logo
Why the Latest Meme Stock Craze Won't Take Down the Overall Market

Why the Latest Meme Stock Craze Won't Take Down the Overall Market

Yahoo3 days ago
Meme stocks are back from the dead. Penny shares are soaring. Stocks that leap and crash by multiples of the market are desirable again. July in summary: wild speculation.
Should investors who don't want to gamble on daily stock moves, or three-times leveraged versions of them, worry about this?
Thanks for Your $1 Billion Job Offer, Mark Zuckerberg. I'm Gonna Pass.
Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler to Resign
The Wild Week in the American Economy
Jury Says Tesla Must Pay $243 Million Over Fatal Autopilot Crash
The Leaner, Meaner Chevron Is Ready to Fight
There are two reasons for concern. The first is that excessive gambling in the market leads to unsustainably high prices that have to crash. GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings, the stars of the meme-stock boom in 2021, are down 74% and 99% respectively from their peaks. If speculation has lifted the market as a whole, it will eventually sink it, too.
The second concern goes back to something the economist John Maynard Keynes wrote in 1936—that when 'enterprise becomes the bubble on the whirlpool of speculation,' capital will flow to the wrong companies, damaging growth and jobs.
Both worries are reasonable, but neither is the right reason for concern at the moment.
A lot has been written about what my colleague Spencer Jakab dubbed the DORK stocks from the tickers of Krispy Kreme, Opendoor Technologies, Rocket and Kohl's, the riders of the new meme roller coaster. They are merely the public face of a summer boom in bets by private traders.
Andrew Lapthorne, head of quantitative research at Société Générale, points to gains of 10% or so from betting on rises in the most-shorted stocks, companies with the weakest balance sheets and the highest-volatility stocks in the midst of massive trading. 'The volumes are mental,' he said.
That this is the purest of speculative gambling is most obvious in the performance of penny shares: The 10th of the market with the lowest share price at the start of July had a median gain of 16% by July 23, when the new meme stocks peaked, while the 10th with the highest price rose only 1.4%. The starting share price was by far the best predictor of performance during the month—and also of the size of losses in the last week, when the boom went into reverse and the cheapest stocks fell 6%.
Institutional investors and anyone who understands stock issuance can rightly say this is farcical. The only times the price matters is when it stays below $1 long enough to be delisted because of stock-exchange rules, or is so high that a single share is out of reach for a buyer (and even then, retail brokers now sell fractional shares). A company can double or halve the price (or more) by a simple stock split or reverse split, with no impact on the percentage of the company and implied share of the profit that any shareholder owns. The share price shouldn't matter.
A lot of private traders either don't understand this or don't care. In July, they were right, and the pros were wrong: Share price did matter, both on the way up and more recently on the way down (perhaps, as private traders took profits ready for holidays).
Such speculation can also lead to badly allocated capital, as shown when the last round of meme stocks, led by GameStop and AMC, issued billions of dollars of new shares. The stocks collapsed anyway.
Yet, this mostly passes big investors by. There aren't any penny stocks in the S&P 500, and there was no pattern showing that cheaper shares among big companies did better or worse in July. Back in 2021, private traders helped inflate full-blown bubbles in green stocks, SPACs and loss-making technology stocks alongside the meme excitement, yet the wider market was entirely unaffected when those bubbles burst.
Equally, Keynes was just wrong when he warned that Wall Street's speculative fervor worked less well at providing capital to the right parts of the economy than the more cautious British approach of investing for income.
What critics call 'casino capitalism' and a willingness to take big risks helped finance U.S. growth companies—and even the U.K. government is now trying to kindle animal spirits among voters, worrying that the City of London institutions are failing to provide speculative capital to the British economy.
Long-running sentiment surveys from the American Association of Individual Investors and Investors Intelligence are much more positive than earlier this year, but not excessively so. Futures traders are skewed toward bullish calls, but not nearly as much as they were in 2021. My guess is that retail traders helped push up the S&P when they bought the dip from April on, but that they didn't have that much impact in July.
It's reasonable to worry that stocks are too expensive, that earnings are likely to take a hit from tariffs, that the economy, while superficially strong, has many weak spots, and that excitement about artificial intelligence is overdone. But when it comes to meme stocks and penny shares, the boom and bust has little overspill to the rest of the market.
Write to James Mackintosh at james.mackintosh@wsj.com
Strava's CEO Has a New Way to Improve Your Workouts
'House Rich, Cash Poor' Was Just a Saying—Until We Bought an Apartment
U.S. Hiring Slowed Sharply Over the Summer
Intel Chip-Packaging Expert Takes Job at Samsung
Cooling Job Market Opens Door to September Cut Despite Inflation Jitters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Flexera Named a Leader in 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SaaS Management Platforms
Flexera Named a Leader in 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SaaS Management Platforms

