OCT Bests Angiography Guidance for Improving PCI Outcomes
Gregg Stone, MD
'We found that in those calcified lesions there was a marked benefit of optical coherence tomography [OCT] guidance compared with angiography guidance in improving long-term outcomes, specifically in reducing the 2-year rate of target vessel failure and serious adverse cardiovascular events, as well as stent thrombosis,' study leader Gregg Stone, MD, director of academic affairs for Mount Sinai Heart Health System in New York City, told Medscape Medical News.
Results of the analysis were published in the European Heart Journal .
Substudy Results
The study included 2114 patients from the ILUMIEN IV clinical trial, which compared OCT- and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The participants in the substudy had a single treated calcified lesion in a major epicardial vessel. On angiographic guidance, 1082 patients (51.2%) had a moderately or severely calcified lesion and 1032 (48.8%) had no or mild calcification.
Using angiographic guidance alone, the rate of target vessel failure at 2 years in the moderately or severely calcified lesions was 93% greater than that in the lesions with no or mild calcification (9.7% vs 5.2%).
However, with OCT guidance, the 2-year rates of failure were similar in both groups, 6.8% in the moderately and severely calcified lesions and 7.7% in the no or mildly calcified lesions.
With OCT guidance, the 2-year failure rates were 38% lower compared with angiography guidance in the patients with moderately and severely calcified lesions: 6.8% vs 9.7%. The differences in the patients with no or mild calcification were not statistically significant, the substudy found: 7.7% with OCT guidance and 5.2% with angiographic guidance ( P = .01).
The three major predictors of vessel failure after PCI, Stone said, are minimal stent area and a major dissection or untreated disease at the edge of the stent. 'The real advantage of optical coherence tomography is that it provides a much more accurate picture than angiography in determining the minimal stent area or in detecting edge-related dissections or significant untreated disease,' he said.
The 2024 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend intravascular imaging as a Class IA indication for anatomically complex lesions, Stone noted; but those guidelines do not specifically call out calcified lesions. 'That's the major gap this study fills,' he said.
The American College of Cardiology, in conjunction with the American Heart Association and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, this year issued a Class 1A recommendation for intracoronary imaging, including OCT, during stenting of the left main artery or for other complex lesions.
'Directly Relatable to the Clinic'
While OCT operators need a high level of skill to perform the imaging and interpret the results, the substudy findings are 'quite generalizable to all settings,' Stone said.
'These findings are directly translatable to the clinic, but there's always more fine tuning that can be performed,' he added. That refining would include clarification of the characteristics of calcified plaque on OCT that are at highest risk for target vessel failure, and possibly the need for an advanced strategy of lesion preparation, using either lithotripsy, atherectomy or cutting or scoring balloons, he said.
Several calcium scoring classifications for OCT have been proposed, but none has been clinically validated. 'That would be a rich area for future research,' Stone said.
Clinical Context
Yader Sandoval, MD
The new data underscore the value of intravascular imaging, and add to the data supporting OCT specifically, for characterizing plaque in percutaneous coronary intervention, Yader Sandoval, MD, an interventional cardiologist at the Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital and cochair for the Center for Coronary Artery Disease at the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, told Medscape Medical News .
'This analysis of ILUMIEN IV complements and further adds that this is the right direction that intravascular imaging not only provides superior technical results but it improves outcomes for these patients,' Sandoval said.
The substudy clears up a finding from the original ILUMIEN IV study that, while OCT guidance resulted in a larger minimal stent area than angiography guidance, it did not necessarily reduce target vessel failure at 2 years.
A strength of the ILUMIEN IV trial was the 'meticulous core laboratory data analysis' used, along with its global scope, he said.
The substudy, also reported using OCT guidance, took about 16 minutes longer per procedure than angiography (67.7 minutes vs 51.5 minutes) and required longer fluoroscopy duration and greater total radiation dose, Sandoval said, which could raise questions about the practicality of OCT for this indication.
'The main message is, you are better characterizing calcium and therefore better preparing the lesion and providing a better technical result, better area, and better results for the patient,' he said. 'That comes with the investment that the procedure is little more complex, and you have to do a better job of preparing the lesion. And to me these data elegantly show that.'
