Rugby families, staff lashed for 'appalling' behaviour towards referees
In one instance, a Sunshine Coast junior rugby league referee had to be escorted to their car due to threatening behaviour from players and families.
In another incident Rugby League Sunshine Coast said a referee was told "let's take this out to the car park" by staff members for a team of under 12s.
Yet another was shocked when a player called them a "f***ing r****d", and a fourth refused to referee some teams after consistent poor behaviour.
The league made the incidents public in a missive to all clubs and a post on social media.
Sunshine Coast Falcons chairperson Ashley Robinson said the behaviour was "embarrassing", particularly with officials and volunteers starting as teenagers.
"For them to be treated poorly by players and parents is appalling because if there are no officials there is no game and a lot of these referees are young kids," he said.
"If you think you can do a better job, go do a referee's course and get involved because you wouldn't want to see that abuse happen to your own child."
Mr Robinson said one of the problems was that parents were "living through their children" on the field.
And he said other parents and fans also had a role to play.
"We are all responsible to speak out when we see someone doing the wrong thing," he said.
"If it is a player, [the referee] needs to stop the game, call the coach onto the field and tell them if they can't get their kids under control 'then I will'.
"If it's a parent they need to stop the game, go over to the sideline and actually single them out and say that they will not continue this game until this club sorts out whoever is misbehaving."
Mr Robinson said in his decades in the sport it had always been hard to recruit officials and volunteers, and the bad behaviour only made it tougher.
Bad behaviour in junior sport is not unique to the competition on the Sunshine Coast.
Earlier this week a former elite soccer coach on the Gold Coast urged parents to stop yelling from the sidelines.
In early 2024, Queensland Rugby League (QRL) introduced a "green socks" program so fans and players could tell when referees were under 18.
QRL's Clayton Sharpe said it was about protecting emerging referees and officials from aggression.
"Primarily it is about treating young referees with respect, refraining from abuse, and understanding that our emerging match officials are still learning — just like the players," he said at the time.
In 2021, New South Wales Rugby League began banning competitive games for children under 13 and banned tackling until midway through under 7s.
In a statement Rugby League Sunshine Coast warned there would be penalties if the behaviour continued.
"Sunshine Coast Junior Rugby League firmly stands behind our referees in all instances regardless of excuses given by those who are of the belief that their actions are justified," a spokesperson said.
"We are an organisation which fosters a safe environment where referees, just like players, are allowed to make mistakes without fear of retribution.
"For any player, team staff or spectator who disagrees with our values then we ask you to reconsider your involvement with rugby league on the Sunshine Coast."
Competition organisers have warned the league is considering penalties, including fines and the de-registration of players.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Victorian government eyes further bail changes as its critics target childcare crisis
Victoria's childcare regulators and child safety authorities could be probed by a parliamentary inquiry, amid accusations Premier Jacinta Allan's rapid review of the sector was designed to avoid scrutiny. The three-day sitting week is the first time parliament has met since more than 70 charges of child sex abuse were laid against childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown — allegations that have thrown the sector and its regulation into the spotlight. Meanwhile, the government will use the resumption of parliament to make it even harder for repeat offenders to get bail. The Victorian Greens are pushing for a parliamentary inquiry into the state's childcare regulators and child safety authorities, amid allegations a government-backed review was designed to avoid further investigation. The opposition will also move a private member's bill to immediately overhaul Working with Children Check (WWCC) laws and implement recommendations made by the Victorian Ombudsman three years ago. The proposals flagged last week include lowering the threshold for the WWCC accreditation to be revoked and requiring applicants to undertake child safety training. "It makes sure that people understand their obligations when getting a Working with Children Check," Shadow Education Minister Jess Wilson said. "It can't just be a tick and flick exercise; it needs to mean something." However, the private member's bill is unlikely to succeed, with the Allan government traditionally not supporting bills tabled by the opposition. In the upper house, the Victorian Greens will move to set up a parliamentary inquiry into the childcare sector, with MP Anasina Gray-Barberio accusing the government of setting up a rapid sector review to avoid proper scrutiny. The review, led by former South Australian premier Jay Weatherill and due to report next month, was announced by the government in the wake of the allegations against Mr Brown. It is set to recommend urgent changes based on existing proposals in other states, but