‘Dangerous and disastrous': Cuts to federal jobs could disproportionately impact Black workers
NEW ORLEANS – For Harold John, a job with the federal government meant a more stable, comfortable life than the one he knew as a child.
John grew up in the Melpomene Projects with his three sisters. Neither of his parents, both of who had grown up on rural farms in Louisiana, had obtained more than an elementary school education. John was able to finish high school, join the U.S. Navy and then get a job with the U.S. Postal Service, all of which helped carry him into the middle class in the 1980s.
But today, the now-retired letter carrier is concerned that that same pathway may not be available to young people growing up in similar circumstances.
That is because the second Trump administration has set its sights on dismantling the federal workforce, especially through the slash-and-cut measures of the Department of Government Efficiency, which until recently was led by Elon Musk. In its first few months, DOGE had already targeted diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and initiated mass layoffs across multiple federal agencies, which, some allege, have disproportionately impacted women and people of color.
The U.S. Postal Service has not yet been subject to the same types of abrupt and indiscriminate cuts seen at agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development or the Department of Education but DOGE has its sights set on the post office, which worries John.
'There's been a dedicated narrative from the right that federal workers aren't necessary for a long time,' John said. 'This is not the first time that they've come after the postal service or federal unions, but it's the most disastrous and dangerous time.'
The U.S. Postal Service is highly diverse. As of 2023, 45% of postal employees were racial minorities. Though Black people make up about 14% of the total U.S. population, 30% of postal workers that year were Black.
To John, who is Black, that diversity is one of the Postal Service's greatest strengths.
'That was one of the better things about having a federal job: you knew they weren't going to discriminate when it came to hiring,' John said.
There are approximately 34,000 federal employees in Louisiana, 38% of whom identify as Black – the second-highest share of Black federal workers among the states, behind only Georgia. This trend is consistent across most of the South. In Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina and Tennessee, at least one-third of federal workers are Black.
Part of the reason Black people are overrepresented in federal workers in the South is due to the fact of demographics: There are more Black people in the South.
But Gary Hoover, an economist at Tulane University, said that overrepresentation of Black people in the federal workforce also has to do with the fact that public sector work is one of the few on-ramps to the middle class for historically marginalized communities of color, especially in the South.
'You have to go back nearly 60 years to … the Civil Rights Act in 1964, where employment discrimination became a federal offense,' Hoover said. 'There's the creation of the [Equal Employment Opportunity Commission] that looks into unfair hiring and labor practices. And with the creation of the EEOC, the federal government becomes a leader in fair hiring practices – not by doing anything particularly progressive, just by actually upholding the law as it is written in regards to employment.'
At that time, many Black workers, especially educated Black workers, struggled to get hired or be promoted within the private sector due to widespread racial biases. This was not only the case in white-collar and professional industries, but also in skilled blue-collar industries.
Especially since the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964, public sector work, notably with the federal government, has provided an opportunity for upward mobility for Black workers. It was also a workforce that was rapidly becoming more unionized following a 1962 executive order by President John F. Kennedy granting federal workers the right to engage in collective bargaining
In Louisiana and across the South, a unionized job with the federal government was a good job – and one that ultimately helped build the Black middle class, Hoover said.
'Once I have job security, I can start thinking about buying a home,' Hoover said. 'Once I start thinking about buying a home, I'm thinking about stable communities. Once I have a stable community, then I can start thinking seriously about the future and intergenerational wealth transfers.'
On a recent steamy afternoon in May, a group of protesters gathered outside Republican U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise's Metairie office. The protest, which was organized by the grassroots organization Step Up Louisiana, featured about two dozen people decked out in union garb, holding picket signs above their heads. Marching in a circle outside the 18-floor Heritage Plaza office tower, the protesters took turns leading raucous chants.
'Step Up,' one protester shouted.
'For federal workers!' the rest replied.
'Step Up,' went another call.
'For U.S. Mail,' came the response.
The protest had been organized in response to a Trump-championed budget reconciliation bill, called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which, as drafted, would significantly cut assistance for Medicaid and food stamps. Scalise was set to vote on the bill that same day (May 22). (He ultimately would vote in favor, along with 214 of his colleagues, and help the bill pass the U.S. House of Representatives.)
The group outside Scalise's office included a contingent of current and former federal workers — all of them Black — who were also protesting DOGE's cuts to the federal workforce.
Terrence Johns, a current employee of the National Finance Office, a New Orleans-based federal office that manages payroll and personnel across multiple federal agencies, stepped up and spoke into the megaphone.
'Here in the South, you know there's largely a minority population that makes up these government service jobs,' Johns said, noting that his own office was majority Black. 'Believe me, brothers and sisters, everything that comes out of this administration attacks Black and Brown people.'
