University of Edinburgh publishes Race Review into colonialist past
Nearly 50 recommendations were made following a subsequent policy report and the work was overseen by Scotland's first black professor, Professor Sir Geoff Palmer, who had seen a draft of the review and contributed to feedback before he died in June.
The report, Decolonised Transformations: Confronting the University of Edinburgh's History and Legacies of Enslavement and Colonialism, has been published online, amid a public pledge to address racial discrimination and inequality.
Archival research examined how the 'legacies of wealth' amassed from slavery and colonialism in the 17th and 18th centuries can be traced to contemporary endowments and capital campaigns, and how leading thinkers of the Scottish Enlightenment, who were also prominent University figures in the 18th Century, promoted theories of racial inferiority and white supremacism used to justify colonialism.
Last year, the University funded further research into its historical links with Arthur Balfour, who played a key role in the creation of Israel and was a former Chancellor of the university as well as Prime Minister and Conservative politician.
Sir Peter said: 'Only by fully engaging with and understanding the entirety of our institutional past can we truly learn and move forward. We are unwavering in our commitment to a future where racism, racial discrimination, and racialised inequalities have no place in higher education or society.
'We cannot have a selective memory about our past, focusing only on the historical achievements which make us feel proud.'
He paid tribute to Sir Geoff Palmour and said the work would 'honour his memory through our ongoing commitment to advancing race equality within our institution and in society more broadly' amid data showing under-representation of racially and ethnically minoritised staff and students, disparities in degree awarding and challenges in seeking support for racism.
Among recommendations in the report was the creation of a Naming Approval Committee to manage requests for naming or renaming University buildings in a bid to consider how it acknowledges its historic links to racism and colonialism on campus.
A response group identified actions as part of 'reparative justice', including continued research into racial injustice, strengthening connections with minoritised communities, boosting scholarships, as well as reinforcing anti-racist educational programmes, after the findings.
The university pledged to achieve 'meaningful change' and transparency, and to 'learn from and repair its past'.
Professor Tommy Curry, co-chairman of the Race Review's research and engagement working group, said: 'This review demonstrates a level of self-reflection that very few institutions have had the courage to embark on.
'We have fundamentally changed what we understood as the Scottish Enlightenment. We have shown that the study of racial difference had a major home here, and that there are legacies of discrimination that we still have to correct today.
'We hope our findings will enable the University to emerge as a better version of itself. This sets a standard for other institutions to not only reconsider their historical perspectives and legacies, but also their institutional culture.'
Dr Nicola Frith, co-chairwoman of the Race Review's research and engagement working group, said: 'We've placed a huge amount of effort into joining the dots between the past and present to uncover the impact on our students, staff and community from racially and ethnically minoritised communities.
'Now it can be in the business of producing decolonised and reparatory forms of knowledge that genuinely embrace and include those communities it has harmed in the way that it thinks, acts and is structured.'
Fiona McClement, co-leader of the Race Review response group, said: 'The University exists to produce and disseminate knowledge for the betterment of society.
'Now we need to look at what this means for our future, and how we can move forward within a framework of reparative justice principles.
'Our aspiration is to be an anti-racist organisation. We want to ensure that are a welcoming and nurturing environment in which all members of our community feel a sense of belonging, and can flourish and succeed without facing unjust racialised barriers'
Chris Cox, vice principal of philanthropy and advancement at the University of Edinburgh and chairman of the Race Review's policy report, said: 'Universities are all about opening up difficult conversations such as those raised by our Race Review.
'Our response isn't based on closing down these discussions, but on beginning new and important ones.
