Ukraine moves to quit anti-personnel mines treaty
Ukraine ratified the convention in 2005.
Other countries bordering Russia, notably Finland, Poland and the three ex-Soviet Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - have either withdrawn from the convention or indicated that they would do so.
Zelenskiy said in his nightly video address that Russia had never been a party to the convention "and is using anti-personnel mines with utmost cynicism" along with other weapons, including ballistic missiles.
"This is a hallmark of Russian killers. To destroy life by all means at their disposal ... We see how our neighbours in Europe react to this threat," he said.
"We also know the complexities of the withdrawal procedure when it is conducted during war. We take this political step and give a signal to our political partners on what to focus on. This concerns all countries that border Russia," he said.
Anti-personnel mines, Zelenskiy said, are "often the instrument for which nothing can be substituted for defence purposes".
Russia has used anti-personnel mines extensively in parts of Ukraine where its forces have been operating.
Ukraine regards the clearing of such mines as a key element in post-war recovery.
The decree appearing on the president's website calls for support for a Ukrainian foreign ministry proposal to "withdraw Ukraine from the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction of September 18, 1997".
A senior Ukrainian MP, Roman Kostenko, said that parliamentary approval was still needed to withdraw from the treaty.
"This is a step that the reality of war has long demanded. Russia is not a party to this convention and is massively using mines against our military and civilians," Kostenko, secretary of the Ukrainian parliament's committee on national security, defence and intelligence, said on his Facebook page.
"We cannot remain tied down in an environment where the enemy has no restrictions," he added, saying that the legislative decision must definitively restore Ukraine's right to effectively defend its territory.
Russia has intensified its offensive operations in Ukraine in recent months, using significant superiority in manpower.
Kostenko did not say when the issue would be debated in parliament.
President Volodymyr Zelenskiy says he has signed a decree to pull Ukraine out of the Ottawa Convention banning the production and use of anti-personnel mines as a necessary step in view of Russian tactics in their 40-month-old war.
Ukraine ratified the convention in 2005.
Other countries bordering Russia, notably Finland, Poland and the three ex-Soviet Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - have either withdrawn from the convention or indicated that they would do so.
Zelenskiy said in his nightly video address that Russia had never been a party to the convention "and is using anti-personnel mines with utmost cynicism" along with other weapons, including ballistic missiles.
"This is a hallmark of Russian killers. To destroy life by all means at their disposal ... We see how our neighbours in Europe react to this threat," he said.
"We also know the complexities of the withdrawal procedure when it is conducted during war. We take this political step and give a signal to our political partners on what to focus on. This concerns all countries that border Russia," he said.
Anti-personnel mines, Zelenskiy said, are "often the instrument for which nothing can be substituted for defence purposes".
Russia has used anti-personnel mines extensively in parts of Ukraine where its forces have been operating.
Ukraine regards the clearing of such mines as a key element in post-war recovery.
The decree appearing on the president's website calls for support for a Ukrainian foreign ministry proposal to "withdraw Ukraine from the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction of September 18, 1997".
A senior Ukrainian MP, Roman Kostenko, said that parliamentary approval was still needed to withdraw from the treaty.
"This is a step that the reality of war has long demanded. Russia is not a party to this convention and is massively using mines against our military and civilians," Kostenko, secretary of the Ukrainian parliament's committee on national security, defence and intelligence, said on his Facebook page.
"We cannot remain tied down in an environment where the enemy has no restrictions," he added, saying that the legislative decision must definitively restore Ukraine's right to effectively defend its territory.
Russia has intensified its offensive operations in Ukraine in recent months, using significant superiority in manpower.
Kostenko did not say when the issue would be debated in parliament.
President Volodymyr Zelenskiy says he has signed a decree to pull Ukraine out of the Ottawa Convention banning the production and use of anti-personnel mines as a necessary step in view of Russian tactics in their 40-month-old war.
Ukraine ratified the convention in 2005.
Other countries bordering Russia, notably Finland, Poland and the three ex-Soviet Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - have either withdrawn from the convention or indicated that they would do so.
Zelenskiy said in his nightly video address that Russia had never been a party to the convention "and is using anti-personnel mines with utmost cynicism" along with other weapons, including ballistic missiles.
"This is a hallmark of Russian killers. To destroy life by all means at their disposal ... We see how our neighbours in Europe react to this threat," he said.
"We also know the complexities of the withdrawal procedure when it is conducted during war. We take this political step and give a signal to our political partners on what to focus on. This concerns all countries that border Russia," he said.
