Ryanair cutting flights from major EU airport as 'sky-high charges' blamed
Ryanair will no longer be flying to a popular airport in the EU as aviation levies continue to rise in Europe.
They announced they will be axing all routes from Maastricht Airport in the Netherlands. The budget carrier's latest shake-up will take effect from October 26, cutting off all Ryanair-operated routes from the Dutch airport, including popular services to Alicante, Bari, Girona, Porto, and Zadar.
The decision is expected to eliminate 150,000 annual seats and remove five direct European connections. The move comes as part of Ryanair's ongoing battle against rising aviation levies across the continent.
The airline blamed Maastricht's growing operational costs and the Netherlands' eco-tax, introduced in 2021 and now reportedly costing up to €30 per passenger, as key factors in its decision. Ryanair's Chief Commercial Officer Jason McGuinness voiced disappointment over the exit, blaming Maastricht for failing to recover post-pandemic and accusing the airport of "pricing itself out of the market."
(Image: Getty Images)
"Ryanair continues to grow traffic across Europe by offering unbeatable low fares at airports with low access costs," Mr McGuinness said. "Maastricht's sky-high charges have irreparably damaged its connectivity. The airport has only recovered 50% of its pre-Covid traffic in 2024, a figure that will fall further now."
The Netherlands isn't alone in facing Ryanair's ire. Earlier this year, the airline slashed its summer schedule in Spain by 18%, cutting 12 routes and removing 800,000 seats, citing unfavourable fee increases. It also pulled out of Aalborg, Denmark, in protest of a newly imposed 50 DKK departure fee.
Maastricht Airport has yet to respond to Ryanair's decision.
Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
9 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Dulux Paints takes court action over Cork site
The site, which straddles the River Bride near the Commons Road in Blackpool on the northside of the city, had been used to manufacture paint for 140 years before Dulux closed it down at the end of last year. Dulux Ireland has now filed in the High Court a special summons, which is normally a fast-track procedure that can be used to resolve questions around deeds or the administration of trusts. Simon Colvan, head of communications UK and Ireland, for Akzonobel — the Dutch company that owns the Dulux paint brand — said in response to queries that the action was 'a relatively routine administrative process'. 'The case relates to our site in Cork and aims to resolve a historical ownership issue around part of the site. We're taking the necessary legal steps to ensure property records are accurate and up to date,' he said. Colvan did not respond when asked whether the legal move was necessary as part of a potential plan to sell the site by the firm. In May last year, Dulux announced it was shutting the paint manufacturing business on the Commons Road with the loss of 45 jobs. Most manufacturing of Dulux paint was moved to existing UK facilities. The news was a blow to the area and there were calls at the time for the site to be redeveloped. Reports at the time said although more than €2m was invested in an upgrade of the plant in 2010, that modernisation was needed and a new facility would have been required to retain production at the site. In 2019 the firm pleaded guilty after it was prosecuted by the Environmental Protection Agency for a breach of its Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Licence. A spokesman said 'the department has not received any papers in relation to any case involving Dulux Ireland. As such we cannot offer any comment.'
Irish Independent
9 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Warning Dublin Airport passenger cap could unleash ‘reciprocal' Trump transatlantic aviation restrictions
Warning Dublin Airport passenger cap could unleash 'reciprocal' Trump transatlantic aviation restrictions US Transportation chief Sean Duffy said administration was 'monitoring' EU countries that introduce 'unjustified operational limits' A DAA spokesman said: 'The US is right to be concerned. This cap is outdated, unworkable, and is increasingly seen as a trade barrier.' Pictured, US Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy. Photo: via Getty Images Fearghal O'Connor Today at 06:30 Ireland could be hit with transatlantic aviation restrictions by the Trump administration because of the cap at Dublin Airport after US transportation secretary Sean Duffy issued a stark warning to European airports.
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Trump claims victory on trade - but EU had little choice
In many respects US President Donald Trump achieved his aims by introducing a swath of tariffs with America's main trading partners around the world. The European Union has a population of 448 million compared to the US which has 340 million. However, the US economy is larger. Many have been surprised at the way Donald Trump has appeared to be able to dictate terms to Europe. His announcement yesterday that he would commence the new tariff arrangements from 7 August appeared to be his decision with little input from the EU. President of the European Commission Ursula Von Der Leyen has defended the deal, which will see tariffs of 15% imposed on EU goods. There are two reasons why the EU did not want a full blown trade war with Mr Trump. Firstly, European businesses were opposed to a prolonged period of tit-for-tat tariffs with enormously damaging consequences. Secondly, if relations with Mr Trump soured, he could threaten to row back on defence commitments. The EU is highly reliant on the US for arm supplies, funding for NATO and military support for Ukraine. But looking at scale of tariffs imposed on other countries the EU's 15% does not seem too damaging compared to India's 25%, Canada's 35% and Switzerland's 39%. Most of the US' main trading partners have rates of 15% or 20%. The exception is the UK's 10% tariff. However, this is not an all-inclusive rate. In other words, other rates can be added to it. Nor does Britain have a written agreement capping pharmaceutical tariffs unlike the EU. It is worth bearing in mind that while tariffs on European goods go up, Mr Trump stated the EU would be "opening up their countries at zero tariffs" for US exports. Unanswered questions From the Irish point of view there are still many unanswered questions. There is no agreement on alcohol exports to the US. That sector was expected to be covered by a zero-for-zero tariff arrangement but that has not yet been confirmed. This is critical for Ireland's whiskey industry and the EU's wine exports. It seems clear that pharmaceuticals and computer chips will face tariffs of up to 15%, but the timing is still uncertain. Both are subject of so-called Section 232 investigations because Mr Trump believes the US' use of imports is a national security issue. Tánaiste Simon Harris said the tariffs for sectors under investigation will not become clear until those processes are concluded. For pharmaceuticals that is expected to happen in two weeks. But the fact that the EU-US agreement won't exceed 15% does provide some clarity for the industry. Bank of Ireland pointed out that drugs are relatively inelastic, which means if prices go up people still buy them because they are prescribed by doctors. The new swath of tariffs come at a time when the dollar has been weakening and making EU exports to the US more expensive at the worst possible time. Then there is the question of what this all means for the Irish economy. In March, the Department of Finance and the Economic Social Research Institute published research on the impact of tariffs on the Irish economy. It looks at a range of scenarios from tariffs of 10% to 25%. Based on that analysis, officials at the Department of Finance told business leaders yesterday that the economy would continue to expand, but at a slower pace than previously expected. Employment will grow but at a slower rate. The Government will now have to decide how all this will impact the Budget in October. But while Mr Trump may believe he has achieved his aims on tariffs, in the long run his actions carry the risk of higher inflation in the US and undermining the American economy.