'In addressing our legacy, we have the chance to plan for a better future and celebrate the full diversity of our community.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
Sue Gray appointed to governing body of Queen's University
Sir Keir Starmer's former chief of staff Sue Gray has been appointed to the governing body of Queen's University Gray quit as the prime minister's chief of staff in October 2024 after rows over her pay and has now been named as one of four new members of the senate at Queen's University of Belfast (QUB), a role that comes without a senate is the university's governing body, responsible for the oversight of strategy, finances and performance. Ms Gray has been appointed a pro-chancellor at QUB, so will attend ceremonies like graduations to becoming the prime minister's chief of staff, Ms Gray had worked in government in Northern was once described as "the most powerful civil servant you've never heard of" when she had a job in the Cabinet Office. Ms Gray was also the so-called Partygate critical report into lockdown gatherings in Downing Street contributed to the resignation of Boris Johnson as prime Conservative MPs expressed anger when Ms Gray subsequently took up a high-profile role with the Labour Party in after resigning as the prime minister's chief of staff, Ms Gray subsequently decided not to become the government's envoy to the nations and was appointed to the House of Lords at the end of leaving Downing Street she has also chaired the board of a business and investment consultancy, and has now been announced as one of four new members of the QUB university's vice-chancellor Prof Ian Greer said the pro-chancellors at the university played "a crucial role in upholding the highest standards of accountability and leadership."Former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton has been the chancellor of QUB since is a mainly ceremonial role, though the university has faced opposition from some staff and students over Ms Clinton's stance on the conflict in Gaza.
Daily Record
41 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Councillors' unexpected journey to South Ayrshire's top table
Independent Councillors Brian Connolly and Alec Clark speak about their journey from being the only independents on South Ayrshire Council to becoming Leader and Depute Leader. Two months ago, Councillor Brian Connolly became South Ayrshire's first independent council leader. But he almost fell into politics by accident. In 2006, he was a member of Maybole Community Council, with no real aspirations to 'higher' office. When the then-Labour Council Leader Andy Hill resigned, both from his post and position as councillor for North Carrick and Maybole East, the businessman offered to stand. However, he was told that he would have had to be a party member for at least six months to be eligible. That seemed to be that – until Labour announced that they were putting forward a candidate from Coylton. Cllr Connolly told Labour that, unless they selected a member from within the ward he would stand as an independent. This was during the last year of the single member wards, which was replaced by the current multi-member wards in 2007. In the end he won the seat by the absolute smallest of margins, defeating former Ayr Advertiser Editor, Conservative candidate Ann Galbraith, by a single vote which was confirmed after three recounts. Labour were left to rue their choice, with Sandra Goldie falling from first to third of the four candidates. He was re-elected in the 2007 election as one of four councillors in Maybole, North Carrick and Coylton – alongside the two Labour and Conservative candidates he had defeated the year before. That election marked the biggest shift in a generation, with the upsurge in support for the SNP. As Cllr Connolly had become South Ayrshire Council's first ever independent member, the SNP picked up their first seats – with their eight councillors transforming the authority into a three-way contest between them, Labour and the Conservatives. As the sole 'neutral', Cllr Connolly said he was sought out to carry out a number of roles despite his inexperience, including the chair of the key scrutiny committee. It would not be until the next election, in 2012, that Cllr Connolly would be joined by another Carrick member. When Cllr Alec Clark was elected to the Girvan and South Carrick ward, it became clear that a commonality of purpose and understanding that it would be logical to support each other as independents, meant that their paths would become entwined. Cllr Clark also came from a community council background, but took a more circuitous route to the council. Coming from a Girvan family, he had met his wife in Gibraltar and spent the majority of the 80s in the region, before returning to Girvan in 1988. He got involved in the community soon thereafter. As a businessman he was aware of the defunct Girvan Merchants Association and with others worked to launch a new Girvan Business Association. The group helped the town obtain Christmas lights and CCTV among other things. He then took up the position of Chair of Girvan Community Council in the noughties, eventually deciding to make the leap to stand for South Ayrshire Council. Cllr Clark admitted that he did consider the possibility of standing on a party ticket, but eventually chose an independent path. He said: 'I stood to be elected because things were happening in Girvan which I thought weren't getting the right oversight. They had lost the beach pavilion and then decided to close the swimming pool for no good reason. His work in the community had certainly been noticed. In that 2012 election he picked up almost half of the first preference votes, almost 30 per cent ahead of the three mainstream parties, with the Conservatives ultimately losing their seat. Cllr Clark said: 'Brian and I have worked close together ever since really. I did know Brian before I went to the council and went to him for advice around what was involved. 