
Why Osteoporosis Isn't Just a Senior Problem Anymore
Despite being so common, osteoporosis is often misunderstood, undertreated or ignored. But new science is changing that, giving us new insights into how bones weaken, how to catch it early and how to protect skeletal health for life.
At its core Osteoporosis is a disease of bone imbalance. Normally our bones are constantly renewing themselves—old tissue gets broken down and new tissue replaces it. But when this balance tips either by losing too much bone or making too little bones become porous, brittle and prone to break. As bone loss occurs individuals may lose bone mass and increase the risk of fractures.
According to Aging Clinical and Experimental Research (2021) this imbalance can come from a variety of factors including hormonal changes (menopause), aging and even immune dysfunction [1]. These changes affect how cells within the bone operate and tip the scale towards bone loss. Imbalances in certain hormones can also significantly impact bone health.
Children aren't immune either. Disorders like osteogenesis imperfecta or chronic malnutrition can cause pediatric osteoporosis. As stated in Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology (2021) when bone growth is disrupted in early life—during rapid growth spurts or due to genetic factors—the result is lifelong fragility [2].
Family history is another risk factor as individuals with a family history of osteoporosis are more likely to experience bone loss. Osteoporosis is a medical condition that requires a licensed physician for proper diagnosis and treatment. Routine screenings as recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force are essential for osteoporosis diagnosed early. Almost everyone is at risk of developing osteoporosis due to aging and lifestyle choices.
Here's where things get even more interesting: bone health isn't just about calcium and exercise. The immune system and gut microbiome are also involved. A 2020 EXCLI Journal review states that chronic inflammation and microbial imbalances can weaken bones—linking osteoporosis to broader systemic issues like autoimmune diseases and gut disorders [3].
Chronic inflammation plays a big role in many osteoporosis cases. Conditions like rheumatoid arthritis accelerate bone loss not just because of the disease itself but because of the inflammatory chemicals involved. These substances called cytokines disrupt the delicate balance of bone remodeling. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2012) says pro-inflammatory cytokines can increase bone destruction and shut down new bone formation [8].
Another often overlooked factor is bone quality. We focus on bone mineral density (BMD) but that only tells part of the story. A person can have normal BMD and still fracture due to poor bone microarchitecture. In 2021 Instructional Course Lectures stated that bone strength also depends on its internal structure—like how well the collagen and mineral components are arranged [4].
Think of it like two buildings made of the same materials but one will collapse faster if the internal framework is weak. Bones are living tissue undergoing continuous remodeling where old bone is broken down and replaced with new bone.
The gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is the DEXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) scan which measures bone mineral density. A bone density test is essential for identifying the disease early. But diagnosis goes beyond numbers. Clinicians look at a person's risk factors for osteoporosis: age, gender, history of fractures, medications like steroids and chronic illnesses.
According to Lancet (2019) secondary fracture prevention programs such as Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) are proving to be essential tools in identifying patients who may have osteoporosis but were never formally diagnosed—especially after their first fracture [10].
These services help close the gap between injury and intervention so patients get the care they need before another break occurs. Healthcare providers diagnose osteoporosis during routine screenings following guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Osteoporosis treatment isn't just about pills—it's a lifelong approach to treating osteoporosis. Preventive measures like being active, eating a diet rich in calcium and vitamin D, not smoking and being at a healthy weight can go a long way.
Weight-bearing exercises like walking, jogging and dancing are essential for building and maintaining strong bones. Taking a calcium supplement can help you meet your daily recommended intake especially if your dietary calcium is inadequate.
But for those already affected, medications play a big role. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics (2015) stressed the importance of patient education saying that understanding the condition improves long-term treatment outcome [5]. Here are the common treatment options:
To prevent osteoporosis you need to adopt a healthy lifestyle that includes a balanced diet and regular physical activity.
P&T Journal (2018) noted that while these treatments are effective doctors must also consider cost, side effects and the patient's ability to adhere to the regimen when choosing a therapy plan [9]. Preventing fractures involves maintaining bone health through adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, prescribed medications and avoiding falls.
Weight-bearing exercise is particularly beneficial in preventing bone loss and reducing the risk of fractures as we age. Treating osteoporosis effectively requires a balanced approach that includes medication, diet and exercise.
Children with bone disorders need a more tailored approach. Their bones are still growing so doctors must be cautious with medications that might affect that process. A 2023 Current Osteoporosis Reports article emphasized the need for nuanced care strategies in kids with developmental delays or skeletal disorders [7].
The future of osteoporosis care is moving beyond one-size-fits-all approaches. As the 2023 Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics review said, age, genetics, environment and lifestyle all play a role in determining bone health risk and treatment plan [6].
Achieving peak bone mass by 30 is key to reducing the risk of osteoporosis later in life. Maintaining bone mass over time is also crucial to reducing osteoporosis-related fractures.
