Christchurch Mayor backs proposal for government-capped rates rises
Photo:
RNZ / Nate McKinnon
Christchurch Mayor Phil Mauger is backing calls for the
government to cap rates rises
.
Cabinet will consider options to control rate rises, including capping, later this year.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis has complained of councils' wasteful spending, comparing local politicians to kids in a candy store.
"Councils don't always do a great job of spending your money like you would spend it. There are wasteful projects - there is evidence of that," Willis told
Morning Report
on Monday.
"We want councils focusing on the things people expect them to do, which is the rubbish, the roads, the pipes, the basics - and not all the fanciful projects."
Mauger told RNZ he could not agree more.
"Everyone campaigns 'ohh, we gotta stick to basics', right? And then the first thing some of us do is go away and not stick to basics," he said.
"We need to be stronger around the council table to say what's basics. Now ... someone's basic might be someone else's must have ... but it's good to have rates caps. I feel it's good. I really do."
Earlier this year, the Taxpayers' Union launched a campaign calling for rates to be capped at inflation levels.
Mauger imagined a cap closer to 5 percent and said his council was "very close to what I'd call the rates cap".
He conceded it would not be possible to cap rates at inflation.
"If it's low as that we would struggle with that," Mauger said.
"I think to get down to 2 percent, if the government put a rates cap at 2 percent on it, I think there's a lot of problems."
Christchurch City Council had approved average rates increases of 6.4 percent, 9.9 percent and 6.6 percent this term, as a result average rates bills had climbed almost 25 percent in the city this triennium, while inflation had only risen about 8 percent during that time.
Willis told
Morning Report
she expected push back from councils "because when you take candy away from kids in a candy store, they don't really like it. But at the same time, we are on the side of ratepayers".
Asked if he was acting like a kid in a candy store, Mauger told RNZ: "No - when it's my own money, it is. But when you're spending other people's money, [rates caps] are good".
"If we had money running out of our ears, you'd spend it on other stuff. We haven't got that at the moment," he said.
He agreed with Willis that councils had engaged in wasteful spending, and when asked for an example he pointed to cycleway spending.
"We've wasted money on how we have designed and built cycleways. Now I'm not against cycleways but we can build them one hell of a lot cheaper - a lot, lot cheaper," Mauger said.
The council had budgeted $210.4 million for new cycleways, improvements, and cycleway and footpath renewals over the next decade in its long-term plan.
However, that only accounted for 3.2 percent of its budgeted $6.5 billion in capital spending.
With major projects, such as Christchurch's new stadium and new sports complex, almost complete, rates pressure would ease in the future. But Mauger said the council still needed to find other ways to cut its cloth.
"What we've got to look at is our levels of service now," he said.
"Everyone expects when they walk out the door, they expect the footpath to be half-good, they expect the gutter to be falling the right way, they expect the water to be not leaking out of the ground, the grass mowed and rubbish picked up - that's what they expect.
"If we backed off and didn't mow the grass as often or didn't pick up the rubbish as often, that's how we could save some money. I can't say that's how you would, but that's how we can do it quicker and easier."
Rates caps had been
panned by Labour leader Chris Hipkins
- who said it would make the problem worse not better - and Local Government New Zealand president and Selwyn District mayor Sam Broughton - who said capping rates could be "disastrous for communities".
