NumbersUSA Unveils State Immigration Enforcement Scorecards Project
We call this new tool our State Credible Immigration Enforcement Scorecards.
While Congress has the power to lower immigration's numerical limits and control national borders, the States have ample power to credibly enforce laws deterring illegal immigration within their own boundaries.
Today, we unveil the first Scorecards for each state legislator's immigration actions in Ohio and West Virginia (2023 and 2024), North Carolina (2024), and Montana (which met only in 2023). NumbersUSA will be adding Scorecards for additional states every month.
Creating these Report Cards requires significant effort, including research, data collection, and analysis. NumbersUSA has partnered with the Institute for Legislative Analysis to bring this scoring platform to life. Nobody else has ever offered anything like this deep look into state legislatures on immigration.
"And for the first time, we are negatively scoring leaders such as Speaker of the House and committee chairs when they quietly refuse to bring good bills up for a vote," says Andrew Good, NumbersUSA Director of State Government Relations. "This is a key reason that sensible immigration policies don't pass more frequently in Congress, and it is the main reason that credible immigration enforcement laws often have an uphill battle in the states."
Here are a couple of examples from our pioneer states that explain their poor Leadership grades:
The Ohio House passed a bill expanding the use of E-Verify last year on an 85-6 vote. But Ohio Senate leaders never allowed a vote on the bill, so it died at the end of 2024.
The West Virginia Senate passed a mandatory E-Verify bill in 2023, on a 34-0 vote. But leaders in the West Virginia House never allowed a vote on the bill, so it died at the end of their 2023 session.
In 2024, it looked like victory was guaranteed when the West Virginia House WAS allowed to vote and passed a bill expanding the use of E-Verify on a 82-18 vote. But the Senate which unanimously passed it the year before was barred from doing so again because Senate leaders refused to bring that bill up for a vote. The bill died.
Despite votes for E-Verify from the overwhelming majority of their state legislators, neither Ohio nor West Virginia has any E-Verify law at all, entirely because legislative leaders carried out the bidding of business lobbies and killed bills by not allowing votes. Our state scorecards expose these backroom deals.
"Join us in celebrating this groundbreaking tool, the first of its kind, and ensure that no state official's role in immigration enforcement goes unnoticed or misrepresented," NumbersUSA CEO Roy Beck says.
Andrew Good notes the immensity of holding state legislators accountable: "If you think our Congressional Grade Cards are impressive (and they are!), consider that state legislatures cumulatively introduce 23 TIMES more bills than Congress, totaling an average of 128,145 bills per year. That's a lot of Crackerjack to sift through to find the prizes.
"NumbersUSA is intent on guaranteeing that our elected state officials are transparent in their actions and accountable for delivering the credible immigration enforcement their constituents favor."
About NumbersUSANumbersUSA is a nonpartisan organization that for 28 years has educated voters -- particularly its more than 8 million online followers -- about immigration policies and has provided them easy-to-use tools to make their voices heard. It advocates for lower immigration levels and credible enforcement of immigration laws.
Media Contact:Andrew Goodagood@numbersusa.com(703) 816-8820
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/numbersusa-unveils-state-immigration-enforcement-scorecards-project-302416375.html
SOURCE NumbersUSA.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
15 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations
Lawmakers will use much of September to work on spending bills for the coming budget year, which begins Oct. 1. They likely will need to pass a short-term spending measure to keep the government funded for a few weeks while they work on a longer-term measure that covers the full year. It's not unusual for leaders from both parties to blame the other party for a potential shutdown, but the rhetoric began extra early this year, signaling the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual. Advertisement On Monday, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries sent their Republican counterparts a sharply-worded letter calling for a meeting to discuss 'the government funding deadline and the health care crisis you have visited upon the American people.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up They said it will take bipartisanship to avert a 'painful, unnecessary shutdown.' 'Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many in your party are preparing to go it alone and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis,' said the letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Republicans have taken note of the warnings and are portraying the Democrats as itching for a shutdown they hope to blame on the GOP. Advertisement 'It was disturbing to hear the Democrat leader threaten to shut down the government in his July 8 Dear Colleague letter,' Thune said on Saturday. '... I really hope that Democrats will not embrace that position but will continue to work with Republicans to fund the government.' Different approaches from the House and Senate So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills, mostly along party lines. The Senate has passed three on a strongly bipartisan basis. The House is pursuing steep, non-defense spending cuts. The Senate is rejecting many of those cuts. One side will have to give. And any final bill will need some Democratic support to generate the 60 votes necessary to get a spending measure to the finish line. Some Democratic senators are also wanting assurances from Republicans that there won't be more efforts in the coming weeks to claw back or cancel funding already approved by Congress. 'If Republicans want to make a deal, then let's make a deal, but only if Republicans include an agreement they won't take back that deal a few weeks later,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., a veteran member of the House Appropriations committee, said the Democratic minority in both chambers has suffered so many legislative losses this year, 'that they are stuck between a rock and their voting base.' Democrats may want to demonstrate more resistance to Trump, but they would rue a shutdown, he warned. 'The reality would be, if the government were shut down, the administration, Donald Trump, would have the ability to decide where to spend and not spend,' Fleischmann said. 