
Taxi driver jailed over Southport disorder loses bid to challenge sentence
Andrew McIntyre was jailed for seven and a half years in January for encouraging violent disorder and criminal damage and possession of a knife, following the attack on 29 July 2024 in which three girls died.
After the attack, McIntyre set up a Telegram channel called 'Southport Wake Up' and shared content from a site called Tommy Robinson/Britain First/For Britain about a protest in Southport on 30 July.
At the Court of Appeal barristers for McIntyre, formerly from Rufford, Lancashire, claimed his sentence should have been lower as he was not given enough credit for his guilty pleas.
Dismissing the appeal bid Lord Justice Holroyde said: 'It was for the judge to decide what reduction was appropriate.'
He continued: 'It is not arguable that the total sentence was excessive, let alone manifestly so.'
After the Southport attack, McIntyre said in one post: 'Rise Up English Lads. 8pm tomorrow St Luke's Rd Southport.'
Hours before violence broke out in the town, he wrote: 'Message to All … Stand in our way, even if you're just doing your job … prepare to fall.'
Liverpool Crown Court heard in January that McIntyre's phone was in the area of St Luke's Road in Southport at 7pm on 30 July, and the car he was later arrested in was also in the area when the disorder took place.
Over the following days, McIntyre congratulated those involved in the disorder and shared information about immigration advisers.
He was arrested in Liverpool on 8 August, with a knife found hidden in the boot of his car.
The court heard that when his home was searched, officers found weapons and a copy of Hitler's Mein Kampf.
Sentencing him, Judge Neil Flewitt KC said McIntyre was 'motivated by racial hatred' and was 'prominent' among those spreading misinformation after the attack.
Julian Nutter, for McIntyre, said he should have been given a shorter sentence to reflect his guilty pleas.
He said the case did not concern an offender who had 'provided the means' to commit offences or 'instructions to make those means'.
Arthur Gibson, for the Crown Prosecution Service, told the hearing in London that the evidence of McIntyre's offending 'was there for the defendant to accept or deny as he so wished'.
He continued: 'There were guilty pleas entered, but subsequent to that, even, the applicant was not accepting his full responsibility."
In the Court of Appeal's ruling, Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mrs Justice Yip and Sir Robin Spencer, said: 'The applicant incited violence and criminal damage by many people at different locations on multiple occasions.
'He thereby threatened public safety, promoted widespread damage to property and exposed police officers to serious injury.
'He boasted about the scale of disorder which disfigured Southport and other towns and cities. Throughout, his conduct was racially motivated."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
11 hours ago
- The National
I have more questions than answers about Jeremy Corbyn's new party
He and I are both admirers of Tony Benn and I share many of his political opinions. At the same time, I respectfully disagree with him on some important issues. And I point out that the 27-year-old Scottish Socialist Party has already announced – and reiterated again at our National Council in Glasgow last weekend – that it is our intention to stand in all eight regions at next year's Holyrood election. One of the most substantial differences we had with Corbyn for a long time was the nature and role of the Labour Party, which I left 40 years ago. For me Labour are not now, nor have ever been, a legitimate or trustworthy vehicle for socialist change. The independent socialist Scotland and modern democratic republic I want to see, for example, is not an ambition Labour share. The reverse in fact is true. It seems Corbyn, having split with Labour, agrees with me on the former issue at least. Keir Starmer's ambivalence toward the ongoing slaughter in Gaza is merely the last straw for many of his erstwhile voters. Others were just as disgusted by his attack on the benefits for people with disabilities and families with more than two children. Then there is the betrayal of the Waspi women and the repugnant decision to divert international aid spending towards armaments. Many questions remain about the Corbyn/Sultana project, however, largely because its advocates have been slow to provide answers. Is it their intention, for example, to create another version of the Labour Party? In other words, an electoral machine that may criticise but ultimately sustains capitalism? Where is the primacy of class in the new party's politics? How will it prevent the broad, and therefore shallow, coalition of disparate opinions