logo
Hoarder's Home Drew 19 Complaints Before Fire

Hoarder's Home Drew 19 Complaints Before Fire

Scoop24-06-2025
Nineteen complaints were made in one year to Hastings District Council about a home surrounded by hoarded goods before it caught fire over the weekend.
But firefighters as recently as eight months ago did not deem the pile a fire hazard, because of a lack of ignition source - meaning there was no enforcement option available to authorities.
In the early hours of Saturday morning the "materials", which included piles of scrap wood, ignited and quickly spread to the Frederick Street home, near the Mahora shops.
Firefighters were called from Hastings, Napier and Taradale. One person was treated by ambulance staff at the scene.
Police said on Monday the fire was now being treated as suspicious, and they were investigating.
Neighbours and locals who have watched the pile in the yard grow over the past few years say they have been stunned at the lack of council action at what they claim was an obvious fire risk.
A council spokesperson said it had received the complaints, but after exploring the Health Act, Building Act and the Resource Management Act it found "no enforcement tools available" to allow it to remove goods from the private property.
The council spokesperson said staff were exploring whether there were any other options for enforcement before the fire broke out.
The council has now employed contractors for an urgent clean-up of the charred debris at the house, the cost of which is yet to be determined.
A close neighbour, who declined to be named, said the house was set up like a "fortress" and said the last four and a half years living beside an "obvious" fire risk had been "hell" for her family.
She said she was lucky in the early hours of Saturday morning she was lying awake when "all of a sudden the room was light".
By the time her husband went outside to have a look and came back in, the blaze had spread from the stuff piled in the front yard to the neighbours' house.
"We woke up our three children and my mother-in-law and took them over the road, then grabbed our dog and birds.
"I also grabbed my go bag, which has our birth certificates in it, because I just knew that one day this would happen.
"Things were exploding. It was scary as hell. Just nuts man."
Among the debris was a charred gas bottle, which was placed on the footpath near the home at Frederick Street on Saturday.
Firefighters remained onsite most of the day with parts of Frederick Street closed to traffic.
The neighbour said she had made numerous complaints to the council about the piles of goods around the property.
"I've been sent from the council to the police to fire and back to the council.
"People have said to me 'why don't you just move?'
"It's not that simple. We bought in the boom, so paid top dollar and the fortress wasn't there then - you could see the front door."
Fire Emergency New Zealand Hawke's Bay advisor for risk reduction Clayton Locke said the house was assessed roughly eight months ago and no fire hazard was found.
A fire risk was different from a fire hazard, he said.
"[Even] your car parked on the side of the road can be a fire risk.
"A fire hazard has an ignition source such as an incinerator in your backyard, with grass up to the window sills," Locke said.
He said if a property was found to have a fire hazard, firefighters' first approach would be education, before then issuing a notice of remedy.
Rochelle Sudfelt from ClearHoarding NZ - a task force dedicated to raising awareness, reducing stigma and providing support for homeowners who hoard - said she also made a complaint about the house last year.
"Someone from the council had assessed the property and didn't deem it a risk to the environment until it spilled on the berm," she said she was told.
She said one in 20 homes in New Zealand was considered at risk of becoming a "hoarding house".
"Fire is the greatest risk to people inside these homes as well as fire and emergency staff who put themselves at risk getting inside to help people. "
Another nearby resident said the council was receiving ongoing complaints about the Frederick Street property.
"I live just down the road, the footpath always had items being dropped on council land outside.
"I asked the council if they could advise the occupant to remove it and if it could do something about the risk it was creating.
"The items were then moved into the property until the room inside was running out quickly.
"I found the council's reply hard to believe. It said 'sorry, we understand your concern, but there is unfortunately nothing we can do, we are aware of the property, however, we can refer your complaint to the fire services to look into'.
"Nothing happened. This property has been a fire and safety concern for years."
Police urged anyone with information to contact Police on 105 and quote 250621/9027.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Southland dairy farmer who exploited workers cops further fine
Southland dairy farmer who exploited workers cops further fine

Otago Daily Times

time2 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Southland dairy farmer who exploited workers cops further fine

