
The Best Leaders Encourage 'Spacious Thinking'
The team's conversation led to the recognition that there were overlooked assets in the archive that might be used for a new program. This idea eventually led to a top-line contribution of tens of millions, and reductions in workforce were avoided. In contrast, other departments in the institution simply moved forward with cycles of layoffs which reduced morale and led to burnout.
For the last few years we have been researching two modes of attention that people use at work: doing mode, in which people pay narrow attention to a specific task in order to control, predict and get it done efficiently; and spacious mode, in which people pay attention more expansively, without hurry, making them more receptive to relationships, interdependencies, and possibilities—like Soren's approach to cost-cutting. Spacious mode leads to critical benefits in the workplace, such as gaining insight into challenges, thinking strategically, spotting opportunities, building relationships, and sparking joy and motivation.
Unfortunately, we've found that spacious thinking is regularly suppressed in favor of doing mode in organizations. This is hardly a surprise. We are living in a time of cultural obsession with productivity and achievement across all spheres of life. Our research—which has included a global survey of more than 3,000 employees, ongoing discussions with 50 global professionals, and interviews with leaders and those they lead—shows that employees looking to excel worry that shifting into spacious mode can be interpreted as a lack of efficiency or urgency. As a result, it feels career-limiting, and like it requires permission from a manager, so few employees do it regularly.
While all employees have some agency to shift to spacious mode, leaders play a crucial role in making it more accessible at work because they can legitimize it as a good way to spend precious time (or not). In this article we'll show how leaders often unknowingly discourage spacious thinking on their teams, and what they can do to help instead.
How Leaders Get in the Way
Leaders and managers are the key to encouraging spacious thinking because their behaviors signal what is acceptable. Too often, managers are narrowly focused on achieving the next short-term deliverable which means their teams are stuck in doing mode too. And though the team's to-do list gets ticked off, there is no way of knowing whether those to-dos were the right ones, no space for a team to grow, no joy or interest to discover what is possible. This can suck the life out of a team.
One senior manager we came across in our research was infamous in her organization for her catchphrase: 'Be clear, be quick, be gone.' In our conversations with her team and colleagues, it became clear that less-confident employees kept quiet around her and declined to raise complex, important challenges that would require inquiry and exploration.
You may think that, unlike this manager, you already engage in spacious mode, so you don't need to worry. But leaders tend to overestimate how spacious their own behaviors are. For example, our research has shown that the more senior we are in a hierarchy, the more we think we are open to hearing others, when we are really not. Similarly, in our experience facilitating meetings, leaders almost always underestimate how much airtime they take up.
Leaders also tend to mistakenly believe that it's easy for their direct reports to move into spacious mode without permission—or that it would be easy to ask for that permission. This is driven by ' advantage blindness,' which can cause those with higher standing in a hierarchy to underestimate the power they hold and the impact it has. Therefore leaders overestimate how approachable they are and how able those lower on the hierarchy are to choose their own course of action.
How to Encourage Spacious Mode
To give employees permission to spend time thinking, learning, innovating, and collaborating, you'll need to rethink how you communicate and which behaviors you reward. For example, Toni, a regional manager at a large U.S. retailer we spoke with during our research, counted herself lucky: 'My chief people officer has a real sense of spaciousness around her and the way she shows up. I feel like I've got a lot of permission and protection from her in my role.'
Our research points to three behaviors of leaders and managers who enable their teams in this way:
Focus on ideas instead of tasks.
One of us (Megan) was working with a CEO who wanted his senior team to focus more on the bigger picture rather than day-to-day operations. Through their conversations, he realized that in his meetings he almost inevitably focused first (and often solely) on quarterly results. To expand the team's thinking, Megan suggested that he begin some meetings by asking, 'What hasn't gone well over the last few weeks, and what have you learned from that?' or 'How have you developed your team recently?' Over time, the team's conversations naturally began to shift more toward group-wide perspectives that bolstered their learning and development.
Our survey showed that many employees feel that tasks are consistently prioritized over more spacious topics. They ranked learning, values, purpose, creativity, and relationships as topics they'd like to talk to their managers about above tasks. Managers need to structure meeting agendas in a way that includes these spacious-mode topics.
Bring in novelty.
We often meet in the same places, follow the same agendas with the same people, and assume that the same process can meet any number of different outcomes.