collapsing under the pressure of ideological divisions and competing tactical priorities? If I were to guess at the social composition of the 600,000 people who have reportedly signed up for this project, I'd say many were likely to be students, others would be from the pro-Palestinian diaspora. And most would be from Greater London and the biggest English cities. READ MORE: 'One that belongs to you': Jeremy Corbyn reveals temporary name of new party My late father, a lifelong socialist and trade union member, never took to Corbyn as Labour leader. He felt he was just not 'hard enough' to withstand what the Labour right would throw at him. I confess I could see what he meant. Corbyn is a decent man, and it is an outrage that the charge of antisemitism was levelled against him for criticising the actions of the ultra-reactionary Israeli government. And yet he often seems like 'an altar boy at a knife fight', prone, according to Owen Jones's book This Land to disappearing to his allotment for days at a time to avoid confrontation. Just as Starmer has come a cropper for being merely the anti-Tory conduit in last year's election, Corbyn can surely see that offering an opposition to Starmer is not enough for people to sustainably coalesce behind. Another feature of the Corbyn announcement I found interesting was examining who is not joining – John McDonnell, Diane Abbott (below), Ian Lavery and other members of the 'Bennite' group of Labour MPs, nor are the trade unions. Nor are many socialists in the schemes of Scotland. The project, it seems to me, is therefore hamstrung by the contradictions within it. It's another London-centric project whose approach to the national question is at best ambivalent – they say they will not take a position on Scottish independence. I fear this new party is therefore less likely to succeed in Scotland than many believe. If it fails to build roots in working-class communities here, it will not sustain and in due course may perversely act as an accelerant for further advance by forces such as Reform UK. The rise in support for Reform can also be traced to Starmer's door. It has been seven years in the making and while the first five were spent largely trying to usurp the Tory Party, it really took off under the weight of Starmer's failures. They won the Runcorn by-election in May – Labour's fifth-safest seat – and are on course to win the Welsh Assembly election. They have 500 councillors, many in England's poorest counties and their narrative that 'Britain is broken and needs Reform' resonates with millions. Successful strategies demand thorough preparation, immense funding and resolute application. Nigel Farage, I regret to say, seems better prepared and more streetwise than Corbyn. The question I have been examining in this column over recent months is not so much 'is support for Reform increasing in Scotland?' but rather 'why is it on such a sharp incline?' What is driving its support? It's a question that demands an honest and comprehensive answer from an independence movement losing support to arch-Unionists. READ MORE: John Curtice gives verdict on John Swinney's indyref2 plan and SNP chances in 2026 Starmer's failures are undoubtedly the main driver. He promised to redistribute wealth in favour of working people and to fully fund public services such as the NHS, social care and education. He palpably has not. But it is also true that John Swinney must take his share of the blame for Reform's surge here. As First Minister, he has presided over NHS Scotland's worst crisis and betrayed a promise to deliver a national care service. His cut-and-paste independence strategy is no more credible. Claiming only an SNP majority at [[Holyrood]] next year can deliver indyref2 is undermined by a poor record in government over the past 19 years. That referendum also remains in the gift of Westminster and Swinney has never offered a serious route to achieving it. Incapable of thwarting the rise of Reform, he is unable to extricate himself from the view voters have of him as part of the political establishment implicated in the failure to address the grotesque inequalities, privatisations and exploitation people endure here. The Scottish Socialist Party will offer people an alternative to the parties of the 'extreme centre' and Reform UK at next year's election. And in doing so we will highlight our unwavering support for an independent socialist Scotland and a modern democratic republic – and the fact our MSPs would live on the average worker's wage, as I did between 2003-07. We'd replace the hated and unfair Council Tax with an income-based alternative where the poorest are exempt, and point proudly to an unparalleled record, over a quarter of a century, of support for workers and communities in struggle.


