Schuylkill River Passenger Rail Authority chooses new leaders
Chester County Commissioner Marian Moskowitz was unanimously chosen by the Schuylkill River Passenger Rail Authority during a reorganizational meeting Monday to serve as the new chairwoman.
Chester County Commissioner Marian Moskowitz has been chosen as the new chairwoman of the Schuylkill River Passenger Rail Authority. (BILL UHRICH/READING EAGLE)
Moskowitz replaces Berks County Commissioner Christian Leinbach, whose two-year term at the helm of the authority came to a close. When the authority was established in 2022 it was decided that each county involved in the joint venture — Berks, Chester and Montgomery — would take turns leading the authority.
'I want to thank Christian for his leadership during these past few years,' Moskowitz said after being selected to her new post. 'I believe that our authority has set a new way for counties throughout the commonwealth to work across party lines to make sure we're doing what's right for the good of our residents.
'And I think that's something to be very proud of.'
Montgomery County Commissioner Thomas DiBello was selected to serve as vice chairman.
Phoenixville Mayor Peter Urscheler was chosen to serve as treasurer, and Scott France, director of the Montgomery County Planning Commission, will serve as secretary.
The authority meets virtually on the fourth Monday of each month, except in situations when it interferes with holidays.
During the meeting, Thomas Frawley, executive director, said the authority has completed the first phase of a federal program that is providing a critical boost to the effort to restore train service and is on the verge of moving onto the second phase.
The second phase of the Corridor Identification and Development Program includes the development of a service plan that would examine ridership and revenue forecasts, capital programming and an operational analysis.
The service plan is just the beginning of what is likely to be a long process.
Once the plan is complete, the next phase will include preliminary engineering to demonstrate to the authority whether the project is feasible. And if it clears that hurdle, the project will move onto the implementation phase that includes the final design.
Also at the meeting, Frawley shared that Amtrak officials have reported an operating loss on its Reading-to-Pottstown-to-Philadelphia bus service.
Amtrak began offering the route that makes two trips back and forth each day in June 2022. Ridership on those routes is expected to provide some insight into the demand for transportation services between the two cities.
Frawley said the service is experiencing an annual operating loss of $260,000.
'We are working on different ideas to better promote and more efficiently operate the service,' he said. 'We are very happy to hear Amtrak and the bus operator have identified about $60,000 a year in operating cost saving, and the authority has been contributing marketing support through our various social media platforms.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 days ago
- USA Today
Proposed 72-hour train route between LA, NY aims to debut in 2026
A rail company is proposing a new privately funded train route that can begin transporting people between Los Angeles and New York City in less than 72 hours as soon as next year. Delaware-based group AmeriStarRail unveiled its coast-to-coast route called the Transcontinental Chief with hopes of it being operational by May 10, 2026, ahead of the United States' 250th birthday and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The goal date, which lands on National Train Day, is subject to operating agreements with various host railroads, the company clarified. The project has been presented to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, also known as Amtrak. AmeriStarRail argues that a partnership between the two companies would be mutually beneficial, emphasizing that the route would be more profitable than Amtrak's existing long-distance trains. AmeriStarRail CEO Scott Spencer said Amtrak is seeking more information on the planning and coordination of the proposed system. "This is a way to confront the challenges Amtrak faces and create opportunities for them to succeed," Spencer told USA TODAY. "We're hopeful that all the parties that are involved including the host railroads recognize what a great opportunity this is for our nation." Amtrak did not respond to multiple USA TODAY requests for comment. Transcontinental Chief to replace existing bicoastal routes AmeriStarRail said the Transcontinental Chief train would replace the Southwest Chief and the Pennsylvanian Amtrak routes that currently help transport people between Southern California and New York via stops in Chicago or Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. New Yorkers will board the train from the Hoboken Terminal in New Jersey, a three-mile ride to Lower Manhattan across the Hudson River through the Holland Tunnel. AmeriStarRail clarified that it's unable to directly stop in the Big Apple due to New York Penn Station tunnel restrictions for the passenger cars Amtrak uses, known as Superliners. However, there are no boarding restrictions in Los Angeles. The route would also include a single-level train section from Harrisburg to serve people in Washington, D.C., via Philadelphia, according to AmeriStarRail. "In discussion with various interests along the route, whether that be Victorville, California; Newton, Kanas; Lebanon, Pennsylvania, they recognize the economic engine that the Transcontinental Chief will be for their communities," Spencer said. Spencer added that the Transcontinental Chief would also offer travelers on Route 66 an alternative way back from their nearly 2,500-mile drive. Bicoastal route to be 'rolling rest stop for truckers' In addition to transporting passengers, the Transcontinental Chief would also transport truck drivers and their tractor trailers between the West and East coasts within the three-day span, according to AmeriStarRail. Through a roll-on, roll-off loading system, the route would serve as a "rolling rest stop for truckers" while offering a safe alternative to parking shortages, the company states. "At RailPorts along the route, truckers will be able to drive their entire tractor trailer trucks onto railroad flatcars and then rest and relax onboard Amtrak Coach, Sleeper and Dining cars as they travel 200 - 500 miles during their federally mandated 10 hour rest period," an AmeriStarRail news release states. Intending to debut next May, Spencer said the route would start with intermediate ports available in LA and New York City, with plans to incorporate more in the future. The company aims to transport cars, vans, motorcycles, RVs and charter motorcoaches, eventually also serving the Grand Canyon and Chicago.
