Direct Energy Regulated Services Announces Natural Gas Rates for June 2025
CALGARY, Alberta, May 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Direct Energy Regulated Services has announced default natural gas rates for June 2025. These rates will apply to customers who do not currently have a competitive supplier within the ATCO Gas North and South service territories. The method DERS uses to calculate the rates has been verified and approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission.
North Service Territory
The North territory includes customers living in and north of the City of Red Deer.
For customers in the ATCO Gas North service territory, the June regulated natural gas rate is decreasing from the May rate of $2.419 per GJ to $1.775 per GJ.
This rate reflects a market price for June supplies of approximately $1.821 per GJ as reported by the NGX, and incorporates an adjustment of $-0.047 per GJ for May and prior months.
The typical residential gas bill for June based on an average 3 GJ of consumption would be approximately $72 in the North.
South Service Territory
The South territory includes customers living south of the City of Red Deer.
For customers in the ATCO Gas South service territory, the June regulated natural gas rate is decreasing from the May rate of $2.419 per GJ to $1.775 per GJ.
This rate reflects a market price for June supplies of approximately $1.821 per GJ as reported by the NGX, and incorporates an adjustment of $-0.047 per GJ for May and prior months.
The typical residential gas bill for June based on an average 3 GJ of consumption would be approximately $58 in the South.
Typical bill amounts between ATCO North and South regions may differ due to variances in transmission and distribution service provider (TDSP) charges levied by ATCO Gas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Your SIN is a 'master key.' Here's why you must protect it
Dave has learned the hard way that you don't want the wrong person getting a hold of your social insurance number. In 2024, he became a victim of identity fraud. Someone used his SIN to open a bank account and get their hands on some quick cash. And while he didn't lose any of his own money, his credit score tanked for a period. "The most frustrating part was being told, 'Hey, there isn't much we could do about this. Your information is on the dark web. It will be used again.' And months later, it was used again," Dave, of Laval, Que., told Cost of Living. Dave isn't his real name. CBC has agreed to identify him by a pseudonym, as police have told him that further exposing his identity could lead to more challenges. Dave was one of 4.2 million Desjardins customers that had their data leaked in 2019. And they aren't the only victims. Over the past few years, customers with Sobeys, Ticketmaster, London Drugs, Nova Scotia Power and the Canada Revenue Agency, to name a few, have had their data breached. And since more businesses and organizations have started asking for social insurance numbers, experts are cautioning people to be very selective about who they share their SIN with. "It's the most sensitive, secret and unique identifier. Essentially, it's the master key to our identity in Canada," said Claudiu Popa, co-founder of KnowledgeFlow Cybersafety Foundation, which advocates for online safety for Canadians. SINs The social insurance number was created with the launch of the Canadian Pension Plan in the 1960s and used to track who was eligible, as well as for various employment insurance programs. According to Popa, there aren't many places that actually need to know it. A new employer needs your SIN, as does your bank and some government agencies, like the CRA. But more organizations are asking for people's SINs. Popa says that includes gyms, landlords, insurance companies and schools. He says none of these places need your SIN, but that doesn't stop them from asking. That's because it's an easy way to check someone's credit with a unique number. But some companies are also using it as an identifier for customers. "It has just become a lazy way of uniquely identifying people, and unfortunately it places people at the risk of privacy breaches," said Popa. So what do you do if someone asks for your SIN? Just say no. But as the cliché goes, that's easier written into a CBC article than done in real life. Just ask Greg Pace. When Pace made a major career change from an RCMP officer to a farmer, he figured it was a good idea to take some classes to gain more knowledge about the new field. But midway through the government-sponsored classes, someone from the program pulled him aside and informed him he hadn't put his SIN in his paperwork. "I felt there was a lot of social pressure to comply. And yet I knew it wasn't the right ask — that they were, I felt, overstepping," said Pace. Pace, whose background as an RCMP officer taught him to be wary of sharing personal information, asked why, but wasn't given a reason. So he refused, and when it became obvious he was no longer welcome, he left the course. Compromised What makes the social insurance number so valuable to fraudsters, compared to a credit card number or bank password? Popa says it's because, unlike other pieces of information, it isn't easy to change. Dave knows that all too well. Just in the past year, fraudsters have tried to open two different bank accounts in his name and have bought multiple iPhones online. And the onslaught of fraud came just as Desjardins' offer of free credit monitoring was running out. It's taken Dave a lot of time to talk to banks, credit bureaus and police to get it all straightened out each time. And it's not just a hassle. It can tank