logo
Pentagon recalls another 1,000 National Guard troops from Los Angeles

Pentagon recalls another 1,000 National Guard troops from Los Angeles

USA Today3 days ago
The troops were sent to suppress protests and to protect ICE agents conducting immigration raids.
The Pentagon has withdrawn more than a thousand National Guard troops sent to Los Angeles, further scaling back President Donald Trump's controversial deployment.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on July 30 recalled 1,350 California National Guardsmen assigned to protect federal buildings and personnel amid public uproar following recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids across the city and Southern California.
The troop withdrawal comes with about a week left in what the White House described as a 60-day deployment that started on June 7. Two weeks ago the administration called back 2,000 California National Guardsmen from their assignments in Los Angeles.
Troop withdrawal, phase 1: Pentagon pulls 2,000 National Guard members from Los Angeles in immigration rollback
Approximately 250 troops will remain in Los Angeles to protect personnel and property, the Pentagon said. At the peak of their deployment, nearly 5,000 service members were dispatched to the region: most were National Guard troops, but Trump also sent 700 Marines to guard federal property in the city.
The troops were directed to suppress protests and to protect ICE agents conducting immigration raids.
Newsom: Trump's 'political theater backfired'
Several California Democratic lawmakers criticized the June deployment, calling it an overreach of presidential authority, accusing Trump of inciting violence. Trump's response at the time was that "Los Angeles would be burning right now" without the military presence.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, sued the Trump administration, alleging the deployment was unlawful. A San Francisco appeals court ruled that the troops could remain.
Newsom said July 30 in a post on X that Trump's "chaotic, needless takeover of the California National Guard, his political theatrics in LA have blown up in his face."
"President Trump is realizing that his political theater backfired. This militarization was always unnecessary and deeply unpopular," Newsom said in a statement.
Raids and deportations has a heavy cost: Deportations are taking a toll on California's economy - and have only just begun
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass also viewed the deployment as a "political stunt" and said in a July 30 post on X the withdrawal was a "win." Bass said she would continue to pressure the administration until "ALL troops are out of L.A."
Hegseth responded to Bass in an X post of his own.
"You're welcome Mayor. These brave troops are redeploying because their mission was so successful. You should be thanking them for saving your city from mobs & chaos," Hegseth said. "We will continue to support law enforcement – even when you won't."
The troop deployment has been estimated to cost about $134 million, according to the Pentagon.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From friend to foe: Behind the tangled relationship between Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump
From friend to foe: Behind the tangled relationship between Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

From friend to foe: Behind the tangled relationship between Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump

President Trump once called Rupert Murdoch "my very good friend." But the 94-year-old media baron, whose fortunes have risen in tandem with Trump's political ascent, has turned into an unlikely foe. Trump has bristled over a Wall Street Journal report that he allegedly sent a suggestive letter to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003. Trump denied sending the message, calling it a "fake," and last month he filed a $10-billion defamation suit against Journal publisher Dow Jones & Co., Murdoch and others. The billionaire — who sits at the top of the world's most prominent conservative media empire — has become the focus of the president's fury. "I hope Rupert and his 'friends' are looking forward to the many hours of depositions and testimonies they will have to provide in this case," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, a nod to "Fox & Friends," one of his favorite TV programs. The Journal, he wrote, is a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag," and Murdoch's "'pile of garbage' newspaper." Trump's attorneys applied more heat last week in a startling bid to force Murdoch to promptly appear for a deposition. In a motion, Trump's lawyers cited the mogul's age and health complications, which they said includes a recent fainting episode, and over the last five years, a broken back, a torn Achilles tendon and atrial fibrillation, which could make Murdoch "unavailable for in-person testimony at trial." Through a spokesman, Murdoch declined to comment. The tussle provides a rare glimpse into the tangled relationship of two titans whose dealings date back a half-century when the Australian-born Murdoch arrived in the U.S. and bought the New York Post, a punchy tabloid with screaming headlines. Trump forged his reputation as a New York real estate tycoon, in part, by dishing scoops to the paper's celebrity-hungry Page Six. And Fox News would become one of Trump's biggest champions. The network has long heaped on positive attention that helped Trump transform himself from reality TV star to the political hero of his Make America Great Again base. The cable network gave Trump a platform for his unfounded "birther" conspiracies about former President Obama. And Trump's political rise helped cement Fox News' status as a ratings and financial juggernaut. This summer, Fox News ranks as America's No. 1 network, according to measurement firm Nielsen, attracting more viewers in prime time than broadcast leaders NBC and CBS. What's more, a string of Fox News personalities have joined Trump's administration, including former weekend host, now secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth. Murdoch and Trump "feed off one another — they've had this relationship since the '70s where they kind of benefit from one another," said Andrew Dodd, a journalism professor at the University of Melbourne. "But they also have these turns where they're against each other." Gabriel Kahn, a USC journalism professor and former Wall Street Journal reporter, said the tension is real. "As much as Rupert has pumped up Trump World over the last 10 years, Rupert really sees himself as the kingmaker — not the lackey," Kahn said. Trump's social media posts over the years reveal bouts of frustration with Murdoch and his media properties. Read more: Fox News' Jesse Watters admits mistake in program claiming Newsom lied about Trump call The two men have different political philosophies: Murdoch is known to be a small-government Reagan Republican, "not a true conservative populist" in the MAGA vein, according to one Republican political operative who was not authorized to speak publicly. Insiders and observers point to a series of slights, including a 2015 remark Murdoch made on Twitter a month after Trump descended on the golden escalator at Trump Tower to announce his first presidential bid, and then ignited a firestorm with anti-immigrant comments. "When is Donald Trump going to stop embarrassing his friends, let alone the whole country?" Murdoch asked a decade ago. Murdoch, at turns, tried to recruit or boost rival presidential hopefuls. Florida's Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis received flattering coverage on Fox News early in President Biden's term. By that time, Trump was back at Mar-a-Lago after losing the 2020 election and Fox News was navigating treacherous terrain. The network was the first major outlet to call Arizona for Biden on election night, riling Trump and his supporters who viewed the move as a betrayal, one that short-circuited their claims the election had been stolen. Fox News witnessed an immediate viewer exodus. Read more: How will cable news thrive without Donald Trump in the White House? To win back Trump supporters, the network gave a platform to Trump surrogates who suggested machines flipped votes for Biden, despite the fact that Murdoch and others knew such claims were false, court filings revealed. Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic sued for defamation. Discovery in the Dominion lawsuit revealed that, two days after the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, Murdoch wanted to carve some distance, writing a former executive: "We want to make Trump a non person." In a 2023 deposition, Murdoch conceded missteps of spreading the unfounded theories. Fox that spring agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million — one of the largest payouts ever for a U.S. libel suit. The Smartmatic case is still pending. "They promulgated the 'Big Lie,'" Dodd said of Fox News' post-2020 election coverage. "Now, in the twilight years of his life, Murdoch [may be] thinking: 'Well, this man really is not worth supporting any longer.'" Read more: Murdoch has survived scandal after scandal. Will Dominion-Fox News lawsuit be different? Such a shift would not be out of character. Murdoch, in the past, has promoted political leaders and governments, only to pull that support. In the 1970s, after initially backing Australia's then-Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, Murdoch allegedly directed his editors to "Kill Whitlam," in a political (not violent) sense. Twenty years later in Britain, Murdoch abandoned the Conservatives after being a close ally of former leader Margaret Thatcher. He famously threw the weight of his tabloid, the Sun, behind Labor's Tony Blair. After years of backing Tories, the Sun shifted back to Labor and Keir Starmer last year, saying that "it is time for a change." "Murdoch has a long career of breaking what he makes," Dodd said. His vast empire, divvied between News Corp. and Fox Corp., allows his outlets to have different leanings. The Journal has lent more skeptical coverage to Trump. It broke stories about Trump's hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels and former Playboy bunny Karen McDougal. This year, its editorial board called his high tariffs "the dumbest trade war in history." Fox News, however, remains staunchly in the president's camp. Murdoch is "putting one part of the organization in attack mode while keeping the other [Fox News] in reserve while it benefits from the base of the person that he's attacking," Dodd said. Read more: Rupert Murdoch, scrappy Fox mogul who transformed media, begins his Hollywood goodbye The media baron has long relished his proximity to power. He attended Trump's second inauguration in January and participated with business leaders in an Oval Office meeting a few weeks later. Murdoch was reportedly among Trump's circle of VIPs in New Jersey on July 13 for the FIFA Club World Cup soccer championship match. Two days later, a Journal reporter emailed White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, advising that the paper was preparing to publish a story about the Epstein birthday letter, according to Trump's lawsuit. Trump's lawyers pushed back, saying the allegations were false. Trump called Murdoch, according to court filings. "Murdoch advised President Trump that 'he would take care of it,'" Trump wrote in a July 17 post on Truth Social, the day the story published. "Obviously, he didn't have the power to do so," Trump wrote. Trump sued the next day. A Dow Jones spokeswoman responded: "We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit." Read more: How Paramount's $16-million Trump settlement came together — and could've fallen apart The legal dustup comes after a string of controversial wins for the president. Last month, Paramount Global agreed to pay Trump $16 million to settle a dispute over "60 Minutes" edits of a Kamala Harris interview, a lawsuit that 1st Amendment experts said had no merit. In December, Walt Disney Co. paid $16 million to end a defamation lawsuit brought by Trump over inaccurate statements by ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos — an outcome derided by some 1st Amendment experts who thought Disney would eventually prevail. "President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos/ABC, 60 Minutes/CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal," Trump wrote. "It has truly turned out to be a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag.'' Murdoch watchers don't expect him to capitulate. "In this bizarre world that we live in, Rupert is actually one of the few people who might be willing to stand up to Trump," Kahn said. "Remember, Rupert loves newspapers, he loves the scoop and he loves to stir the pot." Times staff writer Stephen Battaglio contributed to this report. Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Texas Democrats arrive in Illinois to block vote back home on redrawn House maps sought by Trump

