logo
‘White genocide' theory in South Africa is ‘absurd': Crisis expert

‘White genocide' theory in South Africa is ‘absurd': Crisis expert

Yahoo12-05-2025
(NewsNation) — While President Donald Trump has effectively halted all other U.S. refugee programs, he is bringing white South Africans to the U.S. as refugees.
Pauline Bax, African program deputy director for the International Crisis Group, joined NewsNation to explain why the refugee label is not accurate.
'Maybe they will have more economic opportunities than they think they have here in South Africa, but the idea that they will be refugees is completely false,' she said.
RFK Jr. goes swimming in DC's Rock Creek despite ban over bacteria
The White House has claimed that white South Africans are facing persecution in the country, something Bax says is inaccurate.
'There is no persecution. The fact of the matter is that South Africa had an apartheid system where people who were white dominated politics, they dominated the economy, and even low-skilled white people, mostly Afrikans, who didn't have many prospects, could easily get a state job,' Bax said. 'The situation has now changed completely.'
Protests erupt nationwide as ICE ramps up immigration arrests
South Africa's transition to democracy ended apartheid, but Bax said white Afrikaner people are still among the most successful people in the country, owning large companies and most of the land.
The government has enacted a law that makes it possible to take back land that isn't being developed or isn't being used in an equitable way, but no land has been expropriated so far despite claims that white people have had their land stolen.
'It's just not true,' Bax said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Abruptly Ends CNN Interview After Being Questioned About New Epstein Photos
Trump Abruptly Ends CNN Interview After Being Questioned About New Epstein Photos

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Abruptly Ends CNN Interview After Being Questioned About New Epstein Photos

President Donald Trump hung up on a CNN reporter during a phone call Tuesday that lasted a mere 30 seconds after the journalist questioned him about resurfaced images showing Jeffrey Epstein at Trump's 1993 wedding to his second wife, Marla Maples. While appearing Tuesday on 'Erin Burnett OutFront,' reporter Andrew Kaczynski shared details about the abrupt phone call with Trump that ended in name-calling. The call took place after CNN's 'KFile' found photos of Epstein and Trump that had not been widely reported on before. One photo showed the disgraced financier and sex offender attending Trump's Plaza Hotel wedding to Maples. In a separate image, Epstein was seen with Trump and his children at a Harley-Davidson Cafe that same year. CNN also released a video of Trump and Epstein chatting with each other at a Victoria's Secret Fashion Show in New York in February 1999. Kaczynski told host Burnett that the call, in which he asked Trump about the images, ended with the president slamming CNN as 'fake news' and hanging up after he refused to answer questions about his past connection to Epstein. 'We were not on the phone very long. I think our call was about 30 seconds or so,' Kaczynski told Burnett. 'But when I asked him about the wedding photo, he said, he sort of paused for a second and then said, 'You've got to be kidding me,' before calling CNN 'fake news' and then hanging up on me.' In a statement to CNN, Kaczynski said, White House communications director Steven Cheung said, 'These are nothing more than out-of-context frame grabs of innocuous videos and pictures of widely attended events to disgustingly infer something nefarious.' Cheung added: 'The fact is that the president kicked [Epstein] out of his club for being a 'creep.'' Kaczynski's heated yet ultra-brief conversation with Trump comes after the Department of Justice and FBI released a two-page memo earlier this month, claiming their Epstein investigation determined that there was no evidence Epstein was murdered or had a 'client list' of powerful figures he could potentially blackmail. Following the memo release, Trump faced scrutiny over his administration's handling of the Epstein files. Trump supporters and right-wing figures called on the president and his administration to release more information. Watch Kaczynski's appearance below. #CNNExclusive: #CNN obtains never before published photos of #PresidentTrump with #JeffreyEpstein, including photos at Trump's wedding and photos with two of #Trump's children.#BreakingNews#OutFrontCNN#EpsteinFiles#CNN#News#A3# — Erin Burnett OutFront (@OutFrontCNN) July 23, 2025 Related... 'Now Do Epstein': Martin Luther King Jr.'s Daughter Takes Aim At Trump Over Released MLK Files Trump Boldly Claims The 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' Has Boosted His Approval Rating 'Significantly' MAGA Is Probably Going To Be Pretty Disappointed By Trump's Latest Promise

