Trump's passport policy was lifted, but these Americans are still in the dark
This moment felt like a "huge relief" to the West Virginia resident, who told USA TODAY in early March he wasn't sure he'd ever receive a passport matching his gender identity as a transgender man following the Trump administration's January policy acknowledging just the male and female sexes, assigned at birth.
The LGBTQ+ advocate received his passport on June 12 as one of the seven plaintiffs in the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Massachusetts, and law firm Covington & Burling LLP's lawsuit Orr v. Trump, which was brought to the courts in February. The suit alleged that the policy violates the right to travel and privacy and discriminates against LGBTQ+ people. Last Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick in Boston expanded the preliminary injunction that blocked the policy, granting passports to the plaintiffs and any impacted Americans.
Orr had applied on Jan. 16 to renew his passport with an updated gender marker for an upcoming trip to Ireland for a medical procedure to avoid any issues at airport security, which he'd experienced before since his driver's license still listed him as female. Days later, the U.S. State Department suspended the processing and issuing of all passports seeking a binary gender change or the "X" gender marker under Trump's policy.
Thousands of transgender, intersex and nonbinary Americans were left in limbo, unable to travel internationally, and without a critical ID document to secure jobs, housing and other opportunities. To many in the transgender community, the policy also felt like another attack by the current administration to erase them from public spaces and deny their existence.
"When your basic right to move freely is denied, it's a message: 'You don't belong here.' It's bigger than bureaucracy. It's systemic erasure," transgender drag artist and RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars 10 contestant Aja previously told USA TODAY. Her passport renewal was rejected despite her current passport and other documents matching her gender identity.
While the judge's latest motion offers some relief, the battle is far from over. Many of those affected are still caught in a holding pattern, trying to figure out how to receive their passports, while others have conflicting emotions as the policy's impact went far deeper than just not having a passport.
"I think the first time in years, I really felt like the legal system actually saw us, you know, as trans, nonbinary, intersex people as real and as deserving of dignity," Orr said about the judge's action.
'I am exactly who God made': Why travel is a battleground for drag and trans performers
Can transgender, intersex and nonbinary Americans get their passports?
Legally, yes. As of June 17, the State Department is obligated to process passports requesting the "X" gender marker or a binary change and is taking immediate steps to implement the court order, said a State Department spokesperson.
However, many Americans have yet to receive accurate passports and are left in limbo. "We're waiting on the State Department to tell us – and to tell everyone publicly – how they're planning on processing all of these passports that need to be processed," said Aditi Fruitwala, an ACLU senior staff attorney on the lawsuit.
The ACLU has received numerous inquiries from people who need to travel internationally urgently but don't know if they need to resubmit a new application or fill out a form for an error correction. "From what we can tell, there are class members who are still unable to update the sex designation on their passport, which indicates that they have not implemented the court order," she said.
Although temporary, the judge's ruling is optimistic, according to Fruitwala. "That was sort of exciting to see, that none of (the government's) arguments really carried any water," she said.
The State Department told USA TODAY it does not comment on ongoing litigation.
Mixed emotions for the trans community
Despite the positive direction, the continued reality of not having a passport isn't lost on those impacted. Patrick, who is identified by his first name only out of safety and privacy concerns, is one of those Americans stuck in uncertainty. At the end of 2024, he applied for a passport renewal as a transgender man so he and his wife could go on a long-awaited honeymoon. In March, he received his passport with his gender listed as female on it, rendering it nearly unusable.
"That's six months with a passport that I don't know that I'll ever be able to use, and it puts me in danger," he said. Not only does Patrick feel stuck in case he needs to seek asylum, but his home state of Texas recently passed a bill that bans gender marker changes on medical documents unless due to a clerical error, so any accurate ID documents are vital. He also doesn't feel comfortable sending in his medical documents, knowing they can't be replaced if unreturned. He also isn't in a place to pay the fees again.
"With Texas doing what Texas is doing, it's making it to where I won't have any accurate IDs," he said. "You know, if Texas reverts my driver's license, will I ever be able to get a passport that reflects my gender identity? Because then it'll say F on there."
Knowing so many others in his community are experiencing what Patrick is going through, Orr said he feels conflicted between guilt and gratitude. "I am very eager and just very thankful that I have this privilege to be able to finally leave and get the medical care that I need, when there are still so many that, you know, are navigating the system and this latest order," he said. His trip to Ireland is back on and coming up soon.
After everything, Orr admits he's worried about returning to the U.S. borders. "I don't think anybody wants to make a plan for what if I'm detained, what if I'm denied entry into a country where I'm a citizen?" he said. "No one wants to have to make those plans. But again, that is the unfortunate reality of trans travelers right now."
