Asian stocks hesitant, dollar slides on Trump's attack on Powell
Investors eye trade deals ahead of tariff deadline
Dollar slides after Trump attacks Powell again
Oil inch higher to stabilize after a volatile month
SINGAPORE, June 26 (Reuters) – Asian stocks stuttered on Thursday, while oil prices stabilized and the euro was perched at a 3.5-year high as investors weighed geopolitical, economic and fiscal uncertainties as they braced for US President Donald Trump's deadline on tariffs.
Markets have been soothed by a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that appeared to be holding, reducing the risks of disruptions to the global oil trade and underpinning sentiment.
MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan was little changed in early trading, as the rally in Wall Street took a breather overnight. Tokyo's Nikkei rose 0.9% to a four-month high.
The US dollar selling kicked up a notch after a media report said Trump has toyed with the idea of selecting and announcing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's replacement by September or October in a bid to undermine his position.
That pushed the euro to its strongest level since November 2021. It last fetched $1.6805. The Swiss franc firmed to a decade-high while the Japanese yen strengthened 0.35% to 144.70 per dollar.
Trump has repeatedly criticised Powell for not cutting interest rates and has floated the idea of firing him or naming a successor soon, denting investor confidence in US assets and undermining the central bank's independence.
'I think it's a given that Trump's pick to succeed Powell, when it comes, will be one that sits at the highly dovish end of the spectrum and will support Trump's agenda of lowering interest rates,' said Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG.
'The issue with this is it will resurface questions from earlier in the year around the Fed's independence, which, as we saw, undermines confidence in the Fed and the USD.'
The dollar index, which measures the US currency against six rivals, wallowed at its lowest level since March 2022. The index has slid 10% this year as investors, worried by Trump's tariffs and their on US growth, look for alternatives.
Financial markets remain on edge over Trump's chaotic trade policies as the clock ticks down to his July 9 deadline for trade deals.
Powell, who resumed two days of congressional testimony on Wednesday, said Trump's tariff plans may well just cause a one-time jump in prices, but the risk it could fuel more persistent inflation is large enough for the central bank to be careful in considering further rate cuts.
Fed officials still expect to cut interest rates this year, but the timing is uncertain as officials wait on looming trade deadlines and for more certainty about the scope of the tariffs that will be imposed and the ways that rising import levies influence prices and economic growth.
'No one knows exactly how tariffs will impact inflation, which will keep central banks in conservative mode, particularly the Fed,' said Bank of America strategists, noting downside risks to global growth remain relevant, not only due to trade wars but also due to geopolitical developments.
'We are carefully monitoring fiscal policy across key countries that can affect global interest rates. Unsustainable fiscal dynamics can trigger an accident in bond markets,' they said in a note.
In commodities, oil prices inched higher to continue recovering after a volatile month so far due to the conflict between longtime rivals Israel and Iran.
Brent crude futures rose 0.2% to $67.82 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude (WTI) gained 0.28% to $65.1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
US migrant raids spark boom for private detention providers
Donald Trump's promise to carry out the largest deportation operation in US history has appalled some Americans. But others are cashing in on the boom in demand for private detention centers. Migrants captured by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents need to be temporarily housed in places like the facility being readied in California City, prior to deportation. "When you talk to the majority of residents here, they have a favorable perspective on it," said Marquette Hawkins, mayor of the hardscrabble settlement of 15,000 people, 160 kilometres north of Los Angeles. "They look at the economic impact, right?" California City is to be home to a sprawling detention center that will be operated by CoreCivic, one of the largest companies in the private detention sector. The company, which declined AFP requests for an interview, says the facility would generate around 500 jobs, and funnel $2 million in tax revenue to the city. "Many of our residents have already been hired out there to work in that facility," Hawkins told AFP. "Any revenue source that is going to assist the town in rebuilding itself, rebranding itself, is going to be seen as a plus," he said. - Boom - Trump's ramped-up immigration arrests, like those that provoked protests in Los Angeles, saw a record 60,000 people in detention in June, according to ICE figures. Those same figures show the vast majority have no conviction, despite the president's election campaign promises to go after hardened criminals. AFP/File | Patrick T. Fallon More than 80 percent of detainees are in facilities run by the private sector, according to the TRAC project at Syracuse University. And with Washington's directive to triple the number of daily arrests -- and $45 billion earmarked for new detention centers -- the sector is looking at an unprecedented boom. "Never in our 42-year company history have we had so much activity and demand for our services as we are seeing right now," Damon Hininger, executive director of CoreCivic, said in a May call with investors. When Trump took office in January, some 