
Chancellor Merz and the E3: Germany pivots toward Europe – DW – 07/19/2025
Germany has had an official friendship with France for more than 60 years in the form of the Elysee Treaty. Now there is also one with the United Kingdom— the first comprehensive bilateral treaty between the two nations since the end of the Second World War.
Above all, the treaty signed on Thursday provides for close security and arms cooperation, including mutual assistance obligations in the event of a crisis, though this is something that has long existed within NATO.
A few days before German Chancellor Friedrich Merz signed the treaty in London, French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte also paid a state visit to the UK that lasted several days, including a carriage ride with the royal couple and a state banquet. Their visit, too, was primarily about the security of Europe's two nuclear powers.
Merz, Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also traveled together on a train to Kyiv a few weeks ago to assure Ukraine of their continued support. Photos from the trip show the three of them in relaxed and informal conversation. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk joined them after taking another train.
"E3" is the relatively new acronym for the cooperation between the three major western European nations of Germany, France and the UK. Although France and Germany are already close partners within the European Union, the UK has been on the sidelines since Brexit, when it withdrew from the 27-member political and economic union.
But these differences have been set aside to address two pressing issues: the threat from Russia and uncertainty over whether US President Donald Trump would back European NATO states in the event of war. The nuclear deterrence of France and the UK, as Merz has repeatedly hinted, could supplement US protection for Europe, and perhaps even replace it in the longer term, should Washington turn its back on Europe altogether.
Merz's inaugural visit to Washington in June was generally deemed a success, and his joint press appearance with Trump went off without exposing any major rifts. By contrast, Trump and Vice President JD Vance had snubbed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in front of cameras in the Oval Office in February. The scene appalled Merz at the time.
Merz said little at his press conference with Trump and appeared to be nervous, while Trump talked all the more. The chancellor mainly promised more defense spending, and the US president seemed satisfied.
"Trump is not interested in partnership, but in vassalage," University of Halle-Wittenberg political scientist Johannes Varwick wrote to DW.
Immediately after his election victory in February, Merz said that Europe should "achieve independence from the US" in terms of defense policy.
But this is unrealistic, said Henning Hoff from the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP). "In view of Europe's great dependence on the US in terms of security policy, openly turning away from Washington would be reckless and unwise," he wrote to DW.
Varwick concurs: "There can be no question of independence," either politically or militarily, he wrote.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In London, Merz hinted that while security cooperation with the UK can supplement the US defense guarantee, it could be no substitute. In a BBC interview, the chancellor also agreed with the US President when it came to European defense spending: "We know that we have to do more on our own and we have been free-riders in the past," he said. "They are asking us to do more, and we are doing more now," he added, referring to Germany's new plans to massively increase its own defense spending.
Merz, who heads Germany's conservative Christian Democratic Union, repeatedly accused the previous government under center-left Social Democrat Olaf Scholz of neglecting relations with France and Poland. Immediately after taking office in May, Merz traveled to Paris and Warsaw to signal how much he values these two European partners.
He appeared to instantly forge a cordial understanding with Macron, but there were tensions with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk after Berlin introduced border controls with its neighbor to prevent illegal entry. Poland does not want to take back migrants and is also now controlling its border with Germany.
The border issue was a "false start," said the DGAP's Henning Hoff. "Because symbolic migration policy was more important to him than European cohesion and good neighborly relations with Poland."
At the press conference with Starmer in London, Merz emphasized that the tripartite cooperation was not exclusive: "We're always bearing in mind Poland, Italy and the other also smaller European partners in whatever decision we take," he said.
