Irish homebuilding shares leap following rent reform news
European shares closed in the red as early gains motivated by better than expected inflation reports were evaporated by US-China trade talks that offered less detail than expected.
The pan-European Stoxx 600 index lost 0.3 per cent, remaining 2 per cent shy of its all-time high in February.
DUBLIN
The Iseq All-Share index ended the session down 0.02 per cent at 11,716.64.
READ MORE
Dalata, the owner of the Maldron and Clayton Hotel brands, had a good day, rising 0.79 per cent to €6.38. Last week, the board of
Dalata Hotel Group
rejected a €1.3 billion bid from the
Nordic Pandox consortium
, which had tabled a €6.05 a share, non-binding cash offer.
Home builders tried to keep the index positive following the announcement of a rewrite of rental regulations, which will allow exemptions from existing rental rules for new tenancies and new-build apartments.
Cairn Homes shot up 3.18 per cent to €2.27, Glenveagh Properties added 1.22 per cent to its share price to reach €1.83, and insulation specialist Kingspan Group jumped 0.32 per cent to €77.8. Ires Reit fell among the group, dropping 0.37 per cent to €1.08.
The banking sector had a mixed day. Permanent TSB rose 1.37 per cent to €1.86, Bank of Ireland marginally rose 0.16 per cent while AIB declined 0.29 per cent.
LONDON
The benchmark FTSE 100 closed 0.1 per cent higher, sitting about 45 points away from its all-time highs. The mid-cap FTSE 250 also ended 0.2 per cent higher.
Setting out day-to-day budgets for Government departments from 2026 to 2029 and investment plans out to 2030, British finance minister Rachel Reeves prioritised spending on health, defence and infrastructure projects to drive economic growth.
An index for aerospace and defence shares closed 0.7 per cent higher.
Reeves also announced an additional £10 billion investment to build thousands more homes in England. Home builders and household goods stocks gained 1.5 per cent.
On the downside, industrial metal miners slipped 1 per cent tracking falling copper prices.
Ibstock sank 15.6 per cent to the bottom of the FTSE 250 after the bricks and concrete producer issued a warning of a hit to its adjusted Ebitda outlook for 2025.
Ricardo shares jumped 27.8 per cent after Canada-based WSP Global said it would acquire the British environmental and engineering consulting firm.
EUROPE
The European benchmark closed 0.3 per cent lower – it's third straight day of losses.
The pan-European STOXX 600 had risen following a cooler-than-expected US inflation report that eased tariff-related concerns and bolstered hopes for the Federal Reserve to cut rates.
The biggest catalysts for European markets are increased defence spending and the European Central Bank cutting borrowing costs. However, ECB officials have indicated that the easing cycle will come to an end. Traders are pricing in just one more rate cut by the tail-end of this year.
On the markets side,
retailers led the decline, sinking 1.7 per cent due to a 4.4 per cent drop in Inditex after the Zara owner missed first-quarter sales forecasts.
NEW YORK
The S&P 500 and Nasdaq were trading near record levels in mid afternoon trading, with the S&P 500 about near all-time highs touched in February, and the Nasdaq just below its record peaks reached in December.
Data showed consumer prices increased only marginally in May, but inflation is expected to accelerate in the coming months due to the Trump administration's import tariffs.
Annually, headline inflation stood at 2.4 per cent, lower than the 2.5 per cent rise estimated by economists polled by Reuters.
A day after officials from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework to put their tariff truce back on track, President Donald Trump said the US deal with China was done, with Beijing to supply magnets and rare earth minerals.
Tesla advanced as signs of a thaw in hostilities between CEO Elon Musk and Trump emerged following an abrupt rift that had roiled the electric-vehicle maker's shares.
Shares of video game retailer GameStop fell after it reported a decline in first-quarter revenue.