his credit score. "To know that somebody could use … your information in a fraudulent manner, something that you worked so hard to build, is extremely frustrating," said Dave. Since the Desjardins breach, some have requested new SINs. But that doesn't happen often. It requires proof that the number has been used in fraud, not just that the information has been leaked. And fraudsters are clever, Popa says. They'll often wait until their victims' credit monitoring has run out, which is usually public information. In an email to CBC, Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) says it takes steps to protect people from having their SIN compromised, including awareness campaigns, fraud prevention resources and secure application processes. It says that if your number is compromised, you should file a police report, notify the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, contact a credit bureau and report it to any affected government programs. It doesn't, however, recommend applying for a new SIN. "Having multiple SINs can increase fraud risk. Getting a new SIN does not erase the old SIN and does not protect it from future abuse," said ESDC spokesperson Saskia Rodenburg. A different method? There is another potential solution: digital IDs. This system would allow you to share only what you want to share and nothing else. "You might have something like a digital wallet that's in your phone, or in your smart tablet," said Joni Brennan, president of the non-profit Digital ID and Authentication Council of Canada. One piece of information on the ID could be your verified income, for example, which you would be able to share with whichever person or organization that requires it. This way, she says, you could share only the information that's necessary, or that you want to share. Some regions are taking the necessary steps, like B.C., but don't expect a Canada-wide digital ID anytime soon. That's because provinces have a lot of jurisdiction over credentials. And as that progresses, Brennan says finding ways to protect our SIN needs to be an ongoing conversation. "As we see, new technologies come forward that might create new ways for bad folks to do bad things, [so] the space that's focused on security and protection and privacy needs to continue to evolve, as well."
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Canada's stubby beer bottle finds new meaning in an age of American bluster
Forty years after its retirement as the industry standard bottle for beer in Canada, the stubby is being reinterpreted in an age marred by tariffs and American grievance — not as a cultural icon, but as a discreet way of protecting a national industry. In a research paper published this spring, Heather Thompson, a recent graduate of the public history program at Carleton University in Ottawa, argues that the stubby — squat, recyclable and therefore largely unappealing to foreign brewers — functioned as a quiet and distinctly Canadian form of protectionism. "At the time, the Big Three, [Canadian Breweries Limited], Molson and Labatt's, they see the Americans coming and they knew they were very interested in the lucrative Canadian market. They needed something," she told CBC News. "The stubby is not a tariff, it's not government-imposed. It's as much an economic product as it is a cultural product." In today's climate of rising tariffs, "buy Canadian" policies and deepening trade tensions, the story of the stubby might feel less like historic footnote and more like a blueprint — for how Canada can still navigate life beside an economically dominant and often unpredictable neighbour. The stubby was introduced in 1961, at a time when Americans, who favoured non-recyclable aluminum cans, made their products in large centralized facilities and shipped their beer across the U.S. and to the world. The stubby, by contrast, was glass, but it was also cheap, durable and lightweight, making it easy to transport. It was also able to be reused up to 100 times. It was the keystone in a closed-loop Canadian bottling system that kept costs down for domestic brewers while it kept foreign brewers out by raising the cost of market entry. The bottle also fit neatly within Canada's fragmented domestic economy. Thanks to interprovincial trade barriers, brewers looking to sell in a given province often had to produce their beer there or face tariffs and restrictions when crossing provincial lines. By 1962, the year after the stubby was introduced, Canada's Big Three brewers controlled about 95 per cent of the Canadian beer market. They owned nearly all of the country's 61 breweries, which gave them a physical presence in every region of Canada. The Big Three also held a majority stake in Ontario's Beer Store, known then as the Brewing Warehousing Company Limited. When the stubby was made a packaging requirement for all beer sold at its stores in Ontario, Thompson argues, the Big Three effectively locked all foreign brewers out by creating an extra hurdle for entry into the market. "To bottle in the stubby, [American brewers] are going to have to make their own line at their plant to bottle specifically for Ontario," she said, noting any cost savings for American brewers through the reusable stubby would be eaten up in transportation costs by first shipping the beer to Canada then shipping it back the U.S. for a refill. Since almost all of Canada's breweries were owned by only three companies when the stubby was introduced in Ontario, the rest of the country followed suit in adopting the stubby because the bottle could be filled and reused in any bottling plant in any province by any Big Three brewer. On par with bagged milk, says history