it is not looking at the performance of the sector's regulator or the Commission for Children and Young People. Ms Gray-Barberio said the review had "gaping holes" and would fail to ask the hard questions. "Labor's narrow review avoids scrutiny of their own regulation while they've been marking their own homework," she said. "We need this inquiry to fill in the gaps." The parliamentary committee, which is understood to have the backing of Coalition MPs and the crossbench, would scrutinise the performance of the state's education department. It would also examine the differences between private, for-profit operators and not-for-profit childcare centres in Victoria, as well as the WWCC system and staff-to-child ratios. Earlier this month, the government told the ABC it was making changes to Working with Children Checks to take into account any prohibition notices, rather than just police charges, when determining whether to revoke or suspend a WWCC. The government has also committed to creating a childcare worker register as soon as possible, and moving to ban personal devices from childcare centres. Meanwhile, the government has unveiled details of a new round of bail law changes that it says will build on earlier reforms it deemed the "toughest bail laws" in the country. The new changes will see people accused of committing six serious robbery and home invasion offences while on bail, refused bail unless the decision-maker is satisfied that it's highly likely they won't reoffend. A new "second strike rule" will also make it harder for people accused of repeat indictable offending to get bail. "The data tells us that there are certain types of serious offences that are more likely to be repeated or committed again by people who are out on bail," Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny said. "The two tranches of bail reform are directed squarely at addressing the concerns from the community about serious offending by people who are out on bail, but also about sending a strong message that there are consequences for people who continue to commit and reoffending while on bail." The government said the changes, to be introduced to parliament on Tuesday, will be subject to "key safeguards to mitigate any disproportionate impact on vulnerable people". The changes that passed parliament in March included installing community safety as the overarching principle for bail decision-making, and removing remand as a last resort for serious youth offenders. However, they were strongly criticised by community legal groups and youth advocates who said the laws were dangerous and discriminatory. The government anticipates the combined changes will increase the number of adult and youth offenders on remand and says it is hiring new prison staff and bringing more prison beds online to prepare. In his first wide-ranging interview since joining the force, Victoria's police commissioner this week told the ABC he didn't want to see young people in prison, "but some need to be there to protect the public".
News.com.au
29 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Craig Hutchison's rise from Footy Show bombing to media mogul
2017 was a big year for media mogul Craig Hutchison. Not only did he become the owner of a radio station, he also took over as the lead host of the iconic The Footy Show, thanks to James Brayshaw's contract war with Channel Nine. Garry Lyon had already left the show in 2016 and Hutchison had been the host of the Sunday Footy Show and Footy Classified and was one of the most high-profile choices available in Nine's stable. 'Hutchy' was following in the footsteps of one of his idols in Eddie McGuire — taking the hot seat on one of the country's longest-running shows. But the revamped version of the Thursday night staple bombed, and Hutchison was outed in July that year and McGuire back in the hosting chair, a stinging blow. 'To me Eddie McGuire was where he wanted to be, he modelled himself on Eddie,' Hutchison's former colleague at the Herald Sun, Jon Anderson, said. The final straw was Hutchison's co-star Sam Newman delivering a silent protest after being muzzled by the network on certain topics. 'I've always been one of those polarising guys,' Hutchison said on SEN radio the day after his Footy Show sacking. That blow may have however, helped create a media empire, as Hutchison expanded his SEN horizons, bringing on massive names across the country including Matty Johns in Sydney, Ian Healy in Brisbane, Adam Gilchrist in Perth and Garry Lyon and Tim Watson in Melbourne. But the rise of SEN hasn't always been linear, with Sports Entertainment Group losing $9.2 million in a year and racing against a deadline to pay a $28 million Commonwealth Bank loan in late 2023. Hutchison had been in preliminary meetings about selling the company before a buyer appeared for his NBL team, the Perth Wildcats. The deal valued the Wildcats at $40m, with $21 million paid in August 2024, another $15m in to be paid in June 2026 and a final $4 million in June 2028, which wiped out the debt that may have crippled his company. Hutchison is still in the hosting chair however, leading the way in Channel 7's revamped football coverage as the host of The Agenda Setters on Monday nights. The move from Nine to Seven was not without creating some headlines, as Hutchison took with him the opinionated Kane Cornes and his long-time friend Caroline Wilson to spearhead a new era. Wilson, who is one of the few people to call him Craig, often drove Hutchison home after filming Footy Classified each week for 17 years. But that close friendship hasn't held the two back from their own on-air frost on set, with the two arguing about a joke Wilson recently made about Hutchison's brutal axing of talent at RSN.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Banks to refund $60m of 'excessive' fees but CommBank withholds $270m
