Pupils could gain more face-to-face time with teachers under AI plans
It suggests AI can cut down administrative tasks – such as generating letters, reports and planning lessons – to give teachers more time to work with pupils.
But the guidance also calls on teachers to always check outputs generated by AI for 'accuracy' and it insists that personal data should be protected.
School leaders' unions have welcomed the resources but they said further investment is needed to unlock the potential benefits of AI in education.
The support materials suggest that generative AI could be used to help teachers with formative assessments – such as generating quizzes and 'offering feedback on errors' – as well as generating 'exam-style questions'.
Generative AI tools can also help staff with administrative tasks such as composing emails and letters, policy writing and planning trips, it added.
One section of the guidance demonstrates how AI could be used to generate a letter to parents and carers about a head lice outbreak at the school.
It said: 'Strategic implementation of AI can cut down administrative tasks for leaders, teachers and support staff, particularly in areas such as data analysis, lesson planning, report generation and correspondence.
'This could allow educators more time to work directly with students and pupils and help to reduce workload if implemented well.'
But educators should only use AI tools 'approved' in their setting, it added.
AI should also only be used by teachers for formative, low-stakes marking – such as classroom quizzes or homework, the DfE has said.
Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'These resources are a welcome source of support for education staff.
'AI has huge potential benefits for schools and children's learning but it is important that these are harnessed in the right way and any pitfalls avoided.
'Government investment in future testing and research is vital as staff need reliable sources of evaluation – supported with evidence – on the benefits, limitations and risks of AI tools and their potential uses.'
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'The great potential of AI is in easing staff workloads which are driven by system-wide pressures and are a major cause of recruitment and retention challenges.
'If we can get this right it will improve working conditions and help address teacher shortages.
'However, there are some big issues which need to be resolved and paramount is ensuring that all schools and colleges have the technology and training they need.
'Budgets are extremely tight because of the huge financial pressures on the education sector and realising the potential benefits of AI requires investment.'
The DfE has said it is investing an extra £1 million in funding to accelerate the development of AI tools to help with marking and generating detailed, tailored feedback for individual students.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'We're putting cutting-edge AI tools into the hands of our brilliant teachers to enhance how our children learn and develop – freeing teachers from paperwork so they can focus on what parents and pupils need most: inspiring teaching and personalised support.'
She added: 'By harnessing AI's power to cut workloads, we're revolutionising classrooms and driving high standards everywhere – breaking down barriers to opportunity so every child can achieve and thrive.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Times letters: Tech-free ‘cloisters' can help young minds
Write to letters@ Sir, I share Niall Ferguson's concern about the catastrophic effect of AI upon cognitive development ('AI's great brain robbery — and how universities can fight back', weekend essay, Jul 5). Founding, in 2007, the UK's only screen-free school, we have established precisely what he calls for: an oasis (or, as he calls it, a 'cloister') from which devices are excluded, where learning is centred around books, handwriting, discussion and real-world activities and relationships. Our academic outcomes prove that it works (74 per cent of GCSEs at grades 9 to 7), and we see very low incidence of mental health issues. My question is: where is Ferguson going to find university students 'capable of coping with the discipline of the cloister' if schools are habituating them to screen-dependence? If we are to avoid the new Dark Age of which Ferguson warns, we urgently need a 'screen-free schools' movement to complement the 'smartphone-free childhood' one. Jason Fletcher Headmaster, Heritage School Cambridge Sir, I fundamentally disagree with Niall Ferguson's response to the growing influence of AI in education. If more and more students are using ChatGPT to write their essays at the cost of eroding their own individual thinking and reasoning skills, then creating tech-free 'cloisters' in universities is not the answer. There is no uninventing AI, so education, like every other walk of life, is simply going to have to learn to adapt to it. The answer is to remove the essay as the primary measure of academic achievement and replace it with other means that are AI-immune, such as the old-fashioned interview panel, or viva voce. Bob Maddams Louth, Lincs Sir, Niall Ferguson rightly draws attention to the intellectual hollowing-out of student learning at universities due to generative AI. The urgency is even greater for learning at schools. The British government is significantly behind other nations in understanding what the best are doing internationally and developing a dynamic national strategy. In the face of this torpor, I set up the charity AI in Education two years ago with Alex Russell, chair of the Bourne Education Trust. We provide schools with guidance to ensure the interests of student welfare are put first. We cannot stop AI. We can only shape it. At best, AI has much to offer schooling. Yet the British education establishment is asleep to the risks and continues