107 centers were operating. The number now hovers around 200. For Democratic politicians, this proliferation is intentional. "Private prison companies are profiting from human suffering, and Republicans are allowing them to get away with it," Congresswoman Norma Torres told reporters outside a detention center in the southern California city of Adelanto. At the start of the year, there were three people detained there; there are now hundreds, each one of them attracting a daily stipend of taxpayer cash for the operator. Torres was refused permission to visit the facility, run by the privately owned GEO Group, because she had not given seven days' notice, she said. "Denying members of Congress access to private detention facilities like Adelanto isn't just disrespectful, it is dangerous, it is illegal, and it is a desperate attempt to hide the abuse happening behind these walls," she said. "We've heard the horrifying stories of detainees being violently arrested, denied basic medical care, isolated for days, and left injured without treatment," she added. Kristen Hunsberger, a staff attorney at the Law Center for Immigrant Advocates, said one client complained of having to wait "six or seven hours to get clean water." It is "not sanitary and certainly not... in compliance with just basic human rights." Hunsberger, who spends hours on the road going from one center to another to locate her clients, says many have been denied access to legal counsel, a constitutional right in the United States. Both GEO and ICE have denied allegations of mistreatment at the detention centers. "Claims there is overcrowding or subprime conditions in ICE facilities are categorically FALSE," said Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security. "All detainees are provided with proper meals, medical treatment and have opportunities to communicate with their family members and lawyers." - 'Strategy' - But some relatives of detainees tell a different story. Alejandra Morales, an American citizen, said her undocumented husband was detained incommunicado for five days in Los Angeles before being transferred to Adelanto. In the Los Angeles facility, "they don't even let them brush their teeth, they don't let them bathe, nothing. They have them all sleeping on the floor, in a cell, all together," she said. Hunsberger said that for detainees and their relatives, the treatment appears to be deliberate. "They're starting to feel that this is a strategy to wear people down, to have them in these inhumane conditions, and then pressure them to sign something where they could then agree to being deported," she said.
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
NASA says it will lose about 20 percent of its workforce
The US space agency NASA will lose approximately 3,900 employees under Donald Trump's sweeping effort to reduce the federal workforce — at the same time the president prioritises plans for crewed missions to the Moon and Mars. In an emailed statement, NASA said around 3,000 employees took part in the second round of its deferred resignation program, which closed late Friday. Combined with the 870 who joined the first round and regular staff departures, the agency's civil servant workforce is set to drop from more than 18,000 before Trump took office in January to roughly 14,000 -- a more than 20 percent decrease. Those leaving the National Aeronautics and Space Administration on the deferred resignation program will be placed on administrative leave until an agreed departure date. An agency spokesperson said the figures could shift slightly in the coming weeks. "Safety remains a top priority for our agency as we balance the need to become a more streamlined and more efficient organization and work to ensure we remain fully capable of pursuing a Golden Era of exploration and innovation, including to the Moon and Mars," the agency said. Earlier this year, the Trump administration's proposed NASA budget put a return to the Moon and a journey to Mars front and center, slashing science and climate programs. The White House says it wants to focus on "beating China back to the Moon and putting the first human on Mars." China is aiming for its first crewed lunar landing by 2030, while the US program, called Artemis, has faced repeated delays.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
US tariffs: fragmentation and reshaping global supply chains and African MNEs
South Africa has reportedly reached an agreement with the US about tariffs, but government is keeping it under wraps until it is finalised. The US tariffs that will be implemented on Friday if countries do not make a deal with US president Donald Trump, will mark a fundamental economic shift towards fragmentation and reshape global supply chains and African Multinational Enterprises (MNEs). Arthur Kamp, chief economist at Sanlam Investments, warns that the sharp rise in US tariffs represents a significant shock to the system due to its stagflationary risks. 'You would expect higher inflation and lower growth in the US. After all, this is effectively a significant tax increase.' However, despite market calm, he cautions that from a macroeconomic perspective, the backdrop has worsened. The current US tariff for South Africa is 30%. Roy Mutooni, portfolio manager at Sanlam Investments, believes the initial market reaction may have been overly complacent. He explains that tariffs typically hurt companies in one of two ways: either manufacturers absorb the costs, which squeezes margins, or they pass them on to consumers, which dampens demand. 