Chabria: The insurrection that wasn't, and other Trump fantasies
To hear our national leaders tell it, Los Angeles is in chaos and our governor and mayor are out to lunch with the police, blissfully ignoring reality as the city burns.
"These Radical Left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will NOT BE TOLERATED," President Trump wrote on social media, shortly after ordering the National Guard onto our streets.
"To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States," he wrote in a memo Saturday, authorizing 2,000 National Guard troops to be deployed in L.A. for at least 60 days.
Put down your macha lattes and trade in your Birkenstocks for boots, folks. We are the revolution, apparently, so dangerous only a seasoned military can stop us. The only problem, of course, is that Los Angeles is not in chaos on this particular sunny Sunday and the vast majority of Angelenos are just trying to enjoy the weekend without becoming a federal prisoner.
Read more: What really happened outside the Paramount Home Depot? The reality on the ground vs. the rhetoric
Trump's memo will go into the history books as a moment when presidential power expanded to put under his control a military force aimed at U.S. civilians. While not unprecedented, the dean of UC Berekley's law school, Erwin Chemerinsky, said it was "stunning."
All the more so because the deployment is based on a lie. Yes, there has been some violence in the past few days as federal immigration authorities round up criminals and regular folks alike in deportation sweeps. If you keep the camera angle tight on those protests, as many media outlets have done, it does look dire.
Rocks being thrown, even Molotov cocktails. Masked protesters hammering at concrete pillars outside of a downtown federal building. Cars on fire.
All of this is terrible and those responsible should be arrested — by our local police and sheriffs, who are more than up to the job of handling a few hundred protesters.
But 99% of this city business as usual, with brunches and beach walks and church and yoga classes. And even in those few pockets where the protests are happening, such as a march downtown Sunday, this is Los Angeles — I've seen more chaos after a Lakers game.
Jessica Levinson, a law professor at Loyola Law School, told my colleague Seema Mehta that while it's extremely unusual for a president to take federal control of troops, it's not unprecedented and maybe not illegal. It happened in 1992 during the Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King verdict.
"One of the exceptions is when there is violence and the inability of the federal government to enforce federal laws," Levinson said. "And that is exactly what the president is arguing is happening."
My intrepid colleagues at this paper have been on the ground since the first protests began, and, as their reporting shows, the majority of what is happening is peaceful, and isolated.
Even the cops agree. And seriously, when the cops are agreeing there's no riot — there is no riot.
"Demonstrations across the City of Los Angeles remained peaceful and we commend all those who exercised their First Amendment rights responsibly," the LAPD wrote in a statement Saturday night.
Still, by Sunday morning, those troops, in full military gear with guns in hand, (presumably with less-lethal ammo, I hope) were arriving. The U.S. Northern Command tweeted that the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team has some members on the ground in Los Angeles, with more to come.
"These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens," Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, further explained before they arrived.
Read more: News Analysis: A political lesson for L.A. from an unrestrained president
Also, as you plan your week, there is now a dress code — at least for civilians, not the authorities intent on hiding their identities.
"(F)rom now on, MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests. What do these people have to hide, and why???" Trump wrote.
All this, Gov. Gavin Newsom said, is "Not to meet an unmet need, but to manufacture a crisis."
He's right — Los Angeles has landed a starring role in Trump's war on brown people. It makes sense. We are a city of immigrants, of all colors, and a Democratic — and democratic — one at that. What's not to hate?
Mayor Karen Bass told my colleague Rachel Uranga that her office had tried to talk to the White House to tell them "there was absolutely no need to have troops on the ground," but got nowhere.
"This is posturing," Bass said.
"They want violence," Newsom added in a Sunday email. "Don't give them the spectacle they want."
I'm not sure that's possible. There will always be the bad actors, the violent ones, at any protest. And again — they should be arrested.
But Trump is going to laser-focus on those few to make an example of this city, and to increase his own power.