'At that time I was still in business. Once I was retired I was able to take on portfolios. 'At the time trying to invest but at a minimum. We ended up with a Quay Zone that wasn't the finished article. So these are the things that drove me. I have always been community minded.' He added: 'As depute leader and Brian as Leader, our focus is on South Ayrshire as a whole. 'But at the time there certainly wasn't an equilibrium between Ayr, Prestwick and Troon and what was dubbed the rural area. 'We had to have a better oversight of the whole of South Ayrshire. 'Not that, these are where most people stay and need houses and then build all of the houses there.' He said that in turn would lead to fewer moving to the south with the knock on impact on businesses and the local economy. Cllr Connolly said that while they were not at the heart of the administration in the 2012-17 term, both continued to be called to take on roles by virtue of their status. He said: 'That independence tag gives you that neutrality. Alec and I discuss politics in general very often, but on the council we have kept out of that. ' The 2017 election saw an SNP/Labour coalition take the council over from the Conservatives, with the two independents taking on portfolios and joining the then Leadership Panel. Cllr Connolly added: 'After 2017, we have had central roles in every administration. ' In 2022 it looked as though the two independents would join Labour and the SNP to continue their coalitionn. However, the two parties failed to come to an agreement. Cllrs Connolly and Clark said that their loyalty was not in question, despite an approach from the then Conservative leader Martin Dowey. Cllr Connolly said: 'To Martin's favour he asked us just after the election, but we said that we had committed our loyalty to SNP and Labour. 'That didn't happen, so when he came back, Martin said again 'will you take on these roles?' 'He actually came back and asked us twice and that is when we agreed to join the administration.' Cllr Clark added: 'At the end of the day if we have a position where we can influence things, then it is much better for us to help our communities.' Fast forward to the end of May and the breaking of the scandal that saw the Leader step down over promises made to a business over contracts, the Chief Executive resign and several Conservative councillors sever ties with the party. There had already been a shift in the balance of the administration before the crisis exploded, with the cabinet featuring more independents than Conservatives. There was significant criticism of the members of the administration, who were accused of 'rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic' by maintaining much the same cabinet as before. That journey for the two independent councillors reached its unexpected destination in June when they were elected Leader and Depute Leader. However, they are clear that they took the view that this change of leadership would not spark a series of upheavals. Cllr Connolly said: 'What was obvious to us all, we only had two years left in administration and we didn't want everything to change. 'By the time all that settles, you are into your last year and you have no time to do anything. 'We were quite comfortable with the path that the administration was on. 'We had projects coming to maturity and we have seen that, when administrations change, everything is up in the air. 'Our aim is to simply keep the council moving forward in the right direction.' Cllr Clark pointed to the regeneration work progressing across South Ayrshire. He said: 'It wasn't just Ayr, Prestwick and Troon, although they are getting their slice of it. 'We have a lot in other towns. Maybole is starting to get a lot of regeneration. Girvan is getting regeneration. 'We have everything set up to go and are on the cusp of this coming to fruition. 'Why would we want to change that?' With the number of independent councillors hitting double figures, as a result of elections and defections, Cllr Connolly admitted he would like to see more independents come the 2027 local elections. Both councillors said they had never foreseen or looked to pursue a bid for the top jobs when they were the only independents in town. Cllr Clark said: 'No, I didn't forsee it. 'What the journey we have had brings is experience. 'When you come into council, even though I had ten years with the community council, you have got to learn it is a political world, whether you are an independent or not. 'You have got to understand how the council works. What you can do what you cannot do. It is a big learning journey. 'But we have so much experience now that we find it quite comfortable. It is not something that we can't handle. 'That is why we can provide stability. We know that there is nothing that can come up that we have not seen before. The Leader agreed, saying: 'It is not the position I would have thought of at the start of the journey, particularly when we were the only independents. 'I think anybody, whether it is Joe Public or council officers, would want an independent run council. 'Politics just gets in the way.' The Depute Leader said: 'Politics is fine at a level above as you have to have that balance and checks. 'But an independent run council is absolutely much better.'
