Government developing 'cooperative stack' to integrate all rural schemes through PACS: Cooperation Secretary
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The government is developing a comprehensive ' cooperative stack ' by integrating various schemes through Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACS) to create a unified system for dispensing benefits in rural areas, a top cooperation ministry official said on Tuesday.This cooperative stack initiative aims to transform the rural institutional landscape by leveraging PACS as the primary vehicle for delivering government benefits, marking a significant shift from the current fragmented approach, where different schemes operate through separate channels."The ecosystem (of PACS) has been changed. (We have) reinvented the system...It was necessary to remove opacity and lack of transparency in PACS. We worked on that," Cooperation Secretary Ashish Bhutani said, highlighting the government's efforts to bring transparency to village-level credit cooperatives.Bhutani, while addressing a workshop on emerging technologies in PACS, also said the digitisation of PACS through online systems has already begun transforming operations, with many societies now operating through digital platforms to enhance efficiency and accountability.There are now about 1.08 lakh PACS having 13 crore members across the country. Of which, around 63,000 PACS are in the advanced stage of computerisation, he said.The cooperative credit societies are the oldest institutions that were set up in the 1900s. In the course of time, Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) and Regional Cooperative Banks (RCBs) were computerised, but not the PACS.Without transparency and technology adoption, the regulator Reserve Bank was not allowing them to undertake more activities. After the cooperation ministry was formed on July 6, 2021, the focus was on computerising and strengthening the PACS. The government is targeting to computerise 80,000 PACS, he said.With more PACS getting computerised, the government has started a comprehensive initiative to integrate all schemes with PACS, which are institutions backed by legislation, rather than continuing to create multiple separate systems for different rural interventions."PACS are backed by an Act. Why not strengthen the existing PACS than keep on adding a new system every day? There is no point creating silo institutions in individual areas," the official explained, emphasising the need for institutional consolidation within the cooperative stack."The intent now is to migrate to a cooperative stack, similar to agristack initiated by the agriculture ministry," he said, adding that the idea is to create a unified system for dispensing benefits of government schemes in rural areas.While other rural clusters like Self-Help Groups have emerged over time, these operate under circulars and notifications rather than formal legislative backing, making PACS a more robust and legally sound foundation for the comprehensive cooperative stack being developed.The official noted that Self-Help Groups came into existence primarily because PACS were not functioning adequately in certain areas.An inter-ministerial committee of secretaries is actively working on establishing a single centre for dispensing all government scheme benefits in rural areas instead of the current system of multiple institutions handling different programmes.PACS have been identified as uniquely positioned to serve as the backbone of this cooperative stack, given their widespread presence across rural India and their legal backing through cooperative legislation.The official emphasised that technology adoption is crucial for seamlessly linking all schemes through the cooperative stack, with digital integration being the key to successful implementation."The technology is the way forward to link all schemes seamlessly through PACS. It's all the more reason to ensure PACS embrace technologies as soon as possible," Bhutani said.The technology integration within the cooperative stack includes AI-driven solutions such as automated weather advisories that can help farmers make informed decisions about crop management and agricultural practices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
BJP MPs protest parliament panel inviting Prakash Raj, Medha Patkar; meeting cancelled
A parliamentary committee meeting ended abruptly on July 1 as Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MPs protested against the panel's decision to hear activist Medha Patkar and actor-turned-activist Prakash Raj. The Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, headed by Congress MP Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, had called Patkar and Raj to hear her views on the implementation and effectiveness of the land acquisition law enacted by Parliament when the Congress-led UPA government was in power in 2013. Patkar had led protests against raising the height of Sardar Sarovar Dam in Gujarat and is accused by the ruling party of working against the country's development interests in the name of public and environmental causes. Former Union minister and BJP MP Parshottam Rupala was joined by other lawmakers from his party as they walked out of the meeting, with some dubbing Patkar as "anti-national". A BJP MP wondered if leaders from Pakistan could also be called to such a meeting, news agency PTI said, Ulaka, the panel's chairperson, however, defended the decision, saying that it is standard practice for a parliamentary committee to hear civil society members and other stakeholders on various issues. "We wanted to hear their views on the land acquisition law. We wanted an opinion from everyone, but they (BJP) didn't allow it," he told news agency PTI. Out of the 29 members of the committee, 14 members, including the chairman, were present, and a majority of them were from the BJP and its allies. The meeting's agenda was to hear from different stakeholders on the implementation and effectiveness of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, a UPA-era Act. Representatives of the Department of Land Resources (Ministry of Rural Development), the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, non-government organisations (NGOs), experts, and other stakeholders were to speak before the panel. Among those invited before the panel were officials from the Environment and Forest Ministry and activists, including Patkar and Prakash Raj, also an actor who has often criticised the BJP's politics. Former prime minister HD Deve Gowda also attended the meeting, according to PTI. A BJP MP said they were not told about the decision to ask Patkar to share her views with the committee. Generally, sources said, it is the chairman's prerogative to pick names, though members can make suggestions. A BJP member said their primary objection was to calling Patkar, who was the face of the 'Narmada Bachao Andolan' protest against a determined push by the Gujarat government, headed then by Narendra Modi as chief minister, to raise the height of Sardar Sarovar Dam. The state government's views finally prevailed, and Modi, who took over as prime minister in 2014, has often spoken about the efforts to stall the project since its foundation in the 1960s. As the BJP MPs walked out, Ulaka said he decided to end the meeting due to a lack of quorum. "As per rule, a quorum of 10 members is required. When the BJP MPs walked out, there was no quorum, and the meeting ended," he said. BJP MPs objected to Patkar appearing before the panel, and called her 'anti-national,' according to sources quoted by news agency PTI. A miffed MP also wondered if the prime minister of Pakistan could be called for questioning by the panel, the news agency report said. When the meeting started, opposition MPs were of the opinion that Patkar should be heard, to which the BJP MPs did not agree. Asked about the incident, Patkar said she was invited to appear before the panel, and while she and others were waiting, they saw some MPs leave. We wanted to hear their views on the land acquisition law. We wanted an opinion from everyone, but they (BJP) didn't allow it. She added that later, they were informed that the meeting had ended. Patkar said she had also appeared before parliamentary committees earlier. "I have never experienced anything like this before. It is important to talk about the land acquisition law," she said.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Centre allows use of non-transport motorcycles for passenger journeys through aggregators