Trump Releases His All-American Action Plan for AI
Trump Releases His All-American Action Plan for AI

Gizmodo

time18 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Trump Releases His All-American Action Plan for AI

Donald Trump on Wednesday revealed 'America's AI Action Plan,' a collection of more than 90 policy recommendations designed to ensure that the country remains competitive when it comes to the development of artificial intelligence, some of which would loosen regulations around the development of data centers and encourage rapid adoption of the technology across different sectors. 'We believe we're in an AI race,' David Sacks, the White House AI czar, said during a call with reporters. 'We want the United States to win that race.' The 23-page plan is broken down into three primary pillars that the Trump administration sees as key to speeding up AI development: 'Accelerate AI Innovation,' 'Build American AI Infrastructure,' and 'Lead in International AI Diplomacy and Security.' Trump plans to get the ball rolling on the plan by signing several executive orders on Wednesday, per Bloomberg, including a directive to use the US International Development Finance Corporation and the Export-Import Bank to encourage American technology be deployed globally and another that will require any large language models used by the federal government to be neutral and 'unbiased.' What Trump's plan primarily amounts to is rolling back regulations. For instance, the report calls to 'reject radical climate dogma and bureaucratic red tape' that it believes will interfere with expanding AI infrastructure, including building data centers and new power plants to support them, plants that Trump has already declared are a-okay to be coal-powered. The administration is also using the plan to get its say on state-level AI laws, since its attempt to pass a 10-year ban on states passing their own regulations for AI got stripped from the One Big, Beautiful Bill. Within the plan, there is a call to withhold federal funding from any state that enacts 'burdensome AI regulations.' Given the lack of detail as to what amounts to a burden, the administration will surely flex that muscle at will. The plan calls for siccing the Federal Communications Commission on the states by putting the agency in charge of evaluating 'whether state AI regulations interfere with the agency's ability to carry out its obligations and authorities under the Communications Act of 1934.' There is also a fair amount of undoing what little AI policy came before within the 'Action Plan.' While the Biden administration only issued a single executive order related to AI, it did start ramping up federal agencies to address potential concerns related to the new technology. That seems to be over now. Trump's plan calls for reviewing all Federal Trade Commission investigations initiated by the Biden administration to make sure they 'do not advance theories of liability that unduly burden AI innovation.' The Trump administration also plans to revisit the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework to 'eliminate references to misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change.' The Action Plan does call on AI models to be open-sourced, so that's nice. But the rest of the plan seems to be carte blanche for AI companies to do as they see fit, with few requirements or regulations to protect the public. It also shows little interest from the federal government in looking into what potential harm that it might cause.

Some Democrats may finally be ready to play dirty over redistricting
Some Democrats may finally be ready to play dirty over redistricting

