logo
Two University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee researchers part of global team that discovered a new object in space

Two University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee researchers part of global team that discovered a new object in space

Yahoo11-06-2025
When students open their science textbooks in the future, there's a chance they'll be reading about a cosmic discovery made by scientists at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Their discovery "may hold the key to unlocking a new kind of star that we don't yet understand," said UWM physics professor David Kaplan.
Kaplan and others, including Akash Anumarlapudi, a recent UWM doctoral graduate, were part of a global team that discovered an unknown object emitting both radio waves and X-rays. This is the first time an object in this class has been detected using X-rays, which may help astronomers find and research more of these objects in the future.
ASKAP J1832-0911, the unknown space object that the global team of astronomers first spotted in December 2023, is categorized as a long-period transient. LPTs are a new and rare group of cosmic objects discovered in 2022.
Ziteng "Andy" Wang, member of the International Center for Radio Astronomy Research and associate lecturer at the Curtin Institute of Radio Astronomy in Australia, was another researcher involved in the discovery.
After the object was initially spotted in 2023, Kaplan said, Wang spent the next year and a half finding radio telescopes across the world that could point to the area of the sky in which the object was located.
Kaplan, who was among nearly 50 researchers directly involved with the project, explained the significance of the discovery.
'It'll still take more study, more observations, more mass to really understand this object and all of its related friends, but it's a lot of fun to think that you are one of the first people to find one of these and to study it and just figure out how weird the universe really is," Kaplan said.
Kaplan explained that the techniques used to find LPTs are the same as those used to train advanced computer intelligence models used for security research, TikTok algorithms and more. He said a number of people who are interested in astronomy learn these techniques but go on to make careers in technology at companies like Facebook or Google.
'We're looking to inspire the next generation of everybody who finds interesting questions and wants to figure out how to answer them on their own.'
David Kaplan, physics professor
"We're not just looking to inspire the next generation of astronomers,' Kaplan said. 'We're looking to inspire the next generation of everybody who finds interesting questions and wants to figure out how to answer them on their own.'
The human eye can see only a tiny fraction of the universe, Kaplan said. Without a carefully designed experiment and special telescopic equipment, light forms like ultraviolet X-rays and gamma rays are difficult to identify.
'When you look up at the sky at night, you can be overwhelmed by the number of stars out there,' Kaplan said. 'But unless you look at them in real detail, you might not notice that some of them are actually changing.'
The research project sought to look at the universe through "radio eyes" to find out which cosmic objects were changing, Kaplan explained.
Kaplan said 90%-95% of the time researchers were watching for the object, it wasn't actually visible. This is because the object rarely "blinks," only pulsing for two minutes every 44 minutes.
A human would never be able to observe this kind of object by looking up into the sky just once, Kaplan said. He compared it to a lighthouse that's lit up for only a few minutes every hour.
'You have to get really lucky in order to see this flashing. And then we had to get even luckier — we accidentally discovered it flashing the X-rays as well as radio,' Kaplan said. 'This whole project is really luck, piled on luck, piled on luck.'
The global researchers, along with astronomers from ICRAR, made their discovery using a radio telescope in Australia. The telescope is on a desolate million-acre farm so as to avoid man-made noise from cell phones and satellites, Kaplan explained.
At first, the team saw nothing when looking at the object through an optical telescope and X-ray telescope.
Then, through NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory, Wang found that a Chinese research group had coincidentally pointed a telescope in the same area of the sky. The group discovered the same information as Kaplan and Wang, and both teams put out papers documenting their findings.
Wang served as an author of the team's paper, which was published May 28 in the science journal Nature.
Anumarlapudi and Kaplan, from Milwaukee, analyzed radio telescope data, calculated and contributed to the journal publication. Kaplan also helped lead the research team that discovered the object.
The nearly 50 global researchers who made up the research team came primarily from the U.S. and Australia, with others from Italy, Spain, China and Israel.
Contact Mia Thurow at mthurow@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: UWM scientists help discover mysterious space phenomenon
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's how watching videos at 2x speed is reworking your brain — and the age group most impacted
Here's how watching videos at 2x speed is reworking your brain — and the age group most impacted

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Here's how watching videos at 2x speed is reworking your brain — and the age group most impacted

The fast and the curious? If you're a big fan of watching videos on the internet — like via TikTok, YouTube or Masterclass — chances are you've grown accustomed to listening to people speak at Looney Tunes speed. Speed-watching has become an increasingly common way to consume content since it enables the assimilation of information in half the time or more. Advertisement 3 A new analysis reveals how speed-watching impacts our ability to retain information — and there's a big difference between younger and older brains. fizkes – But have you ever wondered about the effect that it's having on your brain? An international team of researchers set out to determine just that. The group examined 24 studies that generally involved placing participants into two groups — one in which they listened to a video at normal speed and another in which the same video was presented at 1.25x, 1.5x, 2x and 2.5x normal speed. Advertisement Afterwards, both groups were asked to complete tests that assessed how well they retained the video's content. While not much of a difference was recorded at 1.5x, memory retention definitely took a hit at 2x and above. 3 While not much of a difference was recorded at 1.5x, memory retention definitely took a hit at 2x and above. Viktoriia – 'Incoming information is stored temporarily in a memory system called working memory,' Marcus Pearce, who researches cognitive science at Queen Mary University of London, wrote this week in The Conversation about the study. Advertisement 'This allows chunks of information to be transformed, combined and manipulated into a form that is ready for transfer to the long-term memory.' Pearce notes that working memory can only process a certain amount of information at a time — too much at once can lead to cognitive overload and loss of information. The scientific takeaway is to stick to 1.25x or 1.5x speed, especially for unfamiliar, complex content. Advertisement The findings were recently published in the journal Educational Psychology Review. It's tempting to think that the way we consume content today only affects young, developing minds — but this research suggests otherwise. 3 A 2023 study found that older adults see a 31 % drop in understanding at just 1.5x speed, compared to younger peers who maintain over 90 % comprehension at 2x. Dorde – Adults aged 61 to 94 were more impacted by the faster speeds than those 18 to 36 years old. A 2023 study found that older adults see a 31 % drop in understanding at just 1.5x speed, compared to younger peers who maintain over 90 % comprehension at 2x. What's unclear, at this point, is whether the issue is age or practice — meaning, are younger adults better at consuming content at faster speeds because their minds are more pliable or is it simply because they've trained their brains by doing it more often? If it's the latter, can older adults improve? Advertisement The limited research we have indicates that, sadly, the answer is not so much. Younger brains are simply more adaptable, although studies do suggest that older adults can train to get better, even if they often require more time and likely hit a plateau sooner. If older adults want to rewire their brains for speed-watching, a deliberate program of gradual speed training, retention checks and cognitive boosting is the most promising route. The good news is that experts say that consuming content at normal speed actually makes it more enjoyable for everyone.

