logo
Reclamation changes must not become the thin edge of the wedge in Hong Kong

Reclamation changes must not become the thin edge of the wedge in Hong Kong

Hong Kong without its harbour would be difficult to imagine. The famous stretch of water is the city's most precious asset and best known feature around the world.
Advertisement
But over many years, beginning in the 19th century, reclamation of the harbour caused it to narrow. The distance between Hong Kong Island and Kowloon was cut in half. Public concern led to the passing of the Protection of the Harbour Ordinance in 1997.
A landmark court judgment in 2004 strengthened the safeguards. Reclamation works would only be permitted if there was an 'overriding public need' based on cogent and convincing evidence. A high threshold was set.
Lawmakers last week passed amendments to the law to make small-scale reclamation much easier. Such work is said to be needed to enhance the harbourside and better connect different parts of it.
The new arrangements will apply to works of 0.8 hectares or less and concern specified structures such as piers, boardwalks and moorings for boats. Such projects will require consultation with the government-appointed Harbourfront Commission and district councillors. The financial secretary has the final decision.
Advertisement
The amendments will provide greater flexibility, allowing work to be done to clear old piers and provide promenades and boardwalks for the enjoyment of harbour views.
This is better than having people dodge traffic in busy roads to see the sunset. Making it easier to provide moorings will also benefit the city's bid to become a centre for yacht tourism.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China toughens import rules on Vietnamese durians after detecting health risks
China toughens import rules on Vietnamese durians after detecting health risks

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

China toughens import rules on Vietnamese durians after detecting health risks

Chinese authorities have tightened oversight of imported Vietnamese durians this year after finding 'excessive levels' of two potentially harmful substances in the popular, high-value fruit. The General Administration of Customs of China now requires enhanced pre-export safety checks and compliance testing before shipments leave the source country, with 'qualified' test reports to be attached to durians, a customs official told the Post, requesting anonymity due to internal rules. She said the administration had intensified testing for the organic compound alkaline yellow and the metal cadmium in Vietnamese durians, after discovering concentrations that 'seriously endangered the health of domestic consumers' at the start of 2025. 'In order to effectively prevent food safety risks, the General Administration of Customs immediately took action.' Under the stricter rules, Vietnamese durians are subject to 'batch by batch' testing – with any unqualified fruits returned or destroyed. Exporters are in turn suspended from shipping the fruit to China, she said. Fresh durian shipments from Vietnam fell by about 45 per cent year-on-year from January to June in value terms, customs data showed. Vietnam's shipments totalled US$611.5 million over the first half of 2025.

Trump takes step back from Philippines in South China Sea
Trump takes step back from Philippines in South China Sea