Metro
14 hours ago
- Metro
Russia issues warning to 'everyone' after Trump moves nuclear submarines
Days after President Donald Trump said he deployed nuclear submarines 'in the region' of Russia, the Kremlin has issued a warning to the world. Trump said nuclear submarines are near Russia after previous threats from officials in the country. He's repeatedly given Russia an ultimatum to end the war in Ukraine soon, or face sanctions. The official deadline Trump has given Russia is August 8, but a war of words online has begun before that deadline. 'I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' wrote Trump on his Truth Social platform. 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.' After being told to 'watch his words' by Trump, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev shocked many when he reminded the US of Russia's nuclear strike capabilities. 'Remember how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be,' Medvedev wrote on Telegram, referencing Soviet-era Doomsday nuclear weapons. Now, the Kremlin has issued an official statement after Trump said nuclear submarines had been moved towards their country: 'Russia is very attentive to nuclear non-proliferation. We believe that everyone must be extremely careful with nuclear rhetoric.' But former Russian president Medvedev himself has threatened nuclear war if Russia loses the war in Ukraine. 'It doesn't occur to any of the wretches to draw the following elementary conclusion: That the loss of a nuclear power in a conventional war could provoke a nuclear war,' he said in 2023. 'Nuclear powers have not lost major conflicts on which their fate depends. And this should be obvious to anyone.' Though the Kremlin has claimed 'everyone' must be careful with nuclear rhetoric, they themselves haven't been. On state-funded television, hosts have openly threatened nuclear attacks on Britain and other Western countries. 'The people of Britain are there, they also want to live a good and happy life at our expense, right? But if there is no Britain, there is no problem,' Reservist general and hardline MP Andrei Gurulev previously said. In the face of these increasing threats, the US president's tone toward Russia in recent weeks has changed to a more aggressive and far less friendly. In July, when asked if he was done with Putin, Trump said: 'I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him.' More Trending And when pressed on whether he trusts the Russian leader, he replied: 'I trust almost no one.' Trump then said that the first lady was among the people who convinced him to change his tune toward Putin. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit,'' he said. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Donald Trump rushes to Sydney Sweeney's defence after voting controversy MORE: Russian TikTokkers 'arrested for taking selfies outside oil depot inferno' MORE: Risk and reward, Trump's Mini-Me and planting trees for the planet


Scottish Sun
14 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
How Putin's ‘secret daughter' lives lavish life in exile as mum went from cleaner to millionaire after Vlad ‘affair'
There, she works at two anti-war art galleries while launching thinly veiled attacks on Mad Vlad VLADDY'S GIRL How Putin's 'secret daughter' lives lavish life in exile as mum went from cleaner to millionaire after Vlad 'affair' IN the shadow of one of the world's biggest tyrants, she lived like a princess - jet-setting in private planes, dripping in designer gear, and sipping champagne behind Gucci facemasks. Now, Vladimir Putin's rumoured secret daughter has seemingly turned her back on her gilded past — and on the man alleged to be her father. Advertisement 12 Elizaveta Krivonogikh is rumoured to be Putin's secret love child 12 Elizaveta, 22, sports a designer facemask in pictures posted to her social media Credit: Instagram 12 She is said to be Vlad's offspring with his former long-term lover Svetlana Krivonogikh (pictured) Credit: Proekt Media 12 The Kremlin has always denied that Putin has any relation to Elizaveta Credit: Getty Elizaveta Krivonogikh, 22 – also known as Luiza Rozova and now Elizaveta Rudnova - is now living in self-imploded exile in Paris. There, she works at two anti-war art galleries while launching thinly veiled attacks on Putin, blasting the "man who took millions of lives and destroyed mine". She hasn't named the Russian despot directly — but the target of her cryptic fury couldn't be clearer. She recently wrote on her private Telegram channel Art of Luiza: "It's liberating to be able to show my face to the world again. Advertisement "It reminds me of who I am and who destroyed my life." From Gucci to guilt Born in 2003 during Putin's first term in office, Elizaveta was the result — according to persistent allegations — of a clandestine affair between the then-rising Kremlin strongman and Svetlana Krivonogikh, a former cleaner turned multimillionaire. Svetlana, now in her 40s, went from scrubbing floors to owning a stake in sanctioned Rossiya Bank and a property empire worth over $100 million. She also owns a raunchy St Petersburg nightclub, Leningrad Centre, known for its erotic shows. Advertisement Elizaveta grew up drenched in luxury - private jets, exclusive