Vox

time19 minutes ago

  • Vox

Some Democrats may finally be ready to play dirty over redistricting

is a senior politics reporter at Vox, where he covers the Democratic Party. He joined Vox in 2022 after reporting on national and international politics for the Atlantic's politics, global, and ideas teams, including the role of Latino voters in the 2020 election. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to retaliate at Texas by forcing a state referendum or legislation to redraw districts to give Democrats a five- to seven-seat boost in Congress.A new kind of political battle is emerging between America's parties — one centers on the composition of Congress and congressional redistricting. This process usually occurs every decade, after the US Census finishes its work and releases new demographic information that states use to reconfigure how the 435 seats in the House of Representatives are divided among the 50 states. But this month, Texas Republicans are scrambling those norms. Republican lawmakers have begun fielding proposals for the GOP-controlled legislature to redraw their congressional maps in the middle of the decade to give the national party an advantage in the 2026 midterm elections. It's a blatant power play — jump-started by President Donald Trump's desire to offset potential losses next year and win a bigger Republican majority in the House for the second half of his term. At the moment, it looks likely that Republicans might lose some ground in Congress, as has been the trend for presidents' parties for the last 70 years. The Logoff The email you need to stay informed about Trump — without letting the news take over your life. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. This mid-decade redistricting effort is not the first time Texas Republicans have aggressively gerrymandered seats to boost their party's representation in Congress, but it is abnormal for redistricting to happen this early, or as a direct response to a president's wishes to gain an electoral advantage. And it doesn't seem like Texas will be the only Republican-controlled state to try this. This sudden gamesmanship is forcing national and state-level Democrats to consider their own tit-for-tat, mid-decade redistricting efforts — and to confront a harsh reality. Many Democrats lack the political will to bend norms in response to these Republican efforts. And those who do will face steep legal and political obstacles, including from their own party. How Republicans are pressing their advantage Republicans have the upper hand on redistricting. In the majority of states across the country, state legislatures have the primary control and power to draw district lines. That includes the three states where Republicans have signaled they will try to redraw maps before the 2026 midterms — Texas, Ohio, and Missouri — all in which the GOP has unified control of the legislature and the governor's office. Through redistricting these states alone, Republicans would be able to gain enough seats to secure a majority after midterm elections. They'd gain about five seats in Texas, anywhere from one to three seats in Ohio, and one seat in Missouri. Republicans currently have a three-seat majority in the House, as a result of resignations and deaths, which shrinks to a two-seat majority if all those vacancies are filled. And there are still more Republican-run states that could be tapped. As Punchbowl News reported this week, five Democratic-held seats could be threatened in Florida if Gov. Ron DeSantis agrees to a mid-decade redraw. And New Hampshire's governor, Kelly Ayotte, could still be convinced by the White House to consider state Republicans' past plans to create another Republican-friendly seat in the state. Other Republican-leaning states — like Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, and Nebraska — are limited from redrawing maps before 2026 by Democratic governors, more moderate Republican legislators and state courts, or the fact that their legislatures aren't in session. Democrats in the three states that will likely create new GOP seats have few options to resist or block redraws. In Texas, Democrats have considered boycotting or preventing the legislature from voting by leaving the state — though Republicans are trying to force them to participate by delaying a vote on flood disaster relief and recovery funding until after their redistricting effort passes. Democrats in Ohio and Missouri have no similar leverage. That leaves out-of-state Democrats as the next line of defense. But they face obstacles there. Democrats are limited by their own advocacy Democrats hoping to strike back have many fewer options. They're limited by the number of states they control, the way those states handle redistricting, and the political will of legislators who view this kind of redistricting as beyond the pale. Democrats have unified control in 15 states, out of which they could probably only gain seats in about nine states: California, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Washington. But politicians trying to redraw districts in any of these states will face steep hurdles. In California, Colorado, New York, New Jersey, and Washington, independent or bipartisan commissions have the power to draw congressional maps, not state legislatures. Those commissions were set up after years of bipartisan advocacy for fair representation and liberal activism for better government accountability and transparency. They are enshrined by state law or were set up by state ballot measures, and would require constitutional amendments, a statewide referendum, or court challenges to return redistricting power to the state legislature. That includes California — the state with the largest population — where Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to retaliate at Texas by forcing a state referendum or legislation to redraw districts to give Democrats a five- to seven-seat boost. Newsom hasn't yet presented a solid case or plan for how he'd go about doing this, however. And he faces bipartisan opposition to his idea. Other states essentially have prohibitions on mid-decade or early redistricting efforts, Dan Vicuña, a redistricting expert at the government accountability organization Common Cause, told me. The state constitutions of Washington and New Jersey, Vicuña said, contain provisions that limit redistricting to the year immediately following the census, and limit intervention before that time. That leaves Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, and Oregon as the Democratic states where early redistricting could likely be accomplished with fewer obstacles. Already, some Maryland Democrats are signaling they would try to squeeze one more Democratic seat by redrawing their district lines. National Democrats have said they'll try to gain a seat in Minnesota, though they'll have to wait until state Democrats regain their majority in the senate, where a Democratic lawmaker resigned this week, tying the chamber. Democrats may have no choice but to try redistricting For as much bluster as Democrats are making about trying to retaliate, Republicans are actually taking the steps to do early redistricting. Congressional Democrats, for now, are trying to build support among governors and state lawmakers to engage in this political back-and-forth. According to CNN, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and his advisers are exploring legal ways to redraw maps in California, New Jersey, New York, Minnesota, and Washington, but those details have yet to be made public. But to stay in the game, Democrats may have to abandon their own rules. The Trump-era GOP has shown their willingness to push the bounds of political norms and bend institutions. There are valid, long-term concerns about what this kind of ad-hoc redistricting will mean for elections and trust in government in the future — what Vicuña described as a 'race to the bottom' — but Democrats, at least in Congress, are accepting that playing fair, or by old norms, isn't enough.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store