Race for Yukon's next premier between business insider and former chief
A new premier of Yukon is expected to be chosen by the governing Liberal party on Thursday, leaving the winner with just months to make their mark before a territorial election has to be called.
Yukon Liberals will pick the party's next leader at a convention in Whitehorse to replaced outgoing premier Ranj Pillai, who announced in May that he would be stepping aside once a successor is chosen.
An election must be held on or before Nov. 3 in the territory that has been governed by the Liberals since 2016.
The leadership race pits party insider and longtime local businessman Mike Pemberton against Doris Bill, the former chief of the Kwanlin Dun First Nation.
Pemberton is chair of the Yukon branch of the federal Liberals and was vice-president of the territorial party before stepping aside to run for party leader.
He said in an interview that one of the biggest issues he's hearing from Yukon residents is the high cost of living, made worse by the ongoing tariff fight with the United States.
'The cost of living in the North typically is higher because of transportation and not having enough because of our grow season. We don't have the food security that maybe our counterparts in the South have.'
He said one of the ways to address that would be to adjust the northern living allowance, a federal tax credit provided to those living in remote locations in Canada.
The allowance hasn't been adjusted for 'quite a while,' he said, noting that it also has never been tied to the consumer price index.
'So, this would be one of the easiest ways to offset the higher cost of living in the North. And I'm not talking about just Yukon, because the North is vast.'
Bill was chief for the Kwanlin Dun First Nation, Yukon's largest First Nation, for three terms from 2014 to 2023 after spending three decades as a journalist for CBC.
She was born in Whitehorse and grew up in permanent government care in Inuvik.
If she is selected as leader, Bill would become both Yukon's first Indigenous premier and the first to be born in the territory.
She said she doesn't think about glass ceilings much.
'When I was first elected chief of the Kwanlin Dun First Nation, a number of young Indigenous women reached out to me. So, I know what this means, and I've heard from them over the course of this campaign, people who are incredibly proud that I've even put my name forward,' she said.
'Because you don't see a lot of Indigenous people putting their name forward to run for — especially the head of a mainstream government.'
Since her term ended as chief, Bill has served as vice-chair to the Yukon Residential Schools Missing Children Project and chair of the Yukon Housing Corporation board.
She said crime and gang violence is a big concern in the territory.
As chief, the Kwanlin Dun First Nation implemented a Community Safety Officer program that was effective in decreasing calls to police and has been used elsewhere in the territory, she said.
'I think that there are things that can be done to augment the program. For instance, we need to focus on training, we need to focus on capacity. These programs also need implementation dollars,' she said.
Pillai was acclaimed as premier when he took the job in 2023, and Pemberton said having a contest for leadership is better for the party.
'Running in a leadership race is a win-win for everybody, for the candidates that are running, for the party, and for the public to see who is going to be the next leader and then the premier,' he said.
A statement from the Liberal party says more than 1,000 people are eligible to vote at the convention.
Eligible voters will be using a ranked preferential ballot and the candidate who receives 50 per cent plus one of the total number of votes will be declared the winner.
Both the opposition Yukon Party and NDP have started rolling out candidates in advance of the territorial election called.
Pemberton said he would likely call the election before the November deadline if he becomes premier.
Bill said there are things that can be accomplished in the next few months.
'I'd like to see what Prime Minister (Mark) Carney is going to do in terms of the housing initiatives, and those are things we can tap into,' she said.
'So, there are some things that we can work on in that small period of time. I wish it was a bit longer, but like I said, it is what it is, and we will move forward.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 18, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
30 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
After Trump threat, Canada cancels digital services tax. What was it — and why is it gone?