Thousands of Australians wrongly slugged more than $60 million in excessive bank fees could soon get a refund, but the national corporate regulator says Commonwealth Bank customers may not receive a cent. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) today revealed it had put banks on notice for incorrectly charging low-income earners who receive Centrelink payments, such as JobSeeker and Age and Disability Support payments. While the watchdog said a review of 21 banks found 800,000 customers were eligible for refunds, millions of Australians could be impacted. It comes one year after the corporate watchdog found four of the country's banks, which had a significant number of First Nations customers, had caused "financial distress". Susan Potts lives in Broome, 2,200 kilometres north of Perth, and was recently refunded ten years of fees charged by the Commonwealth Bank. She said she was only made aware of the charges after Kimberley financial counsellor Alan Gray spotted the fees in her bank statements while investigating an unrelated scam. "They were taking [fees] all these years and we're only on low income, all on disability, so it's a bit unfair," Ms Potts said. "It's just nice this is coming to the surface. We've been taken advantage of for the last 10 years." Mr Gray applied for Ms Potts' refund in May but said he was unsuccessful until the bank "did a U-turn". "I am absolutely furious with Commonwealth Bank," he said. "This is the richest bank in Australia profiting from the poorest people on the continent. ASIC's first report revealed the Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, Bendigo Bank and the ANZ knowingly kept more than 150,000 Indigenous customers in high-fee accounts despite qualifying for an account with minimal charges. That report led to a promise of $33 million in refunds. The latest ASIC report stated ANZ would commit to return $47.9 million, Westpac promised more than $9.9 million, while eligible Bendigo Bank customers will receive a share of $155,000. But the corporate regulator said Commonwealth Bank — including subsidiary Bankwest — would not refund the $270 million it had charged low-income customers between July 2019 and October 2024. Instead the bank said it would move 1.5 million eligible customers to a yet-to-be-approved 'new nominal fee account'. "That will address problems going forward for those people, but what it doesn't do is set things right for the fees they've been charged in the past," ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland said. It is a similar story in other regional and remote communities. In Djarindjin, almost 200 kilometres away from the nearest bank branch, residents said there was confusion over who was entitled for a refund. Nyikina woman and Commonwealth Bank customer Audrey Shadforth said she only found out about the initial refunds through word-of-mouth. "I remember one of my family members got some money back," she said. When the ABC met with Ms Shadforth she had just received a letter confirming she would be repaid $400. Djarindjin mother and Bardi-Jawi woman Jenaya Cox said she did not know if she was eligible. "It would help me out with the bills I need to pay," she said. "I have a daughter now so it's a bit hard." Djarindjin financial counsellor Veronica Johnson said many of her remote clients had already been subject to financial abuse in the past. "I believe some people got paid, other people didn't. "It's just a little bit of a shemozzle in relation to people being given a fair go." ASIC's report found some banks had made progress to "better understand First Nations customers". Some institutions increased the number of interpreters on designated customer care helplines, while others had offered cultural awareness training to staff. But both financial counsellors agreed banks should do more. "It doesn't matter how many times a financial counsellor tells the big banks there is no street delivery of mail in the outback — they never, ever get the message," Mr Gray said. "I feel a lot more could be done to communicate in a fair and equitable way so people can understand what is going on," Ms Johnson said. The ABC contacted ANZ, Westpac, Bendigo Bank and the Commonwealth Bank for comment. Westpac and Bendigo Bank did not provide an official comment. An ANZ spokesperson said it had made "a number of changes" since ASIC's first report and "taken a deliberate decision to expand its remediation payments, leading to a larger cohort of customers refunded in fees and interest". The spokesperson said an "expansive approach to remediation is the right thing to do." A Commonwealth Bank spokesperson said it had already made repayments of $25 million in relation to ASIC's first report on "a goodwill basis". However, in relation to the $270 million ASIC's latest report cites should be refunded, the spokesperson said the fees "were disclosed to customers and were charged in accordance with their terms and conditions". "Where customers have incurred unusually high fees we consider goodwill adjustments where appropriate while continuing to provide access to lower-fee options," the spokesperson said.
