
Trump kicks off a yearlong celebration of America's 250th anniversary in Iowa
tax cut legislation
that he championed.
On the eve of the
July 4th holiday
, Trump said "there could be no better birthday present for America than the phenomenal victory we achieved just hours ago, when Congress passed the one big beautiful bill to make America great again."
The Republican president plans to sign the legislation Friday during a picnic at the White House, while stealth bombers and fighter jets that participated in recent airstrikes in Iran fly overhead, a symbolic synthesis of the overwhelming force that he's deployed to reshape Washington and the country.
"We've saved our country," he boasted after taking the stage, pumping his fists while singer Lee Greenwood belted out Trump's campaign trail anthem "God Bless the USA." In addition to tax breaks, the legislation boosts funding for deportations while cutting back on healthcare and food assistance for low income people.
The event at the
Iowa State Fairgrounds
in Des Moines was the opening act for a yearlong birthday party to mark two and a half centuries of American independence. The plans will culminate next summer with a massive fair on the National Mall in Washington featuring exhibits from every state.
Live Events
U.S. Ambassador Monica Crowley, Trump's liaison to the organizing group, America250, said in an interview that the celebration "is something that I think that all Americans can come together to celebrate and honor our history as well as our present and our future."
When she took the stage, she delivered an ode to Trump, describing him as the inheritor of the country's original revolutionary spirit.
"I don't know what more people expect or want from an American president," Crowley said. "He is literally fulfilling the entire job description, and so much more."
A few thousand spectators waited for Trump for hours in 90-plus degree Fahrenheit (32 degree Celsius) heat. The audience was awash in Trump paraphernalia, including "Make America Great Again" hats, shirts that said "Ultra MAGA" and a stuffed monkey with its own miniature Trump shirt.
During the speech, Trump heard what sounded like fireworks. The anniversary of his attempted assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania, was only ten days away.
"It's only fireworks, I hope," he said. "Famous last words."
Unlike a year ago, Trump was speaking from behind thick bulletproof glass.
"You always have to think positive," he said. "I didn't like that sound either."
The reminder of one of the darkest moments in recent political history did little to dampen Trump's political euphoria. He boasted about the recent U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, the declining price of eggs, the lower number of migrants crossing the southern border with Mexico and his election victories.
"We got great marks in the first term, and this is going to blow it away," Trump said. He said he likes calling his wife Melania "first lady" because "it reminds me that I'm president."
Organizers see the coming year of festivities as a way to help unite a polarized nation and bridge partisanship. But it's a monumental task given the country's divides and the staunch Democratic opposition to the 800-plus page package full of the GOP's main policy priorities. More U.S. adults also disapprove than approve of how the Republican president is doing his job.
A recent Gallup poll showed the widest partisan split in patriotism in over two decades, with only about a third of Democrats saying they are proud to be American, compared with about 9 in 10 Republicans.
About 4 in 10 U.S. adults approve of Trump's performance as president, according to a June AP-NORC poll, while about 6 in 10 disapprove.
The Trump administration's own cost-cutting moves this year threaten to complicate the celebrations. Reduced funding led the
National Endowment for the Humanities
to send letters to state humanities councils across the country saying their federal grants had been terminated. Many of those councils had been working on programming to commemorate the 250th anniversary and had already dedicated some of their federal grants for events at libraries, schools and museums.
Gabrielle Lyon, executive director of Illinois Humanities and chair of the Illinois America 250 Commission, said the cuts already have curtailed some of the planned programs, including community readings of the Declaration of Independence.