The Liberal government cancelled the digital services tax after a call between Carney and Trump on Sunday. Evan Vucci/Associated Press
an hour ago
Is Canada now free of internal trade barriers? Not yet, says expert
Federal and provincial leaders are working to dismantle internal trade barriers that push up the cost of goods and make it harder to do business within Canada. But anyone expecting all of them to be gone by tomorrow should read the fine print, experts say. Throughout the spring federal election campaign, Mark Carney as Liberal leader repeatedly vowed to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers and create free trade by Canada Day. The rhetoric has been at times confusing and the political scorecard on this one is hard to track. With July 1 just a day away, Carney's government has passed its planned changes into law — but it's more like the start of a conversation than the final word, says internal trade expert Ryan Manucha. It's a starting gun and it's starting a lot more activity and work, which is honestly the really exciting part, said Manucha. If any of this was easy, it would have been done. Manucha writes on the topic for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think-tank and authored the book Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada's Quest for Interprovincial Trade . When I'm advising governments, I say, 'Don't think of this as a light switch, ' he said. We are changing the way that everyone approaches the concept of regulation and risk here, and so it's going to take some time. The rush to break down internal barriers to trade comes in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war with Canada. One study estimates that existing internal trade hurdles cost the economy some $200 billion a year. Manucha said Canada has talked about this problem for decades but is only addressing it seriously now — and it would never have happened had we not had Trump. He said the introduction of the Carney government's bill on internal trade was incredible to see because the idea was just an academic theory maybe even as little as eight months ago. Bill C-5, the omnibus bill that reduces federal restrictions on interprovincial trade and also speeds up permitting for large infrastructure projects, became law on June 26. An analysis of the law by McMillan Vantage says that this legislation would not achieve the elimination of all internal trade barriers. Provinces hold power When Carney made his campaign promise, he was talking about cutting red tape put up by the federal government — not the rules set by the provinces, which have the most authority in this area. The prime minister described this effort as a sort of quid pro quo with the provinces. We're getting rid of a bunch of duplicative federal regulations. We're going to have a principle of one project, one review — and in exchange, they're going to agree to eliminate all the barriers to trade and labour mobility, Carney said at a rally in Kitchener, Ont., on March 26. The federal government committed that we will sweep away all of our impediments by Canada Day. Free trade by Canada Day. WATCH | Why are provincial trade barriers still a thing? Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Why are provincial trade barriers still a thing? More interprovincial trade is being touted as one potential countermeasure to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats, but complicated barriers stand in the way. CBC's Ellen Mauro breaks down why free trade within Canada is so difficult and what needs to happen to get more goods flowing across the country. But Canada's internal trade barriers won't all be eliminated by then — not even all the federal ones. Canada's supply management system for dairy products, which sets provincial production quotas, will remain in place. Quebec also retains language requirements that will stay in place. Credit unions have complained that the new law does not break down barriers to their expansion into multiple provinces. Nova Scotia reducing trade barriers with 5 provinces (new window) But just how many federal barriers does the bill eliminate? That's hard to sort out. A lot of the details will have to wait until regulations are drafted — a process that will involve consultations with affected industries. I don't really know what this legislation could end up doing because a lot of veto power, a lot of discretion still rests with the regulatory authorities, Manucha said. According to the text of that legislation, it would seem like meat inspection would come off. Is [the Canadian Food Inspection Agency] really going to allow for interprovincial trade and inspection of meat coming from non-federally licensed abattoirs? I don't know. Lack of consensus There is no comprehensive list of existing internal trade barriers. Even some lobby groups have told parliamentarians they don't know how many barriers their own industries face. There isn't even consensus on what all counts as a trade barrier. In the provincial legislation in Ontario, they're talking, for many occupations, [of] having a 30-day service standard for how long it'll take for credentials to be recognized, Manucha said. Nova Scotia, meanwhile, is on the 10-day turnaround time. That's less than a third. Can you call the 30-day versus 10-day a trade barrier? Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, who has repeatedly stated that most of the barriers are at the provincial level, testified to the Senate that she will meet with her provincial counterparts on July 8 to discuss next steps. One major obstacle is in Freeland's crosshairs: Canada's patchwork of interprovincial trucking regulations. One of three areas that I will be putting on the agenda at that meeting is trucking, she said on June 16. It should be a lot easier than it is to drive a truck from Halifax to Vancouver. We need to get rid of conflicting requirements. Kyle Duggan (new window) · The Canadian Press
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Canada cancelled its digital services tax. What was it and why did the US hate it?