Johns, who has also served as the longtime president of a local chapter of the American Federation of Government Employees union, said that both federal jobs and social welfare — necessary to sustaining the people of the Deep South — have been gutted since the Reagan administration.
'Don't believe the rhetoric,' he added. 'Nobody is living high on the hog. But these are decent jobs and have always set the standard for American workers.'
When John started at the Postal Service in 1985, that there were a small number of good, unionized jobs across the greater New Orleans area, such as at the Avondale Shipyard and the port, John said. But apart from those, the best opportunities were in unionized public sector work. Many educated Black people like him found opportunities with the federal government at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (then known as the Veterans Administration), or at the nearby NASA Michoud facility. Or with the Postal Service.
'We had a definite economic impact on New Orleans,' he said, referring to the Black middle class that was emerging through public sector work.
Troy Lee Davis, another Postal Service employee in New Orleans, grew up in the Desire Projects before moving to New Orleans East. His dad, who had served in World War II, worked in construction while his mom worked as a housemaid and cook. Davis, like his father before him, joined the military, which helped pay for college at the University of New Orleans. After that, he got a job as a mail handler.
'This was one of the better-paying jobs in New Orleans,' Davis said, adding that the job came with benefits, paid time off, holidays and regular cost-of-living adjustments. 'So, it was a big opportunity for anybody coming from poverty to get to have a comfortable lifestyle.'
Being part of the Postal Service has a long, storied reputation among Black communities because it was one of the earliest available public sector jobs – and one that paid decent wages.
But these days, both John and Davis are worried that the second Trump administration may unravel the gains that post office and other federal employees have made.
In March, Postmaster General Louis DeJoy entered into an agreement with DOGE, allowing the team to find 'further efficiencies' in the postal service, targeting a specific list of issues, including the management of retirement plans, workers' compensation costs, lease renewals and counterfeit postage. He also said he would seek to cut 10,000 of the Postal Service's 600,000-plus employees through early retirement offers. (DeJoy resigned later that same month.)
However, some worry that the DOGE partnership, along with Trump's pick of a FedEx board member to lead the USPS, means that the Postal Service may soon be privatized – an idea that Trump and Musk have expressed support for in the past.
'I've seen all the progress that was made during my lifetime destroyed in less than one hundred days,' John said. 'It is just so disheartening to see it all gone, pretty much overnight.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
This article first appeared on Verite News New Orleans and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Is Trump Trying to Get Back in Elon Musk's Good Graces?
Elon Musk and Donald Trump joined forces before the 2024 presidential election to help each other out. Trump needed Musk's money to buy votes and Musk needed Trump to decimate the federal government while making sure contracts with his own companies remained untouched. But the two men had a very messy falling out back in late May, when Musk departed his government role with DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency. But no matter how much the men may bicker in public, they keep trying to signal through their public statements that all is not lost. The men flip back and forth between loving and hating each other in a very public way, issuing their little tweets with petty jabs before tweeting again about how they support what the other is doing. Where does the relationship between the two men stand today? Judging by Trump's post to Truth Social on Thursday, the president wants to make it clear he likes Musk. Well, at least he likes his businesses. 'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large-scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so! I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!' Trump wrote. 'The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us. We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!' Trump continued. What prompted Trump's tweet? It might have something to do with a recent article from the Wall Street Journal that claimed the Trump administration was trying to figure out ways to harm Musk by cancelling some of his SpaceX contracts. According to the newspaper, a senior official at the General Services Administration asked the Department of Defense to provide information on June 9, laying out all the contracts DoD had with SpaceX. Unfortunately for Trump, the vast majority of the contracts, with agencies like NASA, Space Force, and the Air Force, were deemed vital for the country. But the fact that Trump was trying to figure out ways to pull contracts from Musk and his companies wasn't exactly news last week. Trump had previously said he wanted to do that during a contentious back-and-forth that played out in the media. Trump first said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk during a press conference in the White House on June 5, after the billionaire Tesla CEO had been criticizing the so-called Big Beautiful Bill. The president even said Musk might be developing 'Trump Derangement Syndrome,' and made fun of Musk's black eye in the Oval Office, saying, 'Do you want a little makeup?' The criticism prompted Musk to go nuclear, writing, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' That set off Trump who noted on Truth Social, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Musk replied to Trump's threat with his own tweet that same day: 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, would later back off his threat to decommission the Dragon spacecraft. And while it's not clear why, one imagines he had a little chat with the COO of SpaceX, Gwynne Shotwell, the person who seems to be the person who actually runs the company. Folks at NASA really like Shotwell and distrust Musk, according to several reports. We now know that Trump's name is indeed in the Epstein files, and the president was told as much by the Department of Justice in May, according to the Wall Street Journal. The White House denies this is