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Flexera Named a Leader in 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SaaS Management Platforms

Flexera recognized for its Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision ITASCA, Ill., Aug. 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Flexera, the global leader in technology spend and risk intelligence, today announced it has been positioned as a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for SaaS Management Platforms. We believe this recognition reflects Flexera's strong vision and SaaS strategy, its global presence and its robust thought leadership in the SaaS Management market. It is also the latest recognition from Gartner, as Flexera is the only vendor recognized in both the 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SaaS Management Platforms and the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Cloud Financial Management Tools. It's our view that this continued recognition highlights Flexera's advanced capabilities to help organizations control SaaS costs, manage shadow AI risks and reduce SaaS sprawl, while driving FinOps maturity through its integrated Flexera One platform. "In today's AI-first world, enterprises face unprecedented complexity in managing their technology ecosystems," said Jim Ryan, CEO of Flexera. "Flexera is uniquely positioned to help them close the visibility gap and act with precision. Our new SaaS Management offering is part of our broader Flexera One platform. This isn't just about SaaS management; it's about delivering actionable, high-fidelity intelligence across hybrid IT to power AI, mitigate risk, and reduce spend. Our leadership in this category is built on the unmatched scale, depth, and trust in our data — and to us, our position in the latest Gartner report demonstrates our commitment to driving innovation where it matters most." According to the Flexera 2025 State of Cloud Report, 35% of organizations report increased SaaS waste year-over-year—underscoring the urgent need for visibility, governance, and cost control. Flexera One SaaS Management solution addresses these challenges by offering: Comprehensive discovery engine: advanced discovery methods, such as Browser and Financial Discovery, Agent, API, Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), and Single-Sign On (SSO), ensure full visibility into all SaaS applications, including those unauthorized or hidden. Advanced SaaS optimization: Sophisticated insights that combine usage intelligence and financial data help identify underutilized licenses or features and implement automated governance and controls to manage and eliminate unused or redundant SaaS subscriptions. Integrated platform: Integration with IT asset management (ITAM) and FinOps processes within the Flexera One platform provides a unified view, supporting better decision-making and cost optimization across the entire IT ecosystem. 'As shadow AI and unsanctioned SaaS usage proliferate, organizations need visibility and control more than ever,' said Leigh Martin, senior director of product management at Flexera. 'Flexera One SaaS Management is the result of extensive innovation and strategic effort, designed to uncover hidden risks, eliminate waste and align SaaS investments with business priorities to meet evolving market demands. We believe our position as a Leader in this Gartner Magic Quadrant reflects our strong SaaS strategy and dynamic solution that meets market demands.' As ITAM, FinOps, and SaaS operations increasingly intersect, organizations need a holistic view across the entire environment. Flexera's SaaS Management capabilities, embedded within the Flexera One platform, provide the foundation for FinOps maturity and the visibility necessary to manage risk across the entire software estate. The evaluation of the 17 recognized vendors was based on criteria that analyzed each company's Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision. To talk to an expert about Flexera One SaaS Management, please visit: A complimentary copy of the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for SaaS Management Platforms report is available here. Follow Flexera on LinkedIn on X (formerly Twitter) on Instagram About Gartner Magic Quadrant Reports A Gartner Magic Quadrant is the culmination of research in a specific market, providing a wide-angle view of the relative positions of the market's competitors. A Magic Quadrant offers a graphical competitive positioning of four types of technology providers in markets where growth is high and provider differentiation is clear: Leaders, Challengers, Visionaries, and Niche Players. Gartner, Magic Quadrant for SaaS Management Platforms, By Tom Cipolla, Dan Wilson, Lina Al Dana, 30 July 2025 GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally, and MAGIC QUADRANT is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, express or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. About Flexera Flexera helps organizations understand and maximize the value of their technology, saving billions of dollars in wasted spend. Powered by the Flexera Technology Intelligence Platform, our award-winning IT asset management, FinOps and SaaS management solutions provide comprehensive visibility and actionable insights on an organization's entire IT ecosystem. This intelligence enables IT, finance, procurement, FinOps and cloud teams to address skyrocketing costs, optimize spend, mitigate risk and identify opportunities to create positive business outcomes. More than 50,000 global organizations rely on Flexera and its Technopedia reference library, the largest repository of technology asset data. Learn more at For more information, contact: publicrelations@ in to access your portfolio

