Teesside fraud-busting scheme extended by a year
Ian - not his real name - told BBC Radio Tees the family felt "betrayed" when they discovered a relative had withdrawn £26,000 over the course of a year, after having stayed with them.The fraud came to light when Ian's sister went to pay in a cheque at the bank on behalf of their mother, who has a terminal illness."We discovered a lot of money had gone from my mum's bank account," Ian said, adding: "Even larger amounts had been transferred out of her ISA into her bank account and then on to another account."It had started with relatively small amounts, but then accelerated. Sometimes a couple of thousand pounds was going within a week."My sister and I couldn't sleep at night. Her hair started dropping out with the stress of it. I told my dad and he started sobbing in my arms."
'Tip of the iceberg'
Without power of attorney, Ian said he had been unable to deal with the issue on his mum's behalf.But the FFA team, based at Stockton, was able to step in and help - providing an advocate to talk to the bank.The family member responsible for the fraud was later sentenced to a suspended jail sentence.The FFA is funded by money recovered from criminals using the Proceeds of Crime Act.
While some fraud victims do come forward, the FFA's Dave Mead described them as "the tip of an iceberg"."This is a fairly new scheme. We've been running five months, and it's a bolt-on to the support we already provided, such as emotional help and referring people to debt counsellors."Bad people's money is now helping good people. "We're at about £300,000 recovered - that's back into the pockets of people on Teesside who have been victims of romance fraud, courier fraud or rogue traders."It's great to see the smile on people's faces when money is returned."Mr Mead said people who suspect they have been a victim of fraud should immediately contact their bank, followed by police.The FFA will then contact victims having had the details passed on by officers.
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Staffordshire library part of £5m modernisation project
A library in Staffordshire is set to be part of a £5m modernisation project, the county council has County Council has revealed Wombourne Library will be one of 10 larger libraries in the region to undergo extensive work in the next few library will close its doors at 16:00 BST on 2 August, with a temporary library set to open in its place in the adjoining community centre on 7 August.A county council spokesperson said work would take about three months, with the library reopening in the autumn. Hayley Coles, Staffordshire County Council's cabinet member for Communities and Culture, said: "This investment is for libraries that haven't been improved in recent years and the money will be spent entirely on improving the public areas."At Wombourne there will be a dedicated children's area, free Wi-Fi and access to the internet, as well as space for people to work on their own devices, access business start-up advice and dozens of other services."She added: "Although Wombourne's temporary library will be a little smaller, residents will be able to order from the service's whole stock as usual."We'll keep them updated as work progresses and I'm sure they'll be pleased with the final result when it reopens."As well as Wombourne, nine other libraries run directly by Staffordshire County Council, including Leek, Stone, Biddulph, Perton, Kidsgrove, Burntwood, Rugeley, Uttoxeter and Cannock, are in line for future investment. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Outwitted': have water companies managed to sidestep Labour's bonus ban?
It started before the election. Against a background of growing fury about the conduct of the water companies, Labour promised to end the injustice of their executives getting bonuses while sewage was dumped in England's rivers and seas. In March 2024, Steve Reed, the then shadow environment secretary, said: 'Since the last election the water bosses have paid themselves £25m in bonuses. Labour will ban the payment of bonuses to polluting water bosses until they have cleaned up their filth.' The policy became a significant part of the election campaign two months later. The manifesto promised: 'We will give regulators new powers to block the payment of bonuses to executives who pollute our waterways.' Once in power, Labour went straight into action. One of the first big laws it passed was the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025. The legislation contains provisions to ban performance-related payments to senior executives of water companies that repeatedly pollute England's waterways with sewage. Reed, now environment secretary, described it as a means to end the 'undeserved' payments. Under the act, the government banned six water firms including Thames Water from awarding bonuses for this financial year after seven major pollution incidents. However, it was not long before flaws in this plan began to emerge. Thames Water has faced particular challenges this year, with regular discussions over its possible collapse, even as customers' bills soar to pay for infrastructure. In February, as the legislation was going through parliament, a court ruled that Thames could proceed with a controversial £3bn loan from a group of creditors, at a 9.75% interest rate, in order to stabilise the company. In May, the chair of Thames, Adrian Montague, told MPs on the environment, food and rural affairs (Efra) committee that bosses were in line for 'substantial' bonuses linked to the loan, on the insistence of creditors. The company needed to pay the bonuses, he said, 'because we have to keep staff. It is a very competitive marketplace out there … If we are unable to pay bonuses, people will come knocking and try to pick out of us the best staff we have. That is not in customers' interests.' Soon afterwards, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs announced plans to use the act to block Thames bosses taking bonuses. A week later, Reed appeared in front of the same committee, telling MPs that the bonuses had been withdrawn. At the same hearing Montague conceded in a letter that he may have misspoken when he said the bonuses were insisted upon by creditors. Reed told the committee that Thames Water had 'appeared to be attempting to circumvent that ban, calling their bonuses something different so they can continue to pay them'. Thames responded, saying that rather than having been withdrawn, the bonuses were paused. But in July the Guardian revealed that Thames had already paid bonuses