It's almost heretical to suggest that a meeting doesn't have to end with actions to add to our already over-stuffed to-do lists. However, other outcomes might be far more important. For example, at a recent meeting at a life sciences company, participants told one of us (John) they found it 'cathartic and hopeful' that the agenda had been specifically designed to be an inquiring conversation rather than their usual action-focused drills. In the weeks following the meeting, participants' senior leadership reported feeling an increase in the team's energy to the point that they felt comfortable shifting away from their usual directive control. As a result, speed of decision making ramped up and the market agility that had been espoused came to life, as staff in the U.S. and Europe felt trusted to use their own judgment in co-ordinating their work.
External facilitators and invited guests can bring in fresh ideas and perspectives. For example, different venues can inspire different sorts of conversations: a walk-and-talk or meeting outside might engage a more open mind than the goldfish bowl of a glass-walled meeting room in the bowels of a building.
One manager we worked with bought his team a new book every quarter, which focused on a different sector or a broader industry- or society-wide issue, and then put some time aside to discuss what they'd read together. Other executives encourage their teams to get out of the office to experience the world as their customers do. When they do, the teams explain to us that these efforts help them to bring the wider context back into view, and that leads to valuable conversations about strategy and purpose. Encountering novelty jolts them to course-correct, keeping on track with customer demands rather than losing sight of those amidst shorter-term tasks and targets. The conversations also strengthened relationships in the teams, through sharing experiences and listening to different viewpoints.
Value and reward spacious mode.
Typically people who are visibly busy and get things done get rewarded. While there is nothing wrong with this—certainly doing mode is vital to high-performing teams—it needs to be complemented with recognition of team members who listen, explore, challenge, and invite the rest of the team to look up and around.
Elaine was introduced to us by her peer, Ben, who had recommended we speak to her for our research. He noted that in the high-pressured transformation project they were leading, Elaine had, on several occasions, challenged the team's viewpoint in a meeting and forced them to consider alternative courses of action. At the time, he reflected, there was some frustration in the team at being held up, but the team agreed that the decisions they ended up making in the spacious mode that Elaine had brought into the conversation were wiser than those they had been about to make while in doing mode. Elaine and Ben's manager recognized this not simply by complimenting Elaine, but by spending time explaining how her attention had benefited the program. After this, when the team faced an important, adaptive challenge, they were more comfortable in pausing to examine and challenge key decisions.
Spacious mode might be hard for you to see as a manager. Consider how your biases might play into this: The same behavior that in one employee may be labeled as annoying, wasteful and lazy, when practiced by someone else (especially someone who is already more powerful) can be seen as strategic and evidence of their readiness to continue moving up the managerial hierarchy. If you are dismayed to see a team member step back from doing mode, ask yourself whether they're actually engaged in spacious mode.
We have created managerial and organizational norms which over-privilege doing mode and hide the value of spacious mode. But only when insights from spacious mode guide teams' actions in doing mode can leaders be sure that team members are focused on doing the right work in the right ways. There needs to be a rebalancing of the relationship between these modes if organizations are to thrive and perform.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sands Capital Technology Innovators Fund Sold Global-E Online Ltd. (GLBE) Due to Cybersecurity and Execution Concerns
Sands Capital, an investment management company, released its 'Sands Capital Technology Innovators Fund' Q2 2025 investor letter. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. Technology Innovators focus on pioneering businesses worldwide that serve as key drivers or beneficiaries of significant long-term changes driven by technology. The fund returned 26.0% (net) in the second quarter compared to a 21.9% return for the benchmark, MSCI ACWI Info Tech and Communication Services Index. Easing geopolitical concerns, renewed AI optimism, resilient macroeconomic data, strong corporate earnings, and technical tailwinds boosted the markets for a quick recovery in the quarter. You can check the fund's top 5 holdings to know more about its best picks for 2025. In its second-quarter 2025 investor letter, Sands Capital Technology Innovators Fund highlighted stocks such as Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE). Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) is a direct-to-consumer cross-border e-commerce platform. Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) shares returned 4.42% over the past month and experienced a 1.58% decline over the last 12 months. On July 24, 2025, Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) stock closed at $34.27 per share, with a market capitalization of $5.817 billion. Sands Capital Technology Innovators Fund stated the following regarding Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) in its second quarter 2025 investor letter: "We sold Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) due to cybersecurity and execution concerns that may derail the business' ability to sustain the strong growth we expected. In recent months, three large customers have been hacked, resulting in significant operational challenges. While it's possible that these attacks were strictly due to vulnerabilities with third party vendors, it would be a material risk to the business and stock if Global-e was implicated. This risk is exacerbated by the challenges higher tariffs may pose to its business, given its role in facilitating cross-border ecommerce. We still see a significant potential for the business, but these unforeseen challenges led us to exit the position in favor of higher conviction opportunities." A shopper browsing through products online from the comfort of their home. Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. According to our database, 32 hedge fund portfolios held Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) at the end of the first quarter compared to 31 in the previous quarter. Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) ended the first quarter 2025 with revenues of nearly $190 million, up 30% year-over-year. While we acknowledge the potential of Global-E Online Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLBE) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q2 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio


Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
12 signs you're micromanaging without realizing it
Micromanagement can silently creep into leadership styles, often without conscious awareness. Could you be micromanaging without knowing it? Here, leadership experts share the subtle signs that you might be—and how to shift your approach to foster more trust and autonomy within your team. Shift from Reactive to Intentional Leadership Micromanagement is a term so overused that it has become shorthand for 'bad leadership.' It is also one of those leadership red flags that is easy to spot in others but harder to recognize in ourselves. This is because it does not always show up as controlling behavior. During times of growth or pressure, micromanagement can be a coping mechanism—a well-intentioned attempt to maintain quality, move quickly, or avoid mistakes. As an organizational psychologist and consultant, I see this dynamic play out most often in teams that are scaling fast. A leader suddenly has more direct reports, new stakeholders, and tighter timelines . . . but no added capacity. With so much in motion, it is easy for a leader to slip from delegation into directing. One minute you are offering feedback on an email; the next, you are rewriting the whole thing. Your weekly check-ins become daily status updates. Conversations shift from 'How are you doing?' to 'What have you done?' While it is tempting to write off this behavior as controlling leadership, the reality is more nuanced. Leaders under stress are often trying to do the right thing, but without support, structure, or clarity, they default to doing everything. Here are four ways to shift from reactive micromanagement to intentional leadership rooted in trust and autonomy: 1. Start with Self-Awareness. Before diving into tasks or meetings, pause and reflect: How do I want to show up today? What does success look like for me? Research shows even brief self-reflection helps leaders step out of the current of reactivity and into intentional presence. 2. Build Trust with Small Bets. Trust does not mean handing over the highest-stakes project on Day One. Instead, identify one or two low-risk projects where you can step back and give your team full ownership. Let them make decisions about the approach and own the outcome. Celebrate the process, not just the results. 3. Define Checkpoints, Not Check-Ins. Instead of checking in constantly, cocreate milestones that clarify what success looks like at 10%, 70%, and 100%. This approach gives your team autonomy to work in their own way while ensuring they know when to align, adjust, or escalate. 4. Prioritize the Person Over the Output. People do better work when they feel their leader cares about them. Reinforce this in your 1:1s by leading with questions that center the human behind the task: What's something going well for you right now? In one case, I worked with a CEO who insisted on being CC'd on every email or Slack thread, even those only tangentially related to his responsibilities. He didn't see it as micromanagement, although he was always burned out. No wonder. He framed it as 'staying in the loop,' but to the team, it signaled, 'I don't trust you to handle this without my oversight.' The unintended consequence became slower decision-making and a creeping 'permission culture' where innovation stalled because everyone awaited a thumbs-up. What did we do? We shifted to trust and autonomy as follows: We moved from 'copy me' to 'checkpoint me.' We set explicit outcome-based milestones (e.g., a progress demo every Friday) instead of constant message monitoring. Visibility shifted from activity to results, while the team regained breathing room. We installed a decision-rights matrix. This meant clarifying who owns, who consults, and who simply informs. Once the matrix was socialized, leaders could step back confidently, knowing the right voices were looped in at the right moments. We scheduled 'office hours,' not