'It seems to me that the market's initial response was to derate – to reduce the value of future earnings. Then, as uncertainty grew, markets began assuming it would all be rolled back. That is the prevailing view now – that the full effect of the tariffs will not materialise,' Mutooni says. ALSO READ: US tariff of 30% on SA exports: where to now? US tariffs shock will likely affect margins and consumer demand However, he cautions that this represents 'very much the best-case scenario' and warns that the shock is likely to affect margins as well as consumer demand. Kamp's core observation is that the world is changing. 'We have come from an era of global integration, freer trade, low inflation and high growth. That is clearly changing with increasing protectionism, trade barriers, financial sanctions and a shift toward a more geo-economically fragmented world. 'We are moving into a more difficult environment for multinationals, with potential disruptions to capital flows already evident in some cases.' Mutooni adds that the traditional global trade model, with emerging markets supplying commodities to Asia and Asian economies exporting to the US consumer, is starting to break down. 'What the US is saying is: you will pay a toll or tax to access our consumer. And for the rest of us, there is no alternative.' This shift leaves investors needing to assess how companies will adapt, whether by finding new markets, changing business models, or investing in the US. 'Effectively, as an investor, you are still stock picking, but you must do it in the new context. 'Key questions include: how is the company dealing with the changed environment, how are its supply chains adapting, can its customer base handle the higher costs and are there new competitors emerging better able to navigate the changed circumstances, such as domestic producers or those from countries with lower tariffs and is management looking to new markets?' ALSO READ: Ordinary South Africans will feel impact of US tariffs Multinational enterprises will face complex questions under US tariffs, expert warns Michael Hewson, director at specialist African transfer pricing advisory firm Graphene Economics, says as Trump's second term seems set to be defined in part by a renewed surge of tariffs and trade protectionism, MNEs face complex questions about supply chains, profit allocations and the overall structuring of their global value chains. 'A key area under pressure is transfer pricing, the term for how multinational groups set the prices for transactions between related entities in different countries. These prices affect where profits are reported and in turn, how much tax is paid in each jurisdiction. 'While transfer pricing is usually a behind-the-scenes concern for finance and tax teams, it becomes highly strategic in times of global economic upheaval.' He says tariffs, which tend to be used to shield domestic industries from foreign competition, act as a tax on imports. 'Trump's focus on introducing new tariffs and his swift changes of direction regarding implementation triggered retaliatory actions from certain trade partners and injected fresh uncertainty into global markets. For African-based MNEs, or those routing goods through Africa to the USA, the impact could be substantial.' ALSO READ: 'Open our eyes and ears' – Ramaphosa on how to tackle US tariff hike on SA cars MNEs manufacturing in Africa will have to reconsider supply chains considering US tariffs Hewsom says MNEs manufacturing in Africa and then distributing into the US will need to consider their value chains. 'For example, imagine a South African company that manufactures automotive components and sells them to its sister company in the United States, which then sells the completed vehicles to American customers. The price at which the South African company sells the parts to its US counterpart is the 'transfer price'.' He points out that revenue authorities in South Africa and the US want to ensure that the price of these components reflects what independent businesses would charge each other, known as the arm's length principle. 'If the price is deemed not to be arms-length, one country might claim it is losing out on tax revenue, which can lead to audits, penalties, or even double taxation. If the US levies high tariffs on South African goods, including these car parts, the multinational group may need to ask whether it makes sense to continue manufacturing in South Africa, or to use one of the other plants in the world that may have lower duties imposed. 'Or it might ultimately decide it is better to build a plant in the USA. These decisions have potential tax consequences. For example, if the profitability of the South African entity reduces because production is shifted to another company within the group, it may be considered as a business restructuring for transfer pricing purposes.' ALSO READ: Devastating impact of US tariffs on SA automotive sector even before implementation US tariffs will affect MNEs on many levels Hewson says that when tariffs raise input costs or make cross-border goods less competitive, traditional intercompany pricing structures may no longer reflect economic reality. 'This affects MNEs on many levels, from shrinking margins to costly compliance breaches. However, the knock-on effects on African economies can also be substantial. 'The ripple effects of tariff-driven supply chain realignments and transfer pricing adjustments can be significant for African economies. If, for example, the car manufacturer decides to shut down its local car parts plant in favour of producing in a lower-tariff country or relocating operations to the US, this could lead to significant job losses in a country already grappling with high unemployment and widespread poverty,' he warns. 'Reduced industrial activity also means lower tax revenues for African governments and diminished demand for local suppliers and service providers. In economies where multinationals play a crucial role in employment and development, these decisions, while financially prudent from the MNE's global business perspective, can have negative local consequences.'
