logo
Aunt Backed for Threatening Sister With Lawsuit After What Toddler Did

Aunt Backed for Threatening Sister With Lawsuit After What Toddler Did

Newsweek21-04-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
A woman has been backed for threatening to sue her sister after her nephew destroyed her expensive gaming set-up.
The woman, who did not give her name but described herself as a 25-year-old student software developer and "a pretty serious PC gamer in my free time," posts to Reddit under the username u/Ok-Jelly-6298.
On April 11, she took to the r/AmIOverreacting subreddit where she shared her dilemma, asking: "AIO [Am I overreacting] for threatening to take my sister to court after her toddler destroyed my $2,000 gaming setup because she said I should've 'baby-proofed my apartment?"
Tara Tighe Umbrino of TLT Legal Services, PLLC, told Newsweek that, first and foremost, "in most states, legally the woman can sue her sister for the damage caused by her toddler," but warned "litigation should be a last resort."
A stock image shows a toddler pulling an item from a drawer.
A stock image shows a toddler pulling an item from a drawer."It is not a fast or easy process, and you incur court costs when you file. Even if you can file in small claims court—which is often faster, cheaper, and friendlier to people who don't have attorneys—it can still be a stressful process."
Even after a verdict, "it doesn't mean you automatically get paid," she explained. "The defendant has to be willing to pay the judgment, otherwise you have to go through enforcement and collections proceedings which can cost you more money than what you sued over."
The woman explained in her Reddit post that she lives alone in a small one-bedroomed apartment, and recently allowed her sister, 30, and three-year-old nephew, Max, to stay the night while their own home was being fumigated and her sister's husband was away.
The woman was aware Max is "spirited," but said her sister promised to keep a close watch on him. However, within "ten minutes of arriving, he'd pulled four books off my shelf, thrown my houseplants on the floor, and spilled juice on my area rug."
Her sister didn't seem concerned, saying it's "normal" for a three-year-old, and when the woman warned her sister about her extremely expensive computer set-up, she "rolled her eyes" but closed the door to the office.
The next morning, the woman discovered that Max had somehow got inside her office space and destroyed the place, pulling down and cracking monitors, sticking crackers and pouring juice into the PC, pulling the caps from the keyboards and coloring the office chair in permanent marker.
Her sister, upon walking into the room, said simply: "You should've baby-proofed the room if it was that important to you."
They got into an argument, and the sister said the "stuff is replaceable"—but offered only a "few hundred" dollars which she could "maybe" pay in a few months. But the woman, who has filed a claim with her insurance and is not confident it will be covered, told her "if she does not pay up, I'll take her to court for what happened."
Reddit users responded in a big way, awarding the post more than 17,000 upvotes, many backing the woman as one wrote: "NOR [not overreacting]. That kid is a menace, and parents are on the hook financially for whatever their dumb kids do."
Another agreed: "Your sister should have gotten up with her child, be prepared for less sleep for one night as you're doing the favor of providing a space, [and] respected your space as, again, you're providing."
And one, who described herself as a mother of two herself, said the situation was "entirely unacceptable. You cannot expect other people to baby-proof for you. You cannot expect other people to watch your child for you. You cannot expect other people to just be fine with your child destroying their things."
In a later update, the woman said her sister's husband came by to check out the damage and take the PC to be cleaned and fixed, and is hoping to work out an arrangement to pay for the damage done. However, depending how things work out, the woman stated she has not ruled out taking her sister to court.
Holly Davis, founding partner at Kirker Davis LLP, told Newsweek she was "encouraged to hear that the sister's husband is reaching out to her to try and find a solution, because, even though I'm an attorney myself, I regularly encourage people to work together outside of a law office."
She encouraged both parties to "put any feelings of hurt and betrayal aside, be grownups, and simply sit down together and hash out an equitable solution that is genuinely fair to everyone involved—as hard as that might seem at times."
She added: "If both people can present their needs in a simple, clear, and reasonable way, and avoid digging in their heels, there is a potential for a positive and healing outcome, rather than letting this be the beginning of a longstanding family resentment."
Newsweek has contacted u/Ok-Jelly-6298 on Reddit for comment on this story.
If you have a similar family dilemma, send an email to life@newsweek.com with your first name and general location. We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man Calls Wife 'Heartless' for Saying She's Glad His Late Mom Never Met Their Daughter
Man Calls Wife 'Heartless' for Saying She's Glad His Late Mom Never Met Their Daughter