Intel shares fell, after gaining 7.8 per cent in the previous session. – Additional reporting: Reuters, PA.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Nothing confirms new Eir partnership ahead of launch of Phone 3 flagship
London-based consumer technology brand Nothing has launched its first retail partnership with Eir with a brilliant introductory offer that could bag you a €99 set of earphones for free. The team-up has occurred ahead of the launch of the third Nothing flagship Android smartphone, Phone 3, on July 1. Nothing has already released two compelling smartphones this year, both in the mid-range market. The cut-price offerings Phone 3a and 3a Pro are both powered by a zippy and capable Snapdragon 7S Gen 3 chip that can handle almost anything you throw at them comfortably. Now, Phone 3a and Phone 3a Pro are available in Eir's 72 nationwide stores. This means that Eir is the only place in Ireland where Nothing Phone 3a Pro are available on a monthly contract. You can also buy the Nothing devices from Eir online or SIM-free in Harvey Norman stores or direct from the Nothing website. To celebrate the Eir partnership, from Friday, Nothing is running an introductory offer which means customers can claim a free set of Ear A earbuds worth €99 when any Phone 3a Series handset is purchased (while stocks last). Meanwhile, in the firm's typical style, Nothing has already confirmed ahead of the official launch event that the upcoming Nothing Phone 3 flagship phone will run on Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 platform. The firm said the chip will deliver a 31 percent performance boost and a 49 percent gaming performance boost over the Nothing Phone 2 which was released two years ago in July 2023. More importantly perhaps, the firm has also revealed it is ditching the Glyph Interface and replacing it with a new light show feature called the Glyph Matrix that reminds me a little of the dot display on the rear of the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro. Nothing's head of design Adam Bates has said: "Instead of predefined light strips, we now have a dense field of programmable micro-LEDs, a canvas for real-time, glanceable communication that feels alive, playful, and deeply personal. The Glyph Matrix allows for dynamic animations, symbolic visuals, and pixel-level responsiveness in a way segmented strips never could. 'It unlocks features where sound and light evolve together to create personalised cues. These features transform the back of the device into an expressive, functional surface, something that doesn't just alert you, but communicates with you.' You can also buy the full range of Nothing products on Amazon where there are bound to be discounts galore on Amazon's Prime Day which is running from July 8 to 11.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Is it worth my while to give half my inheritance to my husband to avoid tax?
I just want to confirm my understanding of the position around deed of variation/family arrangement with wills in Ireland. I am due to inherit €30,000 from my brother-in-law and I am wondering if it is worth my while to gift my husband half, in order to avoid tax ? Ms C.L. When someone draws up a will, they generally have two things in mind. First, they want to take care of those closest and dearest to them; second, they want to minimise how much of their estate gets taken in tax. READ MORE There's an industry of lawyers and tax advisers making a very good living servicing this demand – as evidenced by last week's article about wealthy individuals in Ireland buying farmland to avail of an inheritance tax loophole while it lasts. This can be a game of cat and mouse. New reliefs are introduced, advisers notice they can be used entirely legitimately but not in the way the Government originally intended to benefit their (generally) wealthy clients and, over time, amendments are brought in to try to restore the measure to its original purpose. But what you are talking about is a much longer established structure called a deed of variation, otherwise known as a deed of family arrangement. Anyone who has been in the UK might be more familiar with it as, in that jurisdiction, it can be a very useful way of effectively rewriting someone's will – at least in relation to any inheritance you are in line to receive – to take account of changed circumstances, such as the arrival of children, grandchildren or in-laws since the will was originally drafted. It can also be used in intestacy where the absence of a will might mean, for instance, that a cohabiting partner could otherwise be left with nothing. [ Wills and spouses: Why you cannot just cut a wife out of your will Opens in new window ] In the UK, such a deed of variation must be in writing and must be signed within two years of the original benefactor dying. One of the advantages is that rather than being seen as you inheriting and then passing some of that benefit onwards, the benefit you allocate to anyone else under such a deed is considered as coming to them directly from the person who has died. So what does that mean for you? Well, while there is a lot of similarity between the law here and in the UK due to our shared heritage, there are some significant differences too, not least in relation to inheritance. For instance, while, in the UK, the tax liability is on the estate of the dead person, in Ireland, the liability rests with the individual beneficiaries depending on the amount involved and the beneficiary's relationship with the dead person. In-laws are considered as 'strangers' in terms of inheritance. As such, they come under the lowest category C tax-free threshold And there is a key difference of approach also when it comes to deeds of variation. While there is nothing stopping you exercising a deed of variation to gift your husband half of what you are inheriting from your brother-in-law, it will have no impact on your tax liability. In Ireland, as Revenue has confirmed for me, as far as liability for Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT or inheritance tax) is concerned, you will be considered to have taken the full €30,000 inheritance from your brother-in-law with your husband being seen as taking a subsequent €15,000 gift from you. Now, in practical terms, that raises no tax bill for your husband as gifts and inheritances between spouses are exempt from inheritance. But it could have tax implications for the recipient of your largesse if you were looking to have a friend benefit, for instance. And it does mean you will face a tax bill. In-laws are considered as 'strangers' in terms of inheritance. As such, they come under the lowest category C tax-free threshold – currently €20,000. So you will face a 33 per cent tax bill on at least €10,000 of this inheritance – €3,300. It could be more if, as would not be unusual, you previously received an inheritance – or, indeed a gift of more than €3,000 in one year – from a friend, in-law, cousin or more distant relation. They all come under category C and that €20,000 tax-free limit is a lifetime one extending back to cover any inheritance or large gift received since December 5th, 1991. That leaves you with two choices: you can accept the inheritance and pay the tax due on anything over your tax-free threshold, or you can disclaim the inheritance. However, that second option is an all or nothing one. You cannot just disclaim €10,000 of the €30,000 so that you stay within your tax-free limit. You will be giving all of it up. Nor have you any right, if you disclaim, to influence where the inheritance goes. That will be determined by the wording of the will. The money would most likely go to other beneficiaries under a residuary clause – a clause governing the distribution of any assets not specifically allocated to any person or institution. The bottom line is that, if the intention is to reduce your tax bill, a deed of variation will not do it and, of course, you will have incurred legal costs in getting advice on and drawing up any such deed. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street Dublin 2, or by email to with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Value of sanctions against Irish landlords for breaches reaches highest rate ever, RTB figures show
The value of sanctions against Irish landlords for breaches of rental law has grown to its highest rate ever, according to new figures released by the Residential Tenancies Board (RTB). In 2024, it published 75 sanctions with a total value of €238,299. This is almost four times higher in monetary value than what it gathered in 2023, at €64,360. In July 2019, the RTB was given new powers to investigate and sanction landlords who engage in breaches of rental law, known as improper conducts. The significant increase in the value of sanctions issued against landlords last year came amid renewed focus within the RTB investigations unit on a smaller group of landlords seen to be repeatedly breaching rental laws. READ MORE In a statement to The Irish Times, the RTB said the work 'involved detailed investigations into complex company structures and rental arrangements that were designed to avoid detection and enforcement of rental law'. 'It involved prolonged investigative work to access properties, serve legal documents and to find tenants who were willing to speak with the RTB's authorised officers,' the spokeswoman said in response to questions. 'These investigations into deliberate and repeated offenders saw the RTB's independent decision makers award higher levels of sanctions than previously seen,' the board said. Among those sanctioned in 2024 was Marc Godart and his company Green Label Ltd, with eight different sanctions amounting to a total of €26,100 in penalties for various breaches, including failure to register a tenancy. [ Under the eye of landlord Marc Godart: how a tenant who objected to CCTV surveillance was evicted Opens in new window ] Another notable case from 2024 was that of Anuj Katyal, who received a sanction of €15,000 for a failure to comply with rent pressure zone (RPZ) requirements at an address in Liffey Valley Park, Lucan, Co Dublin. Landlords John and Patricia Keeling also received a sanction of €15,000 for a failure to comply with RPZ requirements at an address in Derham Park, Balbriggan, Co Dublin. The RTB has published 36 sanctions to date in 2025 with a total value of €102,490, including its highest value single sanction yet on a Dublin-based landlord. Sweet Home Accommodation Ltd, run by Renato Passos, was fined €22,000 for a breach of rental laws at six city centre properties under his control. Investigators established he had failed to register 20 tenancies in properties on Leeson Street, Middle Abbey Street and Upper Abbey Street. During the course of its investigation the RTB discovered Brazilian students were being targeted through language schools and on social media about properties Mr Passos did not actually own but was sub-letting. Investigators found there was extensive overcrowding at multiple properties run by him, with bunk beds crammed into makeshift apartments, mattresses laid on floors and livingrooms converted into bedrooms. In one property, there were 15 people sharing one kitchen. Former tenant Julia Langneck, who lived at a property sublet by Mr Passos on Bolton Street in Dublin 1, told The Irish Times 'it was not really human at all, it was really terrible'. She detailed sharing a room with four other people, all in bunk beds, and paying almost €400 a month in rent. When the house became infested with bedbugs and the landlord asked for tenants to pay to have them removed, Julia decided to move out. However, Mr Passos withheld her deposit. This led to her taking a case against him with the RTB, which ordered him to pay the deposit and damages as part of its dispute resolutions process. The RTB subsequently began its own independent investigation into Mr Passos when media reports detailed serious overcrowding and unstable tenancies in properties he was leasing on Leeson Street. This investigation then led to the €22,000 sanction.