AllAfrica

timean hour ago

  • AllAfrica

Trump takes step back from Philippines in South China Sea

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr's recent visit to the White House promised to set a new tone for US strategy. The contrast with the Biden administration was vivid: President Donald Trump mostly discussed trade with Marcos and seemed eager to downplay any militarized rivalry with China. It's an encouraging pivot from the Biden administration's approach, which escalated the US-China rivalry. Last year, President Joe Biden was focused on the so-called 'latticework' of alliances in the Asia-Pacific, holding a trilateral summit with both Marcos and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba of Japan. The rather clear intention was to balance and even contain China's rise. By contrast, while Trump did briefly praise the ongoing military exercises between the US and the Philippines, there was no mention of the trilateral initiatives with Japan. Instead, Trump seemed eager to tamp down the US-China rivalry, at least in the Philippines context. There was only minimal discussion of tensions in the South China Sea and these came at the behest of Marcos. Trump reportedly 'professed that he didn't mind if the Philippines got along with China.' Such a clear effort to defuse the US-China rivalry could simply reflect Trump's desire to secure a near-term summit with Chinese leader President Xi Jinping. However, it might also reflect the new realism that's taken hold in his administration, one that favors a 'spheres of influence approach' to global affairs over the neoliberal paradigm promoted by the Biden administration. Under Biden, the US was focused on safeguarding freedom of navigation and the law of the sea, a strategy that risked near-term escalation with China over meaningless rocks and reefs and fishing disputes. The Philippines has been increasing its maritime capabilities, but it has little prospect of matching China frigate for frigate or cutter for cutter in those sensitive sea areas. In fact, when Marcos did mention 'international law' and alluded to a country—plainly China—'that has intentions of unilaterally changing the world order,' Trump pointedly refused to respond in kind. Instead, he immediately pivoted to the importance of positive US-China relations, saying, 'we're getting along with China really well.' Trump also emphasized the crucial rare earth magnets exported by China and needed across many US industries, which are 'coming out now… in record numbers.' In this White House, it seems geoeconomics trumps geopolitics. When Marcos again brought up the volatile South China Sea situation while discussing Philippines military modernization, Trump changed the topic to terrorism. 'Don't forget… Philippines were loaded up with ISIS and lots of terrorists,' he said, adding, 'we spent a lot of time and a lot of talent on going into the Philippines and wiping out terrorists.' Trump went so far as to claim that 'During my [first] administration… we got [the terrorists] out, and now you really have a good solid country again.' It's worth pointing out that China also assisted the Philippines in this recent and bloody fight against terrorism, according to Manila. Trump further hinted at the White House's new focus on spheres of influence when he explained, 'And the [Philippines] was maybe tilting toward China, but we un-tilted it very, very quickly.' While realists will welcome the diminishing likelihood of a US-China war developing over rocks and reefs, an even more dangerous conflict still lurks. The situation in the Taiwan Strait—often tense—has become a powder keg waiting to explode, maybe even in the near term. Here Trump seems much more cavalier. When asked by a reporter about 'the ammunitions hub that the US plans to build in Subic and the Luzon corridor' of the Philippines, Trump remarked that 'we'll have more ammunition than any country has ever had.' The Philippines is a mere couple of hundred miles south of Taiwan and many US strategists are fixated on the country as a means of deterring or countering a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. If it comes to war in the Taiwan Strait, losses would be enormous on both sides. An authoritative wargame by the Center for Strategic and International Studies a couple of years ago said the US would likely lose two aircraft carriers in the first week of such a war and that's to say nothing of the real potential for nuclear escalation. Nor is the Philippines likely to make a major difference in such a war, since its armed forces are weak and it would likely be attacked by China if it becomes involved in the conflict. Trump is wise to play down the South China Sea conflict and focus on trade and counterterrorism with the Philippines. Wiser still would be a recognition that a spheres of influence approach should seek to detach the Philippines' future from the fate of Taiwan. Lyle Goldstein is director of Asia engagement at Defense Priorities.

Can Hong Kong's IPO boom plug the hole in the city's floundering office market?
Can Hong Kong's IPO boom plug the hole in the city's floundering office market?

South China Morning Post

time3 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Can Hong Kong's IPO boom plug the hole in the city's floundering office market?

In the first instalment of our two-part series on Hong Kong's beleaguered property market, industry players pin their hopes on the resurgent IPO scene to boost office uptake and ease the pain for developers struggling with US$18.8 billion of loans. Advertisement KGI Financial Holding's expansion in Hong Kong has breathed new life into the city's struggling commercial real estate sector, with the Taiwanese financial firm leasing about 40,000 sq ft of space in the central business district. Managing nearly US$135 billion of assets, the diversified financial group has expanded its existing securities and venture operations, and more recently opened the first overseas branch of KGI Bank , burnishing the city's image as a global financial hub. 'As an international financial centre, Hong Kong boasts of highly developed financial infrastructure and professional services,' said Kate Lin, president of KGI Bank. 'Its capital markets and financial industry are well-established, offering abundant funding support to businesses across various sectors.' The Hong Kong branch 'marks an important milestone for KGI Bank in developing overseas markets', Lin said in a written reply to the Post, as it sought deeper collaboration with other units in the group on cross-border capital management, financing and wealth management solutions for corporate and high-net-worth clients. A foggy view of Central, Hong Kong's main central business district. Photo: Eugene Lee The group, through KGI Securities, spent about HK$4 million (US$509,561) a month to rent the 33rd and 34th floors of One Pacific Place , the former headquarters of Swire Pacific – the parent of Swire Properties – which owns the 36-storey grade A office tower, according to sources.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store