time29 minutes ago

Texas Democrats arrive in Illinois to block vote back home on redrawn House maps sought by Trump

A standoff in Texas over redrawn U.S. House maps sought by President Donald Trump sharply escalated Sunday when dozens of Democratic legislators left the state to block a vote, followed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott warning them that he will seek their removal from office if they don't return. The revolt by Democrats, and Abbott giving them until Monday to come home or face efforts to strip them of their elected positions, pushed a widening fight over congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections into new territory. At the center of the deepening impasse is Trump's pursuit of five more winnable congressional seats that will help bolster the GOP's chances of preserving their slim U.S. House majority. In response to Texas' rare mid-decade political gerrymander, Democratic governors have floated the possibility of redrawing their own state's maps in retaliation, but their options are limited. Many of the Texas Democrats were bound for Illinois and a welcoming from Gov. JB Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender, who in recent weeks has offered them support. House Democratic Caucus Chair Rep. Gene Wu declined to say how long lawmakers were prepared to stay out of Texas, and it was unclear whether the gambit would succeed. Four years ago, House Democrats left Texas for 38 days in protest of new voting restrictions that still wound up passing once the holdout ended. 'We will do whatever it takes. What that looks like, we don't know,' Wu said at a Sunday night news conference. Lawmakers can't pass bills in the 150-member Texas House without at least two-thirds of them present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the majority-Republican chamber and at least 51 left the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus. In addition to those in Illinois, delegations of Democratic lawmakers left Texas for Boston and Albany, New York, among other places, Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer said. Abbott threatened to seek the lawmakers' removal, saying they were not meeting under the state's constitution. 'This truancy ends now,' Abbott said in a statement released by his office Sunday night. Abbott also suggested the lawmakers may have committed felonies by raising money to help pay for fines they'd face. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows said the chamber would still meet as planned on Monday afternoon. 'If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table. . .,' he posted on X. Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate, said on X that Democrats who 'try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.' A refusal by Texas lawmakers to show up is a civil violation of legislative rules. The Texas Supreme Court held in 2021 that House leaders had the authority to 'physically compel the attendance' of missing members, but no Democrats were forcibly brought back to the state after warrants were served that year. Two years later, Republicans pushed through new rules that allow daily fines of $500 for lawmakers who don't show up for work as punishment. In calling for the lawmakers' removal, Abbott cited a non-binding legal opinion that was issued by Paxton's office after the 2021 revolt by Democratic lawmakers. The quorum break will also delay votes on flood relief and new warning systems in the wake of last month's catastrophic floods in Texas that killed at least 136 people. Democrats had called for votes on the flooding response before taking up redistricting and have criticized Republicans for not doing so. Texas Republicans last week unveiled their planned new U.S. House map that would create five new Republican-leaning seats. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. Pritzker, who has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term, had been in quiet talks with Texas Democrats for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state to break quorum. Last week, the governor hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state. Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they did decide to break quorum to block the map, according to a source with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. 'This is not just rigging the system in Texas, it's about rigging the system against the rights of all Americans for years to come,' Pritzker said Sunday night. Now, with Texas Democrats holed up in Illinois and blocking the Trump-backed congressional map, the stage may be set for a high-profile showdown between Pritzker and the president. Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House just two years into his presidency, and hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states, such as Missouri, according to a person familiar with conversations but unauthorized to speak publicly about them.

