Fury at 'unacceptable' waste as Parliament brings in new £150k-a-year 'commercial' boss after Lords shambles over £10m gates that don't work
The role of 'chief commercial officer' - based at the Palace of Westminster - has been advertised with a salary of around £150,000.
But it has been claimed the total cost of the hire will be nearer £1million over the next four years, at a time when other budgets are being squeezed.
This is once pension contributions and other costs, such as a headhunting fee, are factored in.
Lord Hayward, the Tory peer, also used a letter to Parliament's management to hit out at 'obfuscation' as to whether it is an 'additional role'.
The appointment comes amid plans to establish a joint commercial department between the House of Commons and House of Lords.
'In the private sector merging departments normally results in a reduction of staff but it would appear not in Parliamentary management terms,' Lord Hayward wrote.
The former MP also highlighted other examples of eye-watering spending, including £9.6million on a new front door that doesn't open properly.
Fresh fury has been aimed at Parliament's 'unacceptable and unnecessary' spending following the hiring of a new top boss on a bumper salary.
Lord Hayward added: 'At a time when all aspects of government and individuals are having to cut expenditure severely... management of the parliamentary estate seem willing to spend money on costs which any ordinary person would find unacceptable and unnecessary.'
There is a new front door at the main entrance to the House of Lords, known as the Peers' Entrance, following the approval of an upgrade in March 2022.
It has since sparked anger after its £9.6million cost was revealed - a nearly 60 per cent increase from the original estimate of £6.1 million.
Peers said earlier this month it is still not fully accessible for disabled peers and requires a permanent member of staff on site 'to press the button to open the door'.
In his letter, Lord Hayward said the 'ongoing cost of security at Peers' Entrance appears to be... more than £2,500 per week'.
'Why is the taxpayer even covering for this?,' he added.
Lord Hayward also criticised the ongoing cost of employing 'traffic marshals' on the parliamentary estate, when he claimed there were 'much cheaper alternatives'.
'The most public example of this ongoing cost which management appears willing to accept is the marshal at carriage gates,' he wrote.
'They have no role. The police and security control the vehicles and public going in and out of the estate.
'This individual position doing nothing costs at minimum £66,000 per annum.
'Can I please ask when parliamentary management is intending to acknowledge that it is spending unwarranted sums while individuals, the nation and government are short of money?'
A House of Lords spokesperson said: 'Providing services that are value for public money is a key priority for the House of Lords Administration, as is ensuring effective systems of governance and financial management are in place to support this.
'Our approach is subject to rigorous oversight by the House Finance and Audit and Risk Assurance Committees and is set out transparently in our annual report and accounts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Major lender cuts mortgage rates to best buys days after Halifax, Barclays and HSBC offer better deals
One of Britain's biggest mortgage lenders has announced it will cut rates on its home loans to best buy levels. From tomorrow, Nationwide Building Society will lower mortgage rates by up to 0.2 percentage points across its fixed rate deals. It follows hot on the heels of Barclays, HSBC, and Halifax, which also announced rate cuts in recent days. Nationwide's lowest two-year fixed rate will stand at a market leading 3.81 per cent. The deal, which is available to both new and existing customers buying with at least a 40 per cent deposit and comes with a £1,499 fee. On a £200,000 mortgage being repaid over 25 years that would work out as paying £1,035 a month. Those moving home with smaller deposits will also benefit from Nationwide's changes. Someone with a 10 per cent deposit will be able to secure a market leading 4.34 per cent five-year fix with a £1,499 fee from tomorrow. There is good news for first-time buyers as well. A first-time buyer with a 10 per cent deposit will be able to secure a five-year fixed rate of 4.39 per cent with a £999 fee from Nationwide. Meanwhile, a first-time buyers with a 25 per cent deposit will be able to bag a 4.2 per cent three-year fix, also with a £999 fee. With hundreds of thousands of households still to remortgage this year, Nationwide's is also lowering rates in this area. Its lowest two-year fix for households with at least 40 per cent equity in their home will be 3.89 per cent from tomorrow - albeit with a £1,499 fee. Nationwide's changes lookm like a direct response to Halifax and Barclays, which both announced rate reductions last week. Halifax has just launched a 3.84 per cent two-year fix targeting borrowers buying a home and Barclays has a 3.92 per cent five-year fix for those needing to remortgage. For those prepared to do something different than locking in for the standard two or five years, MPowered Mortgages has a three-year fix at 3.88 per cent for those buying with at least a 40 per cent deposit. 'Nationwide is the latest big lender to lower its rates and undercut its competitors,' said Aaron Strutt of Trinity Financial. 'Its new rates are cheap enough to top the best buy tables especially if you have a large deposit. 