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Man Calls Wife 'Heartless' for Saying She's Glad His Late Mom Never Met Their Daughter

The woman says she was treated poorly by her mother-in-law, and believes her daughter would have been treated the sameNEED TO KNOW A woman told her husband that she was glad his mother wasn't around anymore, but now she wonders if she "crossed a line" The woman explained that she was treated poorly by her mother-in-law, and believes her daughter would have faced the same treatment However, her husband told her that she was "heartless" and now they are fightingA woman's mother-in-law is still a sore subject for her and her husband, even after her death. The woman took to Reddit to share insight into a recent argument with her husband regarding her late mother-in-law, whom the poster described as a "nightmare." "Lifetime movie villain level. She called me a gold digger for marrying her precious son, 'forgot' to invite me to family holidays for three years, and once mailed him a framed photo of his ex with a note saying, 'The one who got away,'" the woman shares. "When we announced our pregnancy, she said, 'I'll believe it's his when I see the DNA test.' " However, her mother-in-law "suddenly" died in a car accident last year. "My husband was wrecked, obviously, and I held him through it, but inside? Relief," she writes. "Deep, ugly relief." While the woman quickly moved on, her husband has had a hard time, especially after the arrival of their now 4-month-old daughter. "Last night, husband got drunk and tearful, saying, 'I wish Mom could've held her just once,'" she recalls. The woman, "sleep-deprived and still sore from breastfeeding," snapped and replied, "Thank god she didn't. She would've made our kid feel like s--- the way she did me." After a moment of "silence," her husband told her that she was "heartless" and he slept on the couch. "Part of me knows I crossed a line. But another part? Stands by it," she writes. "She was cruel, and death doesn't erase that. He's grieving a mom who wasn't real, the version he wished she was." Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Many people in the comments sided with the woman, with some questioning whether her husband ever tried to stand up for her while his mom was still alive. "No, he always apologized to me but never really did anything or talk to his mother. Sadly," the poster replied to one commenter. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

Trump Slams 'Troublemakers' After Grand Jury Order To Unseal Epstein Files
Trump Slams 'Troublemakers' After Grand Jury Order To Unseal Epstein Files

Newsweek

time13 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Slams 'Troublemakers' After Grand Jury Order To Unseal Epstein Files

President Donald Trump speaks to the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, as Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, look on. President Donald Trump speaks to the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, as Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, look on. Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has requested testimony to be unsealed in relation to the Jeffrey Epstein case, he said in a post on Truth Social Saturday. The statement comes a day after the DOJ requested the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein. "I have asked the Justice Department to release all Grand Jury testimony with respect to Jeffrey Epstein, subject only to Court Approval," Trump said. "With that being said, and even if the Court gave its full and unwavering approval, nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request," he concluded, adding, "It will always be more, more, more. MAGA!" Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice via their online contact form for comment on Saturday. Attorney General Pam Bondi's top deputy, Todd Blanche, submitted the motion to unseal the Epstein transcripts, as well as those in the case against convicted British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, just one day after President Donald Trump publicly directed the department to take that step, Newsweek previously reported. Criticism of the Trump administration's handling of records in the Epstein case has seen many of his former supporters reversing course. The scrutiny intensified following a report from the Wall Street Journal citing a letter from to Epstein on his birthday from Trump. Trump has since sued the publication, seeking at least $10 billion in damages and accusing them of "malicious" effort to "malign" the president with a story based on a "nonexistent" letter, Newsweek previously reported. This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.