true, but Trump was friends with Epstein before they had a falling out in the mid-2000s and appeared in photos and videos together during the 1990s. This on-again, off-again relationship between Musk and Trump is strange to see play out in public. But that's to be expected when you're dealing with men who seek the limelight. Both Musk and Trump have built their reputations by airing their grievances on social media. And the modern MAGA movement is built on whining about all the ways that people are oppressing you and being unfair. But the way that the relationship keeps swinging wildly between love and hate suggests these guys really do need each other. Musk has formed his own political party, dubbed the America Party, as a threat to Trump's candidates at the Congressional level. But it remains to be seen whether Musk really follows through on his third-party ideas. Musk, after all, said on a Tesla earnings call Wednesday that his vehicles would have unsupervised full self-driving by the end of the year. The billionaire has been saying that so much that his failed promises even have their own Wikipedia page.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Musk expects ‘rough quarters' for Tesla
Tesla CEO Elon Musk suggested Wednesday that the electric vehicle company could face a 'rough' couple of quarters going forward. The EV firm's earnings dipped 16 percent in the second quarter of 2025, falling to just under $1.2 billion in the three-month period between April and June. During the same period last year, the company posted $1.4 billion in net income. 'We probably could have a few rough quarters,' Musk said on Tesla's earnings call. 'I'm not saying it will, but we could.' However, he appeared optimistic about where the company is headed next year, as it increasingly focuses on autonomy and robotics. While Tesla still produces electric cars, Musk has sought to shift the company toward autonomous vehicles, like Robotaxi, and humanoid robots, like Optimus. Tesla has faced a tumultuous year so far, largely due to Musk's involvement in politics. After supporting President Trump's campaign last year, the Tesla CEO took on a high-profile role in his administration, leading the controversial effort by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to slash government spending. The EV maker became a political symbol for Musk, attracting both peaceful and destructive demonstrations. The company's stock tumbled, and it posted a 71 percent drop in earnings in the first quarter. After Musk left the administration, Tesla investors appeared hopeful for more stability. However, he quickly became involved in a contentious public feud with Trump over his so-called 'big, beautiful bill.' While the Tesla CEO voiced concerns about the tax and spending bill's additions to the federal deficit, Trump accused Musk of being upset about the repeal of an EV tax credit, which is set to expire at the end of September. Musk and his fellow Tesla executives noted on Wednesday's call that the repeal of the EV credit is likely to impact the company. 'Given the abrupt change, we have limited supply of vehicles in the U.S. this quarter,' Vaibhav Taneja, Tesla's chief financial officer, said, adding, 'If you're in the U.S. and looking to buy a car, place an order now, as we may not be able to guarantee delivery orders placed in the later part of August and beyond.' Taneja said Tesla is currently focused on building and delivering as many vehicles as possible before the credit expires, a push that it likely to slow the company's efforts to ramp up production of a new lower cost vehicle. He also warned of lower revenues after Trump's bill eliminated emissions penalties that Tesla could sell to other carmakers.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
DeSantis: ‘Appropriate' to pursue redistricting in Florida
Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said on Thursday it would be 'appropriate' to pursue redistricting in Florida in the mid-decade due to population shifts and what he called 'defects' in the way congressional lines have been drawn. The governor's comment came after he scored a win last week when the Florida Supreme Court ruled upheld a congressional map that blocked a challenge to the elimination of the majority-Black congressional district in the north of the state that previously was represented by former Rep. Al Lawson (D). The area that comprised the former congressional district is now divided among three Republican lawmakers. 'Just last week the Florida Supreme Court upheld the map that all of the naysayers were saying was somehow defective,' DeSantis told reporters at a press conference in Manatee County. 'I think if you look at that Florida Supreme Court analysis, there may be more defects that need to be remedied apart from what we've already done. I also think the way the population has shifted around Florida just since the Census was done in 2020, I think the state was malapportioned. So I do think it would be appropriate to do a redistricting here in the mid decade,' he said. DeSantis went on to say he believed that his state got a 'raw deal' in the Census when Florida only gained one congressional district, arguing that the state should have garnered at least two seats due to population growth. The governor said he relayed his concerns to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick after he was sworn in earlier this year. 'They said they were going to redo the count in time for 2026,' the governor said. 'They would have to do that relatively soon because you need time to draw maps and you need time to get that done.' Florida has seen an uptick in population growth following the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. A number of Democratic-held congressional seats could be impacted if redistricting were to take place, including those held in South Florida by Reps. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.), Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) and Lois Frankel (D-Fla.). Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.) in the Tampa area and Rep. Darren Soto (D-Fla.) outside of Orlando have also been floated as possible targets. Republicans and Democrats in the states have been engaged in a tit-for-tat of sorts over redistricting in recent weeks. Texas Republicans are moving ahead with redrawing district lines, while speculation has mounted that Republicans in other states like Florida could follow suit. Democrats from California to New Jersey in turn have ramped up calls to redraw their maps in an effort to blunt the GOP's efforts.