BBC ‘failed' to ask the right questions regarding Gaza documentary, says executive
BBC
News executive has said the broadcaster 'failed' to ask the right questions regarding the documentary
Gaza
: How To Survive A Warzone.
It comes after a report looking into the documentary, which was removed from BBC iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator was the son of a
Hamas
official, found that it breached BBC editorial guidelines on accuracy.
The review, published on Monday, was conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews which is independent of BBC News, and found that the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'.
It did not, however, find any other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that 'outside interests' 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'.
READ MORE
Speaking on BBC's Radio 4 World At One programme, Deborah Turness, chief executive of BBC News, said: 'Our current affairs teams, day in, day out, week in, week out, are creating and pushing out incredibly controversial, difficult, complex documentaries.
'We have really good, best-in-class systems in place, but in this we failed, and we must put in place new processes which will enable us to continue with our courageous journalism with confidence.'
She also added: 'It's about accountability. And I think what you can see today is that the BBC has taken this incredibly seriously. We have led a full and thorough investigation, which we are publishing full and transparently.
'Everything is out there, and we share the action plan that we're now putting into place to prevent this kind of mistake happening again.
'We are responsible for everything that we publish and everything we broadcast. We take it incredibly seriously, and we didn't run those questions to ground.'
Ms Turness also addressed a second Gaza documentary, Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, which was originally commissioned by the broadcaster from an independent production company called Basement Films.
However, the corporation delayed airing it until the review into Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone was released.
The documentary, which includes witness accounts from frontline
Palestinian
health workers in Gaza and documents attacks on hospitals and clinics, was later pulled entirely and aired on Channel 4 earlier this month.
Ms Turness said: 'We want to tell the stories of Gaza. We are telling the stories of Gaza.
'We've got long form projects in the pipeline. We are covering Gaza, and we're covering it with courage and without fear or favour.
'During that production, the BBC raised concerns around the social media activity of one of the journalists. Obviously, we are incredibly protective and conscious of our impartiality and our very high standards of impartiality, and we were concerned about the activity of the journalist concerned.
'We decided, in the light of those concerns, that we would pause broadcast of that documentary while waiting to see what the Peter Johnston report would bring us.
'The film company weren't happy with that pause, and they wanted the journalism to air sooner. So we were trying to find a way around that, trying to find a way without airing the documentary, to put the journalism and the voice of the doctors on our platforms.
'And then came a moment where the lead journalist went on the Today programme to talk about Israel's attacks on Iran and used language around Israel that was really not compatible with the BBC standards of impartiality and made it impossible for us to continue with the project.
'It was very difficult to imagine that it could meet the BBC standards of impartiality, and that it would have created at least a perception of partiality, had we aired it.
'And the right thing to do at that time was to walk away, because no BBC journalist could have said what that journalist said on air, and therefore we have to apply some of the same standards to those who work with us from the outside.' – PA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Irish Times poll: Support for Government parties holds steady as Sinn Féin slumps
Support for the Government parties is holding steady while Sinn Féin has slumped since the spring, according to the latest Irish Times/Ipsos B&A opinion poll . There is a substantial increase in support for independents since the last poll in April , the figures show. As economic threats loom for the Coalition from US tariffs and concerns about the multinational sector, the Government parties show little movement in support since April. The state of the parties, when undecided voters and those unlikely to vote are excluded, is: Fianna Fáil on 22 per cent (no change), Sinn Féin on 22 per cent (down four), and Fine Gael on 17 per cent (up one). READ MORE The comparisons are with the previous Irish Times poll, published last April 16th. Source: Ipsos B&A Source: Ipsos B&A Among the smaller parties, the Social Democrats party is at 6 per cent (down one), Labour is on 4 per cent (down one), the Green Party is at 3 per cent (no change), People Before Profit-Solidarity is on 2 per cent (down one) and Aontú is on 2 per cent (up one). Independents /others are at 22 per cent (up five), a figure that includes the Independent Ireland party. Undecided voters – who are excluded from the above figures – are at 25 per cent, a sharp increase of six points since April. Satisfaction with the Government is steady, at 36 per cent, while Taoiseach and Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin remains the most popular party leader, with a 44 per cent satisfaction rating, down by one point. However, Tánaiste and Fine Gael leader Simon Harris slips down by four points to 38 per cent. He is just in advance of Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald , who sees a marginal one-point decline to 36 per cent. Source: Ipsos B&A Despite the polling numbers holding up for the Government parties, the public has little sense that they are getting to grips with the