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
44 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Another OCR cut justified as households, businesses struggle
Photo: RNZ The Reserve Bank is expected to put a pause on its series of cuts to the Official Cash Rate today. The OCR's been progressively reduced for almost a year from 5.5 percent to the 3.25 percent it's sitting on now. However, economists and financial markets are banking on it staying where it is when the decision is announced on Wednesday. Jarrod Kerr Photo: Supplied / Gino Demeer Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr said it appeared the Reserve Bank wanted "to slow down and have a look around" so he believed there would be a pause on Wednesday and then another cut in August. "They've delivered quite a few rate cuts already and they want to see that feeding into the economy and how that's influencing households' spending behaviour and businesses and they want to see what's happening with inflation." There had been a spike in inflation recently, particularly with regard to food prices, Kerr said. He believed an OCR cut would be justified this week because both households and businesses were struggling. Households needed more help with the cost of living crisis while businesses were also finding it tough, with a sharp rise in receiverships and liquidations recently. "It's still very tough out there. We're still crawling out of the bad recession that we had last year so I think the economy needs a bit more support. "We need to be running, not crawling out of this recession." There was a weakening in the labour market at present and this would have an impact on lowering inflation, Kerr said. Rents have been softening and were now increasing at a rate of around 2.5 percent rather than the 4.4 percent increases during a time of high migration in 2023. However, this was being offset by increases in other areas such as food prices and insurance premiums. For those refixing their mortgages in the next few months, Kerr advised that interest rates would go a little lower "but not a lot". He also advised people to split up their home loan so it wasn't all on one rate. chief executive Sarah Wood said homeowners would like to see another drop in the OCR so they could pay lower interest on their mortgages. She said a large number of homes were for sale, for instance, in April 36,000 properties were on the market. The number has since fallen to 32,000. "Interest rates will obviously have an effect on that." When the OCR came down, it helped encourage buyers into the market, including investors and first home buyers. While properties were selling at present, the market was not at the kind of peak it was in during the pandemic, Wood said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Taxpayers' Union Applauds Christchurch Mayor Backing Rates Cap
TUESDAY 8 JULY 2025 The Taxpayers' Union is welcoming Christchurch Mayor Phil Mauger's support for the campaign to cap annual council rates increases, and labelling him a 'ratepayer hero'. Taxpayers' Union, Investigation Coordinator, Rhys Hurley, said: 'Councils have been using ratepayers as a bottomless ATM. It's refreshing to see a mayor finally admit that the current model is broken and something needs to change.' 'Christchurch's rates have gone up nearly 25% over the past three years far outpacing inflation. Ratepayers aren't getting 25% more value. They're getting bloated budgets, pet projects, and everything else no one asked for.' "Mayor Mauger's suggestion of a 5% rates cap is a welcome step, but anything above inflation is still a pay cut for ratepayers." 'Councils won't make tough choices until they're made to. Rate Caps Now does exactly that.' "But at a time when LGNZ is planning a sneaky campaign to use ratepayer money to lobby against and undermine Simon Watts' proposal to cap rates, it's refreshing to see that the local government sector still has true leaders who stand on the side of fiscal prudence and affordable rates. A ratepayer hero in the Garden City."
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Anti-red tape bill a health risk, doctors say
Bill architect David Seymour insists it is about ensuring rules are actually justified and calls critics are "woefully misinformed". Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour insists his bill - the party's fourth attempt to get similar legislation passed - is about ensuring rules are actually justified and calls critics are "woefully misinformed". Hokianga farmer Tokowhati Piripi finally had his long-awaited heart surgery two weeks ago at Auckland City Hospital. He actually needed a second operation within 24 hours after a sudden life-threatening bleed, but is now recovering well. Teina Piripi, who once feared her husband would die on the waiting list, said the care he had received had been "incredible" - but the outcome for the vast majority of Māori was not so good. "There is no way of explaining why Māori receiving cardiac care survive 50 percent less than non Māori." Teina Piripi - who works as a Kaiāwhina (Māori health support worker) in Northland - said the problem with the Regulatory Standards Bill was that it claimed everyone was "equal under the law", but that was not supported by the facts. "All those laws were used to dispossess us and disenfranchise us from our land, from our ways of life, from our language. "They know this. So it is not equitable, and we don't receive equal care for our health and well-being, otherwise we wouldn't die seven years earlier than everyone else." The 2023 coalition agreement between ACT, National and New Zealand First included a pledge to pass a Regulatory Standards Act "as soon as practical" - but when passed, the bill will not be binding. It lays out a set of principles which law-makers, ministries and agencies must consider when looking at changes to regulation: people's freedom of choice and private property rights should not be unduly affected and there should be fair compensation. The Association of Salaried Medical Specialists - which represents the 6500 senior doctors and dentists working in public hospitals - was one of scores of health organisations, which made submissions against the bill. Senior policy and research advisor Virginia Mills said the RSB was about upholding individual rights - but that would not lead to equitable outcomes, especially in health and particularly for Māori. "It includes this formal