Because while this "insurrection" is a fantasy, his dream of more power seems all to real.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump's ‘two week' Russia deadline is now on week five
Trump's 'two week' Russia deadline is now on week five As the war in Ukraine rages on, CNN's Adam Kinzinger looks back on President Trump's recent promise that he would have an answer to Russian President Vladimir Putin's willingness to end the war in 'two weeks.' 01:13 - Source: CNN Vertical Top News 17 videos Trump's 'two week' Russia deadline is now on week five As the war in Ukraine rages on, CNN's Adam Kinzinger looks back on President Trump's recent promise that he would have an answer to Russian President Vladimir Putin's willingness to end the war in 'two weeks.' 01:13 - Source: CNN Latino influencers stick by Trump Tony Delgado and Gabriela Berrospi, entrepreneurs and founders of multimedia brand Latino Wall Street, helped rally the Latino vote for President Donald Trump in 2024. As the administration has escalated ICE raids and deportations this year, they visited Washington D.C. and the White House to advocate for their community and immigration reform. 02:27 - Source: CNN Tillis gives fiery speech about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) warned President Trump and Republicans that the Senate version of the sweeping "big, beautiful bill" will break a promise Trump made to not cut Medicaid. Tillis also announced Sunday that he will not seek re-election in 2026. 01:18 - Source: CNN Idaho residents line streets to honor slain firefighters Residents of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, lined the highway to honor two firefighters killed in an ambush while responding to a fire. The procession transporting the firefighters from Kootenai Health to Spokane, Washington, drew a large turnout from the community. 00:32 - Source: CNN Idaho suspected shooter intentionally set fire, police say Two firefighters were fatally shot while responding to a brush fire in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. Another man found dead with a firearm on Canfield Mountain is believed to be the only shooter in Sunday's attacks, according to Kootenai County Sheriff Bob Norris. 01:09 - Source: CNN Multiple shot while responding to brush fire in Idaho Two people, believed to be fire personnel, were fatally shot and others injured while responding to a brush fire in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and at least one active shooter continues to fire at law enforcement with high-powered rifles, according to Kootenai County Sheriff Robert Norris. 00:58 - Source: CNN Severe heatwave hits Europe Heatwaves have pushed temperatures above 104 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees Celsius) in countries across Europe, including Spain, Greece, Portugal and Italy. Firefighters battled a wildfire near Athens late last week, and regions of Portugal were under high alert on Sunday. According to experts, the extreme weather is linked to climate change. 00:57 - Source: CNN Jury begins deliberations in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial 01:10 - Source: CNN Beyoncé's 'flying' car prop tilts midair A technical mishap led to Beyoncé's 'flying' car prop to tilt during a Cowboy Carter concert in Houston, with fans capturing the moment on video. The singer was quickly lowered down and without injury, according to Beyoncé's entertainment and management company. 00:57 - Source: CNN Video shows woman clinging to tree as immigration agents try to detain her A bystander captured on video the moment immigration agents in street clothes chased a woman across the street trying to detain her outside of a Home Depot where she had been selling food in West Los Angeles just moments prior. 02:07 - Source: CNN Key lines from UVA president's resignation letter University of Virginia president James Ryan announced his resignation amid pressure from the US Department of Justice to dismantle the university's diversity, equity and inclusion programs. CNN's Betsy Klein reports. 01:09 - Source: CNN Minnesota lawmaker and husband lie in state at State Capitol Mourners and lawmakers gather to pay tribute to former Minnesota State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark Hortman, who were killed in a targeted attack. The couple is joined by the family's golden retriever, Gilbert, who also died after being shot during the attacks. 00:41 - Source: CNN Sean 'Diddy' Combs' son escorted out of courtroom A judge removed Sean Diddy Combs' son, Justin Combs, from the courtroom and apparently asked him to change his clothing after Combs' son arrived wearing a shirt that says 'Free Sean Combs' to the defense team's final closing arguments. The controversy comes nearly two weeks after Diddy's son Christian 'King' Combs was also removed and spoken to by the judge for wearing a similar slogan in sight of the jury. 01:28 - Source: CNN Trump reacts to win at the Supreme Court President Trump thanked conservative Supreme Court justices and explained what he plans to do next after the Court backed his effort to curtail lower court orders that have hampered his agenda for months. 00:46 - Source: CNN Supreme Court backs parents who want to opt out of LGBTQ+ curriculum The Supreme Court on Friday backed a group of religious parents who want to opt their elementary school children out of engaging with LGBTQ books in the classroom, another major legal win for religious interests at the conservative high court. 00:52 - Source: CNN Supreme Court limits ability of judges to stop Trump The Supreme Court backed President Donald Trump's effort to curtail lower court orders that have hampered his agenda for months. However, it signaled that the president's controversial plan to effectively end birthright citizenship may never be enforced. 01:32 - Source: CNN See moment suspect lights fire on Seoul subway CCTV footage released by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office captures the moment a man lit a fire on a busy subway in the South Korean capital last month. The footage, from May 31, shows passengers running away after the suspect doused the floor of the train carriage with flammable liquid before setting it alight. Reuters reports that according to the prosecutors' office, six people were injured. The prosecutor's office says it charged the 67-year-old man with attempted murder and arson. 00:48 - Source: CNN
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
SCOTUS' slap at lower courts: Letters to the Editor — July 1, 2025
The Issue: The US Supreme Court ruling that lower-court judges are 'likely exceeding' their authority. The US Supreme Court has rightfully ruled that lower-court judges do not have the constitutional authority to block executive actions from taking effect nationwide ('Supreme rebuke of judges,' June 28). While they did not rule on the merits of this executive order, I'm sure all that litigation will come in due time. For the minority of the court to assume judges can overstep the powers granted to them by the Constitution is in direct conflict with their opinion that the Executive Branch is doing the same. Also: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's opinion that she could trump President Trump does not align with her argument that the law applies equally to all. Her rare but stinging admonition by fellow Justice Amy Coney Barrett was well deserved. Bo Madden Jupiter, Fla. On June 27, six Supreme Court justices removed another obstacle to Trump's complete capture of governmental power. They have removed the 'federal' from federal judges, emasculating rulings by all lower courts that would limit a president's power. The lower-court judges had been the last bastion of resistance to an imperial presidency, a k a a dictatorship. Nicholas Molinari Brick, NJ Wow: Just after five months in office, the Supreme Court untied the hands of Trump's administration, putting district court judges back where they belong. This is as exciting to watch as 'Yellowstone.' I can't wait for the next episode. Mike Santavicca Yonkers The Supreme Court ruling in favor of Trump basically states that if he tries to engage in unconstitutional acts, like his effort to end birthright citizenship, any effort on the part of lower courts to rein him in would amount to judicial overreach. Yet the federal judiciary exists for the purpose of ensuring that neither the Congress nor the Executive Branch exceeds the powers granted to them under the Constitution. To those who believe that the Republican majority on the Supreme Court would have still ruled in favor of a Democratic president exceeding his or her constitutional authority, there is a bridge in Brooklyn I would be happy to sell you. Dennis Middlebrooks Brooklyn The familiar huddle of Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Jackson against all things Trump and in preference of their own social standards above the text of the parchment is tedious and wrong. Leonard Toboroff Ramatuelle, France The Issue: Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa's run to become New York City's next mayor. It is time for a dose of Curtis Sliwa as New York City's mayor ('Sliwa stands tall,' June 27). Like President Trump, he's a proud American, a friend to law-and-order and an assassination-attempt survivor; so, maybe he's lucky too and has got nine lives. Robin Bredin Ontario, Canada Sliwa has been a New Yorker through and through. He is for everyone; just look at his Guardian Angels and knowledge of New York City and the great people who run it. Give him and the city he loves a chance. Bruce Altman Miami Beach, Fla. The lack of media coverage for Sliwa, who, for all practical purposes, is invisible and who the pundits have written off from having any chance of winning the election, hasn't gone unnoticed. Unfortunately, Sliwa is not being given the chance to get the GOP message out. The Post owes its readers some overdue publicity for Curtis; he's been very unlucky so far. J.J. Crovatto Ramsey, NJ Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Polls show Americans largely oppose Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
As the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax and policy bill championed by President Donald Trump winds its way through votes in Congress, polling taken across the past month shows Americans largely disapprove – but are more split when it comes to their views on some of its provisions. Trump has emphasized that he believes Americans support his bill as emblematic of the agenda he campaigned on. He told reporters at a promotional event on Thursday, "Almost every major promise made in the 2024 campaign already will have become a promise kept. That's very important." A wide-ranging Quinnipiac University poll published on Thursday that was taken in late June found that a small majority of registered voters oppose the bill, but are more split on a provision that would create new requirements to be insured through Medicaid. Fifty-five percent of voters said that they oppose the bill, while 29% said they support it and 16% were unsure. Among Republicans, 67% said they support the act while a larger 87% of Democrats oppose it. MORE: Senate races toward final vote on Trump's megabill after weekend of debate, dramaMORE: Will Thom Tillis' opposition to Trump's megabill win over Senate Republican colleagues? The bill would impose new work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients who don't have dependents. Asked about how they feel about the Medicaid provisions, voters were largely split – 47% of registered voters said they support them and 46% said they oppose them, effectively a dead heat. A separate poll of registered voters from Fox News taken in mid-June found similar results. 59% of registered voters said they oppose the bill, while 38% of them favored it. (However, around 4 in 10 voters said they don't understand the bill very much or at all.) A smaller plurality of voters – 49% – told Fox News they think the legislation will hurt their families, while 23% said it would help and 26% said it would make no difference. Meanwhile, a poll of American adults taken in early June by the Washington Post and Ipsos found a plurality of adults, 42%, opposing the bill, and 23% supportive of it. But at that time, 34% of American adults said they had no opinion about it, and separately, 66% said they had heard only a little or nothing at all about the bill. However, 49% of Americans told the Washington Post and Ipsos back then that they would support extending the tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a provision of the bill -- although their support spiked to 71% when asked if they'd support or oppose those tax cuts for people who have incomes lower than $100,000, and dropped underwater when asked about individuals with incomes above $400,000 or business corporations. MORE: GOP Sen. Tillis won't run for reelection after Trump primary threat The Pew Research Center, in an early June poll, also found around half – 49% – of Americans opposing the bill and 29% supporting it. Separately, 54% of Americans also felt the bill would have a "mostly negative effect on the country," while 3 in 10 felt it would have a "mostly positive effect." But similar to the Washington Post's poll, Pew found that around half of Americans would favor creating work requirements for Medicaid, with 32% opposed. A provision on money for border security enforcement – which Pew framed as increased funding for detaining and deporting undocumented immigrants – split American adults. 45% said they are opposed and 41% said they favor. The nonprofit health policy research group KFF, meanwhile, found in an early June poll that a larger majority of American adults, 64%, had an unfavorable view of the bill, while 35% had a favorable view of it. Only 17% of respondents felt that the bill would help them and their families, and 44% said it would hurt, although almost 1 in 4 did not think it would make much difference. The poll separately found a lot of support for Medicaid more generally as a program, with 79% of Americans saying they think it is the government's responsibility "to provide health insurance coverage to low-income Americans who cannot afford it."
