Derby: £35m flood defence package confirmed for city
Property flood resilience schemes across Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Nottinghamshire, will also receive £2.5m, the Environment Agency said.The £35m funding focuses on the opposite side of the river from the side which formed phase one of the flood defence scheme.This included work in front of the council offices and the city's crown court. Phase two will involve the demolition of the riverside office blocks in Stuart Street to create a new green area, designed for flood water to go around Exeter Bridge and help lower river levels through the city by making space for water.
Council documents describe Derby as having a long history of flooding with records dating back to 1750.Flood records from 1931, 1932 and 1965 show extensive flooding of varying extents to Darley Abbey Mills and the centre of Derby. The existing flood defences were constructed following the 1965 flood and run along the left bank of the River Derwent throughout Derby. In the flood event in 2000, the existing defences were close to overtopping.The river burst its banks in 2023 and caused widespread flooding along the eastern bank of the Derwent following Storm Babet.
Peatfield said: "It's absolutely brilliant news for Derby we've been waiting a long time to move onto phase two [of the project]. "It finally gives us the green light to not only protect the city from the dangers of flooding but to use this opportunity to regenerate that part of the city as well. "The plans have been there for a long time - we've known what we've needed to do but these things are all about funding. "Flooding used to be a one-in-100 event and now it's happening every couple of years - this is the reality of climate change and we've got to be resilient and ready to tackle it."Environment Agency chair Alan Lovell added: "With this new funding, we will work closely with the government to deliver the vital projects that are needed across the country, ensuring our investment goes to those communities who need it the most."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Advertising slump rocks STV as 'deteriorating' economic conditions push back TV projects
STV Group has downgraded its sales and profit outlook as 'deteriorating' economic conditions squeeze ad revenues and push back several TV projects. Shares in the Scottish media firm plunged by about a quarter yesterday following the update. The firm said it was expecting full-year revenue and adjusted operating profit to be 'materially below' a consensus of analysts. Nevertheless, it highlighted strong progress within its scripted labels with current projects including for Netflix, Apple, Sky and the BBC. Rufus Radcliffe, STV's chief executive, said production had finished on 'key titles with international appeal, including high-end drama Amadeus for Sky and a third series of Blue Lights for BBC One'.
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The heirs missing out on £1.6BILLION in unclaimed estates after Government wills list is taken down
Around £1.6billion of estates is going unclaimed after the Government pulled a website listing individuals who did not make a will, experts have said. The 'bona vacantia' list - Latin for 'ownerless goods' - was used by people to check if distant relatives had unclaimed property and other assets for which there was no immediately apparent heir. However, a BBC investigation revealed that it was being used by criminal gangs to commit fraud by posing as the sole heir to unclaimed fortunes - depriving living relatives of their rightful inheritance. It published the results in a podcast called The Grave Robbers - and a day after the series was released, the Treasury yanked the list from public view. It is unclear when it will be published again. UK law firm Weightmans suggested the net worth of Britain's unclaimed estates was around £1.6billion, based on the approximately 6,000 outstanding fortunes that were unclaimed at the time, and a then-average property price of £281,000. The public nature of the list kick-started a small industry of 'heir-hunting' - legitimate research of the list to marry up estates with their rightful heirs, who they will contact to alert them to the find and offer to administer the will in exchange for a fee. It sparked the BBC TV series 'Heir Hunters', which was presented by Nadia Sawalha, Lisa Faulkner and Michael Buerk, which followed the work of the firms as they tried to trace relatives who did not know they were in line for a windfall. But it also made them a lucrative target for organised crime gangs who were able to falsify wills, forging the signatures of the dead in order to steal their fortunes. There are concerns that the withdrawal of the list will mean families lose out on fortunes that they never knew they were entitled to - even as the Government says the withdrawal was necessary to safeguard the unclaimed fortunes detailed. Hector Birchwood, of Welsh heir-hunting firm Celtic Research, told the Telegraph: 'It's a knee-jerk reaction that doesn't actually address the problem - it only makes it worse.' The scam saw gangsters use the list to look up estates vulnerable to a hostile takeover. They would then apply for a 'grant of probate' - the legal right to administer a will - online. Critics say the system is too open to exploitation. The BBC probe found that a Hungarian gang was exploiting loopholes in the system to claim forgotten estates - and creating civil nightmares for family members who are alerted to the fraud. Families would only become aware of distant relatives' estates after being alerted by heir-hunters - and then would find that a person they had never heard of had staked a claim to an often large fortune. Among them was Christine Harverson, whose nieces Lisa and Nicole were alerted to their aunt's neer-£1m fortune by a heir-hunting service - only to find a Hungarian man called Tamas Szvercsok had claimed it, saying he was her 'dear friend'. But the sisters, and Ms Harverson's friends, were suspicious as the late woman had never mentioned a Hungarian friend. Other details didn't match up - including an address that didn't exist until 2021, when the will was dated 2016. A MailOnline investigation then found that the west London home of former Liberal Democrat councillor had passed into the possession of a Romanian man, Aurel Mezei, who posed online with large knives. Eileen Holland's home was later raided by police who found it had been turned into a cannabis farm. The will bore signatures of witnesses who did not know of either Mezei or Holland. Mezei then sold the house for £375,000. Jeff Barnes, 64, is one of her few surviving relatives: she was his great-aunt. 