
'At some point reality has to hit,' says ex-Arkane founder Raphael Colantonio on Game Pass — 'this model just doesn't work long-term'
Raphael Colantonio, ex-Arkane Studios founder, has recently delivered a stark assessment of Xbox Game Pass. He suggested that the gaming giant's flagship subscription model harbors fundamental laws.
His comments amidst the recent project cancellations and Microsoft layoffs point to long-term viability concerns that can reshape the industry landscape. He even hinted at the inevitable reckoning of the approach that's been championed by Microsoft.
Raphael Colantonio issues stark warnings
The ex-Arkane Studios founder didn't mince his words on Xbox Game Pass. He straightaway labelled it as an
'unsustainable model'
that has been actively damaging the industry. As per his argument, this damage has been masked for many years by Microsoft's vast financial resources. He called it their
'infinite money'
that's subsidizing it all and artificially propping up the service, but economics is not adding up for most publishers and developers.
Making some bleak core predictions, he said, coexistence with the traditional sales models for Xbox Game Pass is impossible. As he contends, Game Pass faces a binary future. It would either dominate to the point of eliminating all competitors, or Microsoft would be forced to abandon it entirely. In his words,
"
At some point reality has to hit."
Colantonio's comments put a lot of emphasis on the inherent long-term weakness of this model and show increased skepticism from the industry veterans.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
새로 나온 '실비보험', 합리적인 가격과 실속있는 보장으로 최적가 비교가입!...
굿리치 [등록번호:제2006038313호]
가입하기
Undo
These veterans believe the subscription services can devalue games or destabilize the development budgets.
Job cuts and corporate pressures create a ripple effect
Colantonio's critique has emerged amidst the significant turmoil in Microsoft's gaming division. The recent months saw deeper cuts, including some high-profile project cancellations. Rare's Everwild and Initiative's 'Perfect Dark' reboot, apart from studio closures, as per him, these actions were not isolated incidents.
Journalists Tom Warren and Jez Corden have reported that these stemmed from intense financial pressure. As per reports, Microsoft's CFO Amy Hood recently set some aggressive and potentially unrealistic targets for Xbox. As noted, the pressure intensified quite significantly, following Activision Blizzard's massive acquisition. The sheer cost of the deal, together with Game Pass investments trying to be profitable, has created a challenging new financial reality.
Further compounding the struggles of Xbox is Microsoft's strategic pivot. $80 billion, a very significant resource, has been redirected to generative AI, a priority that's been championed by CEO Satya Nadella and Hood. Such a shift within investment focus, completely away from gaming, has further squeezed the operating environment of Xbox, putting it in a precarious position, with further turbulence expected ahead.
Gaming Industry concerns
for Xbox Game Pass are rising
Colantonio is not alone with his skepticism. Even Michael Douse, the Publishing Director at Baldur's Gate 3 developer Larian Studios, has echoed the concern about sustainability. He did highlight a widespread industry question—
"What happens when all that money runs out?"
The fear now deters many publishers from completely embracing the model of Game Pass.
Both Colantonio and Douse are seeing a potential compromise being made.
As per their suggestion, subscription services can find a sustainable niche, keeping the primary focus on back catalogue titles, which are older games that are beyond the initial sales peak. As per their argument, launching major new releases on day one of subscription undercuts traditional sales. It creates unsustainable economics for most publishers and developers not named Microsoft.
Can Xbox Game Pass survive without hurting the industry?
Future of Xbox Game Pass now remains a pivotal question.
As Microsoft continues to balance colossal investments, shifting AI focus and corporate expectations, the viability of the subscription cornerstone does face its sternest test. The warning of Colantonio for now serves as a potent reminder that even all that infinite money cannot defy economic reality forever.
Despite all warnings, Microsoft is pushing Game Pass, banking upon subscriber growth. Yet, with no clear path to profitability and high skepticism from industry, subscription gaming's future remains uncertain.
To wrap up, Colantonio's critique puts forward an important question: Is Xbox Game Pass sustainable?, or is it a bubble that has been waiting to burst?' With Microsoft trying to navigate financial pressures and has been facing a lot of industry backlash, the next few years ahead could determine whether subscription gaming will collapse under its own weight or thrive.
Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Capgemini Acquires AI firm WNS In All Cash Deal, Read Key Deal Details
New Delhi: French consulting and technology group Capgemini announced on Monday that it will acquire UK-based digital business process services firm WNS in an all-cash deal worth USD 3.3 billion (not including WNS's net financial debt). Capgemini will pay USD 76.50 per share, which is a 17 Percent premium over WNS's closing share price on July 3, and a 28 Percent premium over the average share price of the past 90 days. Here are 10 key points about the deal in straightforward language: Deal Purpose: Capgemini says this acquisition will help it become a leader in "Intelligent Operations," using advanced AI (like agentic AI, which can act independently) to help businesses automate and improve their processes. Board Approval: The boards of both Capgemini and WNS have approved the deal, which is expected to be completed by the end of 2025. Premium Paid: The price per share (USD 76.50) is 17 Percent higher than WNS's last closing price and 28 percent higher than the average price over the last 90 days. WNS's Business: WNS has a strong business model with non-linear pricing and high profitability. Over the past three years, its revenue has grown by over 9% per year (in constant currency), reaching USD 1.27 billion in fiscal year 2025, with an 18.7 percent operating margin. Market Impact: Capgemini says that global companies need partners to help them transform and grow, which is driving demand for digital business process services. WNS is targeting revenue growth of 7-11 Percent for fiscal year 2026. Immediate Value: Capgemini expects the combination to quickly create value by allowing both companies to sell more services to each other's clients, and to better compete in the growing market for AI-powered business operations. Global Reach: The deal will make Capgemini a leader in digital business process services, with expertise across different industries and a global presence. Financial Impact: The combined digital BPS (business process services) revenues are expected to be about EUR 1.9 billion in 2024. Capgemini expects the acquisition to boost its revenue growth and operating margin right away, and to increase its earnings per share by 4 percent in 2026 (before synergies) and by 7 percent in 2027 (after synergies). Synergies: Capgemini expects to achieve additional revenue of EUR 100-140 million per year by 2027 from new business opportunities, and to save EUR 50-70 million per year from cost and operating efficiencies. AI Investments: The combination will also make use of Capgemini's significant investments in AI, including partnerships with Microsoft, Google, AWS, Mistral AI, and NVIDIA. Capgemini has stated that its financial targets for 2025 do not include this acquisition and remain unchanged: it expects revenue growth between -2.0% and +2.0% at constant currency, and an operating margin of 13.3-13.5 percent


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ozzy Osbourne Farewell Concert: Where will Black Sabbath band perform again? Here are shocking details
Ozzy Osbourne farewell concert caught everyone's attention when Black Sabbath , the legendary heavy metal band, reunited for a final performance on July 5, 2025. The event, titled Back to the Beginning , took place at Villa Park in Birmingham, the hometown of frontman Ozzy Osbourne. The concert marked a farewell celebration for Osbourne and the band's last on-stage reunion. Ozzy Osbourne Farewell Concert: Historic Reunion The show was Black Sabbath's first performance together in 20 years. Ozzy Osbourne was joined by original members Tony Iommi, Geezer Butler, and Bill Ward. Together, they performed hits like 'War Pigs,' 'NIB,' 'Iron Man,' and 'Paranoid.' Osbourne, seated on a black winged throne, opened his solo set with 'Mr. Crowley' and 'Crazy Train.' Ozzy Osbourne Farewell Concert Performers and Guest Appearances The concert featured some of the biggest names in rock and metal. Metallica, Guns N' Roses, Slayer, Tool, Gojira, Alice in Chains, The Smashing Pumpkins' Billy Corgan, Aerosmith's Steven Tyler, Korn's Jonathan Davis, and Wolfgang Van Halen performed during the event. Hollywood actor Jason Momoa and actor Adria Arjona hosted the event. Momoa also joined fans in a circle pit and shared his passion for the band, saying Black Sabbath's music inspired all his characters. Also Read: Human urine can turn into this useful material. See what is it and how do scientists make this science wonder happen Ozzy Osbourne's Return to Stage Diagnosed with Parkinson's in 2019, Ozzy Osbourne had been largely away from live shows. His appearance was a surprise and a return after several canceled performances. He last appeared publicly at the 2024 Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction but did not perform. The Back to the Beginning concert was streamed worldwide with a two-hour delay, allowing global fans to watch the event. Live Events Ozzy Osbourne Farewell Concert Tributes and Special Messages Pre-recorded tributes were aired during the show. Dolly Parton, Elton John and Jack Black were among those who paid homage. Jack Black recreated Osbourne's famous 'Mr. Crowley' performance. The city of Birmingham had also shown pride in Osbourne's return, decorating the area with murals and tributes ahead of the concert. Ozzy Osbourne Farewell Concert Planning and Purpose The event was co-organized by Sharon Osbourne and Rage Against the Machine's Tom Morello. Morello also