'Schumer knows that, Jeffries knows that. We know that. I think it would be much more productive if we start talking about a short-term (continuing resolution.)' Advertisement Republican angry about pace of nominations Republicans are considering changes to Senate rules to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Thune said last week that during the same point in Joe Biden's presidency, 49 of his 121 civilians nominees had been confirmed on an expedited basis through a voice vote or a unanimous consent request. Trump has had none of his civilian nominees confirmed on an expedited basis. Democrats have insisted on roll call votes for all of them, a lengthy process than can take days. 'I think they're desperately in need of change,' Thune said of Senate rules for considering nominees. 'I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that.' Schumer said a rules change would be a 'huge mistake,' especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. The Senate held a rare weekend session as Republicans worked to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Negotiations focused on advancing dozens of additional Trump nominees in exchange for some concessions on releasing some already approved spending. At times, lawmakers spoke of progress on a potential deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. Advertisement
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Grassley places holds on three Trump Treasury nominees
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is placing a hold on three of President Trump's nominees to the Treasury Department over forthcoming administration rules that are expected to hamper tax credits for wind and solar energy. Grassley, who recently engaged in a heated back-and-forth with Trump over the handling of judicial picks, announced his move to place the holds in the congressional record on Friday. 'Today, I placed a hold on three Department of the Treasury nominees,' he said in the record, specifically naming Trump's picks for the department's general counsel, assistant secretary and undersecretary. The Iowa Republican added that while the 'big, beautiful, bill' recently passed by Congress allowed for wind and solar companies to continue to get tax credits if they begin construction of their projects in the next year, the Treasury Department 'is expected to issue rules and regulations implementing the agreed upon phase-out of the wind and solar credits by August 18, 2025.' 'Until I can be certain that such rules and regulations adhere to the law and congressional intent, I intend to continue to object to the consideration of these Treasury nominees,' Grassley said. Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), is also placing a hold on the same nominees — Brian Morrissey Jr., Francis Brooke and Jonathan McKernan — for the same reason, a source familiar told The Hill. It's not entirely clear whether these holds will actually have a significant impact on the nominations. Typically, they can slow the process of confirming a nominee, requiring the chamber to spend hours debating and taking additional votes for each nominee without ultimately blocking them. With a handful of nominees, holds are more of an annoyance, though in some cases — like when in 2023 Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) put holds on hundreds of military promotions — they have successfully delayed nominations for a significant period. It's unusual, though not unheard of, for lawmakers of the same party to place holds on the president's nominees. Grassley's decision was first reported Monday by C-SPAN'S Craig Caplan. Curtis's move was first reported by Politico. The hold comes amid a larger spat between Grassley and Trump after president told the senator last week to ax the Judiciary Committee's 'blue slip' tradition of allowing home-state senators to veto nominees to district courts and U.S. attorneys' offices. Trump reposted comments that accused Grassley of being 'sneaky' and a 'RINO,' an acronym for Republican In Name Only. 'I was offended by what the president said, and I'm disappointed it would result in personal insults,' Grassley said in response. Trump, meanwhile, has expressed frustration at the pace of the Senate's confirmation of his nominees, saying lawmakers should stay in Washington to confirm more people ahead of their yearly August recess. How rapidly to phase out energy tax credits was a major sticking point among Republican lawmakers as they put Trump's megabill together. The bill provisions that Curtis helped to secure allowing wind and solar projects to get the full value of a lucrative tax credit if they start construction within 12 months of its passage. After the bill was passed Trump signed an executive order that directed the Treasury to take a strict approach to limit which projects are eligible. The administration has been particularly hostile to wind and solar and broadly supportive of other energy sources, including oil, gas, coal and nuclear.
NBC News
16 minutes ago
- NBC News
Confederate general statue toppled in 2020 to be reinstalled in D.C.
A statue of a Confederate general that demonstrators toppled and burned in D.C. in 2020 will be reinstalled, the National Park Service announced. The bronze statue depicting Confederate Gen. Albert Pike is being restored, the Park Service said in a statement Monday. Officials shared a photo of a worker removing corrosion and paint. 'The restoration aligns with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law as well as recent executive orders to beautify the nation's capital and re-instate pre-existing statues,' a statement from the agency said. In June 2020, demonstrators used ropes to tear down the statue outside Metropolitan Police Department headquarters. On live TV, they doused the statue in lighter fluid and set it ablaze. Mayor Muriel Bowser decried property destruction and defended city police. President Donald Trump then called for the statue to go back up. Crews are aiming to have the statue up in October, the Park Service said. 'Site preparation to repair the statue's damaged masonry plinth will begin shortly, with crews repairing broken stone, mortar joints, and mounting elements,' the statement said. The Pike statue, dedicated in 1901, has been a source of controversy for years. The Confederate general also was a longtime leader of the Freemasons, who revere Pike. It was built at the request of Masons, who successfully lobbied Congress to grant them land for the statue as long as Pike would be depicted in civilian, not military, clothing. D.C. officials tried to remove the statue for years. The D.C. Council said it first called for its removal in 1992. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton introduced multiple bills in Congress to get it removed. referred to Pike as a 'chief founder of the post-Civil War Ku Klux Klan.' The Klan connection is a frequent accusation from Pike's critics and one which the Masons dispute. In an executive order this March on 'restoring truth and sanity to American history,' Trump said the secretary of the Interior would determine whether statutes have been removed since 2020 to 'perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology.' Trump ordered their reinstatement.