totalling £2.46m to 21 managers on 30 April, and was refusing to claw the money back. Although it had paused the bonus scheme, or management retention plan (MRP), it did not promise that the next tranches would not also be paid, with the managers due to receive the same sum again in December and a further £10.8m collectively next June. Under the Water (Special Measures) Act, the only bonuses that can be stopped to those at the very top of the company, such as the chief executive, the chief financial officer and the chair. Chris Weston, the chief executive of Thames Water, has voluntarily declined his 300% bonus, because, he said, it would have been a 'distraction'. The water campaigner and former Undertones frontman, Feargal Sharkey, campaigned with Keir Starmer during the general election. But Sharkey has been left unimpressed by the bonus ban. He said: 'Driving forward eye-catching policies designed to do nothing more than grab headlines is no way to fix the biggest problem facing this country in the 21st century, the government has been outwitted and outmanoeuvred by the water companies.' Was the Thames package designed to circumvent the rules? Documents it released to the Efra committee show that when designing the payments package, the company hired top consultants and law firms including Rothschild & Co, Linklaters and Mercer to help it come up with a retention programme that was legally sound and would get past regulators. During Thames board meetings set up to discuss the bonuses, members asked 'if any pressure to waive bonus would be a risk generally or under the water (special measures) bill', according to the documents The board was told the bonuses were in line with the specifications of the legislation: 'The [remuneration] committee requested to reconfirm whether the MRP was consistent with the Water (Special Measures) Act and related Ofwat consultation and it was confirmed that the MRP was a retention payment rather than a bonus, and had no performance-related element. As such, it was not restricted by the Water (Special Measures) Act.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Thames Water and its lawyers and advisers believe they could pay its chief executive and chief financial officer under the scheme if they wanted, because they are retention payments. If this loophole remains open, any water company that breaches pollution rules could continue to pay out millions in bonuses to their executives, as long as the payments are not labelled performance related. In a letter to the Efra committee in July, Reed would not directly answer whether these bonuses would be banned. He said: 'Should Ofwat determine Thames Water have breached the performance-related payments rule, then I expect them to take appropriate enforcement action.' A Defra spokesperson followed up and said: 'It is for companies to follow these new rules and help rebuild trust with their customers.' Water companies can also get round the bonus ban by hiking the pay of executives to make up for the lack of compensation. The Guardian revealed this week that Southern Water has nearly doubled its chief executive Lawrence Gosden's annual pay package to £1.4m. Southern has already been allowed to increase average bills by 53% over the next five years and is appealing to the Competition and Markets Authority to charge more. Ofwat says it may bring forward a planned review of the bonus ban, currently set for 2027, to look at the scope of the rules and see whether the net needs to be widened. The regulator added that executive salaries were a matter for the water companies, but said it expected them to be appropriate when taking bonus bans and company performance into account. A Defra spokesperson said: 'Undeserved bonuses for water company bosses have now been banned as part of the government's plan to clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good. Any instances of companies trying to circumvent the new rules are completely unacceptable. 'The government will leave no stone unturned against any bosses being made these outrageous payments.' Southern Water said the rise in its chief executive's salary was not an attempt to evade the bonus ban but part of a 'long-term incentive plan' as part of an effort to turnaround the company. It added that the payments were 'common industry practice'. A Thames Water spokesperson said: 'The company's CEO is not party to the MRP and has received no payments. None of the retention payments have been funded by customers. Full details of the plan have been shared with our economic regulator and the Efra committee.'
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Plans in Stoke-on-Trent for nearly 5,000 new homes to meet 'urgent need'
Plans to deliver nearly 5,000 homes to meet a city's "urgent need" for housing are set to be approved by City Council has devised a housing development pipeline to help meet the government's national target of delivering 1.5m new homes a programme will see the authority work with Homes England, developers and landowners to deliver 4,857 houses across 23 sites in the council's cabinet is being asked to approve the plans at their next meeting in July. Sites include completed and near-completed developments, such as Goods Yard and Chatterley Court in Chell Heath, as well as sites under development, such as Scotia Road and Bournes Bank in Burslem, Booth Street in Stoke, the former Doris Robinson Court site in Meir and the former Brookhouse Primary School site in Wellfield Road, to the council, the number of applicants on their housing register has been climbing over the last three are more than 3,138 households on the register, a 41% increase in the last 12 months. Over half of those households are in urgent and high need for the same time, the council's housing stock has fallen by 2,550 homes -13% - over the last 10 years. Almost 1,800 homes included in the council's housing pipeline project are expected to be affordable homes for people on the housing addition to this, the council is proposing to deliver an Empty Homes programme of around 100 new homes per Chris Robinson said: "We recognise that there is an urgent need to deliver new homes in the city to meet the increasing demand and, while it will be challenging, we are committed to working closely with our partners to increase the pace and scale of housebuilding across Stoke-on-Trent."We need to act quickly and take action to ensure all our residents can access decent homes in a city where they can stay, grow and thrive – and watch their children do the same." Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