Anti-personnel mines, Zelenskiy said, are "often the instrument for which nothing can be substituted for defence purposes".
Russia has used anti-personnel mines extensively in parts of Ukraine where its forces have been operating.
Ukraine regards the clearing of such mines as a key element in post-war recovery.
The decree appearing on the president's website calls for support for a Ukrainian foreign ministry proposal to "withdraw Ukraine from the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction of September 18, 1997".
A senior Ukrainian MP, Roman Kostenko, said that parliamentary approval was still needed to withdraw from the treaty.
"This is a step that the reality of war has long demanded. Russia is not a party to this convention and is massively using mines against our military and civilians," Kostenko, secretary of the Ukrainian parliament's committee on national security, defence and intelligence, said on his Facebook page.
"We cannot remain tied down in an environment where the enemy has no restrictions," he added, saying that the legislative decision must definitively restore Ukraine's right to effectively defend its territory.
Russia has intensified its offensive operations in Ukraine in recent months, using significant superiority in manpower.
Kostenko did not say when the issue would be debated in parliament.
President Volodymyr Zelenskiy says he has signed a decree to pull Ukraine out of the Ottawa Convention banning the production and use of anti-personnel mines as a necessary step in view of Russian tactics in their 40-month-old war.
Ukraine ratified the convention in 2005.
Other countries bordering Russia, notably Finland, Poland and the three ex-Soviet Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - have either withdrawn from the convention or indicated that they would do so.
Zelenskiy said in his nightly video address that Russia had never been a party to the convention "and is using anti-personnel mines with utmost cynicism" along with other weapons, including ballistic missiles.
"This is a hallmark of Russian killers. To destroy life by all means at their disposal ... We see how our neighbours in Europe react to this threat," he said.
"We also know the complexities of the withdrawal procedure when it is conducted during war. We take this political step and give a signal to our political partners on what to focus on. This concerns all countries that border Russia," he said.
Anti-personnel mines, Zelenskiy said, are "often the instrument for which nothing can be substituted for defence purposes".
Russia has used anti-personnel mines extensively in parts of Ukraine where its forces have been operating.
Ukraine regards the clearing of such mines as a key element in post-war recovery.
The decree appearing on the president's website calls for support for a Ukrainian foreign ministry proposal to "withdraw Ukraine from the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction of September 18, 1997".
A senior Ukrainian MP, Roman Kostenko, said that parliamentary approval was still needed to withdraw from the treaty.
"This is a step that the reality of war has long demanded. Russia is not a party to this convention and is massively using mines against our military and civilians," Kostenko, secretary of the Ukrainian parliament's committee on national security, defence and intelligence, said on his Facebook page.
"We cannot remain tied down in an environment where the enemy has no restrictions," he added, saying that the legislative decision must definitively restore Ukraine's right to effectively defend its territory.
Russia has intensified its offensive operations in Ukraine in recent months, using significant superiority in manpower.
Kostenko did not say when the issue would be debated in parliament.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Trump pressures Hamas to accept ‘final proposal' for ceasefire, as White House cuts supplies to Ukraine
US President Donald Trump has urged Hamas militants in Gaza to agree to what he called a 'final proposal' for a 60-day ceasefire, saying Israel had agreed to conditions to finalise the deal, without elaborating about what the conditions were. Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) that if a 60-day ceasefire was agreed, the US would then 'work with all parties to end the War' over that period. He said representatives for Qatar and Egypt would deliver 'this final proposal' to Hamas. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' he said. But as the White House pressed for a ceasefire in the Middle East, it also confirmed it had stopped the transfer of artillery rounds and air defences to Ukraine amid falling US stockpiles, as Ukraine endures stepped-up missile and drone attacks in its war with Russia. The decision to halt supplies comes as Ukraine struggles to repel large-scale Russian missile and drone strikes across the country. On Sunday, Ukraine said Russia fired a record 537 missiles and drones in 'massive' overnight attacks. Russia has intensified its attacks in recent weeks as its president, Vladimir Putin, defies US and European calls to accept a ceasefire to allow for peace talks. Trump said last week that he thought a ceasefire in Gaza could be 'close.' But he didn't provide further details in his social media post on how an agreement might unfold or with whom he had spoken about a possible halt to the war that began with the Hamas assault on Israel on October 7, 2023, which saw 1,200 people killed and about 250 abducted. Ron Dermer, a senior adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is in Washington this week and had been expected to meet US special envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance. Trump will meet Netanyahu in Washington on Monday. An earlier ceasefire ended in mid-March, and talks on extending that truce stalled with Israel and Hamas deadlocked. Israel has insisted that it will not end its war until Hamas has disarmed, while Hamas has called for Israel to withdraw from Gaza.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump pressures Hamas to accept ‘final proposal' for ceasefire, as White House cuts supplies to Ukraine