Fruitwala said it's a reasonable fear and common question for the transgender, nonbinary, and intersex community since the policy went into effect, even though valid passports are technically usable. Although it would be considered harassment to be denied entry back into the U.S., it's a good idea for travelers to write down the names of civil rights advocates and attorneys, plus to educate themselves on their rights at the border.
"Again, I'm refusing to allow this country to continue to dictate my operations," he said. "You know, I am a citizen. I have rights just as everyone else, and I'm going to travel."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Judges skeptical of Trump using emergency powers for tariff spree
WASHINGTON — A panel of appeals court judges bombarded a Trump administration attorney Thursday with pointed questions about the president's use of emergency powers to levy reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries — hours before 'Liberation Day' duties were set to take effect. The 11-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit put their most searching inquiries to Assistant US Attorney General Brett Shumate. 'The negative balance of goods is decades and decades old,' one jurist said before asking how the trade deficit could be considered a national emergency given its longstanding nature. Shumate argued that the gap between US imports and exports had widened recently and further contended that Congress has given presidents broad leeway to wield tariffs. He cited a 1975 appeals court decision that permitted former President Richard Nixon to slap a 10% charge on imported merchandise to combat inflation four years earlier. 4 The Trump administration argued that President Trump has the authority to slap tariffs against foreign countries unilaterally. REUTERS 4 The court hearing comes before President Trump's Aug.1 deadline for countries to make deals. Bloomberg via Getty Images The hearing on Thursday dealt with the Trump administration's challenge to a May 28 decision by the US Court of International Trade quashing most of the president's tariffs. The appellate court promptly paused that decision to give time for it to hear the White House case. At issue is Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs without congressional approval. The act gives presidents sweeping powers to regulate international financial transactions and trade, including by imposing economic sanctions, but has never been used to tax imports. 'IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them,' a judge griped at one point. Shumate admitted that 'no president has ever read IEEPA this way' but insisted Trump's interpretation did not violate the law. 4 The White House has signaled that tariff negotiations with other countries will go down to the wire ahead of the Aug. 1 deadline. A coalition of 12 blue states and five small businesses brought the case, hoping to get the president's tariff regime thrown out. Neal Katyal, representing the businesses, warned of 'staggering consequences' should the fees be allowed to go ahead. 'You just heard an argument … that our federal courts are powerless, that the president can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, for as long as he wants, so long as he declares an emergency,' chided Katyal, a former solicitor general under Barack Obama. Heading into the court hearing, Trump stressed the high stakes and warned that if the courts side against him, it could be a death knell to his trade agenda. 'If our Country was not able to protect itself by using TARIFFS AGAINST TARIFFS, WE WOULD BE 'DEAD,' WITH NO CHANCE OF SURVIVAL OR SUCCESS. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' he dramatically warned on Truth Social. 4 President Trump has made overhauling US trade relations a key pillar of his second term agenda. Bloomberg via Getty Images It is unclear when the appellate court will rule on the case, V.O.S. Selections v. Trump. Regardless of the outcome, the matter is likely to go to the Supreme Court. Since unveiling a slate of customized tariff rates April 2, Trump has imposed a blanket 10% duty on all imports while negotiating framework deals with some of America's biggest trading partners. Those include the European Union, United Kingdom, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Cambodia and Thailand.


