Logistics rents extend slump in China as suppliers relocate to hedge against tariff war
Rents declined 12.8 per cent in the first six months from a year earlier, property consultancy Knight Frank said in a report on Wednesday. The market weakened by 14.1 per cent in the July to December period last year.
Beijing and Shanghai, China's main commercial centres, highlighted the shrinking demand as rents tumbled 17.2 per cent and 11.3 per cent, respectively, this year. The vacancy rate climbed to 28.9 per cent in Beijing and 26.8 per cent in Shanghai, and the worst may yet be ahead given US President Donald Trump's tariff war.
'The prospect of rents bottoming out is unlikely within the next 12 months,' said Christine Li, Asia-Pacific head of research at Knight Frank, citing US-China trade tensions as a key driver of client relocation. 'Beyond that, it's a wait-and-see on how Trump's policies will shift trade in the region.'
An aerial photo shows a logistics transfer centre in Hengfeng County in eastern Jiangxi Province. Photo: Xinhua
Logistics property owners are losing out to their rivals in India, Knight Frank's data showed. The South Asian nation reported the strongest logistics rental growth in the Asia-Pacific region, driven by sustained demand from the manufacturing sector. Rents climbed 3.4 per cent, versus 2.1 per cent in the second half of 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Where does China stand after US trade deal with EU seen as ‘more rhetoric than substance'?
Analysts say Washington could be hoping its agreement with Brussels offers the US more leverage over China As a framework trade deal was struck between the United States and the European Union on the eve of a new round of trade talks between Beijing and Washington, analysts said China was in a position to stay calm and wait to see how the deal actually pans out, even if the US is likely to use it as a bargaining chip. But Beijing should still be aware of the potential alliance between its two major trading partners in the economic sphere, as the US and EU could transform shared sore points into a united front against China, they added. On Monday, China and the US began their third round of trade negotiations in Stockholm, one day after Washington and Brussels announced a trade deal framework that included a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods entering the US. 'The US may believe that, after essentially securing the EU, it will have greater negotiating leverage when dealing with China,' said Cui Hongjian, the head of EU studies at Beijing Foreign Studies University. The EU agreed to purchase US$750 billion worth of American energy over three years, as well as hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of US military equipment, and invest more than US$600 billion above current levels in the world's largest economy, US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced. The two sides also agreed to drop tariffs to zero on a range of goods, including aircraft, plane parts, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor equipment and some agricultural products, von der Leyen said on Sunday. Unlike the immediate impact of US tariffs, Europe's pledges – whether on investments, energy deals, or defence spending – are backloaded and can be further drawn out, Cui said. Newsletter Daily, Monday to Friday China at a Glance By submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don't want these, tick here {{message}} Thanks for signing up for our newsletter! Please check your email to confirm your subscription. Follow us on Facebook to get our latest news. 'Europe's approach is to first placate the US before addressing specific disputes, banking on the possibility of enduring another four years under a potential Trump administration,' he said. 'Many of its concessions can be diluted over time through bureaucratic processes and renegotiation. 'The so-called agreement is more rhetoric than substance, with Europe offering largely vague long-term promises. In reality, the actual implementation of these commitments seems far from reliable.' We firmly oppose any party reaching deals at the expense of China's interests Guo Jiakun, Ministry of Foreign Affairs As a result, there is no need for Beijing to hastily react just because the US and Europe have reached a deal, he said. 'Further observation is warranted. Yet, Beijing must carefully watch if Europe seeks to redirect the US' focus toward China, using Sino-Western tensions as a tool to resolve transatlantic disputes,' Cui added. Regarding the US-EU deal, Guo Jiakun, a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said at a press conference on Monday that China had always advocated resolving trade disputes through equal dialogue and consultation among all parties. 'At the same time, we firmly oppose any party reaching deals at the expense of China's interests,' Guo said. On top of challenges from US tariffs, the China-EU relationship has also been fraught in recent years, despite ongoing dialogue, with both sides seeking to avoid a full-blown trade war. In particular, the EU has accused China of exporting industrial overcapacity, deliberately flooding European markets with subsidised products – especially in tent-pole sectors such as electric vehicles – and Brussels has said this action distorts trade and threatens local businesses. Top leaders from the bloc were in Beijing last week to attend a high-level bilateral summit, where they also met with President Xi Jinping. Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for the Asia-Pacific region at Natixis, said the US-EU trade deal basically only clarified that Europe would find it more costly to export to the US. 'So, Europe will swallow the 15 per cent tariffs, as everybody else is doing,' she said. 'It's not a major game changer for China-EU relations.' Having locked in deals with other major economies, including Europe and Japan, the US may adopt a tougher stance in trade talks with China, according to Zhuang Bo, global macro strategist at Loomis Sayles Investment Asia. Trump, EU chief strike 15% trade deal in transatlantic stand-off But at the micro level, the 15 per cent US tariff on European goods still gives Chinese exporters some breathing room, as Chinese exports may remain price-competitive, relative to their European counterparts, despite facing levies that are around 30 percentage points higher, Zhuang said. Andy Chen, an independent consultant based in Tianjin, said the US-EU deal could pose strategic risks to China by shifting EU energy and industrial import preferences towards the US, potentially undermining China's comparative advantage in high-end manufacturing, clean-energy exports, and influence in transatlantic investment flows. 'The EU's commitment to buy over US$750 billion in US energy – likely including liquefied natural gas, crude oil and possibly hydrogen – could displace Chinese exporters of solar modules, lithium batteries and other clean-energy components,' he said. He added that the EU's additional US$600 billion investment pledge to the US may crowd out capital previously allocated to, or under consideration for, China. 'This US-EU deal also signals a shift from multilateralism to bilateral power-based trade alignments,' Chen said. But Su Yue, principal economist for China at the Economist Intelligence Unit, said the deal may not cause significant harm to China, because most Chinese and European industries are not in direct competition. 'Most of the goods China exports to the US aren't things Europe produces itself, so I don't see obvious damage to China from this,' she said. 'One scenario is if Chinese companies plan to build factories in Europe – for example, a parts factory in Hungary – to serve the US market. In that case, these moves might become more strategically important,' Su added.
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Will CK Hutchison's plan to tap mainland Chinese firm for Panama ports deal pay off?
Hong Kong's CK Hutchison Holdings may win Beijing's support through its plan to bring in a mainland Chinese company as a strategic investor in the controversial sale of its global port stakes, but the change in tack has also fuelled uncertainty, experts have said. Analysts said that the planned US$23 billion deal to sell CK Hutchison's 43 overseas ports, including two at the Panama Canal, could become a bargaining chip between the US and China as they began their third round of trade talks in Sweden. Experts weighed in after the Hong Kong conglomerate, controlled by tycoon Li Ka-shing, revealed on Monday that it planned to invite a mainland firm to join a consortium behind the deal as a 'significant member'. A deadline for exclusive talks between CK Hutchison and the consortium, led by American asset manager BlackRock and the prominent Italian Aponte shipping family's Terminal Investment Limited, expired at the weekend. The conglomerate said that changes would need to be made to the membership and the structure of the transaction for the deal 'to be capable of being approved by all relevant authorities'. Lau Siu-kai, a consultant for the semi-official Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macau Studies think tank, said he believed CK Hutchison's latest move was an attempt to gain the approval of Beijing, which has signalled its anger over the deal.
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump says to cut 50-day deadline for Russia to end Ukraine war
US President Donald Trump has said he intends to shorten the 50-day deadline he gave Russian leader Vladimir Putin to reach a deal that ends the three-year war in Ukraine. His announcement on Monday came as Russia fired an overnight barrage at Ukraine of more than 300 drones, four cruise missiles and three ballistic missiles, the Ukrainian air force said. Trump said two weeks ago he would implement 'severe tariffs' on Russia unless a peace deal could be reached by early September, as he expressed exasperation with Putin over the bombardment of Ukrainian cities amid the US leader's attempts to stop the fighting. Trump said he would give Putin 10 to 12 days from Monday, meaning he wants peace efforts to make progress by August 7 to 9. The plan includes possible sanctions and secondary tariffs targeting Russia's trading partners. The formal announcement would come later on Monday or on Tuesday, he said. 'No reason in waiting,' Trump said of the shorter timeline. 'We just don't see any progress being made.' Putin has 'got to make a deal. Too many people are dying', Trump said during a visit to Scotland.