Dairy farmer Reza Abdul-Jabbar. Photo: RNZ A Southland dairy farmer who ripped off his workers has been penalised a further $15,000 for obstructing the employment authority's investigation. Reza Abdul-Jabbar and his company Rural Practice Ltd was last year fined $215,000 after the Employment Relations Authority found he had breached multiple employment standards. He was under-paying his three immigrant farm workers and ''invented'' pay records in an attempt to hide it from authorities. Each employee had two versions of their contract and differing payslips so Immigration New Zealand (INZ) would not detect the underpayments. Abdul-Jabbar argued no further penalties should be imposed and that he did not have the money to pay a fine. But the authority said the information about his financial position was "incomplete". Abdul-Jabbar claimed he owned nothing in his name, despite records showing he was a shareholder in companies that owned $2 million of property. The Labour Inspectorate said the breaches were "persistent, systemic and deliberate" and the ERA agreed. During the inspectorate's initial investigation Abdul-Jabbar claimed one of the workers owed $5,000 for recruitment costs paid by RPL to an agent in Indonesia on his behalf, and that the worker had agreed for this amount to be deducted from his wages. However, he was unable to produce a receipt which led the Employment Relations Authority to determine 'it more likely than not this material does not exist.' In imposing the $15,000 penalty, the ERA noted: 'The nature of RPL and Mr Abdul-Jabbar's conduct in obstructing the ERA's investigation was serious and sustained. "The obstruction was not mere inadvertence or negligence.' Abdul-Jabbar also appeared in the Environment Court at Invercargill last November where he was fined $71,500 on four charges laid under the Resource Management Act.

High-profile firms admit guilt over Queenstown landslide
High-profile firms admit guilt over Queenstown landslide

Otago Daily Times

time24-07-2025

  • Otago Daily Times

High-profile firms admit guilt over Queenstown landslide

Landslip debris covers Reavers Lane in Queenstown in 2023. PHOTO: RNZ Nearly two years after heavy rain dislodged construction spoil near Skyline gondola's top station, three high-profile companies will be sentenced in December for their role in the landslip that wreaked havoc in Queenstown's Reavers Lane neighbourhood. Following a long-running prosecution by Queenstown's council, Skyline Enterprises, Naylor Love Central Otago Ltd and Wilson Contractors Ltd have admitted charges brought under the Resource Management Act of breaching their consents. The sentencing hearing will be held in the Christchurch District Court, despite the prosecution dragging on through a series of adjournments in Queenstown's court since October. Mountain Scene understands the location of the hearing is down to court scheduling issues and the availability of the parties' legal counsel. On September 22, 2023, during the highest 24-hour rainfall recorded in the resort town for decades, rock and soil excavated as part of the redevelopment of the gondola's top station was dislodged. The material plunged down through the Ben Lomond Reserve and into the Reavers Lane neighbourhood. A second slip under the gondola cableway, which deposited forestry slash and mud on to Queenstown's historic cemetery and surrounds, was not the subject of the prosecution. However, more than 100 people were evacuated from the Reavers Lane and Brecon St areas, and a state of local emergency was in place for a day. The slips, which prompted Skyline chief executive Geoff McDonald to apologise to the community, forced Queenstown Primary School, Whakatipu Kindergarten and BestStart Queenstown daycare to temporarily close and blocked access to the Queenstown Medical Centre in Isle St. Queenstown council officers executed a search warrant at Skyline's Camp St headquarters 12 months ago.

Effluent Mismanagement Attracts Large Fine
Effluent Mismanagement Attracts Large Fine

Scoop

time23-07-2025

  • Scoop

Effluent Mismanagement Attracts Large Fine

Press Release – Waikato Regional Council Arrick Limited was convicted and sentenced by District Court Judge Melinda Dickey on 4 February 2025 on a charge filed under the Resource Management Act, with the sentencing decision received this week. A prosecution taken by Waikato Regional Council has resulted in a Taupiri farming company being convicted and fined $52,500 in the Hamilton District Court for the unlawful discharge of dairy effluent into the environment. Arrick Limited was convicted and sentenced by District Court Judge Melinda Dickey on 4 February 2025 on a charge filed under the Resource Management Act, with the sentencing decision received this week. In November 2023, council officers conducted a compliance inspection at a farm owned by the defendant at Taupiri, north of Hamilton. They found the dairy effluent storage pond was overflowing, with effluent ponding in the surrounding paddock at such a depth and volume that it posed a risk of contaminating groundwater. In her sentencing decision, Judge Dickey found that the system was poorly managed in the time leading up to the offending and concluded that the defendant had been highly careless in its management of proper effluent disposal on the farm. 'Unfortunately, this is a case where the defendant has failed to address effluent management on the property despite repeated requests by the council since 2012 for the farm owner to upgrade the farm effluent system and previous discharges from the same pond,' said acting Regional Compliance Manager Evan Billington. 'The rules are very clear, and do not permit the discharge and ponding of effluent from effluent holding facilities. That's because large volumes of ponded effluent can pose a real risk of contaminating groundwater.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store