Researchers issue warning after making troubling discovery in ocean fossils: 'This is not good news for us'
Researchers issue warning after making troubling discovery in ocean fossils: 'This is not good news for us'

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Researchers issue warning after making troubling discovery in ocean fossils: 'This is not good news for us'

A study of ancient corals has revealed troubling implications as humankind contemplates the prospect of rising sea levels in the near future. Researchers from universities in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States examined fossil corals from the Seychelles. The team studied two dozen prehistoric corals off the coast of the African islands to unlock clues about today's issues, per It determined that the last time global temperatures were similar to today's, about 122,000 years ago, sea levels rose in rapid bursts, not gradually. Moreover, though the U.S. government projected 1.3 meters of rise by 2100, this research notes it could be up to 10 times higher. "This is not good news for us as we head into the future," Andrea Dutton, a professor of geoscience at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, told The ocean's rising levels are linked to human activity. The planet-heating pollution of dirty energy is creating warmer oceans and accelerating the loss of sea ice. Rising ocean temperatures are the perfect basis for more frequent and devastating extreme weather events. If left unchecked, the problem could become far worse than feared. Three billion people live within 200 kilometers (124 miles) of coasts, and millions could be permanently displaced. Worse still, some of the most crucial natural protections against the effects of extreme weather are in danger. Some parts of the United States may become uninhabitable as home insurers leave the most at-risk areas. While rising sea levels cannot be stopped, they can certainly be slowed down. The study calls for a drastic reduction in dirty energy use and a greater adoption of clean energy sources. It's essential to stay informed about the most pressing climate issues, engage in productive discussions with loved ones, and make responsible consumer choices. Do you think America has a plastic waste problem? Definitely Only in some areas Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Fact-checking viral claims that WHO just listed the contraceptive pill as a carcinogen
Fact-checking viral claims that WHO just listed the contraceptive pill as a carcinogen

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Fact-checking viral claims that WHO just listed the contraceptive pill as a carcinogen

Viral claims that the World Health Organisation (WHO) has 'just classified the pill as a group one carcinogen' are flooding TikTok, the Chinese-owned social media platform. 'The pill is now classified as a level-one carcinogen. Like tobacco. Like alcohol. Like drugs,' one TikToker claims, prompting alarm among users of the platform. Others urge their followers to stop taking the pill altogether. Euroverify has investigated these claims and found that, while the WHO's specialised cancer agency does consider some types of contraception pills to be carcinogenic to humans, the reality is much more nuanced. It's not true that the WHO has 'just' classified the pill as a carcinogen, as TikTok users have claimed. In fact, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) – the WHO's French-headquartered cancer agency – has included certain contraceptive pills on its list of substances 'carcinogenic to humans' since 2005. That list, known as Group 1, includes substances where 'sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity' has been demonstrated in 'studies in which chance, bias, and confounding were ruled out with reasonable confidence". There are two main types of the hormonal contraceptive pill: the combined pill, which contains the hormones oestrogen and progestogen, and the mini pill, which contains progestogen only. Only the combined pill is included on the WHO's so-called Group 1, meaning there's sufficient evidence that it can cause cancer in humans. The mini pill is currently categorised in the IARC's Group 2B, meaning it's considered "possibly carcinogenic to humans." Several studies, however, have found that both of these pills slightly increase the risk of breast cancer in women. For example, a 2023 study by Oxford University's Cancer Epidemiology Unit found that any type of hormonal contraceptive may increase the risk of breast cancer, and estimated that use of the mini pill is associated with 'a 20-30% higher risk of breast cancer". But there is also data to suggest the contraceptive pill can reduce the risk of other types of cancer, such as endometrial, colorectal and bowel cancers. It means the relationship between cancer and the contraceptive pill is much more complex than meets the eye. We detected several TikTok videos published in recent weeks claiming that the WHO considers the contraceptive pill "as carcinogenic" to humans as alcohol, tobacco and asbestos. This claim is misleading. The IARC's Group 1 includes all the substances for which there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans, such as alcohol, tobacco and asbestos, as well as processed meats, sunlight radiation and certain viruses like Hepatitis B and C. But this doesn't mean in any way that all substances on the list carry the same risk level. It simply means there is sufficient scientific evidence to support the claim that they are all carcinogenic to humans. The IARC does not classify substances according to level of carcinogenicity, but rather according to the strength of the scientific evidence to support its link to an increased risk of cancer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store