Unusual Options Volume? Why Only BP Stock Passed the Quantitative Sniff Test
Unusual Options Volume? Why Only BP Stock Passed the Quantitative Sniff Test

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Unusual Options Volume? Why Only BP Stock Passed the Quantitative Sniff Test

With the rising popularity of equities market trading following the COVID-19 pandemic, it was practically inevitable that interest would boom toward the options space. In many ways, options represent a market within a market. Since the underlying contracts exchange hands at a fraction of the rate of the actual security, the leverage can be tremendous. At the same time, unlike securities in the open market, options expire. So while there are incredible rewards to be had, the debit that you put can be completely nuked in a busted transaction. Even worse, in a credit-based position, tail risk — which is the phenomenon where you must make good on the risk you underwrote — can potentially beat your portfolio to a pulp. More News from Barchart Options Traders Expected Palantir Stock's Tamest Earnings Reaction in a Year. Did They Get It Right? PayPal Maintains its Huge FCF Guidance Despite a Q2 Drop - Is PYPL Stock Too Cheap? Option Volatility And Earnings Report For Aug 4 - 8 Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! Therefore, people turn to indicators like Barchart's Unusual Stock Options Volume screener to find potential opportunities. Fundamentally, it's a smart strategy because the options market tends to be the arena of the smart money. So, if you can decipher where the most intelligent traders are putting their funds, you can potentially gain an edge over everyone else. To be sure, interpreting unusual activity in the derivatives arena is both an art and a science. Here's the rub. Even if you were the world's best expert on the financial markets, you would know instinctively that there's no way all 500 stocks identified as 'unusual' represent compelling wagers. There has to be another mechanism to sort the wheat from the chaff. I believe that energy giant BP (BP) is the only enterprise from Monday's list that passed the sniff test. Let's quickly go over the stats since this is a story about unusual options activity and all. Yesterday, BP's total options volume hit 58,533 contracts, representing a lift of 215.73% over the trailing one-month average. Call volume stood at 47,156 contracts while put volume was 11,377 contracts, generating a put/call ratio of 0.24. Again, I'm not going to be overly excited but you should know that on Monday, options flow — which focuses exclusively on big block transactions likely placed by institutional investors — showed that net trade sentiment stood at more than $1.05 million above parity. This metric favors the bulls so the above ratio could be read intuitively. Okay, with the details out of the way, I'm going to get to the good stuff. BP Stock Flashes a Statistically Significant Signal One of the common traps that you'll find in the broader financial publication space is the concept that bullish options flow (or insert any other line of reasoning, such as a cheap earnings multiple) is automatically a 'good' opportunity. However, if the analyst making the assertion fails to define what 'good' means, the argument is likely to be a presuppositional fallacy. Essentially, merely stating that bullish options flow makes BP stock a 'good' opportunity smuggles the conclusion (that BP is favorably mispriced) into the premise (that there is an objective standard in the market for what 'good' means). If you really break down the argument, it's basically stating that BP stock is good because it has bullish options flow, implying that bullish flow is good because it means BP is good. This type