nightclubs, and designer wardrobes. She would flaunt her life of privilege on Instagram while Russia grappled with poverty and pandemic chaos. But in early 2022, just before Russia launched its brutal invasion of Ukraine, she abruptly vanished from Russian social media. Putin's prized nuke sub base 'catastrophically' close to epicenter of 8.8 megaquake The Paris pivot She re-emerged in Paris under a new name - Elizaveta Rudnova - reportedly in a bid to sever ties with her past. Advertisement Ukrainian TV later claimed she was living in the French capital with a passport under the name Rudnova, allegedly ditching the patronymic Vladimirovna, which would confirm her father's name as Vladimir. Her new surname is a likely nod to the late Oleg Rudnov, one of Putin's longtime cronies. 12 Elizaveta used to show her wealth on social media - but her account was deleted when the Ukraine war began Credit: East2West 12 She posted a series of glamorous shots of her luxury lifestyle Credit: Instagram Advertisement 12 Designer fashion features heavily on Elizaveta's Instagram account Credit: Instagram 12 Luxury-lover Elizaveta's posts showcase her champagne lifestyle Credit: Instagram Graduating from the prestigious ICART School of Cultural and Art Management in 2024, she has since taken on a role at two Parisian galleries — L Galerie in Belleville and Espace Albatros in Montreuil — both known for hosting anti-war and dissident exhibitions. Her responsibilities reportedly include curating exhibitions and producing video content. Advertisement But her presence in Paris's dissident art circles has sparked fury. 'She looks like Putin' Not everyone in the expat art world is ready to forgive — or forget. Artist Nastya Rodionova, who fled Russia in 2022, publicly severed ties with the two galleries upon learning of Elizaveta's involvement. She posted on Facebook: "It is inadmissible to allow a person who comes from a family of beneficiaries of [Putin's] regime to come into confrontation with the victims of that regime. Advertisement 12 The 22-year-old is reportedly working at two art galleries in Paris Credit: Social media 12 She also allegedly ditched her tyrant dad's surname Credit: Elizaveta Krivonogikh 12 In a cryptic post, Elizaveta blasted the 'man who took millions of lives and destroyed mine' Credit: East2West "My personal answer in this case is no." Advertisement Dmitry Dolinsky, director of L Association which runs both galleries, stood by Elizaveta. He told The Times: 'She looks like Putin but so do 100,000 other people. I haven't seen a DNA test." Still, the circumstantial evidence is hard to ignore — the timing of her birth, her mother's overnight fortune, and the uncanny facial resemblance which an AI expert pegged at 70 per cent similarity to Putin. Who is Luiza Rozova? LUIZA Rozova, born Elizaveta Krivonogikh, is the 22-year-old rumoured illegitimate daughter of Vladimir Putin. She is allegedly the love child from an affair between the dictator and his former cleaner, Svetlana Krivonogikh. These claims were first made by the Kremlin-critical investigative project "Proekt" back in 2020. She often used to share details of her lavish life on Instagram, until the page was suddenly taken down around the time of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Luiza is reported to have moved to Paris and graduated from a course at the ICART School of Cultural and Art Management in June 2024. She posts in a private Telegram channel called "Art of Luiza", where she has made allusions to her reported father. Rewriting the story Once the toast of Moscow's rich kids scene, Luiza now presents herself as a politically conscious exile. Advertisement Her posts have shifted from flaunting Miu Miu and Maison Margiela to cryptic denouncements of tyranny and war. "The man who took millions of lives and destroyed mine," she wrote, pointedly. She also lamented: "I can't make an extra lap around my beloved St. Petersburg. "I can't visit my favourite places and establishments." Advertisement An older post from 2021 saw her share an extraordinary 'make love, not war' message, in the wake of street protests which saw 5,100-plus arrests by heavily armed police. Her transformation hasn't gone unnoticed — nor has her attempt to claim space in the anti-Putin resistance, even as her background screams privilege. But some, like Rodionova, still see her as as a symbol of the very elite that profited from Putin's long reign — a hidden child from a hidden empire. 12 Svetlana Krivonogikh is a shareholder in a bank sanctioned by the West due to its close links to the Russian president Credit: Proekt Media Advertisement Vlad's 'lover' Her mother, Svetlana, has never publicly confirmed the affair, but has become a posterwoman for the sudden, unexplained enrichment of Putin's inner circle. She was sanctioned by the UK in 2023 and is said to own assets across Moscow, St Petersburg, and Sochi. When independent outlet Proekt first exposed the story, Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he'd 'never heard anything' about Krivonogikh — an evasion that only intensified speculation. Advertisement Putin, who officially recognises only two daughters from his previous marriage, has never acknowledged Luiza — nor denied her.