served as the musical director. The concert ran for 10 hours and was billed as a final send-off for Black Sabbath and Ozzy. All proceeds will go to Cure Parkinson's, Birmingham Children's Hospital, and Acorns Children's Hospice. Also Read: Helldivers 2 Xbox Pre-Order: What is Helldivers 2? See Xbox release date, editions, bonuses, how to pre-order Ozzy Osbourne: No Escape From Now Release Later this year, Ozzy Osbourne: No Escape From Now will release on Paramount+. The documentary will explore his career, medical struggles, and life beyond music. It will offer a deeper look into his public image and recent challenges. Legacy of Black Sabbath Black Sabbath, formed in 1968 in Birmingham, played a key role in shaping the heavy metal genre. Their sound and imagery became influential across generations. Osbourne also reached mainstream audiences with the MTV show The Osbournes. The Villa Park concert brought their journey full circle, back where it started. FAQs What was the purpose of the Black Sabbath farewell concert? The concert raised funds for Cure Parkinson's, Birmingham Children's Hospital, and Acorns Children's Hospice through a one-day-only music event. Who were some major performers at Back to the Beginning? Artists included Metallica, Guns N' Roses, Alice in Chains, Tool, Slayer, and Korn, alongside Ozzy Osbourne and other original Black Sabbath members.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
How Sony might double down on their anti-consumer practices as PlayStation becomes the only hardware in console space
(Image via Getty Images) As Xbox pivots to a multiplatform strategy, and Nintendo carves a unique niche, PlayStation might expectedly cement its position as a primary hardware in the console market sooner. The possibility of such an unprecedented market position being enjoyed by Sony has raised some serious concerns—without any fierce competition, could Sony intensify its anti-consumer practices that have priority over profits and not player choices? Historical evidence suggests a troubling path forward. Sony might double down on anti-consumer move: What does its playbook suggest? With the company's past as a prologue, there's a pattern of Sony leveraging market control to restrict user freedom while maximizing revenue. Sony is popularly known for blocking cross-platform for many years. It was only after being under pressure, as Microsoft supported and promoted the feature, that the company gave in. As the data reveals, Sony got exposed demanding royalties from the publishers just to enable the online cross-play. It was a clear tactic for protecting the walled garden revenue. Why Sony STILL won't allow cross-play! Further, Sony has even aggressively locked users into the ecosystem. The company enforced a near-total monopoly on PlayStation Store's digital game sales, prohibiting any third-party retailers from selling the digital codes, unlike its competitors. Popularly known as Sony Tax, this move allows the company to artificially inflate prices. This was clearly evidenced during the UK £5 billion ($6.35 billion approx.) lawsuit. Therein, it was alleged that digital games cost 47% more than the PlayStation's physical copies. Additionally, Sony was even fined €13.5 million ($14.85 million approx.) previously by the French regulators. It was due to their deliberate attempt to sabotage the third-party PS4 controllers via software updates, while continuing to maintain an opaque licensing program, which stifled the entire competition. When any licensing dispute arises, like 2023's removal of the purchased Discovery content, users even lose access entirely. It even highlighted Sony's ownership fragility within the digital domain, serving as one of the most egregious examples of how Sony handheld digital purchases. The entire case was highlighted as Warner Bros. Discovery content got pulled in 2023, from user libraries, without any offered refunds. PlayStation DELETING 1200 Titles - NO REFUND 🤯 (All Discovery Content) With all being said and considered, the past trends clearly show that Sony is not the one to back down. It will continue to push its anti-consumer policies as and when it gets a chance. Especially with major competition from the console market, it's highly likely to see that such practices are repeated or, probably, soon, there will be some new way to own a monopoly. Why does PlayStation stand alone in shifting the Console landscape? Controversial Xbox Strategy: Moving Exclusive Games to PlayStation The console landscape has dramatically shifted, and the traditional console war is now dynamically crumbling. Microsoft has already made a fundamental shift in strategy, moving some major exclusives, including 'Indiana Jones and the Great Circle' and 'Sea of Thieves,' to PlayStation. The company is now heavily promoting Game Pass accessibility across varied devices—mobile and Fire TV. They are signaling to a future that is beyond pure hardware sales. Xbox now competes within an ecosystem, not just the consoles. Meanwhile, Nintendo is thriving on a unique hybrid model and the family-friendly IP. It's operating in a distinct market segment instead of directly competing for hardcore gamers. Its lower price point is a huge appeal to a broad and casual audience. While some of the franchises here, like Zelda, Mario and Animal Crossing, cater to different demographics than the cinematic and mature exclusives of PlayStation. The focus of Nintendo on affordability and portability, together with its reluctance to engage in a hardware arms