State's problems. Asked if the Government is 'making progress at tackling the problems facing the country', 30 per cent said they believe progress has 'stalled', while 53 per cent said the 'problems are getting worse'. Just 14 per cent of respondents said the Government is 'making progress'. Even among Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael voters, there was not a majority of respondents who believed the Government is making progress in tackling the difficulties. Source: Ipsos B&A Nonetheless, the numbers are likely to come as a relief to the Coalition parties, especially to Fine Gael which had seen a series of sharp declines in support throughout the general election campaign last November and into the new year. The last poll showed the party had dropped to a level not seen in 30 years. That steady fall has now been arrested, and even slightly recovered, though the party remains behind Sinn Féin and Fianna Fáil. Sinn Féin will be less happy with the results. Its support jumped in the wake of the general election and the formation of Government, but has fallen back substantially today. Mary Lou McDonald has the lowest satisfaction rating of all the main party leaders. Is Mary Lou McDonald about to enter the presidential race? Listen | 41:13 The poll was conducted among a representative sample of adults aged 18 years and upwards across 120 sampling points throughout all constituencies. Unlike most other opinion polls, The Irish Times/Ipsos B&A series is conducted through face-to-face sampling. Personal in-home interviewing took place on July 14th and 15th. There were 1,200 interviews conducted and the accuracy is estimated at plus or minus 2.8 per cent.
Irish Times
9 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Ireland's dissatisfied voters are moving, but not towards the left
There are three principal messages from today's Irish Times/Ipsos B & A opinion poll , timed to coincide with the last week of the Dáil term before the summer recess. First, support for the Government is holding firm, despite the absence of any real conviction among voters that they are getting to grips with the country's problems. Second, the Coalition 's chief rivals, Sinn Féin , have slipped back significantly, suggesting there is no sense among voters that they now wish Mary Lou McDonald had emerged as taoiseach after last year's general election. And third, voters dissatisfied with the Government are gravitating not towards the parties of the left, but to Independents or don't know how they would vote. READ MORE Though Fianna Fáil is doing substantially better than its Coalition partner – five points ahead and with the most popular leader – it is Fine Gael that will be more relieved at today's numbers. The party had seen a period of decline in public support through the general election campaign late last year and into the new year, culminating in the 16 per cent it registered in April's Irish Times poll – the lowest in the series since 1994. That led to many nervous 'how low can we go?' conversations. But now the party has stopped the rot and recovers marginally today by one point to 17 per cent. Not where it wants to be for sure, but imagine the party's mood – and the pressure on its leader – if it had seen a further drop. Tánaiste Simon Harris is in a difficult position, playing number two to Taoiseach Micheál Martin in Government after a disappointing election, after which his party finished well behind its partner/rivals. On the other hand, Harris is secure in the knowledge that – assuming the Coalition lasts and he remains Fine Gael leader, both reasonable assumptions – he will become taoiseach in November 2027 and retain the office until and during the next election campaign. It is what Harris does then, rather than now, that will matter most. After a post-election jump that might have been interpreted as buyers' remorse, Sinn Féin sees its support fall away. It's a disappointing development for the party after months of fierce opposition in the Dáil and on the airwaves, often focused on the cost of living. That model of aggressive left populism – to which the party seemed to have recommitted itself after the election – does not seem to be chiming with the public. It is especially disappointing for Sinn Féin when you take into account today's finding that most people don't believe the Coalition is getting to grips with the country's problems. The party will not fixate too much on one poll, but if its research confirms this trend over time, could this prompt more soul-searching about strategy, and perhaps its leadership? There has been considerable speculation of late about the possibility of McDonald running for the presidency, which would mean a change of leader. But if party chiefs – Sinn Féin always talks about a 'collective leadership' – decide that a change is warranted, there is an easy exit ramp for McDonald in the shape of a run for the Áras . It would be a huge move for the party, but today's poll will do nothing to dampen the speculation. Is Mary Lou McDonald about to enter the presidential race? Listen | 41:13 The big winners in this set of numbers are the Independents – including the Independent Ireland party – which see their aggregate support jump by five points, from 17 per cent in April to 22 per cent. To some extent, this may be voters unimpressed by Government or Opposition parties migrating as a sort of 'none of the above' option. We have seen that kind of move before. That analysis is not contradicted by the six-point surge in the numbers, saying they don't know how they will vote (though as ever, the don't-knows are stripped out of the party support figures – after all, you can't vote for a don't-know). And it chimes with what the Government might take away from this poll as it faces into what is likely to be a difficult autumn – and could be an extremely difficult autumn. Despite the pressing policy challenges, things are going okay for the two Coalition parties, but they would be wise not to get carried away.