Newsweek
4 days ago
- Newsweek
Threatened California High-Speed Rail Gets New Boost
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom has backed his state's high-speed rail network with new legislation that could provide a new funding strategy. It comes after President Donald Trump slashed $4 billion of federal funding for the project. Newsweek contacted the California High-Speed Rail Authority for more information via email. Why It Matters California's high-speed rail is in an awkward position. Years of delays and an inflated budget have damaged public and political faith in the project, but the past few years have seen progress—with construction happening throughout the state and tracklaying set to start later this year. To call off the project now, as many of its detractors in the White House desire, would waste years of advancement. That has not stopped Trump, a long-standing critic of the project, from regularly threatening to take away the federal funding that has been vital to the project's progress so far—a threat he and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy carried out in July. What To Know On Wednesday, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 377, compelling the California High-Speed Rail Authority to submit a comprehensive funding strategy for the Merced-to-Bakersfield Central Valley segment in its upcoming 2026 business plan. The new law directs the authority to update cost estimates, conduct risk assessments, and outline options for service initiation in this core section. The high-speed rail project began as an ambitious $33 billion plan, approved by California voters in 2008 to connect San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours by 2020. Today, the project's cost estimates have surged to between $89 and $128 billion, and the initial phase is focused solely on a 171-mile stretch in the Central Valley, targeted for completion by 2033. An Amtrak conductor walks alongside a train on a platform at the Amtrak Diridon San Jose Station, San Jose, California, USA, October 25, 2024. An Amtrak conductor walks alongside a train on a platform at the Amtrak Diridon San Jose Station, San Jose, California, USA, October 25, 2024. Getty Images The legislative effort comes as the Trump administration officially revoked a $4 billion federal grant in July 2025, branding the project a "boondoggle" and arguing it failed to deliver on promises. This action leaves California with the challenge of filling the resulting financial gap. Governor Newsom has proposed extending the state's cap-and-trade program, which generates roughly $1 billion annually for the rail, by 15 years to 2045, ensuring a continued funding stream for the core segment. State leaders are also debating simultaneous expansion north to Gilroy and south to Palmdale, which would better connect commuters to major metro areas via existing transit, provided lawmakers approve increased annual funding. The California High-Speed Rail Authority has indicated that higher ridership from these links could incentivize private investment needed to finish the full system. What People Are Saying Governor Gavin Newsom defended the project and criticized the federal funding withdrawal, saying: "Trump wants to hand China the future and abandon the Central Valley. We won't let him. With projects like the Texas high-speed rail failing to take off, we are miles ahead of others. We're now in the tracklaying phase and building America's only high-speed rail. California is putting all options on the table to fight this illegal action." Ian Choudri, CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, said: "Canceling these grants without cause isn't just wrong—it's illegal. These are legally binding agreements, and the Authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025. "America's only high-speed rail project underway is fast approaching the tracklaying phase, with 171 miles under active construction and design, 15,500 jobs created, and more than 50 major structures completed. This is no time for Washington to walk away on America's transportation future." What Happens Next The California High-Speed Rail Authority is expected to submit its updated business plan and comprehensive funding strategy to lawmakers in 2026. In the immediate term, state officials plan to pursue litigation to restore the lost federal grant and court private investment to close funding gaps.
Wall Street Journal
6 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
Why Did It Take So Long to Build a Coast-to-Coast Rail Operator in the U.S.?
The $85 billion merger deal between Union Pacific UNP 2.00%increase; green up pointing triangle and Norfolk Southern NSC 1.43%increase; green up pointing triangle announced Tuesday joins 50,000 miles of railroad tracks that span from the Jersey shore to the ports in California. The union would create a single company controlling coast-to-coast rail shipments for the first time in U.S. history—a feat Union Pacific says would speed up shipping and make supply chains more efficient. The first transcontinental railway was patched together in 1869, when a ceremonial 'golden spike' was driven into the final rail in Utah connecting two companies' tracks—but that version depended on more than one operator. Today, Amtrak carries passengers from coast to coast but operates mostly on tracks owned by freight railroads.
