logo
Europe hopes for 'no surprises' as US weighs force withdrawals

Europe hopes for 'no surprises' as US weighs force withdrawals

France 2410 hours ago
Washington is currently conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide -- set to be unveiled in coming months -- and the expectation is it will lead to drawdowns in Europe.
That prospect is fraying the nerves of US allies, especially as fears swirl that Russia could look to attack a NATO country within the next few years if the war in Ukraine dies down.
However, the alliance is basking in Trump's newfound goodwill following its June summit in The Hague, and his officials are making encouraging noises that Europe will not be left in the lurch.
"We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe," said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, adding he expected the review to come out in "late summer, early fall".
"I have daily conversations with our allies about the process," he said.
While successive US governments have mulled scaling back in Europe to focus more on China, Trump has insisted more forcefully than his predecessors that the continent should handle its own defence.
"There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe," said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. "The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast."
When Trump returned to office in January many felt he was about to blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance.
But the vibe in NATO circles is now far more upbeat than those desperate days.
"There's a sanguine mood, a lot of guesswork, but the early signals are quite positive," one senior European diplomat told AFP, talking as others on condition of anonymity.
"Certainly no panic or doom and gloom."
'Inevitable'
The Pentagon says there are nearly 85,000 US military personnel in Europe -- a number that has fluctuated between 75,000 and 105,000 since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
"I think it is inevitable that they pull out some of their forces," a second European diplomat told AFP.
"But I don't expect this to be like a dramatic overhaul. I think it's going to be gradual. I think it's going to be based on consultations."
Trump's first target is likely to be the troops left over from a surge ordered by his predecessor Joe Biden after Moscow's tanks rolled into Ukraine.
Officials say relocating the rump of that 20,000-strong deployment would not hurt NATO's deterrence too much -- but alarm bells would ring if Trump looked to cut too deep into personnel numbers or close key bases.
The issue is not just troop numbers -- the US has capabilities such as air defences, long-range missiles and satellite surveillance that allies would struggle to replace in the short-term.
"The kinds of defence investments by Europe that are being made coming out of The Hague summit may only be felt in real capability terms over many years," said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund think tank.
"So the question of timing really does matter."
'Inopportune moment'
Washington's desire to pull back from Europe may be tempered by Trump now taking a tougher line with Russia -- and Moscow's reluctance to bow to his demands to end the Ukraine war.
"It seems an inopportune moment to send signals of weakness and reductions in the American security presence in Europe," Lesser said.
He also pointed to Trump's struggles during his first term to pull troops out of Germany -- the potential bill for relocating them along with political resistance in Washington scuppering the plan.
While European diplomats are feeling more confident than before about the troop review, they admit nothing can be certain with the mercurial US president.
Other issues such as Washington's trade negotiations with the EU could rock transatlantic ties in the meantime and upend the good vibes.
"It seems positive for now," said a third European diplomat.
"But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease will start in 2026. To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage."
© 2025 AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he's reducing 50-day deadline for Putin to agree to peace
Trump says he's reducing 50-day deadline for Putin to agree to peace

Euronews

time27 minutes ago

  • Euronews

Trump says he's reducing 50-day deadline for Putin to agree to peace

US President Donald Trump said on Monday he is to reduce the 50-day deadline he previously set for Russia to agree to a peace deal in Ukraine, highlighting his growing frustration with the ongoing all-out war, now well into its fourth year. "I'm disappointed in President Putin," Trump said in comments alongside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland. "I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen." "I've spoken to President Putin a lot, I've gotten along with him very well," he said, adding that Putin "goes out and starts launching rockets into some city, like Kyiv, and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever, you have bodies lying all over the street." Trump, who boasted on the presidential campaign trail several times that he could end Russia's war in Ukraine within a day, said he and Putin have been close to reaching a ceasefire deal five times, but a final agreement has remained elusive. Trump's 50-day ultimatum Earlier this month, Trump said he had given Russia 50 days to reach a peace deal or face what he described as "very severe" economic sanctions during a visit to Washington by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. While some believe strict tariffs on Moscow could be a game changer, the postponement until September was seen by others as being too long. Russia is making a summer push to break through the 1,000-kilometre front line, and its drones and missiles are hammering Ukrainian cities more than at any time in the past three years. For Russia, Trump's delay of new sanctions is a reprieve. Ukraine's depleted army has recently been losing more territory, but there is no sign of a looming collapse of the front line, analysts say. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he spoke to Trump on Monday, expressing gratitude for the decision to send more Patriot air defence missiles, which are vital to defending Ukrainian cities. "We discussed … the necessary measures and decisions to provide greater protection for people from Russian attacks and strengthen our positions," Zelenskyy said on Telegram. "We agreed to talk more often and coordinate our steps in the future."