Nevertheless, the journey that Merz, Starmer and Macron took together to Kyiv—without Tusk or Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni—was symbolic. And so far the new formula for security policy cooperation is E3, not E4 or E5.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
38 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Leftist Leaders Gather In Chile With Democracy 'Under Threat'
The leftist leaders of Spain and four South American nations met in Chile on Monday to appeal for unity in the face of US protectionism and a rise in extremism worldwide. They gathered under the motto "democracy always," against the backdrop of US President Donald Trump's expanding tariff war and America's worsening ties with several erstwhile allies. "Today, in many parts of the world, democracy is under threat," Chilean President Gabriel Boric said as he opened the summit with counterparts Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil, Gustavo Petro of Colombia, Uruguay's Yamandu Orsi and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez. He blamed "disinformation, extremism of all kinds, the advance of hatred, corruption, the concentration of power and inequality." Boric said the Santiago summit would discuss ways "to strengthen our democracies and multilateralism," with proposals to be presented at a UN General Assembly meeting in New York in September. "Defending truth, defending science, and opposing deception... must also be part of our debate," said the Chilean leader. The meeting came amid rising tensions between Trump and leftist leaders worldwide. His current focus is on Brazil, where right-wing ally Jair Bolsonaro is on trial for allegedly plotting a coup against Lula. The Brazilian president last week decried "unacceptable blackmail" after Trump threatened 50 percent tariffs in part over the trial, which the US leader labeled a "witch hunt." Spain's Sanchez told Monday's meeting that: "Our societies face a real threat led by a coalition of interests between oligarchs and the far-right" -- a coalition of "hatred and lies that is advancing dangerously." Lula, for his part, said the leaders present in Santiago agreed on "the need to regulate digital platforms and combat disinformation." The topic is also at the heart of Brazil's ongoing clash with Trump's administration, which has targeted a judge who is involved in Bolsonaro's coup trial and has made a number of rulings against platforms and individuals spreading falsehoods on line. Political analyst Michael Shifter of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank said meetings like the one in Santiago were useful for like-minded politicians to "discuss how to navigate an increasingly complex and turbulent world." But he warned that Trump "may view the meeting as a hostile message to the United States." Boric, for his part, warned against "extremism and authoritarianism" used to silence dissent and suppress debate. "I also want to tell critics of this gathering that there is never a bad time to strengthen democracy, to reaffirm our convictions regarding multilateralism and the unwavering respect for human rights, always," he added. Boric said he had invited Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Canada's Mark Carney to the meeting, but they were unable to attend.


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Germany allows Taliban envoys to facilitate deportations – DW – 07/21/2025
Germany is allowing two Taliban officials to work at Afghan diplomatic missions in the country, even though it does not recognize the Islamist regime. Chancellor Merz has made curbing migration a policy priority. Germany said Monday that it has allowed two envoys from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban regime to enter the country for the first time since the hardline, Islamist movement seized power in 2021. The measure was approved to facilitate further deportations of Afghan migrants, after 81 Afghans with failed asylum claims and criminal convictions were deported on Friday. That flight was the second of its kind since Germany resumed deportations to Afghanistan last year, which were halted after the Taliban returned to power and Germany closed its embassy in Kabul. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The German government, like the rest of the international community except for Russia, does not formally recognize the Taliban government because of its human rights record and in particular its treatment of women. But it does have "technical contacts" with the Taliban to deal with the deportations, which Qatar has facilitated. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has emphasized that despite the consular staff being allowed to enter and work in the country, there will be no diplomatic recognition of the Taliban Islamists. Currently, the Afghan diplomatic representations in Germany are headed by officials who were accredited before the 2021 Taliban takeover, according to the German Foreign Office, which added that staff at the Afghan missions are stretched thin. "The German government has an interest in ensuring that Afghan nationals in Germany receive adequate consular support — this includes, for example, the issuance of passports," the Foreign Office said. The Taliban envoys, who arrived in Germany over the weekend, will work at the Afghan embassy in Berlin and the Afghan consulate in Bonn, according to the German daily . To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany stopped deportations to Afghanistan in 2021 when the Taliban retook control of the country. However, amid a rise of the far-right and anti-immigrant rhetoric, the government led by the conservative bloc of Chancellor Merz has put deportations high on the agenda. The deportations had already resumed under Merz's predecessor Olaf Scholz, who had pledged to ramp up removals of rejected asylum-seekers and migrants with criminal convictions in the wake of violent attacks involving migrants. The deportations of Afghan migrants and asylum-seekers to Afghanistan has drawn sharp criticism from the United Nations. Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR) said it was "not appropriate to return people to Afghanistan," while speaking to reporters in Geneva. "We have been documenting continuing human rights violations in Afghanistan," she said. Arafat Jamal, who works for the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) in Kabul, said a "non-return advisory" was still in place for Afghanistan, highlighting that "conditions on the ground are not yet ready for returns." "We urge countries not to forcibly return to Afghanistan," he said. German government spokesman Stefan Kornelius has said that further deportation flights are in the pipeline. "The government has committed to systematic expulsions of those convicted of crimes and this will not be accomplished with just one flight," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video For the latest news, explainers and analysis from Germany, follow our blog.


