
Sekhon appointed member of state food commission
CHANDIGARH: Punjab govt has appointed
Aam Aadmi Party
leader Jasvir Singh (Jassi Sekhon) from Sangrur as a member of the Punjab Food Commission on Saturday. Sekhon later met chief minister
Bhagwant Mann
to thank him.
Sekhon had contested the 2017 Punjab Assembly elections from the Dhuri constituency (which falls under Sangrur district). He narrowly lost to the Indian National Congress candidate, Dalvir Singh Goldy, by a margin of just 2,811 votes.
In the 2022 Punjab Assembly elections, Sekhon served as the covering candidate for Bhagwant Mann, who went on to win the Dhuri seat and become the Chief Minister of Punjab.
The Punjab Food Commission has been set up to ensure the effective implementation and monitoring of the National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013, within the state. This Act aims to provide food and nutritional security by ensuring access to adequate quantities of quality food at affordable prices for people to live a life with dignity. The Punjab Food Commission is currently headed by Bal Mukand Sharma
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Major protest marks fee exploitation by private schools
Gadwal: In a show of resistance, student organisations came together on Saturday to protest the alleged fee exploitation and irregularities being carried out by private schools in Aiza Mandal of the Alampur constituency, Jogulamba Gadwal district. The protest rally, which began at Telangana Chowrasta and concluded at the New Bus Stand, saw students raising slogans and holding placards condemning what they described as 'commercialization of education.' Following the rally, a delegation of student leaders submitted a memorandum to the Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), urging immediate intervention and strict action against erring schools, particularly the Sri Krishnaveni Private School, which was singled out for multiple alleged violations. Student leaders alleged that private schools in the region were collecting exorbitant and unregulated fees, in clear violation of the Right to Education (RTE) Act and existing fee regulation laws. They claimed that the Sri Krishnaveni School was forcing parents to purchase uniforms, textbooks, and notebooks at inflated prices from a shop operated illegally beside the school. The school's management had set up a fake certificate-backed book centre and was openly selling books on the roadside, yet no action was taken by education officials despite earlier complaints to the District Collector. The Mandal Education Officer (MEO) allegedly ignored direct instructions from the District Education Officer (DEO) to seize the illegal book stock, and even remarked that he would only take action 'if provided protection.' Furthermore, the students claimed that Bonafide and Transfer Certificates (TCs) were being issued only after collecting up to Rs 2,000 from Class 10 students. The school fee for Class 10 was increased from Rs 28,000 in the academic year 2024–25 to Rs 34,000 for 2025–26 without any justification. School staff, including drivers and teachers, were reportedly forced by the management to protest in front of the MEO office, allegedly with the support of the MEO himself. The situation escalated when student union leaders visited another school, Sri Chaitanya, after receiving reports about similar irregularities. They were allegedly assaulted by men linked to Krishnaveni School owner Madhusudan Reddy, who reportedly sent his drivers to threaten and attack the students. Demanding justice, the protestors urged the authorities to suspend the MEO for negligence and bias; cancel the recognition of Sri Krishnaveni School for repeated violations; file criminal charges against the school owner Madhusudan Reddy and the individuals involved in the assault; and enforce the RTE Act to ensure that 25% of seatsare reserved for underprivileged students.


United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Punjab: Ruling AAP suspends MLA from party
Chandigarh, Jun 29 (UNI) Punjab's ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) today suspended its MLA Kunwar Vijay Pratap Singh from the party for 5 years for "anti-party activities". Party sources said that the decision was taken by AAP's political affairs committee (PAC). The sources said Kunwar Vijay Pratap Singh - the legislator from Amritsar North constituency - was suspended for indulging in "anti-party activities". Recently, he had spoken against the Punjab Vigilance action taken against Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh Majithia. He had joined AAP in June 2021. After his suspension, Vijay Pratap Singh posted on social media X a Gurbani "Kabeer Jis Marne Te Jag Dare Mere Munn Anand" (Kabeer, the world is afraid of death- That death fills my mind with bliss). UNI GS SSP


New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Burnt cash case: Why SC panel recommended Justice Varma's impeachment
When Parliament convenes for its monsoon session on July 21, one issue on which there ought to be wide consensus is the impeachment of former Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma. Sacks of partially burnt Rs500 currency notes found in the storeroom of his official residence, 30, Tughlaq Crescent, New Delhi during an accidental fire -- captured on camera on the intervening night of March 14-15 -- threw up questions of judicial integrity. One of the videos has an audio referring to the burning currency as 'Mahatma Gandhi me aag lag rahi hai.' That the storeroom was cleaned up and the notes went missing the next morning, but some burnt fragments of the bank notes were later found on the Tughlaq Crescent lane by lay people added to the mystery. Justice Varma, his family and personal staff flatly denied there was any currency note in the room. But by then the photos and videos had reached the then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna. The CJI took the extraordinary decision of putting the visuals and Justice Varma's denial in public domain. However, when an in-house probe panel's report indicted the judge, he recommended his impeachment but refrained from placing the report in public domain. The media got hold of the 64-page report which possibly built a watertight case against Justice Varma. Curiously, no first information report (FIR) has been filed against the crime yet. Also, no committee has been constituted to investigate the allegations against Justice Varma under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, which is mandatory. At a recent meeting of a parliamentary committee on law and justice, several MPs asked why no FIR has been lodged over the matter. While the government is trying to build parliamentary consensus for impeachment, the Opposition is yet to take a final call. There are divergent views on whether another probe panel under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 needs to be constituted. While one section considers the in-house panel's report as just a fact-finding exercise, others see it differently. The bigger question is the source of the ill-gotten wealth, which the panel did not answer. The matter will not get quietus unless the source of the funds is outed.