to focus almost exclusively on developing cognitive skills on which AI will always outperform humans, rather than on human skills, human intelligence, human identity and human empathy, which employers want, and on which AI will never outperform us. Sir Anthony Seldon Founding director, Wellington College Education Sir, I did many seven-hour stints in 'the cloisters' at Queen Mary College, London, in the 1970s. After each one the routine was: three hours of snooker and Southern Comfort in the union; one hour commute to Leytonstone; one hour to make and eat corned beef hash; a two-hour movie on VHS; a slow bath; and then bed (to process the cloister work). If I'd had AI to help I might have got a first, not a 2:1 (in astrophysics), but I doubt it. Stephen Hogg Sheffield Sir, When Sir Keir Starmer receives President Macron tomorrow, they will reaffirm their welcome determination to support Ukraine. British-French cohesion to defend the rules-based order over Ukraine is essential and exemplary. We need that same unity of purpose over Israel and Palestine, to uphold international law. In Gaza and the West Bank those same rules are broken daily. We have two requests. Macron and Starmer should press again for an immediate, permanent ceasefire in Gaza with all that that entails — and with consequences if devastation and starvation continue in Gaza. They should decide now to recognise the state of Palestine unconditionally, endorsing the Palestinian right to self-determination alongside Israel, and giving renewed impetus to the French-Saudi international conference on a just peace. Britain and France together will bring Commonwealth and European partners with them. It is vital to show the world, particularly President Trump, that there is an alternative based in law to Binyamin Netanyahu's declared policy: living by the sword. Sir Vincent Fean, former consul-general, JerusalemLord Hannay of Chiswick, former ambassador to the UNSir Jeremy Greenstock, former ambassador to the UNLord Green of Deddington, former ambassador to Saudi ArabiaFrances Guy, former ambassador to Lebanon Sir Tony Brenton, former ambassador to RussiaAnthony Cary, former high commissioner to CanadaSir Dominick Chilcott, former ambassador to TurkeySir William Patey, former ambassador to Afghanistan James Watt, former ambassador to EgyptSir Edward Clay, former high commissioner to KenyaPeter Jenkins, former ambassador to the UN (Vienna)Peter Collecott, former ambassador to BrazilJohn Buck, former ambassador to PortugalMichael Hone, former ambassador to IcelandPeter Millett, former ambassador to LibyaRobin Kealy, former ambassador to TunisiaSir Harold Walker, former ambassador to IraqAnthony Layden, former ambassador to LibyaRobin Lamb, former ambassador to BahrainRupert Joy, former EU ambassador to MoroccoRichard Lyne, former high commissioner to the Solomon IslandsRichard Northern, former ambassador to LibyaAdrian Sindall, former ambassador to SyriaSir Derek Plumbly, former ambassador to EgyptSir John Shepherd, former ambassador to Italy Sir, In your article on the selection of the next Archbishop of Canterbury (news, Jul 5), Lord Evans of Weardale says he seeks somebody 'who can speak authoritatively and graciously with a Christian voice unto the affairs of the nation. And clearly somebody who can take the appropriate lead on safeguarding.' All well and good, and perhaps a bit of motherhood and apple pie. In my diocese we are told we must increase our parish share and get more worshippers in the pews — a laudable ambition. But my benefice of nine parishes spread over many miles of Somerset has one incumbent. What we need in an archbishop, regardless of gender or ethnicity, is someone who realises that to spread the Christian word we need to invest in vicars on the ground. No war was won without soldiers and no company succeeds without salesmen. By all means speak to the affairs of the nation, but better results will come from speaking to the people of the nation in the parishes. Mike Hodson Bishops' Council and Diocesan Synod member; Spaxton, Somerset Sir, The government's ten-year NHS plan includes a 'seismic shift' in care, away from hospitals and towards a 'neighbourhood health service' (news and letters, Jul 5). The advantage of hospital-based clinics is that there is immediate access to full diagnostic facilities and near-immediate access to fellow specialists who can offer a second opinion. Enforcing a specialist diaspora into 'the community' results in professional isolation and, in terms of throughput, is inefficient. It disrupts the 'one-stop shop' approach to secondary care. Providing a proper multidisciplinary service requires far more staff when they are thinly spread over multiple sites, so is not cost-effective. I tried running outreach clinics for several years before concluding all of this, and abandoning them. These proposals demonstrate failure to learn from the mistakes of the past, and are doomed to repeat them. Dr Andrew Bamji Ret'd consultant rheumatologist; Rye, E Sussex Sir, Your leading article (Jul 4) praises a proposed shift to prevention within the NHS's Fit for the Future strategy, but then, in the same paragraph, describes banning alcohol advertising as 'draconian'. The public accounts committee found, in 2023, that alcohol costs the NHS in England alone a likely underestimate of £25 billion per year, with alcohol linked to more than 100 illnesses, mental disorder, self-harm and suicide. It is a major cause of preventable death. We know that action by government (because the alcohol industry isn't going to do it) on price, availability, marketing and advertising would be an effective preventive measure. What is the justification for opposing it? Elizabeth Robinson Consultant in public health; Levenwick, Shetland Sir, I would encourage John Orton to use the NHS app (letter, Jul 5). I'm well into my seventies but find it easy to use both on my phone and