'I turned into the devil': Texas death row inmate Moises Mendoza to be executed Wednesday
Mendoza was sentenced to death row for the murder of 20-year-old Rachelle O'Neil Tolleson on March 18, 2004, in Farmersville, Texas. Tolleson lived in the small town, about 40 miles northeast of Dallas, with her 6-month-old daughter Avery.
Here's what we know about the case.
More from death row: Austin man remains on death row after U.S. Supreme Court denies second petition
In the early hours of March 18, 2004, Rachelle O'Neil Tolleson was at home with her infant daughter Avery. Tolleson and Avery lived alone, as Tolleson was in the middle of a divorce.
Mendoza told police he let himself inside Tolleson's house through a back door that night, per court documents. The two left to get a pack of cigarettes, leaving baby Avery at home.
Mendoza drove a little while before he began to choke Tolleson in his vehicle "for no reason," he said, according to court documents. He then drove the two to a field near his house, where he raped her before choking her again, court documents say.
Mendoza then dragged Tolleson out of his truck and choked her again until he thought she was dead, Mendoza told police. To make sure, he "poked her throat" with a knife. Mendoza left her body in the field, where it remained for a few days before he was interviewed by police about Tolleson's disappearance, court records say.
Paranoid, Mendoza wrapped Tolleson's body in a tarp and moved it to his cousin's land in a more remote area, just a few miles east of Farmersville. He then dumped the body in a "dug-out pit" and set it on fire to "destroy the fingerprints," he told police, The Courier Gazette reports.
A few days later, a man searching for arrowheads found Tolleson's charred body, according to The Courier-Gazette.
Mendoza was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
Before his conviction and sentencing, Mendoza wrote to his parents, telling them he didn't have a reason for what he did. "I don't know what happened to me at that moment. I turned into the devil and after I did something that I thought was in a dream," Mendoza wrote, The Courier-Gazette reports.
At the time of her death, Tolleson was a new mother to her 6-month-old daughter Avery. Tolleson enjoyed activities like scrapbooking and shopping, but her mother Pam O'Neil said it was Avery who was "her oxygen."
"Avery was her life and I was so proud of her when she became a mommy. Everything just came so naturally to her,' O'Neil told The Courier-Gazette about a year after Tolleson's death. "I hate that Avery won't have memories of her."
Over the years, Mendoza's case has gained a sort of notoriety. In 2006, his case was featured in the 10th season of "Forensic Files," and in 2008, the Investigation Discovery series "Solved" highlighted Tolleson's murder.
On April 2, Mendoza's lawyers asked for the opportunity to challenge Mendoza's conviction in federal court.
Neighbors described Mendoza as "hard-working" but said he changed as he got older, recounting a "violent argument" when he pinned down his mother and sister in their front yard once, as previously reported by The Courier-Gazette.
Mendoza graduated from high school, where he did "fairly well," court documents state. He received a few high school scholarships and completed about nine months of heating and air-conditioning training upon graduating.
In 2003, Mendoza was arrested for his involvement in two aggravated robberies on the Dallas College Richland Campus, according to The Courier-Gazette. It was while he was out on bail for one of these robberies that Tolleson went missing, the 2006 "Forensic Files" episode explains.
For much of their upbringing in northern Texas, Mendoza and Tolleson were actually in the same grade school classes, Tolleson's mother, Pam O'Neil, explained in a 2006 "Forensic Files" episode that outlines Mendoza's case. And the Friday before Tolleson's murder, Mendoza had been at Tolleson's house for a party of about 15 people, court documents say.
Clinical psychologist Mark Vigen described Mendoza during his trial as "immature" and "psychologically under-developed," claiming that Mendoza enjoyed getting away with "being sneaky" and got angry when others criticized him, as stated in court documents.
During Mendoza's sentencing, former Collin County First Assistant District Attorney Greg Davis described Mendoza as "one of the most violent, sadistic men" he'd ever prosecuted.