"It is very hard to understand how we can protect and preserve people's ability locally to make this mean something for them, and to celebrate what they want to celebrate, if you're not funding the humanities councils," Lyon said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Trade talks on, but India responds to Trump tariffs on auto with a ‘right' to retaliate at WTO
India has informed the WTO of its plan to impose retaliatory duties on the US in response to steep American tariffs on auto imports. The move comes as both countries attempt to finalise a trade deal by July 9, with India insisting on its right to protect key export sectors. read more India has formally notified the World Trade Organisation (WTO) of its intention to impose retaliatory duties on the United States in response to Washington's 25% tariffs on automobiles and certain auto parts. According to the notification, the American measures are expected to impact approximately $2.89 billion worth of Indian exports, prompting New Delhi to claim its right to suspend equivalent trade concessions. 'India reserves the right to suspend concessions or other obligations… that are substantially equivalent to the adverse effects of the measure to India's trade,' the statement submitted to the WTO read. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While the Indian government has not yet detailed the specific tariff rates or the list of U.S. goods to be targeted, it has indicated that the retaliation would match the estimated $725 million in duties the US will collect annually from these measures. The development comes amid ongoing efforts by both nations to conclude a trade deal before a July 9 deadline set by US President Donald Trump. Trump has warned that if no agreement is reached, a sweeping 26% tariff could be imposed on all Indian imports. India has expressed willingness to reduce some of its high tariffs for American goods but has held firm on sensitive sectors like agriculture and dairy, where it has resisted Washington's demands for wider market access. The move was detailed in a WTO Council for Trade in Goods meeting, where India stated that it intends to suspend certain trade concessions and obligations under various WTO provisions. The US imposed the 25% tariff on March 26, applying it to imports of passenger cars, light trucks, and select automobile components. These duties, which took effect from May 3, 2025, will continue indefinitely. India maintains that these US tariffs amount to safeguard measures, a trade tool typically used to protect domestic industries from import surges. However, New Delhi has pointed out that Washington has not formally registered the measures as safeguards with the WTO—a requirement under international trade rules. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to India, the US action violates the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 and the WTO's Agreement on Safeguards. Since Washington has not responded to India's call for consultations, New Delhi has now exercised its right to seek compensation through retaliatory trade measures. This isn't the first time India has used this approach. Earlier in March, it adopted similar retaliatory measures in response to US tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium exports. India's latest move highlights its intent to defend its trade interests at the multilateral level even as it engages bilaterally to resolve differences with the United States. With inputs from agencies


Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's $7 billion education funding freeze blindsides schools
On Monday, state education leaders across the country got a brief but startling email from the Education Department. Nearly $7 billion in education funding—which Congress had approved and President Trump signed into law in March—wouldn't be released as expected the following day. The email didn't elaborate on why, mentioning a review. With the new school year not far off, the funding freeze has sent superintendents from California to Rhode Island scrambling to figure out how to handle a shortfall. The money had been earmarked for a range of activities, including after-school programs, teacher training, adult education and support for students learning English. 'It's too late to be making this kind of a decision," said Eric Mackey, the Alabama state superintendent, who describes himself as an 'old-fashioned fiscal conservative." On Tuesday, the association of state education chiefs convened an emergency meeting, as their members tried to advise confused district leaders. Advocacy groups attacked the decision as illegal, and educators began contemplating how to plan for the coming school year. Cheryl Jordan, the superintendent of a diverse, midsize district near San Jose, Calif., said she had planned to use some of the funds for teachers of students learning English and for an onboarding program for new teachers. If the money isn't released, it would leave a roughly $1.5 million hole in the district's budget. It's too late to make cuts for this school year, Jordan said, so the district would then accumulate a deficit and have to make deeper cuts the following school year. 