iPad. The government has a responsibility to improve the NHS but we, the users, have our responsibilities too. I also find my phone useful when waiting for a bus — I do the Times sudoku. Cate Rowntree London SE10 Sir, Fraser Nelson (comment, Jul 5) rightly highlights the predicament, created by successive governments for short-term expediency, Britain now finds itself in. Poorly organised debt interest is soaring. The complacency in the Treasury is breathtaking. While Rachel Reeves seems isolated in defence of her fiscal rules, the back benches have shown they do not care so long as the state's reach continues to grow and they can 'virtue signal' to their constituents. Their raw power is filling the vacuum at the top. Most people I know have concluded this government will be a one-term wonder. Where will we find a statesman with clarity of purpose, vision and the honesty to tell us we cannot sustain a freeloading population for much longer? I see no evidence but if one were to emerge, of any party, he or she would have my vote. David R Smith Southport, Merseyside Sir, The expertise of British security printers has long drawn central banks to these shores for the production of their paper money ('Story of banknotes is full of funny money', comment, Jul 5). The 50 rupee note issued in 1968 by the Central Bank of Seychelles was printed in London by Bradbury Wilkinson. It featured a seascape and portrait of the young Queen Elizabeth by Pietro Annigoni. Behind the Queen's head there are two coconut palms. At first sight it is a pleasant, innocuous scene. But turn the note upright and the fronds of the trees are clearly arranged to spell 'sex'. A printing anomaly perhaps — until the 10 rupee note, which featured a handsome turtle and was printed by the same company, was found to have the word 'scum' worked into the coral underneath the turtle. No one owned up to the prank and the notes were left in circulation until the islands gained their independence. Robin Laurance Oxford Sir, Wimbledon is, for me, a highlight of the summer but this year the delight has been dimmed by the absence of line judges. I am deaf and struggle to hear the new electronically generated line calls. Without a judge's clear gestures, I find I am one step behind, having to wait for the score to change or the subtitles to catch up with the commentary. On top of this, the courts look weirdly empty, the ball girls and boys lonely and the chance of those little asides, amusing moments or even eruptions from tense players is gone. Some of the character of Wimbledon has been lost. As for the line judges themselves, how depressing must these Championships be. How hurtful to be chucked out for an electronic gimmick. Octavia Pollock Petersfield, W Sussex Sir, To add to Diana Barrington Holt's 'irritations of tennis' (letter, Jul 5), may I suggest: the camera shot from behind the server that is so low it is impossible to see where the ball is going — and American commentators who talk so much they speak over the play. Lynne C Potter Hexham, Northumberland Sir, You report that three village cricket clubs have been banned from using their grounds after a member of the public said he was hit by a stray ball in a car park (news, Jul 5). At my school in the 1960s there was a walled bull field near the cricket flats, usually with a bull in it. If you were to hit a ball into the field you were awarded 12 runs, but six whacks with a ferula and ruled 'out' — and you had to collect the ball yourself. I don't remember many 12s being awarded. Kevin Lawton Wadebridge, Cornwall Sir, Sophia Bennett asks whether two letters from the same village in one day is a record (letter, Jul 5). I regret to disappoint her. On September 13, 1999, The Times published letters from myself and a close neighbour in the village of Longworth — so close that our houses share the same full postcode of seven characters. Professor Adam Ogilvie-Smith Longworth, Oxon Write to letters@
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Samsung Elec Q2 profit likely to drop 39% on weak AI chip sales
SEOUL, July 7 (Reuters) - Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab is expected to forecast a 39% plunge in second-quarter operating profit on Tuesday, weighed down by delays in supplying advanced memory chips to artificial intelligence chip leader Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab. The world's biggest maker of memory chips is projected to report an April-June operating profit of 6.3 trillion won ($4.62 billion), its lowest income in six quarters and fourth consecutive quarterly decline, according to LSEG SmartEStimate. The prolonged weakness in its financial performance has deepened investor concerns over the South Korean tech giant's ability to catch up with smaller rivals in developing high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips used in artificial intelligence data centres. Its key rivals, SK Hynix ( opens new tab and Micron (MU.O), opens new tab, have benefited from robust demand for memory chips needed for AI, but Samsung's gains have been subdued as it relies on the China market, where sales of advanced chips have been restricted by the U.S. Its efforts to get the latest version of its HBM chips to Nvidia certified by Nvidia are also moving slowly, analysts said. "HBM revenue likely remained flat in the second quarter, as China sales restrictions persist and Samsung has yet to begin supplying its HBM3E 12-high chips to Nvidia," said Ryu Young-ho, a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities. He said Samsung's shipments of the new chip to Nvidia are unlikely to be significant this year. Samsung, which expected in March that meaningful progress over its HBM chip could come as early as June, declined to comment on whether its HBM 3E 12-layer chips had passed Nvidia's qualification process. The company, however, has started supplying the chip to AMD, the U.S. firm