Irish Times
9 minutes ago
- Irish Times
EU seems to suddenly discover it has leverage on Israel
The European Union 's foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas has spent a lot of time on the phone to Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar over the last few weeks. For most of Israel's 22-month war in Gaza the EU has been seen as a bystander, paralysed by its inability to come to a joint position. Then word came through late last week that Israel had committed to letting a lot more humanitarian aid into the devastated Palestinian enclave, in a deal brokered by the EU. This would mean a 'substantial' increase in the number of trucks bringing food and other vital aid allowed into Gaza. Food supplies to kitchens and bakeries would resume, power lines to a plant supplying clean drinking water would be repaired, and closed border crossings would be opened, as part of the deal. The promise from Israel to stop choking off the flow of food, medicine and fuel into Gaza was unlikely to have been the result of a sudden change of heart by prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu 's government. The concessions were more likely an attempt to head off what had been growing momentum inside the EU to – finally – sanction Israel, or threaten to do so, if the dire conditions in Gaza did not improve. It seems it took nearly two years of a war in which at least 58,000 Palestinians have been killed for the EU to discover it has some leverage over Israel. The 11-week total blockade stopping aid entering Gaza, which left a cohort of its civilian population at risk of starvation, pushed the EU to up the pressure on Israel. An effort started by Ireland and Spain, and more recently taken up by the Dutch, forced a review that found Israel had breached obligations to respect human rights made in an 'association agreement' with the EU. The EU's foreign ministers this week debated a set of options the union could take in response. They included suspending the agreement, which governs EU-Israel relations, or shelving a free trade deal. A paper put on the table by Kallas said the EU could ban imports from illegal Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories, blacklist certain Israeli politicians or end visa-free travel for Israelis to the EU. There has been a huge amount of behind-the-scenes lobbying from Israel recently. That suggests a real concern about the reputational damage of being sanctioned by the EU. The deal on humanitarian aid was announced six days before EU foreign ministers were meeting in Brussels to debate options. The commitment to let more aid into Gaza has shifted the focus on to whether Israel follows through on that pledge, limiting the appetite to press ahead with any penalty for now. Most of the potential sanctions would require the unanimous support of all 27 capitals. That is a non-starter. Hungary, Germany, Italy, Austria and Czech Republic have blocked efforts to have the EU hold Israel accountable for its military campaign in Gaza. Suspending the free trade deal only requires a sizeable majority of support. That would be a major blow to Netanyahu, as the EU is Israel's biggest trading partner. However, for that to happen either Germany or Italy would need to switch positions, given their size, to secure enough support to suspend the trade deal. Both governments opposed the EU pursuing any of the proposed sanctions against Israel at the meeting of foreign ministers this week. They pointed to the tentative aid commitments as a win, thanks to backchannel dialogue with Israel. 'If the threat of the stick is not plausible then you have no leverage,' says Sven Kühn von Burgsdorff, a former EU ambassador to the Palestinian territories. The EU's response to Israel's war in Gaza had been defined by a 'complete absence of action', he says. There was a big question mark over whether Israel would stick to commitments it had made in its agreement with the EU, he says. One note of caution should be the fact Kallas has not said how many extra aid trucks Israel has agreed to let enter Gaza a day. Kühn von Burgsdorff served as head of the EU mission to the West Bank and Gaza from 2020 until mid-2023, where he says he 'saw the injustice before my eyes'. A German who spent 31 years as a diplomat for the EU, Kühn von Burgsdorff says the union's timid response to Israel's bombardment of Gaza is a 'disaster' for its standing in the world. It is a point the governments of Ireland and Spain have been making since the start of the conflict. 'It's about who we are, the Europeans, how we want our voice to be heard and influence the world,' Spain's foreign minister José Manuel Albares said this week. 'Europe is about human rights, about democracy, about international law and that's what we should uphold, whether it is in Ukraine or in Gaza,' he said.
