agenda.
Trump subsequently rescinded his executive order. In the wake of the settlement, Paul Weiss faced a firestorm of criticism and the head of the firm's pro bono arm, Steven Banks, resigned.
More than 170 alumni of the firm also signed an open letter to the firm's chairman, Brad Karp, calling the decision to settle "cowardly" and adding that "the very independence of lawyers and the legal profession is at stake."
In total, the nine major law firms that settled with the Trump administration have agreed to provide about $1 billion in legal work, according to Bloomberg.
What People Are Saying
Dunn, Rhee, Isaacson and Phillips said in an email to the firm on Friday both Bloomberg and The Times reported: "We were disappointed not to be able to tell each of you personally and individually the news that we have decided to leave Paul, Weiss to start a new law firm."
Brad Karp, the chairman of the firm, told The Times in a statement: "We are grateful to Bill, Jeannie, Jessica and Karen for their many contributions to the firm. We wish them well in their future endeavors."
Neera Tanden, a prominent Democratic activist, wrote on X (formerly Twitter): "Proud of these legal leaders. They are putting principle first. Hope all lawyers at Paul Weiss of conviction join them."
Jason Kint, a digital media veteran and the CEO of Digital Content Next, wrote on X: "Wow. Paul Weiss just lost the top attorneys representing Google in its adtech antitrust case just as remedies are getting underway. It will be interesting to see how Google handles this since this is fallout for the law firm being first to do a Trump deal."
What Happens Next
At least three law firms—Perkins Coie, WilmerHale and Jenner & Block—have fought Trump's executive orders in court. On Friday, a federal judge appointed by George W. Bush blocked Trump's order targeting Jenner & Block after finding that it violated the Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
17 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Here are the 10 most expensive cities for the ultra-rich in 2025 — and the quiet power shift shaping the next luxury capitals
For the third year running, Singapore ranked as the world's most expensive city for high-net-worth individuals, according to the latest Global Wealth and Lifestyle Report from Julius Baer Group, a Swiss wealth management group. London moved into second place, nudging Hong Kong into third — but behind these familiar frontrunners, a quiet transformation could soon redraw the global map for the super wealthy The 2025 edition of the report, published on Monday, tracked the cost of what it called "living well" — meaning the ability to afford and regularly spend on 20 luxury goods and services that high-net-worth individuals typically enjoy. These include private school fees, luxury property, watches, fancy dinners, and business class flights. Pricing data was collected across 25 cities between November 2024 and March 2025, and each city was ranked based on the weighted-average total cost of all 20 items, converted into US dollars. To complement the price index, Julius Baer also conducted a separate Lifestyle Survey, polling 360 high-net-worth individuals across 15 countries in February and March 2025 to understand how the wealthy are spending and investing. While the methodology is robust, it does not account for geopolitical shifts that followed, including the Trump administration's April tariff announcements, and its relatively small sample size may limit broad conclusions. Still, the findings point to a clear shift in momentum: while the podium remains stable, several key cities — especially in Asia and the Middle East — are climbing fast, suggesting a broader power shift in global luxury hubs. The top 10 most expensive cities for the wealthy in 2025 Singapore. London. Hong Kong. Monaco. Zurich. Shanghai. Dubai. New York. Paris. Milan. The quiet rise of new luxury capitals Several emerging cities climbed the rankings at an unexpected pace, especially in Asia and the Middle East. Dubai jumped five spots to 7th place, edging closer to European strongholds like Monaco and Zurich. Bangkok and Tokyo both rose six