China AI startup DeepSeek faces ban from Apple, Google app stores in Germany
Apple and Google have been asked to remove Chinese AI startup DeepSeek from their app stores in Germany, due to concerns about data protection. PHOTO: REUTERS
FRANKFURT - Germany's data protection commissioner has asked Apple and Google to remove Chinese AI startup DeepSeek from their app stores in the country due to concerns about data protection, following a similar crackdown elsewhere.
Commissioner Meike Kamp said in a statement on June 27 that she had made the request because DeepSeek illegally transfers users' personal data to China.
The two US tech giants must now review the request promptly and decide whether to block the app in Germany, she added, though her office has not set a precise timeframe.
Google said it had received the notice and was reviewing it.
DeepSeek did not respond to a request for comment.
Apple was not immediately available for comment.
According to its own privacy policy, DeepSeek stores numerous pieces of personal data, such as requests to its AI programme or uploaded files, on computers in China.
'DeepSeek has not been able to provide my agency with convincing evidence that German users' data is protected in China to a level equivalent to that in the European Union,' Ms Kamp said.
'Chinese authorities have far-reaching access rights to personal data within the sphere of influence of Chinese companies,' she added.
The commissioner said she took the decision after asking DeepSeek in May to meet the requirements for non-EU data transfers or else voluntarily withdraw its app.
DeepSeek did not comply with this request, she added.
DeepSeek shook the technology world in January with claims that it had developed an AI model to rival those from US firms such as ChatGPT creator OpenAI at much lower cost.
However, it has come under scrutiny in the United States and Europe for its data security policies.
Italy blocked it from app stores there earlier this year, citing a lack of information on its use of personal data, while the Netherlands has banned it on government devices.
Belgium has recommended government officials not to use DeepSeek. 'Further analyses are underway to evaluate the approach to be followed,' a government spokesperson said.
In Spain, the consumer rights group OCU asked the government's data protection agency in February to investigate threats likely posed by DeepSeek, though no ban has come into force.
The British government said 'the use of DeepSeek remains a personal choice for members of the public.'
'We continue to monitor any national security threats to UK citizens and their data from all sources,' a spokesperson for Britain's technology ministry said.
'If evidence of threats arises, we will not hesitate to take the appropriate steps to protect our national security.'
US lawmakers plan to introduce a Bill that would ban US executive agencies from using any AI models developed in China.
Reuters exclusively reported this week that DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
International Business Times
an hour ago
- International Business Times
Trump Terminates Talks with Canada Over Tax on US Tech Companies and Threatens It to Get Ready for the Consequences Within Seven Days
Trump announced that he is halting trade negotiations with Canada due to its decision to move forward with a tax targeting tech companies and added that Canada would face the consequences of this action within "seven days." In a Truth Social post, Trump slammed the move, referring to the tech tax as " a direct and blatant attack on our country." "Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period," Trump said in his post. Drawing Trump's Ire The Canadian government plans to implement the tax starting Monday. The digital services tax will impose a 3 percent charge on revenue earned from Canadian users by major companies such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber, and Airbnb. The tax will be applied retroactively, resulting in U.S. firms owing $2 billion by the end of the month. Speaking to reporters, the President said that "Canada has been a very difficult country to deal with over the years." However, he voiced certainty that Ottawa would eventually back off, saying, "We have all the cards. We have all - every single one." "We do a lot of business with Canada, but relatively little they do most of their businesses with us," he added. "Economically we have such power over Canada, I'd rather not use it." Throughout trade talks with various nations, Trump has criticized digital services taxes, labeling them as "non-tariff trade barriers." No Sympathy for Canada's Actions Canada and the United States have been in discussions on easing a range of high tariffs that Trump had previously placed on Canadian goods. The president accused Ottawa for "copying the European Union" with what he described as an "egregious" tax. Several countries are currently negotiating with the U.S. ahead of a July 9 deadline, after which Trump's hiked tariffs are set to be reinstated. However, Canada and Mexico are not part of those ongoing discussions. Earlier this year, Trump introduced tariffs on neighboring countries, including Canada and Mexico, in response to issues related to fentanyl trafficking and immigration. Negotiations with these nations are taking place separately from other trade talks. The president visited Canada earlier this month for the annual G7 summit but left ahead of schedule, citing developments concerning Iran. On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that several nations are expected to suspend their digital services taxes targeting U.S. tech giants, in return for Congressional Republicans agreeing to block a proposed "retaliatory tax" on foreign investors included in Trump's major legislative package. However, he did not specify which countries were part of this arrangement.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Former head of major Chinese airline under graft investigation
Mr Liu Shaoyong, who headed the airline from 2009 until 2022, is being investigated for 'serious violations of discipline and law'. PHOTO: AFP Former head of major Chinese airline under graft investigation BEIJING - The former head of China Eastern Airlines is under investigation over corruption allegations, two Chinese anti-graft bodies said on June 28. Mr Liu Shaoyong, who headed the airline from 2009 until his resignation in 2022, is being investigated for 'serious violations of discipline and law', the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission said in a statement. The Shanghai-based airline, primarily owned by the Chinese government through its parent company, is one of the three largest Chinese airlines. Mr Liu was credited with turning the carrier around after it posted record losses before he was appointed. China Eastern Airlines under his leadership merged with Shanghai Airlines and joined the SkyTeam airline alliance, strengthening its position in domestic and international markets. Mr Liu also led another one of China's major airlines, China Southern, before taking the reins of China Eastern. Chinese President Xi Jinping has waged an unrelenting crackdown on corruption since coming to power over a decade ago. Proponents say the policy promotes clean governance but others say it also serves as a means for Mr Xi to purge political rivals. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