EU accuses online shopping platform Temu of 'illegal' product sales
EU accuses online shopping platform Temu of 'illegal' product sales

LeMonde

timean hour ago

  • LeMonde

EU accuses online shopping platform Temu of 'illegal' product sales

The European Union accused Chinese-founded online shopping giant Temu on Monday, July 28, of breaking the bloc's digital rules by not "properly" assessing the risks of illegal products. EU regulators believe Temu is not doing enough to protect European consumers from dangerous products and that it may not be acting sufficiently to mitigate risks to users. "Evidence showed that there is a high risk for consumers in the EU to encounter illegal products on the platform," the European Commission said in its preliminary finding. It pointed to a mystery shopping exercise that found consumers were "very likely to find non-compliant products among the offer, such as baby toys and small electronics." Temu has become wildly popular in the EU despite only having entered the continent's market in 2023, and now has 93.7 million average monthly active users in the 27-country bloc. Temu under DSA investigation Temu is under investigation as part of a law known as the Digital Services Act (DSA) that forces the world's largest tech firms to do more to protect European consumers online and better police content online. The EU said Temu's October 2024 risk assessment was "inaccurate and relying on general industry information rather than on specific details about its own marketplace." If confirmed to be in breach, the EU can slap a fine on Temu. Fines under the DSA can go as high as 6% of a company's total worldwide annual turnover and force it to make changes to address violations. Launched in October, the EU probe continues to investigate other suspected breaches including the use of addictive design features that could hurt users' physical and mental well-being and how Temu's systems recommend content and products. Temu will now be able to respond to the EU regulators' findings and defend itself, but there is no time limit on how long an investigation may last. EU law under attack The DSA is part of the EU's reinforced legal weaponry to curb the excesses of Big Tech, with stricter rules for the world's biggest platforms. It has faced criticism from the US administration under President Donald Trump. The Republican-dominated judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives described the DSA in a scathing report as a "foreign censorship threat" on Friday. Staunch Trump ally Jim Jordan, committee chair, will meet with EU Tech Sovereignty Commissioner Henna Virkkunen in Brussels, on Monday. There are currently other DSA probes into Chinese online retailer AliExpress, social media platforms Facebook and Instagram and X as well as TikTok. The EU also wants to crack down on cheap packages that flood into the bloc each year, with a proposal under discussion for a €2 flat fee per parcel. Last year, 4.6 billion such packages entered the EU – more than 145 per second – with 91% originating in China. The EU expects the numbers to increase.

Why is Donald Trump demanding that Beyoncé be prosecuted?
Why is Donald Trump demanding that Beyoncé be prosecuted?

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Why is Donald Trump demanding that Beyoncé be prosecuted?

Amid mounting pressure for the Trump administration to release the Epstein files - as opposed to releasing files regarding the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server – the US President is looking back to last year. He is alleging that Kamala Harris spent campaign money on celebrity endorsements – even if a previous investigation has found this claim to be false. In a recent post on Truth Social, Trump has demanded that Beyoncé (and other celebrities) be prosecuted for campaigning for Harris during the 2024 presidential election. Apparently still bruised from his lack of A-list talent support during the election, Trump wrote: 'I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats, after the Presidential Election, and the fact that they admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!), Three Million Dollars for 'expenses,' to Oprah, Six Hundred Thousand Dollars to very low rated TV 'anchor,' Al Sharpton (a total lightweight!), and others to be named for doing, absolutely NOTHING!' He continued: 'These ridiculous fees were incorrectly stated in the books and records. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO. Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them. All hell would break out! Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Regarding Trump's claim, it is true that Harris' team spent funds on rallies and events, which featured celebrity endorsers like Beyoncé, Oprah and Lady Gaga. However, the publicly shared financial records from the 2024 presidential campaign show that those expenses went toward production costs and staff, not to the celebrities themselves. This was subsequently confirmed by a New York Times investigation published in November 2024. Beyoncé publicly supported Harris last year and made a speech a rally on reproductive rights. She previously threatened Trump's campaign team with legal action for its unauthorized use of 'Freedom' in a social media video, days after the singer approved the song as the official anthem for Kamala Harris' presidential campaign. At the time, Trump spoke dismissively about Beyoncé's appearance at a Harris rally in Houston, saying: "Beyoncé would come in. Everyone's expecting a couple of songs. There were no songs. There was no happiness.' This year, Trump also called for a 'major investigation' into Bruce Springsteen after the music legend made several remarks criticising Trump at his Manchester show earlier this year. Trump alleged that Springsteen was paid by Kamala Harris for his 'POOR PERFORMANCE DURING HER CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT' (posted online on Truth Social in all caps, naturally). He went on to ask: 'ISN'T THAT A MAJOR AND ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION?' In addition to Springsteen, Trump also took aim at other artists, including Bono and (once again) Beyoncé, during his rant: 'HOW MUCH DID KAMALA HARRIS PAY BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN FOR HIS POOR PERFORMANCE DURING HER CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT?. WHY DID HE ACCEPT THAT MONEY IF HE IS SUCH A FAN OF HERS? ISN'T THAT A MAJOR AND ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION? WHAT ABOUT BEYONCÉ? …AND HOW MUCH WENT TO OPRAH, AND BONO??? He carried on, escalating things: 'I am going to call for a major investigation into this matter. Candidates aren't allowed to pay for ENDORSEMENTS, which is what Kamala did, under the guise of paying for entertainment. In addition, this was a very expensive and desperate effort to artificially build up her sparse crowds. IT'S NOT LEGAL! For these unpatriotic 'entertainers,' this was just a CORRUPT & UNLAWFUL way to capitalize on a broken system. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!' This was followed up by a bizarre back and forth, in which Trump shared a fake clip on social media of him attacking The Boss with a golf ball. The post drew heavy criticism and mockery online, with many posting 'reality shots' of Trump on the golf course, and others commenting on how 'this is not what a president does.' Numerous musicians came to Springsteen's defence, including Pearl Jam frontman Eddie Vedder and veteran rocker Neil Young. Elsewhere, South Park creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker responded to the White House's reaction to their latest episode which mocked Trump, showing him in bed with Satan and depicting him as having a micro-penis. Trump, not Satan. White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said: 'Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows. This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention.' This led Parker to respond at Comic-Con International, with his trademark deadpan style: 'We're terribly sorry.' They weren't.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store