What We Know About Americans Freed in Venezuela Prisoner Swap
What We Know About Americans Freed in Venezuela Prisoner Swap

Newsweek

time14 hours ago

  • Newsweek

What We Know About Americans Freed in Venezuela Prisoner Swap

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A group of 10 Americans freed in a hostage exchange with Venezuela included a U.S. Navy sailor and a water sports fan, reports say. When contacted for comment, the U.S. State Department told Newsweek on Saturday that for privacy reasons, the individuals would not be identified nor their cases disclosed. However, a statement to Newsweek by the Foley Foundation, which advocates for captives held overseas, named four of the U.S. nationals who had been held for months in the South American country. Hostage Aid Worldwide named another two U.S. nationals. The group was exchanged for more than 250 Venezuelans deported from the U.S. and flown in March to El Salvador's high-security prison. A detained Venezuelan being assisted off the plane upon arrival at Simon Bolivar International Airport during a prisoner exchange between Venezuela and the U.S. on July 18. A detained Venezuelan being assisted off the plane upon arrival at Simon Bolivar International Airport during a prisoner exchange between Venezuela and the U.S. on July It Matters The complicated deal involving three countries gives Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro a diplomatic coup, helps U.S. President Donald Trump in his goal of bringing home Americans jailed abroad and offers a political boost to Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, who proposed the exchange. What To Know On Friday, Venezuela released 10 jailed U.S. citizens and permanent residents in exchange for migrants deported by the United States to El Salvador in March under the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Bukele said El Salvador had handed over all the Venezuelan nationals in its custody, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Friday that the Americans were being repatriated. The Foley Foundation named four American citizens: Wilbert Castaneda, who had been in custody for 325 days; Jorge Marcelo Vargas, in prison for 304 days; Renzo Castillo, in prison for 299 days; and Lucas Hunter, in prison for 192 days. Hostage Aid Worldwide named another two American nationals: Jonathan Pagan González, who was arrested in October, and Fabian Buglione Reyes, a Uruguayan national living in the U.S. who was arrested at a checkpoint in October. Diane Foley, the founder and president of the Foley Foundation, said in a statement to Newsweek that she applauded "the unprecedented pace set by the Trump administration in securing the release of Americans wrongfully detained around the world." Castaneda, a former Navy SEAL, had been detained in Venezuela while on personal travel and was later accused of leading a CIA-linked plot, CBS News reported. In a statement, his family said he had been "used as a political pawn by the Maduro regime," the outlet reported. Hunter was on a windsurfing and motorcycling trip through Paraguachón, Colombia, near the border with Venezuela, when Venezuelan guards coerced him into crossing and arrested him in January, his family wrote on a website created for him. Sophie Hunter, his sister, said in a statement via the group Global Reach, "My family and I are so happy to hear that my brother, Lucas, was released by Venezuela today." A detained Venezuelan arriving at Simon Bolivar International Airport as part of a prisoner swap between Venezuela and the United States on July 18. A detained Venezuelan arriving at Simon Bolivar International Airport as part of a prisoner swap between Venezuela and the United States on July to the exchange were the 250 Venezuelan migrants freed by El Salvador, which had housed them in its notorious Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, after the Trump administration used the Alien Enemies Act to deport them. The Trump administration accused them of belonging to the Tren de Aragua street gang in a case condemned by rights groups. The deportation resulted in a legal fight that reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. State Department released an image of the 10 U.S. nationals and said in a statement on Saturday that the president had made it a priority to bring home Americans being held hostage or wrongfully detained. "We also welcome the release of Venezuelan political prisoners and detainees from Venezuelan prisons," the statement continued. It added, "The United States continues to support the restoration of democracy in Venezuela and call for the release of all remaining political prisoners." What People Are Saying The U.S. State Department said in a statement: "President Trump has made it a priority to bring home Americans held hostage or wrongfully detained, and the State Department will continue to work to ensure every American held unjustly abroad is released and returned home." Diane Foley, the founder and president of the Foley Foundation, said in a statement: "We applaud the unprecedented pace set by the Trump administration in securing the release of Americans wrongfully detained around the world. Today's release of 10 U.S. nationals held captive by the Maduro regime extends that record of success." What Happens Next The U.S. secretary of state has said every wrongfully detained American in Venezuela is now free and "back in our homeland." However, the fate of the Venezuelans returning home is unclear. Maduro can use the deal to reaffirm support among his base as he asserts himself as president despite evidence that he lost reelection last year and the U.S. and other nations viewing him as an illegitimate leader.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store