British Labour Party's ‘Starmtroopers' mount rebellion against their leader
Keir Starmer's landslide win in the British general election last July delivered to the House of Commons what was supposed to be a hand-picked army of loyalists moulded in his image, a cadre that earned the moniker 'Starmtroopers'. As the prime minister's first anniversary in power approaches next week, the troops have mutinied, and some now have him and his chancellor in their sights. Backbench Labour Members of Parliament on June 26 forced the government into a humiliating U-turn on its flagship welfare reform policy, cancelling some £3 billion of planned disability benefit cuts which had enraged the left-leaning party's ranks. Downing Street had little choice but surrender: Without concessions, Mr Starmer faced the prospect of a parliamentary defeat on July 1 that would have been extraordinary for a government with a 165-seat majority, calling his premiership into question. The move follows U-turns on his previous opposition to a national inquiry into child sexual abuse gangs and on a controversial decision to remove cold weather payments from pensioners. He has also signalled willingness to raise benefits for families with children, a Labour demand he has previously resisted. One left-wing Member of Parliament joked on June 27 that 'Keir always caves' could become the British equivalent of the US meme that President Donald Trump 'always chickens out'. The series of damaging climbdowns have left Mr Starmer's political authority weakened, his judgment under scrutiny and the positions of those around him in jeopardy. They also reflect increasing pressure on Labour from Nigel Farage's Reform UK party, which YouGov projected this week would win the most seats in the Commons if an election were held today – despite only winning five last year. 'Labour thought they had a few years to make difficult decisions and then maybe reduce taxes closer to the end of parliament, but Reform's success has made that tricky for them,' Steven Fielding, emeritus professor of politics at the University of Nottingham, said in an interview. 'Reform can now attack them from left and right. Labour clearly thought they had the political space to do this but it was a miscalculation and they clearly haven't,' he said, referring to the benefit cuts. Speaking to broadcasters on June 27, Mr Starmer said the adjustments were 'the right thing to do,' giving the package of welfare cuts 'the right balance'. The policy changes will have fiscal implications for Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves, however, while also placing her in political peril. Her first problem is the extra £4.5 billion she will need to find to fill the gap left by the reversals on disability benefits and winter fuel. Moreover, the U-turns suggest she is unable to get serious spending cuts past Labour MPs, leaving tax rises at the autumn budget increasingly inevitable and further hurting the chancellor's bet on economic growth coming to the rescue, according to Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Electoral pledges not to raise income tax, value added tax and national insurance for workers, coupled with the unpopular £26 billion increase in payroll taxes paid by employers that she rolled out at the last budget further tie her hands on what she is able to do next. For the first time, Ms Reeves' position is in serious danger, according to Labour MPs and government aides who spoke on condition of anonymity discussing internal party matters. The chancellor has sunk a lot of her personal political capital into making spending cuts to maintain fiscal stability, only to have them blocked by Labour MPs. A poll for the LabourList website found 40 per cent of Labour members want Ms Reeves ousted. Several MPs told Bloomberg that Mr Starmer should replace her with someone willing to change the government's self-imposed fiscal rules that limit borrowing. Many on the left of the party want a new chancellor to impose a one-time wealth tax. 'The issue of how the government designs a credible autumn budget will be in the news most weeks from now until it happens,' said Mr Sam Hill at Lloyds Bank. 'The unpalatability of measures needed to meet the fiscal rules pressurizes the government into questioning its commitment to the rules in the current format.' MPs are also targeting Mr Starmer's chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney. Several said the premier's most senior aide was responsible for pushing the government to the right on crime and immigration, as well as – alongside Ms Reeves – putting too much focus on fiscal prudence over the more traditional Labour priority of public services. One MP said Mr Starmer should replace Mr McSweeney and Ms Reeves, or at least strip away some of their decision-making powers. Another said both had seen their authority eroded by the U-turns, and that they believed Mr Starmer now aimed to take a left-wing direction more palatable to the party. The bad blood between Mr Starmer's top team and the wider party flows both ways. Backbench criticisms of the premier include that he is often out of the country focusing on foreign affairs, a charge to which even some Starmer supporters are sympathetic. MPs complain he rarely meets them to hear their concerns, does not seem to have an idea of what he wants to achieve domestically, and is not governing enough like a Labour premier. Allies of the premier expressed frustration that so many MPs are behaving like their Conservative predecessors by badmouthing the government to the media. There was particular anger at an anonymous Labour MP who suggested to the Times newspaper that Downing Street needed 'regime change'. One Starmer supporter warned that those agitating for Ms Reeves and Mr McSweeney to be fired, are effectively threatening to bring down the prime minister. Another attributed some of the complaints to ego, saying some backbenchers had decided to cause problems for the government because with such a large intake, career progression to the ministerial ranks was unlikely. But senior Labour backbencher Meg Hillier suggested the root of the disgruntlement was the government's failure to commmunicate with the rank-and-file. 'There's huge talent, experience and knowledge in parliament and I think it's important it's better listened to,' Ms Hillier, who chairs the Treasury Select Committee and had helped spearhead this week's rebellion, told BBC radio on June 27. 'That message has landed.' In an interview with the Observer newspaper on June 27, an unusually emotional Starmer conceded he had made a number of major mistakes since taking office. He accepted he had 'squeezed the hope out' of the country with his gloomy rhetoric about the problems he inherited on taking office, said he had 'deep regret' over a speech he gave on immigration that was criticised as populist, and said he had made 'wrong' decisions on Downing Street appointments. The interview divided his own team: Some felt it showed honesty and a more human side, others worried it projected weakness. Mr Starmer will hope his U-turns are seen by the public as refreshing and proof that he is a politician who knows when he has made a mistake. The risk is that they – and the ranks of Starmtroopers seated behind him – just see him as weak. BLOOMERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