of circular logic — also known as begging the question — runs up and down the financial publication industry. Go read the articles and find out for yourself. Heck, read my articles before my red pill moment, which occurred around April of this year. As far as I'm aware, the only objective truth in the equities sector is that, at the end of the day, the market is either a net buyer or a net seller. It's kinesis or stasis, one or the other. Yes, this may seem like an obvious point but with this framework, we can now much more easily observe recurring patterns and their forward probabilities. For example, in the past 10 weeks, the market voted to buy BP stock four times and sell six times. Despite distributive sessions outweighing accumulative, the overall trajectory of BP was upward. For brevity, we can label this sequence 4-6-U. Now, we all understand that the probability of upside under all conditinos is not a fixed percentage. Have you seen baseball or any team sports in general? Then you know that certain players (the great ones) rise to the occasion. I want to know when BP is in clutch mode and when it's not. To do this, I need to create a decision-tree logic across 10-week intervals (in this case, going back to January 2019): L10 Category Sample Size Up Probability Baseline Probability Median Return if Up 1-9-D 8 37.50% 44.77% 1.73% 2-8-D 24 41.67% 44.77% 4.65% 3-7-D 39 56.41% 44.77% 1.37% 3-7-U 4 50.00% 44.77% 7.70% 4-6-D 63 36.51% 44.77% 2.38% 4-6-U 29 62.07% 44.77% 1.79% 5-5-D 24 33.33% 44.77% 2.12% 5-5-U 54 48.15% 44.77% 2.86% 6-4-D 7 42.86% 44.77% 2.72% 6-4-U 50 44.00% 44.77% 2.11% 7-3-U 14 14.29% 44.77% 3.15% From the table above, the chance that a long position in BP stock will rise is only 44.77%, a negative bias. This is effectively our null hypothesis, the assumption of no mispricing. In contrast, our alternative hypothesis is that because the 4-6-U sequence is flashing, the upside probability for the following week is actually 62.07%. Therefore, an incentive exists to consider a debit-based options strategy. Assuming the positive pathway, the median return is 1.79%. If so, that would imply that BP stock may poke its head above the $33 level quickly. Putting the Math to Good Work Based on the market intelligence above, a sensible idea is to consider the 32/33 bull call spread expiring Sep. 19. This transaction involves buying the $32 call and simultaneously selling the $33 call, for a net debit paid of $54 (the most that can be lost in the trade). Should BP stock rise through the short strike price ($33) at expiration, the maximum profit is $46, a payout of over 85%. However, the most aggressive traders may consider the 32/34 bull spread also expiring on Sept. 19. This trade calls for a net debit of $86, which is pricier than the 32/33 spread. However, the max payout stands at roughly 133%, which is a very tempting proposition. The breakeven for this trade is $32.86, which as mentioned earlier is a realistic target. I mentioned in the title that BP stock passed the quantitative sniff test and that's not clickbait. Running a one-tailed binomial test on the 4-6-U sequence reveals a p-value of 0.0478. This means that there's a 4.78% chance that the implications of the sequence could materialize randomly as opposed to intentionally. Scientists will scoff at this ratio and state that it barely falls under the threshold of statistical significance of 5%. Yet in the context of an open, entropic system like the stock market, this is an awfully compelling signal. No, it doesn't guarantee a positive outcome. However, the usage of Markovian principles helps to rationalize your wagers rather than depending on empirically unanchored opinions and vibes. On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on