Abbott Vascular provided funding for this study. Stone reported receiving speaking fees from Abbott. Sandoval reported serving as a consultant, advisory board member, and a speaker for Abbott.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's signing of 'One Big Beautiful Bill' includes $85 million to move space shuttle Discovery from Smithsonian to Texas
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. On July 4, 2006, NASA's space shuttle Discovery launched on a "return to flight" mission that paved the way for it and its sister ships to fly for another five years. Now, a sprawling budget enacted on Independence Day will seemingly lead to Discovery lifting off again — though this time not into space, but rather from its place in the national collection. President Donald Trump signed into law the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill" today (July 4), a day after the legislation was narrowly passed out of Congress with only Republican support. Deep within the 900-page bill is a provision added by Texas' senators to transfer a "space vehicle" to a NASA center "involved in the administration of the Commercial Crew Program" and "placed on public exhibition at an entity within the Metropolitan Statistical Area where such center is located." The vague language, written in such a way to skirt Senate restrictions on reconciliation bills, was aimed at achieving the "Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act" introduced by Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn in April. "It's long overdue for Space City to receive the recognition it deserves by bringing the space shuttle Discovery home," said Cornyn in a statement released after the Senate passed its version of the bill in a vote of 50 to 50, with Vice President J.D. Vance breaking the tie. "Houston has long stood at the heart of America's human spaceflight program, and this legislation rightly honors that legacy," said Cruz, who chairs the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation. "It ensures that any future transfer of a flown, crewed space vehicle will prioritize locations that have played a direct and vital role in our nation's manned space program, making Houston, Texas, a leading candidate." "Bringing such a historic space vehicle to the region would underscore the city's indispensable contributions to our space missions, highlight the strength of America's commercial space partnerships, and inspire future generations of engineers, scientists, and pioneers who will carry our legacy of American leadership in space," he said. The bill allocates $85 million to move Discovery from the its display home of the past 13 years, the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum's Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Chantilly, Virginia, to Space Center Houston, the official visitor center for NASA's Johnson Space Center in Texas. "No less than $5 million" is earmarked for the transportation of the winged orbiter, with the remainder going towards the "construction of a facility to house the space vehicle." Per the bill, the move of space shuttle Discovery must be completed by Jan. 4, 2027. It does not stipulate how the orbiter should be moved. It is not clear if the $85 million will be enough to cover the transfer and display, given that the first time the retired shuttles were brought to their museum homes in 2012, the cost for just the preparation and delivery of each vehicle was $28.8 million, which did not include ground transportation to the museum. Discovery is the United States' most flown spacecraft in history, with 39 missions between 1984 and 2011. In the process of retiring the shuttle fleet, Discovery was identified by NASA as the "vehicle of record," such that it was kept more intact than Atlantis or Endeavour for the purpose of serving as engineering example at the Smithsonian. Related Stories: — Texas senators: Move space shuttle Discovery from Smithsonian to Houston — NASA's space shuttle: The first reusable spacecraft — Discovery: NASA's busiest shuttle Space Center Houston has not released any details as of yet about how or where it will display Discovery, other than to say it fits into its strategic plans moving forward. The center already exhibits a mock, walkthrough space shuttle, "Independence," mounted atop NASA''s original modified Boeing 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, "NASA 905." A 2011 investigation by the NASA Office of the Inspector General found "no evidence that the White House, politics or any other outside force improperly influenced the selection decision" of where the space shuttles were originally awarded by the space agency. It is unclear if there are any further actions the Smithsonian or other entities could take to halt Discovery's transfer.