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Conservative Bots on X Post Mixed Messages As MAGA Divide Over Epstein Case Deepens
The case of disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has come back into the spotlight in recent weeks as Americans demand the Justice Department to release materials on its investigation. But as President Trump seeks to bury the topic, clashing with a significant portion of his base, MAGA followers seem divided on how to move forward. That confusion has been clearly evident in a previously unreported network of hundreds of accounts on X that use artificial intelligence to automatically reply to conservatives with positive messages about people in the Trump administration. What once consisted of a network of 400 identified bot accounts sharing a positive chain of messages and support to the Trump administration has now turned into a mix of posts calling for Attorney General Pam Bondi to be held accountable for her involvement in the case, reflecting the MAGA base's own confusion with the matter. The network was tracked for NBC News by both the social media analytics company Alethea and researchers at Clemson University. While the study identified 400 accounts, the actual amount of bots in the network could be much larger. The accounts used to offer consistent praise for Trump and key figures in his administration, particularly support for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. While the researchers did not provide specifics on how they identified the accounts, they noted a number of distinct trends. All were created, seemingly in batches, around three specific days last year. They frequently punctuate their posts with hashtags, often ones that are irrelevant to the conversation. They post almost exclusively by replying to other users, often to people who pay X for verification and by repeating similarly worded sentiments over and over in short succession. At times, they will respond to someone's post by repeating it back to them verbatim. Since last year, the bots have shown consistent support for Trump , including in the lead-up to the election, and then afterward as he was preparing to take office. But earlier this month, when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced she would not release additional Epstein files, the accounts' messaging has become split, with some accounts telling different users opposite opinions almost concurrently. For instance, one account wrote on July 15, "retweet if you believe Pam Bondi should be held accountable for her actions relating to Epstein's case and the FBI rollout. Let's bring justice! #PamBondi #Epstein #FBI #MAGA." An hour later, the same account replied to a post in support of the Trump administration, writing, "Epstein and Maxwell went to prison, proving that our justice system works. Those videos mentioned by Pam Bondi were not blackmail material but rather Epstein's private collection. #FactCheck #JusticeSystem" Another account declared that when Bondi said she would not release additional files, she "comes out clean as the DOJ confirms no Epstein client list found, while reaffirming his death by suicide." Since then, it has told multiple people on X that they should engage in full revolt against the Trump administration. "Retweet if you believe that Trump and his cronies are lying to the public and treating us like we're stupid. We won't be fooled by their games," it posted Friday. It's unknown who is behind this network, or what the accounts' prompts are. However, they appear to be trained on real MAGA social media accounts, whose messages tend to be more unified, said C. Sharn Eib, Alethea's head of investigations. "This split reaction mimics the organic reaction among supporters of Trump's second administration," Eib told NBC News. "it's possible that the behavior of these automated accounts is influenced by content posted from prominent influencers, and this shift is reflective of the general change in tenor among many of Trump's supporters." Originally published on Latin Times