'It has acted quickly to lower rates and undercut Halifax by launching a 3.81 per cent two-year fix and a 3.92 per cent five-year fix for mortgages between £300,000 and £5 million. 'These are property purchase products.' Strutt expects more lenders to cut mortgage rates over the coming weeks due to competition ramping up. 'Five of the big six biggest lenders have lowered their rates and no doubt other lenders will follow their lead,' he said. 'If you are offered a sub-4 per cent rate at the moment you are doing pretty well. You just need to decide how long you want to fix for and that really comes down to your attitude to rise. 'Lots of people are still taking two-year fixes as they think rates will come down more. 'With £147bn worth of mortgages coming up for renewal between now and December this latest round of rate cuts which come as welcome news for homeowners needing to remortgage.' How to find a new mortgage Borrowers who need a mortgage because their current fixed rate deal is ending, or they are buying a home, should explore their options as soon as possible. Buy-to-let landlords should also act as soon as they can. Quick mortgage finder links with This is Money's partner L&C > Mortgage rates calculator > Find the right mortgage for you What if I need to remortgage? Borrowers should compare rates, speak to a mortgage broker and be prepared to act. Homeowners can lock in to a new deal six to nine months in advance, often with no obligation to take it. Most mortgage deals allow fees to be added to the loan and only be charged when it is taken out. This means borrowers can secure a rate without paying expensive arrangement fees. Keep in mind that by doing this and not clearing the fee on completion, interest will be paid on the fee amount over the entire term of the loan, so this may not be the best option for everyone. What if I am buying a home? Those with home purchases agreed should also aim to secure rates as soon as possible, so they know exactly what their monthly payments will be. Buyers should avoid overstretching and be aware that house prices may fall, as higher mortgage rates limit people's borrowing ability and buying power. What about buy-to-let landlords Buy-to-let landlords with interest-only mortgages will see a greater jump in monthly costs than homeowners on residential mortgages. This makes remortgaging in plenty of time essential and our partner L&C can help with buy-to-let mortgages too. How to compare mortgage costs The best way to compare mortgage costs and find the right deal for you is to speak to a broker. This is Money has a long-standing partnership with fee-free broker L&C, to provide you with fee-free expert mortgage advice. Interested in seeing today's best mortgage rates? Use This is Money and L&Cs best mortgage rates calculator to show deals matching your home value, mortgage size, term and fixed rate needs. If you're ready to find your next mortgage, why not use L&C's online Mortgage Finder. It will search 1,000's of deals from more than 90 different lenders to discover the best deal for you. > Find your best mortgage deal with This is Money and L&C Be aware that rates can change quickly, however, and so if you need a mortgage or want to compare rates, speak to L&C as soon as possible, so they can help you find the right mortgage for you.
Wales Online
17 minutes ago
- Wales Online
PIP changes explained with fears it will hugely impact Wales
PIP changes explained with fears it will hugely impact Wales What the PIP changes could mean for benefits claimants in Wales ahead of crunch vote Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall arrives in Downing Street for today's cabinet meeting ahead of the crucial welfare reform vote (Image: PA ) MPs will tonight vote on UK Government plans to reform welfare payments. It comes after a climbdown by the Labour administration after huge public outcry and facing a huge rebellion from its own MPs. At its height more than 100 Labour MPs said they would vote against their own government, but that has reduced to 39 Labour backbenchers since changes were announced. Wales' four Plaid Cymru MPs have also backed the amendment, which will be voted on. The proposals were hugely controversial. While the UK Government say reform is needed, critics said they were being rushed through and had not consulted charities or disabled people who will be impacted. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall told the Commons: "Welfare reform, let's be honest, is never easy, perhaps especially for Labour governments. Our social security system directly touches the lives of millions of people and it is something we all care deeply about. "We have listened to the concerns that have been raised to help us get these changes right. The Bill protects people already claiming PIP, it protects in real terms the incomes of people already receiving the UC (universal credit) health top-up from that benefit and their standard allowance, and it protects those with severe lifelong conditions who will never work, and those near the end of their life as we promised we would." The Welsh Government had criticised the plans, with senior minister Jane Hutt writing to Ms Kendall saying there needed to be a review of the plans. Once the climbdown was announced, it was welcomed by First Minister Eluned Morgan. She said: "Around 200,000 people could have been in real trouble, and they've listened, they've learned and they've acted – and that is something I think we should welcome." Article continues below What is PIP? Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is a non-means-tested benefit intended to help with extra costs arising from long-term disability or ill-health which was introduced in 2013. It replaced Disability Living Allowance for people of working age. PIP is made up of two components: a mobility component, based on an individual's ability to get around; and a 'daily living' component, based on ability to carry out other key activities necessary to be able to participate in daily life. Each component can be awarded at either standard, enhanced, or nil (where they receive nothing). What was proposed? The UK Government had proposed sweeping changes that were deeply unpopular there were two main elements: Increasing the basic 'standard allowance' of Universal Credit that all claimants receive, while reducing the generosity of the additional amounts for claimants with disabilities and health conditions that affect their capability for work In terms of PIP, changes to the way eligibility is calculated - claimants would need to score four or more points for at least one of the 'daily living' activities that determine entitlement to the daily living component Now what is happening? The UK Government announced two major changes the new Personal Independence Payment daily living 'four-point' requirement will only be implemented for new claimants from November 2026 existing recipients of the Universal Credit health element, and any new claimant meeting the criteria for the most severe and lifelong conditions, will "have their incomes fully protected in real terms" Why is it so important in Wales? There was a lack of official government data about exactly who would be impacted in Wales but it was widely commented that there would be a disproportionate impact in Wales because Wales has higher rates of disabled people of working age than the UK average. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation highlighted the constituencies where cuts to sickness and disability benefits will fall most heavily which showed of the top 20 constituencies in England and Wales with the highest proportion of the working age population in receipt of health-related social security, eight are in Wales (and 10 out of the top 30) which suggested changing PIP would have a disproportionate impact on disabled people in Wales. In fact, Welsh Government minister Jane Hutt wrote to her UK Government counterpart and said that element needed to be reviewed. "The proposed changes to Personal Independence Payments should be reviewed before any changes are made," she wrote. Policy in Practice estimated there will be substantial increases in poverty and financial hardship for working age households in Wales. The original plans would have impacted an estimated 190,000 people in Wales (6.1% of the population) and see £470m lost from the Welsh economy. Victoria Winckler, director of The Bevan Foundation, said it would "increase social inequality, and exacerbating already entrenched poverty in Wales". Are the changes better news? There are still concerns that the row back is going to create a two-tier system and younger disabled people and those who become disabled in the future will be disadvantaged and denied access to work and education. The concessions by the UK Government have seen a number of the Welsh MPs who had signed an amendment which looked set to sink the government plans has decreased. While Plaid Cymru's four MPs have signed the amendment, only one of the five Labour MPs who had originally put their names to it have kept there, that's Steve Witherden, the MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr. However, a huge number of charity groups say the changes don't go far enough. Since the revisions, groups and charities including Citizens Advice, The Poverty Alliance and The Salvation Army have co-signed a letter saying they want the bill withdrawn. There has not, the groups say, been enough consultation. That was echoed by Luke Young, head of policy at Citizens Advice who asked MPs to vote against the bill. "The UK government's own impact assessment says the cuts will plunge 150,000 people into poverty by the end of this Parliament. Even this is an underestimate of the potential impact. If this Bill is passed, then by 2030 it will have cut PIP for more than 400,000 disabled people and Universal Credit for more than 700,000 people who are disabled or have a long-term health condition. Article continues below "We know Wales will be disproportionately affected, with communities such as Blaenau Gwent, Caerphilly and Neath Port Talbot being hardest hit. It will push more people toward already stretched public services and into to food banks, as they find even less support available under a new three tier system."
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
M&S still working to put cyber attack ‘behind us'
Marks & Spencer suffered a "damaging" cyber attack in April, which forced the suspension of its online operations and resulted in the theft of personal customer data. The breach, attributed to "human error," is expected to cost the high street giant approximately £300 million. CEO Stuart Machin anticipates that M&S's online operations will be fully restored within the next four weeks, with the majority of the attack's impact resolved by August. While online sales for certain fashion and home ranges have partially resumed, services like click and collect and next-day delivery are still being reinstated. Chairman Archie Norman stated that executive pay deals, including CEO Machin's recent 39 per cent increase to £7.1 million, could be impacted by any financial performance drop caused by the cyber attack.