That means looking at bone health from childhood to old age. Early-life interventions especially for children with chronic illnesses can build more bone for the future. In older adults, early screening and multidisciplinary care including primary care, endocrinology and geriatrics can prevent devastating fractures that often lead to disability or loss of independence.
Strategies to keep bones strong are a balanced diet rich in calcium and vitamin D and regular physical activity. Keeping bones healthy is weight-bearing exercise and preventing falls.
Osteoporosis isn't just a disease of aging—it's a lifelong concern that requires early awareness, proactive prevention and tailored treatment especially for those at high risk and increased risk. By understanding the complex interplay of inflammation, bone quality and individual risk factors we're moving towards more effective care for every stage of life. Osteoporosis risk is influenced by many medical conditions and lifestyle choices so preventive measures are key. The science is clear: strong bones start with strong strategies and the earlier we act the better the outcome.
[1] Barnsley, J., Buckland, G., Chan, P. E., Ong, A., Ramos, A. S., Baxter, M., Laskou, F., Dennison, E. M., Cooper, C., & Patel, H. P. (2021). Pathophysiology and treatment of osteoporosis: challenges for clinical practice in older people. Aging clinical and experimental research, 33(4), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01817-y
[2] Testini, V., Eusebi, L., Tupputi, U., Carpagnano, F. A., Bartelli, F., & Guglielmi, G. (2021). Metabolic Bone Diseases in the Pediatric Population. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology, 25(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722566
[3] Föger-Samwald, U., Dovjak, P., Azizi-Semrad, U., Kerschan-Schindl, K., & Pietschmann, P. (2020). Osteoporosis: Pathophysiology and therapeutic options. EXCLI journal, 19, 1017–1037. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2020-2591
[4] Dimar, J. R., Lane, J. M., Lehman, R. A., Jr, & Anderson, P. A. (2021). The Basics of Bone Physiology, Healing, and Osteoporosis. Instructional course lectures, 70, 527–536. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33438933/
[5] Lupsa, B. C., & Insogna, K. (2015). Bone Health and Osteoporosis. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America, 44(3), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2015.05.002
[6] Khandelwal, S., & Lane, N. E. (2023). Osteoporosis: Review of Etiology, Mechanisms, and Approach to Management in the Aging Population. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America, 52(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2022.10.009
[7] Raimann, A., Misof, B. M., Fratzl, P., & Fratzl-Zelman, N. (2023). Bone Material Properties in Bone Diseases Affecting Children. Current osteoporosis reports, 21(6), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-023-00822-6
[8] Redlich, K., & Smolen, J. S. (2012). Inflammatory bone loss: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention. Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 11(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3669
[9] Tu, K. N., Lie, J. D., Wan, C. K. V., Cameron, M., Austel, A. G., Nguyen, J. K., Van, K., & Hyun, D. (2018). Osteoporosis: A Review of Treatment Options. P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 43(2), 92–104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29386866/
[10] Compston, J. E., McClung, M. R., & Leslie, W. D. (2019). Osteoporosis. Lancet (London, England), 393(10169), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
7 hours ago
- Business Wire
Exact Sciences and Humana Expand Colorectal Cancer Screening Partnership with Cologuard Plus™ Test
MADISON, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Exact Sciences Corp. (NASDAQ: EXAS), a leading provider of cancer screening and diagnostic tests, today announced an expanded partnership with Humana Inc. to enhance access to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Through the partnership, the Cologuard Plus™ test will be available as an in-network service for eligible Humana Medicare Advantage members nationwide beginning in August 2025. Humana, the fourth largest private insurer in the United States, has approximately 5.8 million Medicare Advantage members. 'The Exact Sciences team is proud to expand access to Cologuard Plus through our collaboration with Humana, making it easier for more people to access this revolutionary, non-invasive colorectal cancer screening test from the comfort of home,' said Jake Orville, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Screening. 'This agreement reflects our shared commitment to removing barriers for patients and advancing earlier detection, when treatment is most effective.' Cologuard Plus, which launched in March 2025, has received FDA approval, Medicare coverage, and inclusion in the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. About the Cologuard ® and Cologuard Plus ™ tests Developed in collaboration with Mayo Clinic, the Cologuard ® and Cologuard Plus ™ tests are first-line, noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening options for adults aged 45 or older who are at average risk for the disease. The Cologuard test revolutionized CRC screening by detecting specific DNA markers and blood in stool associated with cancer and precancer, allowing patients to complete the collection kit at home without special preparation or time off, and return the kit to the lab for results. It is included in national screening guidelines from the American Cancer Society (2018) and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2021). Since its inception in 2014, Cologuard has been used to screen for more CRC 20 million times. Building on this success, the FDA-approved Cologuard Plus test raises the performance bar even further and features novel biomarkers, improved laboratory processes, and enhanced sample stability. The Cologuard Plus test is expected to reduce false positives by more than 40% compared to the original Cologuard test, helping minimize unnecessary follow-up colonoscopies. Both tests demonstrate Exact Sciences' commitment to improving