The Union government on Tuesday (July 1, 2025) for the first time allowed use of non-transport (private) motorcycles for passenger journeys through aggregators, subject to state government approval, providing long-awaited regulatory clarity for India's shared mobility sector. The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways in its 'Motor Vehicles Aggregator Guidelines 2025' said the new guidelines attempt to provide a light-touch regulatory system while attending to issues of safety and security of the user and the welfare of the driver. "The State government may allow aggregation of non-transport motorcycles for journey by passengers as shared mobility through aggregators resulting in reduced traffic congestion and vehicular pollution, along with providing inter alia affordable passenger mobility, hyperlocal delivery, creating livelihood opportunities,' "the guideline said. According to the guideline, the State government may, in exercise of its powers under sub-section (3) of Section 67 of the Act, permit aggregation of non-transport motorcycles for journey by passengers. "The State government may, under sub-section (3) of Section 67 of the Act, impose fees on the aggregator for issuance of authorisations permitting non-transport motorcycles to undertake journeys through such aggregator, on a daily/ weekly/ fortnightly basis, as may be determined by the state government," it added. This move brings relief to bike taxi operators like Rapido and Uber, who have long operated in a legal grey area, especially in states like Karnataka, where a recent ban on bike taxis had led to widespread protests. Major industry players, including Uber and Rapido, have welcomed the move, acknowledging its potential to drive innovation, expand affordable mobility, and create new livelihood opportunities. Uber lauded the guidelines as a "forward-looking step toward fostering innovation and regulatory clarity." "Timely adoption by states will be key to ensuring uniform implementation and building much-needed predictability for all stakeholders. We commend the Ministry for its consultative and balanced approach, and remain committed to working closely with governments at all levels to support effective and inclusive rollout of the framework," an Uber spokesperson said. Rapido specifically welcomed the operationalisation of Clause 23 of the MVAG 2025. This clause permits the aggregation of non-transport motorcycles for passenger journeys, a move Rapido described as a "milestone in India's journey towards a Viksit Bharat". "By recognising non-transport motorcycles as a means of shared mobility, the Government has opened the door to more affordable transportation options for millions, especially in underserved and hyperlocal move will also help address pressing challenges such as traffic congestion and vehicular pollution, while expanding the reach of last-mile connectivity and hyperlocal delivery services," Rapido said in a statement. In 2020, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways issued the "Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020" under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Since 2020, India's shared mobility ecosystem has undergone rapid and significant change. The rise in demand for diverse and flexible mobility solutions including bike-sharing, introduction of electric vehicles (EVs), and auto-rickshaw rides, has widened the consumer base. The Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020 have been revised to keep the regulatory framework up to date with the developments in the motor vehicles aggregator ecosystem. The new guidelines attempt to provide a light-touch regulatory system while attending to issues of safety and security of the user and the welfare of the driver.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Govt slams X in K'taka HC over plea against takedown orders
Bengaluru: The Union government on Tuesday told the Karnataka high court that X, formerly known as Twitter, complies with takedown laws globally but seeks special treatment in India, as it opposed the social media giant's petition against the Centre's Sahyog portal. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, told a bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna that X must join the Sahyog platform and comply with all takedown notices (Shutterstock) Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, told a bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna that X must join the Sahyog platform and comply with all takedown notices issued by designated authorities. 'In every other country, they follow the law. Only in India they expect these luxuries,' Mehta argued. X has challenged the Union government's direction asking it to join Sahyog, contending that the portal opens the door for 'indiscriminate censorship.' Senior advocate KG Raghavan, appearing for the social media company, cited a recent case where the Indian Railways asked X to remove a viral video of a woman driving on railway tracks in Telangana. The video had gone viral after the police revealed that the woman was attempting suicide. Questioning how such content was unlawful, Raghavan claimed that under Sahyog portal, 'every Tom, Dick, and Harry' could issue takedown notices. Mehta, however, objected to Raghavan's choice of words and said the officers sending such notices were the competent authority and the Union government will not tolerate anyone calling them names. Justice Nagaprasanna asked the senior counsel to exercise restraint, saying these were officers of the 'government of India' and had 'statutory powers.' The Centre also reiterated that X has no legal right to challenge takedown orders. The government had previously told the court in an affidavit that social media intermediaries did not have the locus to fight for their users in court. It had also cautioned that if X resisted, it might lose safe harbour. Section 79 of the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000, provides a safe harbour provision for intermediaries, such as X, shielding them from liability for third-party or user content they host or transmit, provided they comply with takedown requests within 36 hours of receiving official notice. X has argued that this provision has been misused to create a parallel blocking mechanism that violates the Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India, which provides for orders for content removal only under a defined process established under the IT Act. The high court posted the matter on July 8 for further hearing.