Trump praises Sydney Sweeney after learning she's a registered Republican as woke mob torches her American Eagle jeans ad
Trump praises Sydney Sweeney after learning she's a registered Republican as woke mob torches her American Eagle jeans ad

New York Post

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump praises Sydney Sweeney after learning she's a registered Republican as woke mob torches her American Eagle jeans ad

He's tipping his red cap. President Trump on Sunday praised Sydney Sweeney after learning she's a registered Republican – a political bombshell that dropped as a woke mob continues to torch the actress over her American Eagle jeans ad. Trump, 79, reacted with glee after a reporter told him the 27-year-old 'Euphoria' actress shares his right-leaning views, adding that he now finds her controversial new denim campaign 'fantastic.' Advertisement 5 President Trump praised Sydney Sweeney after learning she's a registered Republican. AP 'Oh, now I love her ad,' he told a gaggle of reporters before boarding Air Force One in Allentown, Pa. 'You'd be surprised at how many people are Republicans. That's one I wouldn't have known but I'm glad you told me that. 'If Sydney Sweeny is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic.' Advertisement 5 Sydney Sweeney, 27, has faced relentless backlash ignited by lefty critics over her new American Eagle jeans ad. American Eagle The 'White Lotus' starlet has been registered with the Republican Party of Florida in Monroe County since June 2024, according to public voter records viewed by The Post. The blonde-haired, blue-eyed actress's conservative stripes were revealed Saturday as she faces relentless backlash ignited by left-wing critics comparing the clothing retailer's sultry ad to 'Nazi propaganda' that promotes racism and eugenics. Advertisement 5 The 'Euphoria' star has been a registered Republican in Florida since June 2024. American Eagle The tagline for the marketing campaign is: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' In one promotional clip, Sweeney explains that genes are passed down from parents to offspring 'often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color,' before declaring, 'my jeans are blue.' In another clever ad, the actress approaches a billboard featuring her image and the phrase, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes,' which she then alters by crossing out 'genes' and replacing it with 'jeans.' Advertisement 5 The ad sparked debate over 'Nazi propaganda,' racism and eugenics. American Eagle The campaign sparked a social media frenzy this week over Western beauty standards and race, prompting American Eagle to defend its marketing approach and the 'Anyone But You' star. Other White House officials have also come out mocking the outraged liberal haters, including Steven Cheung, Trump's communications director, who on Tuesday dragged the bizarre backlash as 'cancel culture run amok.' Vice President JD Vance also ripped Democrats for becoming unhinged over a 'pretty girl' selling jeans to kids in America. 5 Sydney Sweeney in an American Eagle jeans ad. 'My political advice to the Democrats is: continue to tell everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive that they're a Nazi,' Vance said on Friday's episode of the 'Ruthless' podcast. 'That appears to be their actual strategy. So you have a pretty girl doing a jeans ad and they can't help but freak out. It reveals a lot more about them than it does us.' Sweeney herself has yet to respond to the public reaction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store