— USA TODAY reporter Greta Cross contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: 'Sadistic' killer Moises Mendoza to be executed in Texas Wednesday
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 days ago
Muslim inmate who won US Supreme Court beard case claims retaliatory transfer by Arkansas officials
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- A Muslim inmate who won a U.S. Supreme Court case upholding his right to grow a beard for religious reasons said in a lawsuit that Arkansas officials transferred him to a federal prison in West Virginia in retaliation for several other lawsuits he has filed. The American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas filed the lawsuit in federal court on behalf of Gregory Holt, also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad, claiming the transfer violated his constitutional rights. In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Holt could maintain a half-inch beard because Arkansas prison officials could not substantiate claims that the beard posed a security risk. The lawsuit filed Thursday argues his transfer was an effort to disrupt his advocacy on behalf of himself and other inmates. 'Mr. Muhammad's history of meritorious litigation showcases the ability of the legal system to provide justice to all, including prisoners,' the lawsuit said. 'The Court should not tolerate the (state's) retaliatory transfer aimed at suppressing Mr. Muhammad's meritorious litigation and legal work.' A spokesperson for the Department of Corrections declined to comment on the lawsuit. Jeff LeMaster, a spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin, said Griffin's office was reviewing the lawsuit and would 'vigorously' defend the state. Holt has six active lawsuits against the Arkansas Department of Corrections, according to the complaint. The lawsuit accuses the head of the division of correction of unilaterally pursuing Holt's transfer to a federal facility after the idea was raised in a mediation session in one of his lawsuits. Since being moved to the West Virginia facility, the ACLU said, Holt has been denied access to basic hygiene, religious services and contact with his lawyers. The lawsuit said he also has lost access to ongoing casework and legal documents that support his cases. The lawsuit said that since Holt is still a state inmate, Arkansas has the power to order his return to a state facility. 'This ordeal has made Mr. Muhammad loathe to ever trust the mediation process or participate in a mediation with the ADC ( or any other government actor) again,' the lawsuit said. In his U.S. Supreme Court case, Holt claimed that he has a right to grow a beard under a federal law aimed at protecting prisoners' religious rights. He had the support of then-President Barack Obama's administration, religious groups and atheists alike. Holt is serving a life sentence for a brutal assault on his girlfriend and was being held at a maximum-security prison 26 miles (43 kilometers) southeast of Little Rock. His case first came to the Supreme Court's attention when he filed a handwritten plea to the court asking it to block enforcement of Arkansas' no-beard rule.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
A federal judge reminds government inspectors: Get a warrant
Get a warrant, government inspectors. After years of litigation — including a trip to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and a trial — that's the commonsense opinion from U.S. District Judge Kathyrn Vratil. Score a big win for property and privacy rights. Your home is supposed to be your castle, of course. But for decades, the government treated it like anything but one. Enter Scott Johnson, who trains hunting dogs on the rural Kansas homestead he shares with his wife Harlene. He is a second-generation trainer, nationally recognized, has won countless awards, and plays by the rules. But that didn't stop the government from searching their property anyway and forcing him to waive his constitutional rights in exchange for a kennel license. Under Kansas law, if Scott wanted to keep his livelihood, he was forced to accept warrantless searches at any time with no notice and no right to refuse. If he or his wife wasn't on-site within 30 minutes of a surprise inspection, he would face automatic fines and more searches. Even asking the inspector to return later or to get a warrant was punishable. That's not just unreasonable but unconstitutional, as Judge Vratil has now ruled. The government's surprise warrantless search violated the Fourth Amendment. Remarkably, Kansas — through two different Attorneys General administrations — defended its actions by invoking the 'pervasively regulated industry' exception to the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on warrantless searches. The U.S. Supreme Court created the exception decades ago for federally licensed liquor and firearms dealers. Since then, state and lower courts expanded it and unsurprisingly, governments took a maximalist view of it. It was a bureaucratic windfall. In 2015, the Supreme Court explained the exception was supposed to be narrow and only applicable to inherently dangerous businesses — think underground mining and nuclear power plants — but governments didn't take the hint. Thankfully, the judge didn't buy the idea that training a dog how to sit or point on command could be counted alongside such dangerous operations. Indeed, she warned that Kansas's logic 'could essentially turn any industry into a closely regulated one,' allowing the exception to 'swallow the rule' that protects us all: The government needs a warrant before searching. The Founders wrote the Fourth Amendment to stop precisely this kind of regulatory overreach. The point was to forever stamp out searches where there was no reason for suspicion. Back then, colonists reviled those searches by British customs agents. In 1761, during a fiery, five-hour speech, lawyer James Otis railed against them in the famous Paxton's Case. He rightly declared it the 'worst instrument of arbitrary power, the most destructive of English liberty and the fundamental principles of law, that ever was found in an English law book.' He went on. 'Now one of the most essential branches of English liberty is the freedom of one's house. A man's house is his castle.' Today, suspicion-less searches have become far too accepted, both by the public and the courts. But Scott and Harlene didn't accept it. They just wanted their home to be treated like their castle. Forcing law-abiding citizens to helplessly watch while a government agent looks through their workshop or their backyard — not because of any suspicion of wrongdoing, but because of their livelihood — is an indignity nobody should have to suffer. Last week, Americans celebrated Independence Day — a time to reflect on the freedoms that define our nation. But freedom doesn't endure on its own. It must be defended. Sometimes in court, and sometimes by a dog trainer and his wife just trying to make a living on their own land. This case is about protecting private property from intrusive government regulation. It was about reminding those in power that no license, no regulation, and no bureaucratic theory justifies treating a private homestead like it is government property. Kansas isn't the only state with overreaching rules and abusive inspections. The temptation to regulate first and ask constitutional questions later isn't unique to it. This case serves as a reminder: What happened in rural Kansas happens elsewhere, and it can't be tolerated. Thanks to Scott and Harlene, Kansans are a little more secure today. And thanks to the Constitution, the rest of us can be too — if we're willing to fight for it. Samuel G. MacRoberts is the litigation director for the Kansas Justice Institute, and represented Scott Johnson and Harlene Hoyt in their Fourth Amendment lawsuit against the State of Kansas.