positions, landing at 11th and 17th, respectively, driven by rising costs of fashion, watches, and property. Bangkok's "growing upper-middle class has had a direct impact on the expansion of the local luxury market," Rishabh Saksena, cohead of Julius Baer's global asset class specialists, told Business Insider. "Increased wealth has mechanically driven demand for luxury goods and services, allowing the development of luxury malls, fine dining, and experiences such as spas," he said. "Additionally, the city benefits from Asia's long-standing appeal as a global tourism destination." Tokyo's rise reflects a similar trend. " Tokyo, and Japan more broadly, has long been a culturally rich and influential region, with a strong luxury market, especially in areas such as fashion, fine dining, and experiences," Saksena added. "The recent global shift among HNWIs toward valuing experiences over goods has further enhanced Tokyo's attractivity and appeal." Meanwhile, Shanghai, which topped the index in 2022, fell from 4th to 6th place — a sign that its dominance may be fading So Paulo and Mexico City also dropped notably in the rankings. "Dubai is nipping at the heels of the bastion cities in the region for wealth and lifestyle — London, Monaco, and Zurich — in a trend that is likely to continue as the Emirate ups the ante on offering an attractive residence proposition for HNWIs," the report said. Behind the movements is a growing desire among the ultrawealthy for stability, wellness, and future-focused cities. The report also notes that Dubai's appeal lies in tax advantages, luxury infrastructure, and a booming property market, while Bangkok and Tokyo benefit from regional economic momentum and cultural cachet. What's driving the change? The global average cost of "living well" actually declined 2% in US dollar terms between 2024 and 2025 — a rare drop in a sector typically shielded from macroeconomic headwinds. Yet, beneath that decline are sharp regional contrasts: Business class air fares jumped 18.2% globally, driven by a shortage of jets and booming demand for premium pleasure travel. Luxury goods like handbags and jewellery fell in price, reflecting shifting consumer priorities. Private school fees soared in cities like London, where new tax rules drove up costs by over 25%. More broadly, high-net-worth individuals increasingly prioritize experiences over possessions and longevity over status. These include spending more on wellness, curated travel, and health services, especially in Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. "The main shift we've seen recently is the growing move toward aspirational consumption among HNWIs, who increasingly value experiences over physical goods," Mark Matthews, Head of Research Asia at Julius Baer, told BI. "This trend varies from one location to another. Markets with a long cultural history of luxury goods (e.g., Switzerland with watches or Germany with cars) tend to show a slower transition toward 'experience-based' spending," he added. Data from the Lifestyle Survey backs this up. While luxury spending growth has cooled in Europe — where only 36% of high-net-worth individuals reported spending more on hotels — HNWIs in Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and Latin America continue to ramp up their spending on high-end fashion, jewellery, and watches. In APAC, 65% reported increasing spending on both hotels and watches, and 63% on women's fashion. In the Middle East, 52% spent more on hotels and 50% on fine jewellery. Across the board, travel and hospitality remain top spending priorities, with fine dining and five-star hotels leading the way. A Eurasian future? The report also hints at a broader geopolitical rebalancing in how — and where — the world's wealthy choose to live. "There is already talk of many wealthy Americans decamping to Europe for the next four years — and possibly forever," Julius Baer's report said, citing affluent individuals looking for political stability and strong institutions. Cities like London, despite Brexit and political change, remain magnets for global wealth thanks to world-class education, healthcare, and cultural capital.