podcaster That kind of market consolidation meant for a generation of Canadian beer drinkers, from 1961 to 1984, the stubby was just about everywhere: on bar counters, fridges or sweating on the dock from St. John's to Victoria. It was also immortalized as a symbol of Canadian identity by the beer-swilling, tuque-wearing McKenzie brothers, who were a parody of Canadian working class culture in the early 1980s, near the end of the bottle's industry dominance. "When we think of the stubby, at least for me, I think of Bob and Doug McKenzie," said Craig Baird, host of the Canadian History Ehx! podcast, a show that looks back on the country's history. Baird said the only thing that comes close to what the stubby did, in terms of uniquely Canadian design and function, is bagged milk. Like the stubby, it's efficient, cost-effective and largely incomprehensible to outsiders, making it both a practical solution and marker of national identity. "If you look online, people say Canadians use bagged milk even though only Ontario and some other localized areas use bagged milk." Canadian brewers dropped the stubby in 1984, switching to taller, non-recyclable long necks as American brands like Budweiser and Coors entered the market thanks, first, to licensing agreements with American brewers and then free trade with the U.S. The new bottles held the same 341 millilitres but offered more branding appeal. WATCH | Saying goodbye to the stubby: Farewell to the reliable old stubby 41 years ago Duration 4:02 The stubby began to be phased out in 1985 and now largely exists only in antique stores and our collective memory. Reviving the spirit, if not the bottle In a global market shaped by trade battles and foreign ownership, Thompson sees the stubby as more than nostalgia. It's a reminder of what Canadian brewers once did to protect their market — and what they might do again. "We're seeing more interest in buying Canadian," she said. "It's a great opportunity for craft brewers to revive the stubby and its cultural power." While few brewers have returned to the squat bottle, its spirit lives on in projects such as Glorious and Free, a patriotic IPA first brewed by Dominion City Brewing in Ottawa. The recipe is shared with 40 breweries across Canada that have used hometown ingredients to create their own versions. "The idea for the campaign really came from a walk in the snow," Dominion City co-founder Josh McJannett said with an obvious nod to former prime minister Pierre Trudeau, a politician whose retirement followed "a walk in the snow" in 1984, the same year the stubby was put out to pasture. "The thought of stubby beer bottles around again is certainly appealing to the nostalgia in me," McJannett said, noting Glorious and Free is available in tallboy cans only. He said the recipe was crafted as a direct response to some of the frustration he was feeling over U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and talk of annexation. "This was a way to harness that feeling and take some kind of an action." McJannett said. Firm, but polite. A beer that, like the stubby, refuses to be poured into anyone else's mould.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Canada is getting a second shot at becoming a major LNG player
A decade after a promised boom in the liquified natural gas industry failed to materialize, Canada has arrived at the starting line, rekindling some aspirations of becoming a major LNG player. The long-awaited LNG Canada project is now up and running — and there are six more projects in various stages of development. If all of them come through, together they would represent $109 billion in capital investment, according to Natural Resources Canada. This comes amid renewed political appetite to build major infrastructure, bolster the Canadian economy and diversify exports away from the U.S. But the U.S. still leads Canada by a wide margin as an LNG exporter, and even if all projects currently under development end up being built, some warn Canada may have already missed the chance of being a major player. "I don't think Canada's ever going to be an LNG-exporting superpower," said Ed Crooks, vice-chair of the Americas for global consultancy Wood Mackenzie. But he said the country has plenty of room to ramp up its export capacity. 'It means prosperity' One proposed facility is in a small fishing community about 800 kilometres north of Vancouver. The Nisga'a community of Gingolx, population roughly 500, is known as the seafood capital of the Nass River. In the next few years, it could have a conspicuous new neighbour: Ksi Lisims LNG, a floating terminal that will export LNG to Asia. The project is proposed by the Nisga'a Nation of B.C. in partnership with Rockies LNG, a group of Western Canadian natural gas producers, and Western LNG, a Houston-based company that develops LNG export facilities. "It means, in one word, prosperity," said Eva Clayton, elected president of the Nisga'a Nation. Clayton said the nation has gone "through the trenches" over the last 10 years to get the project off the ground, and hopes to make a final investment decision later this year. Failure to launch Ksi Lisims is among seven proposed LNG projects at various stages of development. Most have Indigenous ownership or partnerships — a major shift from the projects proposed a decade ago. At the time, a few dozen LNG projects were proposed in B.C. as part of an initial wave of interest in the nascent industry. The majority of those projects were cancelled for a variety of reasons, such as regulatory hurdles and a crash in commodity prices. The U.S. only began ramping up its LNG exports in 2016, but has continued to build to become