Car insurance options for low-mileage drivers
Car insurance options for low-mileage drivers

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Car insurance options for low-mileage drivers

If you don't drive much, paying hundreds or more a month for car insurance can feel like a waste of money. You can't get rid of the insurance expense entirely, but you may have a way to trim your insurance costs. Requesting a low-mileage discount or switching to insurance designed for your limited driving habits could lower your premiums. This embedded content is not available in your region. Learn more: How car insurance works. The basics explained. Can you get low-mileage car insurance? Yes, you can get low-mileage car insurance. Several insurance companies have lower-cost programs for vehicle owners who log fewer hours behind the wheel. Each company sets its own rules regarding who qualifies as a low-mileage driver, how premiums are calculated, and the type of insurance offered. Types of insurance for low-mileage drivers There are three main types of car insurance programs for low-mileage drivers: Standard car insurance with a discount for low annual mileage. American Family Insurance, National General, Progressive, State Farm, Travelers, and others provide standard car insurance at cheaper rates for low-mileage drivers. Pay-per-mile insurance. Pay-per-mile car insurance has an adjustable premium based on how much you drive. Usually, you will pay a low base rate plus a per-mile rate. If your mileage is low, the sum of the two rate components can be cheaper than standard car insurance. Pay-per-mile insurance policies can provide the same coverage as standard insurance, but this may vary by provider. Allstate, Nationwide, and Mile Auto offer pay-per-mile insurance. Usage-based insurance (UBI), also called telematics insurance. UBI sets pricing based on your driving habits, including the number of miles you drive. If you don't drive a lot and drive safely, your rates with UBI coverage can be competitive. UBI providers monitor your driving behaviors and mileage with technology installed in your vehicle called telematics. Root and others offer UBI insurance. Learn more: How usage-based car insurance works How many miles a year is considered low mileage? Each auto insurance company sets thresholds for low-mileage discounts. Often, there are tiers. According to John Espenschied, agency principal at Insurance Brokers Group, insurance companies may characterize 7,500 annual miles driven as low mileage. But someone who drives 3,000 miles a year often gets a larger discount than another driver who drives 7,000 miles annually. You can also define low mileage as being less than the average miles driven. Average miles driven is estimated at roughly 11,000 to 14,000, depending on the source. Kelley Blue Book estimated the 2023 average mileage at 12,200 miles, based on total miles driven divided by the number of drivers. The Federal Highway Administration reported 11,106 average miles traveled by light-duty vehicles in 2023. How is mileage tracked? There are five ways an insurance company can track your mileage. Odometer photos. To maintain a low-mileage discount on standard insurance, you may need to submit photos of your car's odometer reading once a year or every quarter. Service records and claims. Auto dealers, oil change providers, and independent service shops may report work on your vehicle and odometer readings to national databases. Espenschied noted that insurance companies can access that data to determine how much you drive. Device installed in the car. Some insurance companies provide a device that plugs into your car's diagnostic port. The ports may be located under the steering wheel, near the center console, or under the dashboard. You can check your owner's manual to find the exact location. Connected car. Some modern vehicles have built-in technology that collects data on your driving and sends it to your insurance company. For example, some Toyotas made in 2018 or later can share driving data with Nationwide. Smartphone app. You may have the option to use a mobile app that automatically detects when you're driving and records mileage and other data. Who might want low-mileage insurance You may be a candidate for low-mileage insurance if: You work from home. You are retired. You have multiple cars. You live in a walkable city. You favor public transportation or bicycle riding over driving. In short, if you don't drive a car daily or take long trips, low-mileage insurance may be an option. Up Next Up Next How much does car insurance cost for low-mileage drivers? Espenschied estimated that driving less than 7,500 miles annually can lower insurance premiums by 5% to 15%, depending on the state and the insurer. Mileage example The table below shows how monthly insurance premiums can vary by annual mileage across different insurance companies. Quotes assume full coverage and a clean driving record. For this driver, Travelers and Progressive quoted lower rates for lower mileage, while Geico quoted the same rate for all mileages. Because many factors contribute to insurance pricing, your experience may be different. How to get a low mileage discount on your car insurance Know your mileage. You can estimate your annual mileage by checking your odometer weekly during three or four weeks of normal driving activity. Calculate your average weekly miles and multiply by 52 to approximate your annual miles driven. Ask your current provider. Contact your insurance company and ask if there is a low-mileage discount available. You may need to prove you don't drive much, with dated photos of your odometer. Ask your provider what information you'll need to provide and when the discount can take effect. Use a safe-driving app. Install a safe-driving app like Hum and use it to evaluate your driving habits. If the app gives you a good safety score, consider getting a quote for usage-based insurance. UBI is not advisable if you have risky driving habits, since it may cost more than standard insurance. Shop other providers. Your current insurance company may not have a low mileage discount, or the discount may not be competitive. To get the best rates, gather quotes from other companies. Look into standard coverage with discounts, pay-per-mile insurance, and — if you are a safe driver — usage-based insurance. Note that some online quoting tools may not request or consider your annual mileage. In that case, follow up with a broker or agent to ask about a mileage discount. Read more: How to get all the best car insurance discounts Low-mileage car insurance FAQs Is car insurance cheaper if you drive less? Car insurance may be cheaper if you drive less, depending on your car insurance company and where you live. Each insurance provider decides how important annual mileage is as a pricing factor in car insurance rates. Some treat it as a minor factor, and others weight it heavily. How much cheaper is low-mileage insurance? The potential savings for low-mileage driving can be 5% to 15%, according to Espenschied, of Insurance Brokers Group. Are hybrids good for low-mileage drivers? Hybrid cars deliver the biggest fuel efficiency gains in city driving conditions. On longer drives at steady speeds, hybrids rely more on fuel than electricity. Therefore, hybrids are suitable for low-mileage drivers who take short trips in urban areas but are less efficient for low-mileage drivers who only take occasional highway trips. What mileage is the cheapest for insurance? "There is not one cheapest mileage for insurance, but generally, the fewer miles you drive, the bigger the savings," said Espenschied. In other words, those who drive less than 3,000 miles per year can earn larger discounts than those driving 7,000 miles annually.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store