race and subscription wars, means it can coexist with PlayStation instead of directly opposing it. Not to mention, as Sony continues to chase high-fidelity graphics and the live-service dominance, Nintendo thrives on nostalgia and accessibility. It ensures Nintendo remains insulated from any cutthroat competition between PlayStation and Xbox. With the changing dynamics, PlayStation now seems to be the only major player that's solely focused on publishing premium-priced and dedicated console hardware. With Xbox 'embracing the multiplatform strategy' and Nintendo 'doing its own thing', Sony now faces diminished pressure from competition, for giving priority to consumer-friendly policies. The company's dominance within traditional console hardware is now looking to be increasingly uncontested. Sooner, it might allow Sony to enforce some policies, like raising PS Plus subscription price without any addition of meaningful value. It could be riskier in the contested market. Sony's digital dominance and ownership erosion Sony's control over PlayStation Store is the cornerstone of a potential exploitation in the future. Inability to purchase digital games from third-party retailers, including CD Keys like PC platforms or Xbox, creates a captive audience. Such a monopoly would allow Sony to set high prices and resist discounting pressures. The threat extends much beyond pricing. The terms of service of the company explicitly state that users only license the digital content. They do not own it. It was starkly demonstrated as Warner Bros. Discovery content got removed from the user libraries due to expired licensing. With physical media fading, Sony now wields absolute power to revoke access to all purchased media or games, making the libraries of players inherently insecure. PlayStation Loyalty faces rising cost, subscription squeeze and proprietary lock-in Sony Is Being Sued For Trying To Monopolize Digital Games Pricing strategies employed by Sony have grown quite aggressive. The new first-party PlayStation games are now retailing at $70, while the digital versions often cost significantly more than the physical copies. It goes up to 47% more in some of the regions, as per a Dutch lawsuit that sought €1 billion ($1.17 billion approx.) in damages from Sony. The company has even restricted digital game sales to its storefront. It eliminates price competition. On Xbox, players could purchase digital codes from retailers like CDKeys or Amazon, but PlayStation instead locked buyers into Sony's inflated pricing. Note: The price hikes with the Premium tier taking a jump to $160 annually come with a little justification, especially as Sony has removed perks like PlayStation Plus Collection. Considering all of this, the price of PlayStation Plus now seems to be more strategic and merely inflationary. While it offers few tangible benefits, as compared to all past offerings, Sony now leverages the necessity of service for online play to bring in more revenue. New tiers—Essential, Extra and Premium lack compelling value, quite especially the underwhelming classic game library of Premium. It suggests that Sony's focus is on profit maximization rather than service enhancement. PlayStation is Anti Consumer Even hardware lock-ins now look like another tactic. The PlayStation Portal streaming device quite notably lacks standard Bluetooth audio support. It forces users to expensive and proprietary PlayStation Link headsets. It mirrors the costly proprietary memory cards of Vita—artificial banners that have been designed to generate accessory revenue in Sony's closed ecosystem. Sony's gamble on content control and live services comes with high manipulation tactics Sony's pursuit of live-service games has raised some red flags. While it promised many such titles, only a few materialized, and it was often laden with increased microtransactions. The launch controversy of Gran Turismo 7, where the in-game economy was altered drastically post-release to push MTX purchases after the published reviews, shows Sony's willingness to manipulate player experience just for profit. PlayStation's Greed Is OUT OF CONTROL... - Gran Turismo 7 MTX, Directors Cuts, Live Service, & MORE! Together with a lack of transparency over major first-party single-player releases, much beyond Wolverine and Spider-Man 2, the live-services push shows the future to all, where the players' engagement would get highly monetized, aggressively. All of it would be possible with Sony's control over the environment and, quite potentially, at the expense of complete game experiences. Roadmap ahead: Sony's monopoly and power bring consumer risk With the diminished competition within the traditional console hardware space, Sony now faces very little incentive to reverse its course. The current trajectory and past both point to Sony doubling down on anti-consumer practices, which can maximize its revenue in walled garden—high subscription cost, strict digital control, aggressive monetization within live-service titles and proprietary hardware dependencies. The 10 Worst Things Sony Has Ever Done While Sony offers acclaimed exclusives and powerful hardware, the path of PlayStation as a potential sole major hardware player risks prioritizing shareholder value over consumer ownership and choices. There will be a lot of vigilance required in the future from consumers and regulators. It is only then that Sony's dominance could be prevented from stifling the broader gaming ecosystem. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.