pop-ins. A standing slot where the team could surface blockers replaced the leader's ad-hoc pings. It preserved access without hovering. It was not an easy process. Letting go and creating the new rituals took three months, but the results were worth it. Cristina Imre, CSGO ARBOai & Founder Tech Leadership Lab, ARBOai Resist the Urge to Fill Silence One subtle but pervasive sign of micromanagement is when leaders frequently send 'Just checking in' messages on Slack or Teams. It might seem harmless, just a quick nudge to stay informed, but when it happens too often, it creates a culture of anxiety and hyper-availability. I've seen this unfold quietly in remote and hybrid teams. A manager pings someone at 10:32 a.m., asking, 'Any updates on the deck?' Even though the deadline is the end of the day. It may not be intentional, but what it signals is: 'I don't fully trust you to deliver without reminders.' The impact? Team members feel like they're under a microscope, leading to a reactive mindset where they prioritize visibility over impact. It chips away at deep work and autonomy. The shift I recommend is structural and psychological. Set clear expectations for communication: when updates are due, how progress will be tracked, and what level of responsiveness is healthy. Then step back. Make room for trust to grow in the silence. As leaders, we must resist the urge to fill every gap with a ping. Sometimes, the most powerful thing you can say to your team is nothing at all, and just let them do what you hired them to do. Anjan Pathak, CTO and Cofounder, Vantage Fit Empower Decision-Making to Build Trust One subtle sign of micromanagement that leaders often miss is when team members consistently hesitate to make decisions without explicit approval, even for matters within their scope. This quiet dependency is rarely about a lack of capability; it's a signal that the leader has unknowingly created an environment where autonomy feels risky. I've seen this happen with high-performing teams led by well-meaning managers who check in 'just to help' or request frequent updates 'to stay aligned.' Over time, these behaviors, though seemingly supportive, train teams to defer rather than decide. The result is a slowdown in execution, a dip in morale, and a loss of ownership. To shift this dynamic, leaders must audit their behavior. Start by asking, 'Am I giving direction or asking for input?' 'Do I solve problems too quickly instead of coaching my team through them?' Then, take intentional steps to signal trust. That means delegating with clarity, encouraging independent thinking, and celebrating decisions made without your hand-holding. Trust isn't built through absence but through empowerment. When leaders resist the urge to overmanage and instead coach for capability, teams step up. Autonomy flourishes not in the absence of leadership but in the presence of confidence in others. Rhett Power, CEO and Cofounder, Accountability Inc. Rethink Unnecessary Alignment Meetings One of the more subtle (but incredibly common) signs of micromanagement is the recurring 'alignment meeting' that didn't need to exist. On the surface, it looks like a leader trying to stay engaged. But to the team? It often signals something else: 'I don't fully trust you to move this forward without my input.' The kicker? Most managers who do this don't think they're micromanaging. They believe they're offering support, but when quick updates that could've lived in an email morph into standing 30-minute check-ins, autonomy doesn't grow. It withers. Over time, this kind of hand-holding can train even high performers to second-guess themselves or, worse, wait for approval before taking initiative. The better play is to shift from control to clarity. That means moving toward a Results-Oriented Work Environment, where expectations are clearly defined up front. When people know what they're responsible for—and by when—they're far more likely to raise their hand when something blocks progress, rather than hiding issues until a last-minute scramble. Another trust-builder? Ownership without nitpicking. If you assign someone a deliverable, give them full license to get it done their way (within reason). Resist the urge to rewrite their email copy or 'suggest' a different font on the presentation. It may seem small, but those little interventions send the message: 'I don't trust your judgment.' And if you must check in, swap out 'Did you finish that yet?' for something like 'How's it going on your end?' One prompts anxiety. The other opens the door for dialogue. Big difference. Micromanagement isn't always loud. Sometimes it whispers through excessive oversight, unnecessary meetings, or hovering phrasing that erodes trust. The fix? Less managing. More leading. Let people surprise you. They usually do. Allow Team Members to Own Their Work One subtle sign of micromanagement I've observed (and caught myself doing early in my career) is when a leader consistently feels the need to 'reword' or 'tweak' their team's work before it's released. While it might seem harmless or like you're simply helping to polish things, over time, it sends the message that their work isn't quite 'good enough' without your final touch. This erodes confidence and slows down decision-making. The shift? Begin by asking yourself, 'Is this feedback about improving clarity, or about making it sound like me?' If it's the latter, let it go. Encourage ownership by allowing team members to sign off on their own work. Autonomy isn't just about delegating tasks—it's about trusting outcomes, even when they don't exactly match