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
eBay, Etsy warn Trump's surprise move to end ‘de minimis' duty-free rule hurts sellers
Americans shopping for secondhand, vintage or handmade items on platforms like eBay and Etsy face steep customs duties on international purchases next month, potentially hurting trade on those peer-to-peer sites. In a surprise move late on Wednesday, President Trump ordered the removal of 'de minimis' duty-free treatment on parcels under $800 from all countries, starting Aug. 29 -— bringing forward a change previously set for July 2027. The acceleration follows pressure from groups that argue the exemption facilitates fentanyl smuggling and has led to a flood of cheap products entering the US duty-free, undermining US retailers and manufacturers. 3 eBay and Etsy were among US businesses that spoke out against the policy when Customs and Border Protection asked for feedback on the proposal to remove de minimis. Getty Images Trump ended duty-free access for low-value parcels from China and Hong Kong at the start of May, disrupting ecommerce flows for online retailers like Shein and Temu. According to Customs and Border Protection, 1.36 billion shipments entered the US under de minimis last year, for a total value of $64.6 billion. eBay and Etsy were among US businesses that spoke out against the policy when CBP asked for feedback on the proposal to remove de minimis. 'These exemptions are a powerful tool that helps small creators, artisans, and makers participate in and navigate cross-border trade,' Etsy's global head of public policy and advocacy Jeffrey Zubricki wrote in a submission to CBP in March. 'Many American Etsy sellers rely on de minimis to import and export products with key trading partners, sustaining their businesses and generating income to support their families.' The majority of Etsy's 5.6 million active sellers and nearly 90 million buyers are in the US. Etsy did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. 3 'Many American Etsy sellers rely on de minimis to import and export products with key trading partners, sustaining their businesses and generating income to support their families,' an Etsy executive said. REUTERS eBay also urged the customs agency to reconsider, arguing that de minimis gives American consumers access to 'a global market to find value at lower prices, particularly for used goods and a unique, collectible inventory that is not available domestically.' In a results call on Wednesday, eBay CEO Jamie Iannone flagged the elimination of de minimis outside of China as a potential disruption that may impact revenue. eBay did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Goods shipped through the postal system will face one of two tariffs: either an 'ad valorem duty' equal to the effective tariff rate of the package's country of origin or, for six months, a specific tariff of $80 to $200 depending on the country of origin's tariff rate. 3 Trump ended duty-free access for low-value parcels from China and Hong Kong at the start of May, disrupting ecommerce flows for online retailers like Shein and Temu. Christopher Sadowski It is the latest headache for small businesses grappling with hefty import tariffs imposed by Trump, driving up costs, forcing many to hike prices and fueling concerns that Americans will be paying more for everyday goods. 'The complexity of doing business with the US has gone to levels nobody could have imagined,' said Andrew Wilson, deputy secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce. He also questioned whether US authorities can handle the tariff collections, potentially leading to delays and backlogs. 'Is border trade equipped to manage the checks and duties collection? If not, what happens with customs backlogs? It's a huge additional burden from next month,' said Wilson.


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Top Trump officials traveling into Gaza amid food crisis
Top Trump administration officials will travel into the Gaza Strip on Friday to inspect food distribution amid international outrage over increasing deaths from starvation and criticism that U.S. efforts to distribute food are contributing to suffering and death. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that Steve Witkoff, President Trump's special envoy for peace missions, and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee will travel into Gaza to 'inspect the current distribution sites and secure a plan to deliver more food and meet with local Gazans to hear first hand about this dire situation on the ground.' Leavitt said that Witkoff and Huckabee are expected to brief Trump tomorrow after their visit, and the president will 'approve a final plan for food and aid distribution.' The administration has provided little to no details on Trump's announcement, made earlier this week, that the U.S. would set up 'food centers' in Gaza. Trump made the promise after acknowledging starvation among the population in the strip, in a rebuke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claims that there's no food crisis there. Still, humanitarian workers, non-governmental organizations and the United Nations are highly critical of Trump's efforts to take over food distribution in the strip. Trump backed the establishment of the U.S.-founded Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) that took over food distribution alongside Israel shutting down the majority of humanitarian access points for delivering aid. But the U.N. says that since May, approximately 674 people have been killed while trying to access food aid through the GHF, under threat from the Israeli military and with GHF contractors reportedly using live ammunition and stun grenades against aid seekers. 'The new distribution scheme imposed by Israeli authorities through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and other actors has created, actually a dangerous power vacuum,' said Bushra Khalidi, policy lead with Oxfam, during a briefing by humanitarian workers organized Tuesday by the nongovernmental organization Save the Children. 'It's sidelined established humanitarian actors like us and the U.N. agencies and have tightly controlled the minimal aid coming in.' The Israeli government responded to international pressure to allow more food aid in and for the U.N. and NGOs to begin pick up and distribution. Israel recorded more than 2,000 trucks with food and other supplies heading into Gaza in July, compared to over 1,800 in June and less than 1,000 in May. While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu blames Hamas for diverting food aid, Israeli military officials reportedly found no evidence of systematic and wide-scale diversion. The United Nations recorded that between May and July, approximately 1,753 trucks have failed to reach their destinations because they are overrun by 'peaceful, hungry people' or armed groups. Food crisis experts warned earlier this week that 'the worst-case scenario of famine' is occurring in the Gaza Strip and Israel is growing increasingly isolated, diplomatically, as countries around the world call on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as manufacturing the crisis. France and Canada have announced plans to recognize an independent Palestinian state as a direct rebuke to Israel, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has threatened to do the same if Netanyahu does not take steps to end the war against Hamas and alleviate the crisis in the strip. And while Trump has largely stood by Netanyahu's pursuit of the war, support in Washington is fracturing. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), a firebrand for Trump's America First movement, became the first Republican to accuse Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. On Wednesday night, a majority of the Senate Democratic caucus voted in favor of blocking weapons sales to Israel.