US President Donald Trump has urged Hamas militants in Gaza to agree to what he called a 'final proposal' for a 60-day ceasefire, saying Israel had agreed to conditions to finalise the deal, without elaborating about what the conditions were. Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) that if a 60-day ceasefire was agreed, the US would then 'work with all parties to end the War' over that period. He said representatives for Qatar and Egypt would deliver 'this final proposal' to Hamas. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' he said. But as the White House pressed for a ceasefire in the Middle East, it also confirmed it had stopped the transfer of artillery rounds and air defences to Ukraine amid falling US stockpiles, as Ukraine endures stepped-up missile and drone attacks in its war with Russia. The decision to halt supplies comes as Ukraine struggles to repel large-scale Russian missile and drone strikes across the country. On Sunday, Ukraine said Russia fired a record 537 missiles and drones in 'massive' overnight attacks. Russia has intensified its attacks in recent weeks as its president, Vladimir Putin, defies US and European calls to accept a ceasefire to allow for peace talks. Trump said last week that he thought a ceasefire in Gaza could be 'close.' But he didn't provide further details in his social media post on how an agreement might unfold or with whom he had spoken about a possible halt to the war that began with the Hamas assault on Israel on October 7, 2023, which saw 1,200 people killed and about 250 abducted. Ron Dermer, a senior adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is in Washington this week and had been expected to meet US special envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance. Trump will meet Netanyahu in Washington on Monday. An earlier ceasefire ended in mid-March, and talks on extending that truce stalled with Israel and Hamas deadlocked. Israel has insisted that it will not end its war until Hamas has disarmed, while Hamas has called for Israel to withdraw from Gaza.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The gripping story of how smuggled books helped end the Cold War
COLD WAR The CIA Book Club: The Best-Kept Secret of the Cold War Charlie English HarperCollins, $29.99 In Nazi Germany books considered to be un-German were burnt in public. No such public ritual existed in the Soviet Union, where censorship was secretive and subtle. During the Cold War (1945-1989), the Polish government suppressed culture behind closed doors too. The most populous central European country was then aligned to Moscow, which meant any criticism of the Kremlin was off limits. This Sovietisation of Polish culture was resisted by certain writers, such as Czesław Miłosz, who fled to Paris in the early 1950s. The Polish poet won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1980, but his writing was banned in his native country. As was the work of many western writers, including George Orwell, Hannah Arendt, Albert Camus and Virginia Woolf. But in communist Poland an underground literary culture still flourished. Books came from the west via various channels and sources. Some were hidden in the toilets of sleeper trains shuttling across Europe. A copy of The Gulag Archipelago, by Russian dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, was said to have been concealed in a baby's nappy on a flight to Warsaw. But banned literature wasn't coming into Poland by sheer chance. '[It was] part of a decades-long US intelligence operation [that built] up libraries of illicit books on the far side of the Iron Curtain,' Charlie English explains in The CIA Book Club. The British author begins this captivating story in 1955, when Free Europe Press printed 260,000 copies of Orwell's 1945 political fable Animal Farm, which were sent by balloon into East-Central Europe. But the clandestine mission, the brainchild of Free Europe Committee (FEC), an anti-communist CIA front organisation, wasn't very successful. So Langley, CIA headquarters, came up with a more effective strategy: direct mail. Post was strictly censored behind the Iron Curtain, but some books got through. 'No country responded with greater enthusiasm than Poland,' writes English, a former Guardian journalist. A persistent researcher who writes with flair, he notes that books with more controversial themes were typically sent to privileged intellectuals less likely to be persecuted. Among that list was Cardinal Karol Wojtyla, the Archbishop of Krakow, later elected Pope John Paul II. The world's first Slavic Pope had been receiving books — indirectly at least — from the CIA for years. But like most of the recipients, he had no clue where the books were coming from. The CIA book programme was 'a complex organisation ... consisting of bookshops, publishers, libraries, book exporters, and Russian and East European personalities' living in various European cities, as George Minden once put it. During the mid-1950s the Romanian exile began working for the Free Europe Press Book Centre in New York, which handled the CIA's mailing project.