how you would have done them. This builds more confidence than any rephrased headline ever could. Communicate Expectations Early to Avoid Panic The problem with micromanagement is how quickly it cascades through an organization, and sometimes that cascade kicks off with simple questions from the 'boss' that come a little too late. I learned this the hard way. For 20 years, I was an executive inside a multibillion-dollar company. I sat between the CEO and my 200-person team. One day, I was in a meeting, and my boss asked about a project my team had been working on for several months. I didn't have all the answers to his questions, so when I left the meeting, I called the director and asked for an update. No big deal. Well, it turned into a big deal. I learned that when you ask a question too close to rollout, it can cause a team to panic. The questions I was asking revealed gaps in the plan and frustrated the team. They felt micromanaged, which was not my intent. I simply needed an update. So, how do you solve this? Both sides need to meet in the middle and agree on a process that allows for more proactive communication. The team wants respect and autonomy, and the leader wants alignment and information. I should have communicated the company's requirements more effectively and outlined the key areas that needed to be considered, so that the team could incorporate them into the plan. The team should have proactively and consistently communicated the project status and given me a chance to weigh in, not because I knew better, but because I might have had a perspective that could help improve the result. As leaders, we need to stop waiting until the 11th hour to set expectations and ask questions because this can be perceived as micromanagement. As employees, we need to proactively share our progress so that when we get feedback, it's not difficult to incorporate. The more we communicate, collaborate, and align early on, the less leaders will feel frustrated, the less teams will feel micromanaged, and the higher the likelihood we will build a solution that makes everyone proud. Pam Nemec, CEO, Pam Nemec Consulting Inc. Address Underlying Fears Driving Control A subtle sign of unintentional micromanagement is when leaders repeatedly ask for unnecessary status updates while claiming they're 'just checking in.' This often stems from unacknowledged anxiety or a silent heartache around control that the leader hasn't recognized within themselves. This pattern reveals a misalignment between what the leader says they value (trust and autonomy) and how they behave (constant monitoring). The heart and mind are operating on different frequencies. To shift this pattern, leaders should first connect with their own heart intelligence, examining what fears or past experiences might be driving their need for control. Are they projecting their own perfectionism? Is there a deeper insecurity about their leadership capabilities? This approach involves establishing clear objectives while deliberately creating space for team creativity. Practice heart-centered check-ins that focus on supporting team members' growth rather than monitoring their activities. When you find yourself wanting to intervene, pause and ask: 'Am I responding to a genuine need, or am I acting from my own unexamined anxiety?' True leadership presence emerges when we lead from trust rather than fear, allowing both the leader and team to align purpose with action. To do so creates cultures of psychological safety, where talent naturally thrives. Hema Vyas, Psychologist Take Responsibility for Poor Outcomes Micromanagement is not always loud or obvious. Sometimes, it hides in leadership behaviors that appear decisive on the surface but quietly erode trust underneath. One of the most damaging forms is when a leader refuses to take responsibility for poor outcomes and shifts blame onto the team. Many leaders are micromanagers without realizing it. Micromanagement is not just about controlling tasks. It is also about controlling outcomes, perception, and accountability, often to protect the leader's ego or reputation. I have seen this unfold when a team follows direct instructions, only to be blamed when results fall short. In extreme cases, entire teams are let go to protect the leader's image. This is not accountability. It is misdirection. This kind of leadership creates a culture of fear. It discourages initiative, silences feedback, and stifles innovation. People become hesitant to lead, question, or take risks, because they know they will be held responsible for outcomes they could not influence. The shift starts when leaders ask different questions. Not 'Who is at fault?' but 'What did I over-control, under-communicate, or fail to clarify?' True accountability requires reflection, not retribution. So while this may look like a blame game or a leadership failure on the surface, at its core, it is a deeply embedded form of micromanagement. The leader controls without accountability. That is what makes it so damaging, and so hard to detect early. Great leadership is not about being right. It is about being responsible. When leaders take ownership of both direction and outcome, they build a foundation of trust. And when trust exists, people step up. They take initiative. They learn from failure. They grow. Accountability is not about blame. It is about integrity. And it begins at the top. Florence Idowu, Chief Talent Strategist, Bavarde Consulting & Management Trust Your Team to Innovate and Grow We've all worked for 'that boss'—the one who needs to control every decision, approve every move, and rewrite every email. While it might come from a place of good intentions, micromanagement is one of the fastest ways to drain the life from a team. In my experience, this kind of behavior usually stems from insecurity or inexperience. The leader either doesn't trust their team, or they don't trust themselves. Regardless of the root cause, the outcome is always the same: creativity gets crushed, motivation disappears, and innovation grinds to a halt. By controlling every detail, they rob their teams of the chance to rise, to learn, to lead. True leadership requires something much harder than control. It demands trust, humility, and patience. Having dealt with my fair share of micromanagers, I vowed to do things differently when I became a leader. I recognized the importance of giving my team the freedom to perform. My role was not to impose my way of doing things but to ensure a creative space where people could thrive. Even if my approach was more efficient due to years of experience, it didn't mean it was the best or only way to get the job done. As I progressed in my career, I sometimes fell into the trap of steering others toward my preferred method. It took time to realize that I was stifling their ability to innovate by insisting on my way. They were being paid to be creative and resourceful, yet I was unknowingly molding them into replicas of myself. When I allowed my team members to experiment and learn through trial and error, they often came up with solutions far superior to mine. The act of letting go and trusting my team was not only liberating for them but also transformative for me as a leader. Gina Osborn, Leadership Advisor, Podcast Host & Keynote Speaker, Gina L. Osborn & Associates Let Go of Control to Foster Team Development I used to have to approve every single marketing video before it went out. It didn't matter if it was a 15-second teaser or a full brand story. I'd watch it, rewatch it, and give it the green light before it hit the client's inbox. I thought my eyes needed to be on everything. I thought that was what a good leader did—protect the brand, avoid mistakes, keep clients happy. Then one day, my mentor called me out. He asked, 'Why do you have to approve them all?' I said, 'Because if my team misses something and the client gets mad, that's on me.' He looked at me and said, 'Have you ever missed something before?' I paused. 'Yeah, I have.' 'Okay, so let them. That's how they learn.' That moment hit me. I realized I was micromanaging. Not in the obvious way, but in a quiet, constant-control way. I thought I was being responsible. But I was actually getting in the way of my team growing. So I let go. Not overnight, but slowly. I started handing off approvals. I trusted my team to catch errors and deliver great work. And you know what? They stepped up. They caught things I might've missed. They got faster, more confident, and more invested. We still mess up sometimes. And that's okay. We fix it. We move on. And we grow from it. Letting go wasn't easy. But it's one of the best things I've ever done as a leader. Trust builds teams. Control holds them back. Build Strong Relationships to Prevent Micromanagement I believe there are two potential situations when this kind of micromanagement occurs: 1. A manager (often new or junior) focuses on prescribing and monitoring 'how' things are done instead of clearly articulating desired outcomes and then either providing guidance and assistance or simply getting out of the way of the employee. Why does the manager do this? Likely because they've been conditioned to do so (often a sign of insufficient leadership development). My advice to the manager in this situation is to be curious and ask lots of questions (and resist the temptation to offer advice). Questions along the lines of: 'What is your approach to this problem?' and 'What does success look like for you?' or 'How best can I support you on this problem/project?' 2. An employee who feels like their manager doesn't trust them. Even if the manager isn't micromanaging the employee, it might feel like it. Since humans judge themselves by their intentions while judging others by their actions, I suggest a conversation about personal values and beliefs as a starting point to developing the trust that begins through vulnerability but is also nuanced into four categories: Ability, Believability, Competence, and Dependability.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
In his 20s, the boss of this 4,100-employee Fortune 500 company tried to refuse a promotion to CEO—his advice to new grads is stay ‘humble'
EXCLUSIVE: Tony Cheng rose up the corporate ladder at Reinsurance Group of America by embracing challenging roles early and credits his steady, decades-long career growth to continual learning, humility, and a willingness to take on responsibility. His leadership helped expand RGA's presence in Asia and beyond, encouraging individuals looking to lead companies to always be open to continued growth. It's rare to be offered a big promotion and turn it down, but it's even rarer to warn superiors you don't feel prepared for the role and be appointed anyway. Yet that's precisely what happened to Reinsurance Group of America boss, Tony Cheng, in his early years with the business. Cheng has worked his way up the ranks of RGA over the past three decades, helping grow the company to its current position of $3.9 trillion of reinsurance covering active policyholders. In 2025, RGA announced a landmark $1.5 billion deal with Equitable to reinsure $32 billion worth of life insurance policies, securing its place as an industry leader and expected to boost earnings for quarters come. Sitting down for an exclusive interview with Fortune this summer, Cheng reflected on that all-important promotion to CEO, and the value of staying humble even in the C-suite. The following has been condensed and edited for clarity. Tony, in an era where job-hopping is often seen as the fast track to career growth, you've chosen a different tactic—working up through RGA since 1997. Where did your work ethic come from, and what's inspired your long-standing commitment to the company? I was born in Hong Kong, and my parents—both teachers—felt for the future of their four kids (of which I was the youngest) Australia would provide the Western education they wanted. So I grew up in Australia from nine months to the age of 20 and didn't travel overseas much. My parents worked incredibly hard. Mom looked after the four kids and Dad unfortunately had to give up his love for teaching because it just wouldn't pay the bills. Eventually they opened up small businesses and then we, the four kids, on the weekend would go work there—12 hour days—and didn't think otherwise. That really bred in the sacrifice of the parents, the hard work, all things I'd wish to pass onto my kids. Growing up as many of us in a Western country but very Asian family do, I think I went to Asia once in my life, so [I took] an opportunity to join RGA in 1997 in Malaysia. Between 1999 and 2002 you returned to the States to earn an MBA while working for RGA, before leaving to head up the Hong Kong office. When you arrived, you had a team of 10. The Asia Pacific region now has more than 1,000 employees and revenues of $4 billion. Are there untapped career opportunities in emerging markets as opposed to progressing in established regions? We had a very small operation, but we were actually covering about 500 million people. It was Hong Kong and Southeast Asia so Malaysia, Thailand, all those countries. I went there as the actuary, and a year and a half later they promoted me to be the CEO of that business. It was daunting, right? The first time I was asked to take it by my boss, I sort of said, 'No, I'm too young.' At the time I was 29. He ignored that. The equation in my mind was I've probably got a 10% chance of success—and that would be great—or a 90% chance of failure, but hey, I'm gonna learn a hell of a lot. I had no mortgage, no kids, so just wanted to learn. Maybe that instinct, that desire and drive to keep learning was from my parents being teachers. In its latest financial results RGA reported revenues of $22.1 billion. How has the start-up mentality you learned in Asia helped grow the business globally? We built that business up with incredible hard work. I'd joke internally that once every month or so pest control would come in, and that meant we could go home at 5 o'clock because what else were we going to do with ourselves? That was the spirit. In the early days, you solve problems. I'd say to the team: 'Let's just try. We know it's really hard, but let's just try.' In the U.S., people usually don't create new products or create new things because the market's so big, a lot of it's already played out and it's been created. Any good idea has been thought of, and that's truly okay. It's actually more connecting the dots in the U.S., but with a drive to not just settle on: 'Hey, here's the market, we want a share of it' it's a drive to create new things or a new combination of things so that we [can] increase the pie and share in that greater value creation. That's always been in the company spirit, it was just really about bringing that out again to the forefront. Like a lot of other Fortune 500 CEOs we speak to, you clearly have a love for learning. In a world where AI is expected to disrupt the labor market, what are the skills you're looking for in new talent? I can only think of what I advise my son, who's in his second year of college. As the younger generation already knows, AI is gonna accelerate, and therefore number one they've absolutely got to be able to use it and partner with it. Ultimately AI, one would think, is gonna replace whatever is mathematically easier to replace. Had a conversation at one of the town halls with some risk professionals in the U.S. last week and I said all those soft skills really matter, you've still got to learn the hard skills, you've got to understand your subject matter expertise regardless of technology, but increasingly all those abilities to interact, to communicate, to join the dots, to be able to understand information, communicate it, and just put those dots together is the stuff that's gonna be obviously harder for AI to replicate. Maybe it will one day, but then you've just got to keep elevating yourself. So, what is that a lesson of? It is a lesson of continually adapting, continually learning, a bit like a sports person. When they've lost their passion to play and fight, it's time to retire. For me, when I've lost that passion to learn and grow, you're probably not gonna give it your full go, hence maybe the learning really just keeps me going. It's not like I ever said, 'Hey, I want to be the CEO of the company.' I was so far away, I just wanted to be treated right and enjoy the journey and the growth, So the lesson to individuals is you've just got to keep learning, you've got to be humble. If you're not humble, you're not gonna listen to yourself or your failings, you're gonna blame them on something else as opposed to, 'Well, what was my role in that?' so I can learn. This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data