'It will definitely greatly impact us," she said. Armen Tooloee, a spokesman for the White House Office of Management and Budget, said the move reflected an 'ongoing programmatic review" and that 'no decisions have been made yet." He added that 'initial findings" from the review show that grants had gone to 'subsidize a radical leftwing agenda." Tooloee said that in one instance a grant had 'promote[d] illegal immigrant advocacy organizations." He didn't say what share of the funding has gone to uses that OMB deems inappropriate. The administration has made similar arguments for withholding funds for other federal initiatives, including for NPR and USAID. Mackey of Alabama said he wasn't aware of instances of such uses of funds in his state, and would want them brought to his attention if the administration were aware of any. The billions of dollars in question amount to less than 1% of total money spent on public schools. But the grants are spread widely across thousands of school districts and every state in the country. Chase Christensen, the superintendent and school principal of an 83-student district in northern Wyoming, said he had planned to use the funds to help train teachers on a new math curriculum and to continue a self-defense program. Without that money, he can probably preserve the teacher training but he isn't sure about the self-defense course, which Christensen says has boosted students' self-confidence. In Durham County, N.C., Superintendent Anthony Lewis is concerned about a dozen or so federally funded instructional coaches who mentor and support new teachers. Lewis doesn't know whether the money will ultimately come through or whether he should try to find another funding source. 'It's impacting our ability to plan effectively for this coming year," he said. The Trump administration has several possible next moves. It could ask Congress to approve the cancellation of these funds. It previously sought congressional approval for other withheld federal dollars. In a recent Senate hearing, OMB Director Russell Vought said further requests are 'certainly an option." The administration could on its own not distribute the funds—which would set up a challenge to a federal law that bars the executive from unilaterally withholding congressionally approved dollars. The administration could ultimately restore the grants, or some of them, after its review. Thomas Beck, an attorney who was on the Trump transition team where he wrote memos about withholding federal funds, said the administration might argue that states and schools have failed to adhere to the terms of the education grants. Lawmakers from both parties have raised objections. 'This funding was appropriated by Congress and is critical to Maine public school programs," Sen. Susan Collins (R., Maine) said. Sen. Patty Murray (D., Wash.) also criticized the move. This is the Trump administration's latest effort to cut federal dollars for local schools and shrink the Education Department's budget. Officials have argued that the department and some of its programs have proven ineffective. In March, Education Secretary Linda McMahon revoked a previously approved extension for spending Covid-relief money. A federal judge recently blocked this move, and schools have been able to tap in to this funding again. The administration has appealed. Angélica Infante-Green, the commissioner of education in Rhode Island, said she was particularly worried about withheld funding that has been used to train teachers in science-based reading instruction. 'It's just been so very chaotic for the last six months," she said. 'This is just another layer of that chaos." Write to Matt Barnum at


India Gazette
25 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Assam, Meghalaya to sign MoU to define boundaries between the states
New Delhi [India], July 4 (ANI): Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Friday announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to define boundaries between Assam and Meghalaya. In a post on social media X, the CM wrote that the signed MoU would help people and administration have clarity on the jurisdiction and would also allow governance to shine in the 'once grey areas.' 'In 1972, when Meghalaya was carved out, a significant portion of its boundary with Assam was left ambiguous, often leading to chaos and tension between our states. 50 years later, in 2022, under the leadership of Adarniya @narendramodi Ji and in the presence of Adarniya @AmitShah Ji, our two states signed a historic MoU to begin defining our boundaries. 6/12 disputed areas have been resolved and earmarked for boundary works, and fruits of that agreement are now flowing in as the first pillars get erected. So, how do these pillars improve harmony between the sister states? People and administration on both sides now have clarity on jurisdiction. Governance can finally shine in these 'once grey areas', the post read. Meanwhile, on July 3, CM Sarma challenged the Congress to say that cow slaughter in the name of sacrifice was a 'heinous crime', stating that it would take seven lifetimes for the Opposition party to say it. 'I challenge Congress to muster the courage to tell the Muslim community in Assam that cow slaughter in the name of sacrifice is a heinous crime. They will never be able to say it. When it comes to the rights of Gau mata (cow), the BJP does not care about any vote bank,' Sarma posted on X. He said that the BJP has the courage to say that Islam doesn't mandate cow sacrifice and allows for the sacrifices of other animals. 'They will never speak against Qurbani. However, the BJP has the courage to say it clearly: Islam doesn't mandate cow sacrifice specifically. Qurbani can be of other animals, too. BJP dares to urge people that on the next Eid, please offer a goat, not a cow. Can Congress do the same? It will take them seven lifetimes to say this. Tell me, who is the true well-wisher of the cow?' Sarma said in a video posted on his X account. (ANI)