Vogue
21 minutes ago
- Vogue
Easy Ways To Regulate Your Cortisol Levels in the Morning and Have a Stress-Free Day
Good morning! As you probably already know, cortisol is the big hype of 2025. High cortisol levels! Cortisol deficiency! Foods and supplements and practices for balancing that cortisol! We've gotten just as obsessed with lowering the levels of this steroid hormone as we are about keeping our collagen levels high. And that's life: Certain trends and topics of conversation are cyclical, and right now, what we're interested in—given our stressful lifestyles—is lowering cortisol levels. Especially when you live in a big city, leave home in a hurry, and get into a crowded subway car: Frankly, it's hard not to arrive at work stressed, exhausted, and with levels of this tricky hormone skyrocketing. But cortisol is necessary to be able to function and move through the world. As psychologist Brenda de la Peña tells Vogue: 'Every morning when we wake up, our body generates a natural cortisol spike that helps us to get up and running. The challenge here is to keep it stable and sufficient for the whole day, preventing it from spiking more than necessary or staying elevated all the time.' So: The goal is to keep cortisol stable and regular, but without beating ourselves up about being emotionally stressed. What it is about, says de la Peña, 'is to raise awareness about the tendency to activate the automatic pilot, [which we do to] save cognitive resources. We live our day to day lives in a fairly automated way, exhausting ourselves, and reacting to things that happen around us. In reality we can simply choose to let them pass. Our energy is limited, and stress does not exactly play in our favor.' 'We must establish a strategic and firm commitment to the habit of consciously choosing what we decide to spend it on,' she adds. '[We must] foster a state of inner calm that allows us to listen to what we need. We can make the small day-to-day decisions with a firm and calm attitude, instead of an anxious one.' What happens when cortisol is high or unstable? An established and consistent early morning routine is so important for avoiding your cortisol skyrocketing before you even arrive at the office. And if your mornings are chaotic and stressful? You can expect symptoms like constant exhaustion, irritability, pain, muscle tension, digestive problems, or even hair loss as signs of high cortisol levels. These vary from one person to another, but it's what should usually raise the alarm about the need to respond differently to everyday life.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
That distinctive springtime smell: Asparagus pee
Along with many other delights, springtime brings the beginning of the asparagus growing season. Regardless of whether you prefer the green, purple or white variety, asparagus provides a rich source of vitamins and minerals, and its consumption as part of a healthy diet may reduce risk of cancer and cardiovascular-related diseases. Despite the nutritional benefits of asparagus, many are opposed to eating the vegetable due to its pungent aftereffects. As Benjamin Franklin wrote in 1781, 'A few stems of asparagus eaten, shall give our urine a disagreable odour.' This odor has become so well known that post-consumption urine is now often referred to as 'asparagus pee.' Scientists believe the odor in question is due to two chemicals: methanethiol and S-methyl thioester. When enzymes in the human digestive tract break down the asparagusic acid that's naturally present in the vegetable, these volatile compounds are created. When voided from the body, they become foul-smelling gas, wafting up from your asparagus pee. And just because you don't smell it doesn't mean you're not making it. Two studies have shown that people who are unable to smell the odor in their own urine also don't detect it in the urine of known producers. Yes, volunteers sniffed samples of other people's asparagus pee. Though most everyone probably produces the scent to some degree, it seems not everyone's noses pick up on it. In fact, a study my colleagues and I conducted in 2017 found that only 40 percent of those surveyed reported detecting the odor in their urine. A lower proportion of women were able to detect the odor, compared to men, despite women being thought to have a more keen sense of smell. We asked almost 7,000 participants from two large cohort studies to respond to the prompt 'After eating asparagus, you notice a strong characteristic odor in your urine.' By linking the questionnaire data with genetic data, we were able to show that the ability to smell or not to smell depends on a person's genetic makeup. Hundreds of variants in the DNA sequence across multiple genes involved in sense of smell are strongly associated with the ability to detect asparagus metabolites in urine. Asparagus isn't the only food that has genetically linked controversial smell or taste effects. Some people avoid eating cilantro because they claim it has a 'soapy' aftertaste. A study using data from almost 30,000 users of 23andMe found genetic variants in olfactory receptors linked to people's perception of this adverse taste. Maybe you can conduct your own survey at the next family meal that includes a platter of asparagus – or soon after. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Sarah Coseo Markt, Harvard University Read more: Can you pass this smell test? Oral nicotine pouches deliver lower levels of toxic substances than smoking – but that doesn't mean they're safe Don't believe everything you hear about pesticides on fruits and vegetables Sarah Coseo Markt receives funding from the National Institutes of Health.