principle that 'everyone is equal under the law', which on the surface sounds okay, but is actually quite a loaded principle because when it comes to health. "People have got different needs and require different treatments, and we know that treating everyone the same won't lead to the same outcomes." The RSB also saw regulation as "a negative hindrance" - red tape that needed cutting, she said. "But if you were to deregulate the health workforce for example, that could mean lowering the standard of education or experience or skills to do the job, which could lead directly to patient harm." Seymour - who is also associate health minister - said the RSB's aim was not deregulation. "These comments are woefully misinformed. "The bill does not have an emphasis on deregulation, so that is a false assumption from the get go. "The bill does have an emphasis on transparency and justification when rules are made." The proposed new law would have a Regulatory Standards Board to consider how legislation measures up to its principles, with members appointed by the Minister for Regulation - currently Seymour. Psychiatrist Giles Newton-Howes said he and his colleagues had major concerns about what such transparency meant for health services. "Who makes the decisions about what regulations are appropriate or not and how that is measured? "And if that is done in economic terms, we're fundamentally missing the point. "You're trying to monetise health, and you can't do that." In its submission on the RSB, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists said it was dangerous to allow two people (the Regulatory Standards Minister and the Attorney-General) to decide whether wider consultation was needed. "Without legislative expectation to consult with those who hold the most experience in particular spaces, such as psychiatry, we expose ourselves to the mercy of ministerial appointments and ideological frameworks that may not reflect evidence based best practice in health." The submission also noted a "one size fits all model" did not work in complex spaces, such as health and addiction, especially for those who were "persistently harmed by unconscious bias, systemic racism, and social drivers of intergenerational trauma". Newton-Howes said if New Zealanders were truly "equal under the law" in terms of health outcomes, some groups should be receiving more resources than they were. "You can pretty much name any objective you like and we're not [equal under the law], because we're under-serving people in poverty, people in rural areas, Māori and Pacific people, and particularly for mental health." Nurses Organisation chief executive Paul Goulter feared the bill would open the door to further privatisation of healthcare because it favoured business interests. "You get a tension between that collective right to a quality public health system and the private property owning rights. "And this bill takes you into the private property owning rights having dominance over the collective right to a quality public health system." Public health and legal experts have also warned of a potential "chilling effect" on public health measures . They point out that under the bill's "takings or impairment principle", it would allow commercial interests (such as the tobacco and alcohol industries or big polluters), to seek compensation from taxpayers if future legislation caused them to lose money. Seymour has denied the legislation could be weaponised by business interests. "The bill does not anywhere mention, preserving the right to make a profit, so such an objection could never be raised. I would be very happy to sit down with these people and address their concerns, because it appears to me that they have not properly understood the bill before criticising it." The RSB made it clear it created no new legal rights or obligations enforceable through the courts. Furthermore, there was provision under the bill to "constrain" someone's liberties in order to secure the same liberty for others, Seymour said. "That is how you would justify a restriction on polluting the air or water that other people breathe or swim, for example. "If people feel their proposals will not withstand scrutiny, the answer is not to oppose scrutiny but come up with better proposals." However, leading medical oncologist Associate Professor George Laking, Māori Clinical Director at Auckland University's Centre for Cancer Research, remained sceptical. "If you look at the history of environmental catastrophes around the world, they're all carried by people who don't have power to affect the political process, and those are the ones who end up with trash and pollution and the knock on health effects of that. "So sure, there may be provision to deal with pollution under the RSB, but it's much more likely to be dealt with if it irritates someone who's wealthy." There was a risk the "broad brush" legislation with its narrow focus on economic measures could be used - for instance - to change Pharmac's current remit of focusing on patient outcomes, he said. "Of course efficiency is important but what I object to is this elevation of efficiency as the 'be all and end all'. It's not as simple as that." He was disturbed by Seymour's tongue-in-cheek remarks following a speech to the Adam Smith Institute in London last month, in which he credited smokers with saving governmental balance sheets by paying lots of excise tax and not claiming a pension. "This Minister's clearly not interested in health outcomes if he's going to jokingly refer to people who smoke as so-called 'fiscal heroes'. He's much more interested in fiscal outcomes than health outcomes." Parliament's Finance and Expenditure Select Committee is meeting all this week to hear submissions and is due to report back in November. Meanwhile, Teina Piripi was looking forward to taking her husband home to Northland ahead of the birth of their new mokopuna next month. Several times a day, while visiting him at Auckland City Hospital, she has walked past a plaque commemorating the fact the land for it was donated by Ngāti Whātua chief Āpihai Te Kawau in 1847. "Most of our hospitals in this country are built on Māori land - and why? "It's because Māori care about people. It's innate to our understanding. "This bill denies history and the present and the breaches and inequities that come from denying that racism exists." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