New Statesman
6 hours ago
- New Statesman
Why I am sticking with Labour
In a packed fringe meeting at the Labour Party conference in 1980, cigarette smoke hung thickly beneath dim, flickering lights. Amid the hum of tense whispers and shifting chairs, Shirley Williams stood, resolute and defiant, her voice slicing through the haze: 'We are going to fight to save the party, and by God we think we can. We are going to start fighting for a Labour Party worthy of the name. Yet barely a year later, Williams and her allies – soon to be known infamously as the Gang of Four – left Labour altogether, founding the new Social Democratic Party. Why begin an article about my decision to remain within Labour with a quote that, in hindsight, didn't even survive the year? Three reasons. First, because today I – and many others inside the Labour Party – feel exactly as Shirley Williams did when she uttered those words. This is not a Labour government worthy of the name. From its morally hollow alignment with a far-right US president amidst war crimes and probable genocide in Gaza, to its embrace of a discredited economic orthodoxy reliant on trickle-down myths, deregulation, and corporate extraction, this is not the principled, people-first politics we were promised. Add to this the normalisation of racist rhetoric about migrants and asylum seekers, punitive policies targeting disabled people – from threatened cuts to Personal Independence Payments to real-terms reductions in Universal Credit – and the introduction of some of the most draconian laws this country has seen outside wartime, including proscribing protest groups as terrorists, and it becomes painfully clear: something has gone profoundly wrong. Like Shirley Williams then – and countless others from both the left and right throughout Labour's history – I believe remaining in the party (as long as that option is open) and fighting for its soul is the right choice. For all its faults, Labour remains the political vehicle that has done more than any other to improve the lives of working-class people in Britain. That legacy isn't just worth defending; it demands our defence. Secondly, given the increasing fragmentation of British politics – and the very real possibility that the Labour-Conservative duopoly, which has defined our political landscape for over eighty years, might finally unravel – the events of 1981 now look less like a historical footnote and more like an urgent warning. The SDP failed on its own terms, but the two-party system that it aimed to break open never really recovered from its intervention. So, what, if anything, has today's Labour leadership learnt from the emergence of the new left party? What deeper forces – economic, social, and environmental – are shaping this moment? And how might we navigate the storm of intersecting crises we now face? Judging by their reaction thus far: very little. Within Labour circles, responses have been defined more by dismissive sneers than serious reflection. But the hundreds of thousands expressing interest in the new party should serve as a profound wake-up call. This isn't a fringe rebellion, it's an indication that the foundations of our electoral system are cracking. Discontent of this magnitude doesn't emerge from nowhere, nor will it vanish if ignored. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Even if you share the leadership's apparent wish that the left be locked away and forgotten, history demonstrates that suppressing dissent doesn't neutralise it – it energises it. Those turning toward this new party are not extremists or radicals, but ordinary people repeatedly told that their entirely reasonable demands (a fair economy, genuine democracy, and meaningful climate action) are dangerous delusions. That lie has a limited shelf life, and we may well be reaching its expiry date. Third, Shirley Williams' instinct in 1980 to remain in the party, was fundamentally right, an instinct shared by myself and many others today. The fight ahead against authoritarian and anti-democratic forces will only intensify. How and where we engage in this struggle must be strategic. Effective strategy against a capable and adaptive opponent demands keeping as many paths open as possible, resisting premature narrowing unless the landscape unmistakably demands it. This strategic calculation lies at the heart of current tensions. Many see this as the decisive moment to commit fully to the new left project. They might well be correct. And those of us still holding the line within Labour, even cautiously, may yet be proven wrong. But we must also acknowledge the unknowns surrounding the new project. Its political culture remains largely untested. There is a genuine risk of fragmentation and recrimination. Prudence advises us to maintain fallback positions and avoid burning bridges prematurely. We must recognise there are many fronts in this fight. I understand deeply the anger towards this Labour government – anger shared by many still within the party. Yet dismissing those who choose to engage within Labour, the Greens, or elsewhere neither advances our cause nor aligns with the pluralist politics this moment demands. We all have roles to play. Thousands choose to fight from within Labour; others do so externally, whether in a political party or campaign groups and broader civil society. What matters is mutual support and solidarity among all committed to democracy, social and climate justice, pluralism, and human rights – across parties and factions. Ultimately, my choice is guided by strategic judgement, not certainty. In these turbulent political times, certainty is a luxury none of us possess. Yet, I sincerely hope the path I've chosen contributes meaningfully and that, regardless of the routes we each take, we find ways to converge again when it truly matters. [See more: Revenge of the left] Related