'I think this needs investigating a lot further,' he told MailOnline. 'It seems obvious to me that this is a scam, and that this so-called businessman got the house illegally. 'It's disgusting that he's been able to get away with it. He's wormed his way in, and I worry that slippery characters like this - who may or may not even still be in the country - often succeed in evading detection.' However, those who have found lost relations thanks to the bona vacantia list say it needs to be returned to service as soon as possible to help others like them. Jason Cao, whose sister Huong Lan Cao died a recluse, told the Telegraph that he would never have known she had passed away were it not for heir-hunters like Hector Birchwood. 'To be able to tell my mum - so she could have closure - that's information I would have paid for. If it hadn't been for Hector, my mum would still be asking, 'Where's your sister?' And I wouldn't have an answer.' The Government says that while it appreciates the issues caused by the withdrawal of the list, the fraud investigation needed to be allowed to proceed unobstructed. In some cases, the BBC found, fraudsters were using wills to stake their claims on properties that the deceased person did not even own - with the Probate Service failing to check that the will was correct. It is thought they do this to try to stake a claim for other buildings when their actual owners also pass away. Sir Bob Neill, former chair of the House of Commons Justice Select Committee, believes the push to digitise Probate Service applications - moving away from regional offices - has driven a rise in fraudulent claims. The current system was rolled out in 2017 - overwriting the old system, which required applicants to visit their local probate office in order to swear an oath that they had a legitimate claim to the estate. 'When you had regional offices you had human awareness, contact and scrutiny that was better suited to pick up cases where things have gone wrong,' he said. 'A purely sort of automated system isn't really good at doing that.' Estates that are unclaimed for 30 years become the property of the Crown. The Crown Estate made £67million from unclaimed estates in 2024/25, down from £77million the year before. A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: 'We recognise the difficulties the website's removal causes for those affected but this is an important measure while a fraud investigation is underway. 'Probate fraud is incredibly serious, and it is vital that we work with the relevant agencies to support ongoing investigations into alleged fraudulent activity to ensure criminals feel the full force of the law.' The Government Legal Department told MailOnline today that it could not provide an estimate as to when the list may go live again.
Spectator
10 hours ago
- Spectator
What Trump gets right about Britain's windfarms
Donald Trump is often treated in Britain as a know-nothing who speaks off the top of his head on subjects he does not understand. No one is keener to try to make this point than the BBC. Yet not for the first time, it turns out that he is bit more on the ball than some of his critics. After his game of golf at his Turnberry course in Ayrshire, western Scotland on Sunday, the president retorted: 'It's probably the best course in the world. And I look over the horizon and I see nine windmills at the end of the 18th. I said: 'Isn't that a shame?''. It was enough to provoke the BBC into providing what it saw as an explainer. Scottish environmental correspondent Kevin Keane was especially excited by Trump's comment suggesting that Britain 'get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil'. Protesting, somewhat pedantically, that there are no 'windmills' in the sea off Britain, just wind turbines which generate electricity rather than mill corn, Keane went on to assert that it isn't possible to 'bring back the oil' because North Sea oil in running out and will decline even were it not for the UK government's refusal to issue licenses for oil and gas extraction there. There are, in fact, several oil and gas companies which are very keen to invest in new exploration – but the government has made their lives near impossible. Not only has the search for new oil and gas fields there been effectively banned, but companies exploiting established fields are subject to a 'windfall' tax which increases the effective levies on their operations to nearly 80 per cent. The extra tax was introduced by the previous government in 2022 when there really were windfalls being made owing to high global prices following the end of the Covid pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Yet the tax has lived on in spite of prices falling back a long way. The BBC also ignores the potential for shale gas in Britain – a putative industry which has since been banned by the present and the previous governments. Various estimates have put the amount of shale gas available beneath Britain to be equivalent to between 10 and 50 years' current usage. That certainly could be a growing industry – if only it were allowed. Britain's energy sector, asserts the BBC, 'needs wind…to replace the jobs which are already being lost in oil and gas'. That overlooks two problems with the UK's wind industry. Firstly, it has been pretty feeble at creating jobs. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) the UK has 0.3 per cent of global jobs in renewable energy – yet it has one per cent of the Earth's population and has set itself tougher 'net zero' targets than all but a handful of other countries. Why hasn't it landed more jobs? One important factor is that Britain has the highest industrial energy prices in the world – thanks in large part to net zero targets, carbon levies and so on. It is just so much cheaper to produce wind turbines – and other manufactured goods – in China, where 60 percent of electricity generation still comes from cheap coal. Secondly, Britain does not have the grid infrastructure to support the large number of turbines which have been built in and around Scotland in recent years. On windy days, turbines there often have to be switched off because the transmission wires cannot cope. When this happens, owners of wind farms receive generous compensation in the form of what are known as 'constraint payments' – which cost energy consumers £1.5 billion last year. The wind farms which Trump feels are spoiling the view from his Scottish golf courses are not just unsightly – they are costing UK consumers a fortune and struggling to keep the lights on.