USA Today
4 days ago
- USA Today
Body of missing California teen found, man charged with her murder
Editor's note: If you know or suspect someone is experiencing domestic violence, call 911 or the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or text START to 88788. Police in Northern California have found the body of a teenage girl whose family reported her missing last month, and arrested a man on a murder charge in connection with her killing. Marissa DiNapoli, 18, of Morgan Hill was reported missing June 30 after she did not return to her Santa Clara County home in the southern San Francisco Bay Area, the Morgan Hill Police Department, the lead agency on the case, said. The teen's body was found on July 2, police said, and the Santa Clara County Coroner confirmed her identity on July 3. "This is not the outcome any of us wanted and we are heartbroken by this news. Marissa was a vibrant member of our Morgan Hill community with a bright future ahead of her," police wrote in a statement on Facebook. Martin Mendoza was arrested trying to reenter the United States through the Mexican border, police announced in a statement on July 7. He has been charged with one count of murder in connection with DiNapoli's death. It was not immediately known where Mendoza is from, but online jail records show he is 20 years old. USA TODAY contacted police on Wednesday, July 9, but has not received a response. When did Marissa DiNapoli disappear? DiNapoli's family reported her missing on June 30 after she did not respond to calls or texts from family, investigators said. The teen, police said, last communicated with family via text message just after 9:15 a.m. on June 28. "In that message, she indicated that she planned to stay with a friend for the evening and would return home the following day," police said. Investigators said DiNapoli was last seen with Mendoza on surveillance video on Trail Drive around 9:45 a.m. on June 28, leaving a home just outside Morgan Hill city limits. DiNapoli's car was later located in the same area, according to police. Investigators previously named Mendoza a person of interest in her disappearance. According to The Morgan Hill Times and KGO-TV, the suspect was DiNapoli's boyfriend at the time she vanished. Accused child killer at large: US Marshals' tips: Fugitive Travis Decker may have hitchhiked to Idaho forest How did Marissa DiNapoli die? When her body was found, DiNapoli had been stabbed multiple times in the back, the Morgan Hill Times and KGO-TV reported, citing court documents. Mendoza has been charged with first-degree murder and the use of a knife to commit murder, Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said, per KSBW. He was arraigned in court on July 8, online Santa Clara County court records show. Mendoza was booked into jail on July 7, and as of July 9, he was being held without bond, jail records show. An attorney of record for Mendoza was not listed online, and it is unclear whether he has obtained legal counsel. Pennsylvania man's parents tried to get him help. Then he beheaded his father: Prosecutors 'Prayers, kind words': How to help Marissa DiNapoli's family The victim's family released the following statement after DiNapoli's death: "The loss of our beloved Marissa deeply saddens us, and at this time, our family kindly asks for privacy as we grieve and navigate this difficult journey. We appreciate the love and support from those who have reached out to us. In honor of Marissa's memory, we kindly ask that no GoFundMe accounts or donation pages be created. If you wish to show support, please do so through your prayers, kind words, and cherished memories. Thank you for understanding and respecting our wishes during this deeply personal time." DiNapoli attended Central High School in the Morgan Hill Unified School District, officials said. According to police, mental health professionals will be present through July 11 at Central High School for any student or staff member "who needs a safe space to process their emotions, reflect, or speak with a counselor." "Our deepest condolences remain with Marissa's family," Morgan Hill police wrote after her body was located. "We will continue to stand with you, not just as law enforcement, but as neighbors, friends, and fellow members of our grieving community." Anyone with information about the case is asked to call 669-253-4962 or email USA TODAY contacted the Morgan Hill Unified School District on July 9 but has not received a response. Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund.