the world's largest exporter of LNG. Some experts say the diverging outcomes speak to the level of policy uncertainty and red tape that companies in this country have had to contend with. "One of the fundamental problems has been it's been very, very difficult to build any kind of energy infrastructure in Canada," said Crooks. "Anything you try and build, there are a lot of people that have objections," he said, pointing to community groups and environmental activists raising concerns with either the specific location or broader ecological impact of a project. WATCH | Can Canada become a global LNG powerhouse? Exploring Canada's LNG potential as first-ever exports begin 4 minutes ago Duration 4:15 Times may be changing. Ottawa, along with B.C. and Ontario, have each passed legislation aimed at speeding up major projects — though not without opposition. Public polling suggests Canadians are becoming more comfortable with the idea of new infrastructure, including pipelines. Demand for natural gas is expected to grow 70 to 80 per cent through 2050, according to Wood Mackenzie. That's thanks to a variety of factors, ranging from the world's growing population to power demand from AI data centres and air conditioning to the role of natural gas as an alternative to coal. Canada has significant natural gas reserves, and B.C.'s Northwest coast provides a quick and secure route to markets in Asia. The U.S. is eyeing the same opportunity. While much of the U.S. export facilities are located on the Gulf Coast, one proposed $50-billion mega-project is located in Alaska. The White House is backing the project, including around $30 billion US in loan guarantees. "It could be, certainly, a major competitor for projects on Canada's West Coast," said Martin King, a Calgary-based analyst with RBN Energy. Heather Exner-Pirot, director of energy, natural resources and environment with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, says the Alaska project does face certain logistical challenges. Because of where the resource is located, it would need a longer pipeline traversing terrain, and materials, equipment and labour would have to be transported to isolated areas, driving up costs. Still, she said, the project could present a pretty compelling case to investors. "Alaska really wants it and all levels of government are aligned," said Exner-Pirot. "You have the secretary of energy, you have the governor of Alaska, you have everyone getting together and saying, 'We want your investment, we'll build fast, we're a reliable exporter." Ellis Ross, Conservative MP for Skeena-Bulkley Valley, isn't convinced the current political momentum around building major projects will translate into success. "What I see right now is this rhetoric — it's virtue-signalling," said Ross, who is also former chief councillor of the Haisla Nation. "I don't think this government is truly sincere in turning Canada into an energy superpower, let alone fast-tracking major projects." Rushing in Others are concerned the country is veering in the wrong direction, green-lighting projects without fully considering the environmental consequences. The community of Kispiox, about 300 kilometres up the Skeena River, is known as a fishing destination and boasts being the steelhead capital of the world. "This is one of the rare parts of the world where you can drink from the streams, you could drink from the rivers," said Kolin Sutherland-Wilson, elected chief councillor of the Kispiox Band. The community is also about 15 kilometres from the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission line, which would transport natural gas from northeastern B.C. to the Ksi Lisims project on the coast. Sutherland-Wilson said community members are concerned about the impact on the local watershed and salmon population. While the B.C. government recently approved the pipeline's continued construction, he expects there will likely be further protests, and is part of a group challenging the pipeline's approval in B.C. Supreme Court. "I would say this is the calm before the storm right now," he said. WATCH | Opposition to new pipelines persists in B.C.: Local communities worried about pipeline required for Ksi Lisims LNG 4 minutes ago Duration 2:39 Kathy Clay, president of the Kispiox Valley Community Centre Association and Chief Councilor Kolin Sutherland-Wilson of the Kispiox Band explain their concerns about the proposed pipeline. Climate concerns are another variable. Natural gas can help countries get off coal, but it is still a fossil fuel. While the pendulum of public discourse has recently swung away from climate change, it will inevitably swing back, said Crooks at Wood Mackenzie. Window of opportunity That means Canada has a narrow window to capitalize on the current upswing in LNG demand. Dulles Wang, another analyst with Wood Mackenzie, said the next five to 10 years will be critical, when demand from markets in Asia is expected to be strongest. "Beyond that, the story is a lot murkier, because the role of gas in the energy space is becoming much more uncertain," said Wang, a director on the firm's Americas gas and LNG research team, who said that at a certain point, renewables could start to displace natural gas. "The clock is definitely ticking." Clayton with the Nisga'a Nation is optimistic about breaking ground on her LNG project next year. She's eager to see the first vessel come up the river to pick up the first shipments, which could happen as early as 2029. "It's going to be amazing, and it's going to be bringing a lot of smiles and happiness to our people," said Clayton. "We see the project not just benefitting for the moment, but in perpetuity."