Tech giants such as Amazon and Google will not have to shell out close to $2 billion as expected today, as Canada moved to cancel the controversial digital services tax on Sunday, just one day before the first payment was due. The announcement from Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne came late Sunday evening, following a phone call between Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump. That call concluded a flurry of discussion between the two countries since Trump suddenly announced on Friday afternoon that he was ending all trade talks with Canada and threatened new tariffs. But the standoff had really been building for years. Here's a brief look at what the tax was about and why Trump made such a drastic move to try and kill it. What is the digital services tax? The tax was announced in 2020, but the legislation to enact it didn't pass until last year. While it has been in effect for a year, the first payment, retroactive to 2022, was to be submitted on June 30. Canada cancelled its digital services tax. What was it and why did the US hate it? The government intended it to overcome what Canada saw as a tax loophole, with big tech companies operating in Canada digitally, making money off Canadian users and data, but not paying tax on it in Canada. The tax was to apply to companies that operate online marketplaces, online advertising services and social media platforms, and those that earn revenue from some sales of user data. It meant companies such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb, would pay a three-per-cent levy on revenue from Canadian users. The tax was only to cover large companies, those that have worldwide annual revenues greater than 750 million euros per year and Canadian digital services revenue greater than $20 million per year. The parliamentary budget officer had estimated it would bring in $7.2 billion over five years. Because the first payment was retroactive to cover three years, the expectation was the companies collectively could be on the hook for an initial payment of around US$2 billion. Why did Canada impose it? Work has been underway for years at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development to set up a multilateral tax approach meant to replace digital service taxes imposed by individual countries. But after that work stalled, Canada went ahead with its own tax. Other countries, including France and the United Kingdom, also have digital taxes. The Liberals had long maintained Canada would go ahead on its own if the OECD deal fell through. In a 2024 release, the government said while "Canada's priority and preference has always been a multilateral agreement," many of Canada's allies have digital services taxes in place. "Canada has been at a disadvantage relative to these countries which have continued collecting revenue under their pre-existing digital services taxes," it said. Why do some oppose it? Critics of the tax took issue with Canada's refusal to wait for a global deal. They also opposed the retroactive application of the tax, which means companies will have to pay several years' worth of taxes at once. US businesses and politicians argued the tax targets US companies. The tax applied to all large tech companies no matter where they were based, but because so many of those companies are American, US firms would have paid the bulk of the money. In a letter earlier this month, 21 members of Congress said US companies will pay 90 per cent of the revenue Canada will collect from the tax, and that first payment will cost US companies US$2 billion. That opposition isn't new. The Biden administration also pushed back against the tax, and the stance isn't isolated to Canada, with the US also opposing digital service taxes imposed by other countries. Before the tax was rescinded on Sunday, the president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Canada said its "members have been warning for years that this tax would become a flashpoint in the Canada-US relationship. That moment has arrived." The tax is "retroactive, one-sided, and deeply damaging to cross-border trade," Rick Tachuk said in an emailed statement, which encouraged Canada to cancel its tax. Michael Geist, Canada research chair in internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa, wrote in a blog post Saturday the current conflict shouldn't come as a surprise. "Canada pushed ahead despite efforts at an international agreement on the issue and later dismissed the increasing friction over the issue with the US, which has been signalling its opposition to the DST for many years," he said. Geist said once Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne confirmed on June 19 Canada would be going ahead with the tax, the government "virtually guaranteed the US would respond as it did." Where does Trump come in? While opposition to the tax has been brewing south of the border for years, Trump escalated it abruptly Friday afternoon with an online post. He wrote he was "terminating all discussions on trade with Canada" because of the tax and called it a "direct and blatant attack on our country." He also complained about Canada's dairy-sector protections that include high tariffs on imports of American milk and cheese. Canada and the US have been in a trade war for months, triggered by Trump's imposition of tariffs. At the G7 summit in Alberta earlier this month, Carney and Trump agreed to work on reaching a deal by mid-July — work that Trump said was halted Friday. Friday afternoon, shortly after Trump's post went live, Carney told reporters he hadn't spoken to Trump that day but that "we'll continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians." So what happened on Sunday? A flurry of activity followed Trump's post on Friday, culminating Sunday night in the call between Trump and Carney. The decision opened the door for trade talks to restart, and Carney said in a statement, the overall results of those talks were paramount. 'In our negotiations on a new economic and security relationship between Canada and the United States, Canada's new government will always be guided by the overall contribution of any possible agreement to the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses," he said. "Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis.'