CRC screening access and outcomes. About Exact Sciences A leading provider of cancer screening and diagnostic tests, Exact Sciences helps patients and health care providers make timely, informed decisions before, during, and after a cancer diagnosis. The company's growing portfolio includes well-established brands such as Cologuard® and Oncotype DX®, along with innovative solutions like Oncodetect™ for molecular residual disease and recurrence monitoring. Exact Sciences continues to invest in a robust pipeline of advanced cancer diagnostics aimed at improving outcomes. For more information, visit follow @ExactSciences on X, or connect on LinkedIn and Facebook. NOTE: Exact Sciences, Cologuard, and Cologuard Plus are trademarks of Exact Sciences Corporation. The Cologuard test and Cologuard Plus test are only available in the U.S. Forward-Looking Statement This news release contains forward-looking statements concerning our expectations, anticipations, intentions, beliefs, or strategies regarding the future. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that we have made as of the date hereof and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, conditions and events to differ materially from those anticipated. Therefore, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements regarding the development and commercialization of the Cologuard Plus test and the performance characteristics and health care benefits of the Cologuard Plus test in a commercial setting, as well as statements regarding the development and commercialization of Exact Sciences' pipeline tests. Risks and uncertainties that may affect our forward-looking statements are described in the Risk Factors sections of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Kennedy could soon reconstruct US preventive care panel, STAT News reports
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could imminently overhaul a key federal advisory panel that recommends which preventive services insurers must pay for, health and medical news website STAT News reported on Tuesday, citing a person familiar with the plans. Federal health officials are vetting new members for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the report said. It also cited David Mansdoerfer, who advises a group allied with Kennedy, as saying he knew people being considered for the panel but that he declined to name them. Mansdoerfer, who served during President Donald Trump's first administration as deputy assistant secretary at the Department of Health and Human Services, later told Reuters that he knew "a couple" of those being considered. He added that he was not actively involved in the process, which he said could take from a few weeks to two or three months. The Office of the White House Liaison at HHS is in charge of the vetting, said Mansdoerfer, now the chief strategy adviser to the Independent Medical Alliance, a group of physicians allied with Kennedy. This was also the case with candidates for advisory committees during his time at the department, he said. Asked if the people he knew of who were under consideration were physicians, Mansdoerfer said they were all clinical health professionals. He had earlier told STAT that the existing panel was "MD heavy" and that the reorganized one was likely to include other kinds of healthcare providers. The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that Kennedy planned to remove all of the panel's 16 members. An HHS spokesperson said Kennedy had not yet made a decision. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force includes medical experts serving staggered four-year terms on a volunteer basis. Its role in choosing what services will be covered by insurers was established under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The 40-year-old group, whose recommendations provide guidance to doctors, looks at everything from routine screenings for breast cancer to drugs to prevent HIV infection. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. reportedly eyeing overhaul of cancer screening task force
(NewsNation) — Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is facing criticism over a reported plan to fire all 16 members of a federal advisory panel that helps determine which cancer screenings and preventive services insurers must cover at no cost to patients. The group in question, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, provides evidence-based recommendations on screenings such as breast and colon cancer and plays a role in shaping coverage for millions of Americans. The plan was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, which cited sources claiming Kennedy believes the plane is 'too woke.' NewsNation has not independently confirmed the potential firings but has requested a comment from the Department of Health and Human Services. FDA eyes warning about antidepressants during pregnancy AMA: Panel plays a 'critical, nonpartisan' role in patient health The American Medical Association wrote a letter to Kennedy expressing 'deep concern' over the potential dismissals. The AMA said the panel plays a 'critical, nonpartisan role in guiding physicians' efforts to prevent disease and improve the health of patients.' The organization is urging Kennedy to retain the previously appointed members and 'ensure their important work can continue without interruption.' AMA President Dr. Bobby Mukkamala has pushed back on criticism of the panel as well as claims that it's driven by partisan ideology. 'So the question is, why was this taken apart?' Mukkamala said. 'What was the motivation to do that? What did we think that these folks were doing wrong, that then somebody else may be perceived as doing it better, for reasons that we have no idea what makes this person wrong and what makes this person right. And that's where we're concerned.' Not allergic to poison ivy? Don't be so sure Task force accused of being 'too woke' Kennedy's reported plan comes in the wake of an article in the American Conservative Magazine, which accused the task force of harboring left-wing ideology. Kennedy has since postponed the panel's meeting scheduled this month. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword