logo
Jeffrey Sachs and David Sacks take it to the ‘warmongers' and Zelensky

Jeffrey Sachs and David Sacks take it to the ‘warmongers' and Zelensky

The Hill08-03-2025
Even though their last names are pronounced the same, Jeffrey Sachs and David Sacks are not related. What does unite them is their revulsion over the senseless slaughter in Ukraine.
There is a good chance that you have not read or heard about the horrific casualty numbers emanating from the war in Ukraine, because many media sites — and almost all the elites pushing to 'fight to the last Ukrainian' — tend to ignore them or sweep them under the rug. After all, what's a million or more human beings killed or wounded when you are seeking to use the people of Ukraine as cheap, disposable pawns in a proxy war against Putin and Russia?
And just who believes the conflict between Russia and Ukraine to be a 'proxy war?' None other than Secretary of State Marco Rubio. In an interview on Wednesday, Rubio directly stated what so many have assumed for the last three years: 'It's been very clear from the beginning that [President Trump] views this as a protracted, stalemated conflict. And frankly, it's a proxy war between nuclear powers — the United States, helping Ukraine, and Russia — and it needs to come to an end.'
Many believe the war could have 'come to an end' soon after it started. One who does is Jeffrey Sachs.
At the end of last month, the Columbia professor and former advisor to three U.N. Secretaries-General — delivered to the European Parliament an address on the horrors and the futility of war in general, and especially in Ukraine, titled ' The Geopolitics of Peace.'
Sachs makes many critically important points about Ukraine — the folly of NATO expansion; the 2014 overthrow of Ukraine's president; the continual mistakes and provocations made by the Obama and Biden administrations; and his hour-long plea with Biden National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan to avoid war by publicly declaring that 'NATO will not enlarge to Ukraine.'
According to Sachs, although Sullivan answered they 'could not say that publicly,' he assured Sachs there 'will be no war.'
To that, Sachs stressed during his remarks to the EU Parliament: 'These are not very bright people. I'm telling you, if I can give you my honest view, they're not very bright people. They talk to themselves. They don't talk to anybody else. They play game theory.'
One person who agrees with Sachs on much of this is David Sacks, a billionaire entrepreneur who is now the White House AI and crypto czar. Sacks has been one of the most powerful and consistent voices screaming out for both an end to the war in Ukraine and for full accountability.
During an interview with Jesse Watters on Fox News, Sacks said, 'I think that Zelensky has powerful motivations not to make peace … He basically says the war needs to go on forever. And I think there's good reasons for that in his mind. Number one, if the war is over, he loses power, right? … And he'll be vulnerable to political retaliation from his political opponents. He needs this war to justify his rules. So I think that's number one is, if he gives up power, his own safety is at risk. Number two is the gravy train here. I mean, we've been sending hundreds of billions of dollars over to Ukraine. And these Ukrainian elites there, these oligarchs have been feasting on that money. And Zelensky is at the top of that pyramid. And that whole grift ends if the war ends.'
Many might find Sacks's words shocking, but many others believe they should have been spoken months or even years ago. Perhaps the reason they have not is that most of the media and the elites immediately signed up with 'Team Ukraine.'
Once they did, seemingly most negative stories about Ukraine — reports of more than 1 million killed or wounded; the offer of a very early ceasefire; off-shore bank accounts; connections to organized crime; and full accountability of the billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars being spent on the country; or the exponentially increasing chances of triggering World War III — were off the table and not to be investigated. Why?
Going back to the remarks from Jeffrey Sachs, we might have an answer. Said Sachs, 'I used to be a member of the Democratic Party. I now am a member of no party because both are the same anyway. The Democrats became complete warmongers over time.'
Is the Democratic Party now the 'warmonger' party? One that believes in and instigates 'forever wars' for their own interests? Be those interests a proxy war; an unhinged hatred of Trump which then welds Trump to Putin; helping various defense contractors or international organizations enrich themselves via the slaughter of young Ukrainians and Russians; or simply a giant board game played by wealthy elites thousands of miles from the battlefields.
No matter the answers, 1 million men, women and children have been killed or wounded for absolutely nothing. Jeffrey Sachs and David Sacks have just called out that obscenity in very public ways. They should be applauded.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

At least 34 killed in attack on east Congo church by Islamic State-backed rebels, civil leader says
At least 34 killed in attack on east Congo church by Islamic State-backed rebels, civil leader says

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

At least 34 killed in attack on east Congo church by Islamic State-backed rebels, civil leader says

GOMA, Congo — The death toll from an attack on a Catholic church in eastern Congo by Islamic State-backed rebels has risen to 34, according to a civil society leader. "The bodies of the victims are still at the scene of the tragedy, and volunteers are preparing how to bury them in a mass grave that we are preparing in a compound of the Catholic church," Dieudonne Duranthabo, a civil society coordinator in Komanda, in the Ituri province, told The Associated Press. At least five other people were killed in an earlier attack on the nearby village of Machongani, from where a search is ongoing. "They took several people into the bush; we do not know their destination or their number," Lossa Dhekana, a civil society leader in Ituri, told the AP Both attacks are believed to have been carried out by members of the Allied Democratic Force (ADF) armed with guns and machetes. The military has confirmed at least 10 fatalities, while local media reports put the total death toll at more than 40. Duranthabo said attackers stormed the church in Komanda town at around 1 a.m. Several houses and shops were also burnt. Lt. Jules Ngongo, a Congolese army spokesperson in Ituri province, confirmed 10 killed in the church attack. Video footage from the scene shared online appeared to show burning structures and bodies on the floor of the church. Those who were able to identify some of the victims wailed while others stood in shock. A U.N.-backed radio station said 43 people were killed, citing security sources. It said the attackers came from a stronghold around 7 miles from the center of Komanda and fled before security forces could arrive. Duranthabo condemned the attack "in a town where all the security officials are present." He added: "We demand military intervention as soon as possible, since we are told the enemy is still near our town." Eastern Congo has suffered deadly attacks in recent years by armed groups, including the ADF and Rwanda-backed rebels. The ADF, which has ties to the Islamic State, operates in the borderland between Uganda and Congo and often targets civilians. The group killed dozens of people in Ituri earlier this month in what a United Nations spokesperson described as a bloodbath. The ADF was formed by disparate small groups in Uganda in the late 1990s following alleged discontent with President Yoweri Museveni. In 2002, following military assaults by Ugandan forces, the group moved its activities to neighboring Congo and has since been responsible for the killings of thousands of civilians. In 2019, it pledged allegiance to the Islamic State. The Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC), which has long struggled against the rebel group, has been facing attacks since the renewed hostilities between the Rwanda-backed M23.

How the Hunter Biden cover-up continues to this day
How the Hunter Biden cover-up continues to this day

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

How the Hunter Biden cover-up continues to this day

In the same week that Hunter Biden burst back onto the public stage to play the victim and lash out at Democrats, we also heard from his one time protector turned reluctant nemesis, Special Counsel David Weiss, with similarly self serving and disingenuous testimony to Congress. Weiss, the former US Attorney in the Bidens' home state of Delaware who presided over the troubled five year investigation into the former First Son, told the House Judiciary Committee that there just wasn't enough evidence to justify charging Hunter under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). His investigators 'couldn't put together a sufficient case,' he said in June testimony released last week. Advertisement That's pretty rich, considering that those very IRS investigators complained bitterly about the obstruction and slow walking they faced on Weiss' watch every time they pursued an investigative trail that led to Joe Biden and the lucrative foreign lobbying Hunter did in his father's name. That's why IRS Supervisory Special Agent Gary Shapley and Special Agent Joseph Ziegler blew up their successful careers and became whistleblowers. Hunter's business model during his father's vice presidency and beyond revolved around foreign lobbying — including for the corrupt Ukrainian energy company Burisma that was paying him a million dollars a year, Chinese government-linked firms BHR and CEFC, and an oligarch client in Romania. Advertisement In fact, the very first email this newspaper published from Hunter's infamous laptop was from a Burisma executive, thanking him for arranging a meeting with his father the previous night. It wasn't just any old meeting, either. Hunter had invited VP Biden to a private dinner at Georgetown restaurant Cafe Milano in April 2015 to meet his partners from Ukraine, Russia and Kazakhstan, as his former 'best friend in business' Devon Archer told Congress. In their upcoming tell-all book, 'The Whistleblowers v the Big Guy,' Shapley and Ziegler point out that, along with that Burisma bombshell, emails and communications they recovered from the laptop showed that Hunter's relationship with DC lobbying shop Blue Star Strategies was tied to his position on the Burisma board and that the firm had been hired 'to influence U.S. government officials on Burisma's behalf.' Advertisement 'These connections raised red flags about potential violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act FARA and any comprehensive warrant would naturally include references to individuals who may have been involved, even tangentially.' And so, when their team drafted a search warrant related to potential FARA violation, Weiss' top U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf ordered them to remove all references to 'Political Figure 1,' the DOJ pseudonym for Joe Biden. 'Please focus on FARA evidence only. There should be nothing about Political Figure 1 in here,' Wolf wrote in an August 2020 email, according to their whistleblower testimony to Congress. Advertisement Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Whenever their investigations might lead to Joe Biden they found subpoenas were denied, interviews were canceled or not allowed, and Hunter's lawyers were tipped off before search warrants could be executed. Prosecutors cited bad 'optics' or questioned whether the 'juice was worth the squeeze' For instance, Shapley testified that Wolf refused to approve a search warrant for a guest house Hunter had been staying in on Joe's palatial Delaware estate as part of FARA-related evidence collection. When they discovered incriminating WhatsApp messages Hunter wrote to a business partner at Chinese energy company CEFC on July 30, 2017, citing his father, the investigators were blocked from using phone location data to confirm that Joe really was in the room. 'I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled,' Hunter wrote, demanding $10 million. 'I am very concerned that the Chairman has either changed his mind and broken our deal without telling me or that he is unaware of the promises and assurances that have been made have not been kept.' Advertisement Hunter also threatened that his father would retaliate if the Chinese did not do as he commanded: 'I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction.' Here was Hunter explicitly claiming his father was involved in his business negotiations. Apart from the fact that Joe claimed that he knew nothing about his son's overseas business dealings, Shapley and Ziegler decided there were serious tax implications to the conversation, but they were blocked from pursuing them. They weren't even allowed to find out if Hunter had sent the message from Joe's house. 'The message was clear,' Shapley and Ziegler write in 'The Whistleblowers v. the Big Guy.' 'Although we were investigating Joe Biden's son — who, it seemed, had often involved his father in his shady overseas business dealings — none of our materials were supposed to mention Joe Biden. Advertisement 'Even when we needed material that might be in one of Joe Biden's homes or storage units, we couldn't mention him. The document might leak to the press, and that would make the Biden campaign look bad. 'And in the summer of 2020, there was nothing that the leadership of the FBI wanted less than to make Joe Biden look bad. Doing so might help elect Donald Trump for a second time.' How different was the way the FBI handled Donald Trump compared to Joe Biden. Whether it was the fake Steele Dossier the FBI treated as if it were legitimate evidence, or the raid on Mar a Lago, there was no concern about the 'optics' of investigating a sitting president or presidential candidate when it was Trump. Advertisement As for FARA, the once little-used law against lobbying the US on behalf of foreign interests has been selectively used to target Trump allies and Democrat enemies. For example, Paul Manafort, former chairman of Trump's 2016 campaign, was charged with FARA. So, too, was Gal Luft, the original Hunter Biden whistleblower, who told FBI and DOJ officials in a March 2019 secret meeting in Brussels that Hunter and his uncle Jim Biden were on the payroll of the Chinese. His accurate information was buried and then, one week before Republicans took back the House in 2022, Luft was charged with FARA and other violations. He is currently languishing in jail in Cyprus while Hunter escaped scot free. Advertisement In the last days of his presidency, Joe issued a uniquely tailored pardon for his son, stretching back 11 years and covering Hunter's conviction on gun charges and guilty plea on felony tax evasion charges that Weiss was forced to press after the sweetheart plea deal he'd stitched together with Hunter's lawyers fell apart in the wake of Shapley and Ziegler's revelations. In the end, Weiss forced the IRS to remove Shapley and Ziegler from the investigation as soon as he suspected Shapley had blown the whistle. The Office of Special Counsel last year determined that the IRS had illegally retaliated against the pair by removing them from the investigation after they made protected disclosures to Congress about DOJ interference in the probe. All the obstruction and interference and slow walking past statutes of limitation happened under the benign leadership of David Weiss. So spare us his mealy mouthed justifications for squibbing what should have been the most consequential political corruption investigation in history.

Donald Trump Trashed in Scotland's Biggest Newspaper: 'Menace'
Donald Trump Trashed in Scotland's Biggest Newspaper: 'Menace'

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Trashed in Scotland's Biggest Newspaper: 'Menace'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's visit to Scotland has drawn intense criticism from Scotland's largest newspaper, The Daily Record, which called him a "menace" in an editorial while also urging U.K. leaders to pursue pragmatic engagement for the sake of long-term relations. Newsweek contacted Trump's team for a response to the report via email. Why It Matters The comments come after Scottish police have told Newsweek a "significant" operation was being planned in expectation of protests against Trump during his time in Scotland, where he will visit his newest golf course. In 2018, thousands of protesters gathered when Trump visited his Scottish golf courses during his first term. President Donald Trump reacts as he plays a round of golf at Trump Turnberry golf course on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. President Donald Trump reacts as he plays a round of golf at Trump Turnberry golf course on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. Getty Images What To Know On the eve of Trump's five-day trip to Scotland, The Daily Record published a strong editorial criticizing his actions. The newspaper described Trump as a "menace who has caused chaos at home and abroad," referencing his refusal to accept defeat in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, perceived support for protesters involved in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and his public statements regarding foreign leaders including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The editorial also said that Trump's status as a "convicted felon" was contributing to Scottish protesters' outrage. Despite these criticisms, the paper urged leaders such as U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Scotland's First Minister John Swinney to maintain engagement with Trump for economic and diplomatic reasons, citing decades-long U.S.-UK security ties and potential leverage on international issues such as tariffs and foreign conflicts. What People Are Saying Sarah Malone, executive vice president of Trump International, said in a press release sent to Newsweek: "The Trump family has a deep affection for Scotland, not only as the home of golf, but as the ancestral home of President Trump's beloved mother, Mary Anne MacLeod. We are therefore delighted to confirm that we are planning the creation of a memorial garden in honor of Mary Anne MacLeod as a fitting tribute to her name and legacy." Born on the Isle of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides, MacLeod moved to the U.S. in 1930 and became a naturalized citizen in March 1942. What Happens Next Trump's visit is expected to draw protests throughout Scotland, as noted by The Daily Record. U.K. and Scottish leaders face the challenge of balancing domestic opposition to Trump's policies and character with the need to maintain and potentially strengthen critical U.S.-UK relationships.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store