CNBC
17 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' includes these key tax changes for 2025 — what they mean for you
It's been about two weeks since President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill" became law, and financial advisors and tax professionals are still digesting what the sweeping legislation means for clients. Meanwhile, several changes are effective for 2025, which will impact tax returns filed in 2026. While the Trump administration has been promoting "working family tax cuts," the legislation's impact depends on your unique situation — and some updates are complex, experts say. "There are just so many moving pieces," said certified financial planner Jim Guarino, managing director at Baker Newman Noyes in Woburn, Massachusetts. He is also a certified public accountant. More from Personal Finance:Trump's 'big beautiful bill' caps student loans. What it means for youTax changes under Trump's 'big beautiful bill' — in one chartTrump's 'big beautiful bill' adds 45.5% 'SALT torpedo' for high earners Currently, many advisors are running projections — often for multiple years — to see how the new provisions could impact taxes. Without income planning, you could reduce, or even eliminate, various tax benefits for which you are otherwise eligible, experts say. When it comes to tax strategy, "you never want to do anything in a silo," Guarino said. Here are some of the key changes from Trump's legislation to know for 2025, and how the updates could affect your taxes. The Republicans' marquee law made permanent Trump's 2017 tax cuts — including lower tax brackets and higher standard deductions, among other provisions — which broadly reduced taxes for Americans. Without the extension, most filers could have seen higher taxes in 2026, according to a 2024 report from the Tax Foundation. However, the new law enhances Trump's 2017 cuts, with a few tax breaks that start in 2025: If you itemize tax breaks, there is also a temporary higher cap on the state and local tax deduction, or SALT. For 2025, the SALT deduction limit is $40,000, up from $10,000. The higher SALT benefit phases out, or reduces, for incomes between $500,000 to $600,000, which can create an artificially higher tax rate of 45.5% that some experts are calling a "SALT torpedo." This creates a "sweet spot" for the SALT deduction between $200,000 and $500,000 of earnings, based on other provisions in the bill, CPA John McCarthy wrote in a blog post this week. Trump's tax and spending bill also introduced some temporary tax breaks, which are effective for 2025. Some of these were floated during his 2024 presidential provisions include a $6,000 "bonus" deduction for certain older Americans ages 65 and over, which phases out over $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for married couples filing jointly. There are also new deductions for tip income, overtime earnings and car loan interest, with varying eligibility requirements. This chart shows a breakdown of some of the key individual provisions that are effective for 2025 compared to previous law. During the pandemic, Congress boosted the premium tax credit through 2025, which made Marketplace health insurance more affordable. But Trump's legislation didn't extend the enhanced tax break, which could raise Affordable Care Act premiums for more than 22 million enrollees if no action is taken, according to KFF, a health policy organization. That could impact enrollees when choosing ACA health plans this fall, according to Tommy Lucas, a CFP and enrolled agent at Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo in Orlando, Florida. Starting in 2026, enrollees need to prepare for the ACA subsidy cliff, where enrollees lose the premium tax credit when income exceeds the earnings thresholds by even $1, he said. Currently, most ACA enrollees receive at least part of the premium tax credit. However, the subsidy cliff means enrollees lose the benefit once earnings exceed 400% of the federal poverty limit. For 2025, that threshold was $103,280 for a family of three, according to The Peterson Center on Healthcare, a nonprofit for healthcare policy, and KFF.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Everyone Hates Alina Habba So Much She's About to Be Out of a Job
Alina Habba, Trump's shamelessly biased personal lawyer, will soon be out of the job he gave her. The president appointed Habba, who defended him in his hush-money and E. Jean Carroll defamation cases, as interim U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey in March. The role was for 120 days, allowing Habba to bypass Senate confirmation. But those 120 days are up next Tuesday, and all signs currently point to Habba not getting officially confirmed, as New Jersey Senators Andy Kim and Cory Booker have sworn to block her nomination. A source close to the situation told The New Jersey Globe that Habba admitted to her staff on Thursday that she's not sure what's next. 'I don't know what's going to happen, and I'm grateful for my time. This is an amazing office, and I hope I can stay,' she reportedly said. The end of Habba's DA tenure prevents one of Trump's most ardent supporters from grasping even more power. Her history indicates that she would have only used her role to blindly carry out the president's agenda. In October, amid the tragedy of Hurricane Helene, Habba falsely claimed that the Biden-Harris administration left 'babies floating in the water.' Fox News of all outlets checked her live on air. When Trump fell fast asleep during his own trial, Habba chalked it up to him having tired eyes. 'President Trump, he reads a lot,' she said. 'He's been sitting there, as he's forced to, at the threat of going to jail if he's not sitting there, for what I assume would be a very mundane day.' She demonstrated a shocking lack of legal expertise at that same trial when she clearly misunderstood what 'due process' entailed. And in March, she said that the thousands of military veterans that DOGE fired were simply unfit. New Jersey seems to be safe from Habba's sheer incompetence for the time being. Only time will tell if she remains in Trump's orbit or fades into MAGA obscurity. Solve the daily Crossword