said, opens new tab in June. Samsung's smartphone sales are likely to remain solid, helped by demand for stock ahead of potential U.S. tariffs on imported smartphones, analysts said. Many of its key businesses including chips, smartphones and home appliances continue to face business uncertainty from various U.S. trade policies including President Donald Trump's proposal for a 25% tariff on non-US-made-smartphones and the July 9 deadline for "reciprocal" tariffs against many of its trading partners. The U.S. is also considering revoking authorisations granted to global chipmakers including Samsung, making it more difficult for them to receive U.S. technology at their plants in China. Shares in Samsung, the worst performing stock among major memory chipmakers this year, have climbed about 19% this year, underperforming a 27.3% rise in the benchmark KOSPI (.KS11), opens new tab. ($1 = 1,363.3600 won)
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
As if graduating weren't daunting enough, now students like me face a jobs market devastated by AI
September is the beginning of many young people's lives, as cars speed along motorways transporting 18- and 19-year-olds to their new university accommodations. I remember my own journey down to Exeter in 2022, the first stage in what I hoped would be an experience to set me up for the rest of my life. Little did I know that this was the calm before the storm, before anyone had heard of ChatGPT, or imagined the chaos that generative AI was about to cause for new graduates. Fast forward to 2025, and some of the young people I began this journey with have realised that they've spent the last three years training for graduate jobs that don't exist. Many firms are now slashing their number of new hires. Big accountancy firms have cut back on graduate recruitment; Deloitte reduced its scheme by 18%, while EY has cut the number of graduates it's recruiting by 11%. According to data collected by the job search site Adzuna, entry-level job opportunities in finance have dropped by 50.8%, and those for IT services have seen a decrease of 54.8%. The main cause of this is artificial intelligence, which is destroying many of the entry-level jobs open to recent graduates. Companies are now relying on AI to replicate junior-level tasks, removing the need for them to hire humans. It feels like a kick in the teeth to students and recent graduates, who were already entering a challenging labour market. Once, graduates who had toiled through multiple rounds of interviews, battled it out with other applicants at an assessment centre, and made it through to the final round, could hope to get a job in a sector such as consultancy or accountancy. These historically secure, solid and (some would say) boring options guaranteed you gainful and well-paid employment and a clear career path. Now, those secure opportunities feel as though they're evaporating. Since applicants can't see jobs that no longer exist, their experience of this intense competition for fewer jobs is often limited to a series of disappointments and rejections. Should a student or recent graduate apply for one of these elusive opportunities, their application will frequently be evaluated and often declined by an AI system before a human even reads it. Friends who have recently graduated tell me of the emotional toll of talking to their webcam during an AI-generated interview in the hope that the system judges in their favour, a process that can be repeated again and again. So far, creative fields, and those that involve real-life human contact, seem more impervious to this trend. It will probably be a period of time before doctors or nurses, or professions that rely on genuine creativity such as painters or performing artists, find themselves replaced with an AI model. Even so, if people become increasingly unable to spot AI, and businesses continue to embrace it, the risk is that professions such as art and illustration also get devalued over time, and replaced by a bleak, AI-generated cocktail of eerily familiar 'creative' work. Conservative politicians and the rightwing press have often suggested that the most valuable degrees are those that have a clear job at the end of them (and that those in more creative fields, such as the humanities, are by implication less valuable). As one Times columnist wrote recently, students who do 'less practical' degrees are more likely to be 'living at home, working on their script/novel/music/art portfolio while earning pocket money', without either a profession or a useful skill. But what use is a degree in accountancy if you can't then get an accounting job at the end of it? Why is this course more valuable than studying something that teaches you critical thinking and transferrable skills – anthropology, say, or (in my case) Arabic and Islamic studies? Cuts to higher education mean that we're already seeing the end of some of those degrees often labelled as 'useless', yet the supposedly 'useful' subjects start to look less valuable when the jobs associated with them are replaced by AI models that didn't take three years to learn these skills. The end of university is already a terrifying time. Three or four years of preparing a bulletproof LinkedIn profile and creating a plan for the future suddenly becomes real. The last thing a person needs aged 21 is for an AI model to take the job they were told their degree was essential for. Today the playing field that exists is different to that of a year ago, and it will undoubtedly be different again when I and many other students graduate in a year's time. The adults who implore us to embrace AI to streamline everyday tasks and improve the efficiency of the working day often already have working days, a promise that feels as though it's drifting further and further away. Connor Myers is a student at the University of Exeter and an intern on the Guardian's positive action scheme
