International Resistance To AI In Education Marked In Open Letter
As the use spreads of computer tools marketed as artificial intelligence, some educators and even entire institutions are embracing the new tech. For example, Ohio State University has anounced a bold AI Fluency initiative to redefine learning and innovation.
But some educators are pushing back against the 'inevitable' technology, and open letters are becoming one tool of the resistance. Literary Hub published a letter from authors addressed to publishers. In the Netherlands, over 900 educators have signed a letter entitled 'Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia.'
The unfettered introduction of AI technology leads to contravention of the spirit of the EU Al act. It undermines our basic pedagogical values and the principles of scientific integrity. It prevents us from maintaining our standards of independence and transparency. And most concerning, AI use has been shown to hinder learning and deskill critical thought.
Earlier in July, another open letter launched 'from educators who refuse the call to adopt GenAI in education.' Melanie Dusseau (University of Findlay) and Miriam Reynoldson (RMIT University) got the petition up and running, and to date over 700 educators have signed on in just two weeks.
Dusseau has previously spoken out about AI in education with an article at Inside Higher Ed last November, arguing that resistance is not futile.
If you are tired of the drumbeat of inevitability that insists English faculty adopt AI into our teaching practices, I am here to tell you that you are allowed to object. Using an understanding of human writing as a means to allow for-profit technology companies to dismantle the imaginative practice of human writing is abhorrent and unethical. Writing faculty have both the agency and the academic freedom to examine generative AI's dishonest training origins and conclude: There is no path to ethically teach AI skills.
The open letter declares that 'Current GenAI technologies represent unacceptable legal, ethical and environmental harms,' that it is 'a threat to student learning and wellbeing,' and that it is "overwhelmingly aimed at automating and replacing human effort.'
The open letter includes a series of pledges, including a refusal to use AI to design or evaluate coursework, nor include 'AI literacy' in course design. They also pledge to resist marketing hype, especially that coming from salespeople who are net themselves educators (a problem in education that predates the invention of the computer).
Numerous writers tout the 'inevitability' of AI in education {the London School of Science and Technology published a whole post about 'the futility of resisting AI in education').
But there are also voices arguing against any rush to AI adoption. Scott Latham, Ph.D., a professor of strategy at the Manning School of Business at the University of Massachusetts, wrote a 'memo to teachers' at Inside Higher Ed last year, 'AI Is Not Your Friend' And writing educator John Warner mounts a defense of humanity in writing and writing instruction is his new book, More Than Words.
Dusseau said via email that she and Reynoldson 'wanted to do something that focused on autonomy and academic freedom in the face of the many ethical concerns surrounding generative AI technology.' What they created was one more sign of international resistance to GenAI.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
5 minutes ago
- Forbes
Apple's AI About-Face Isn't A Failure. It's A Lesson In How To Innovate.
Apple computer, iPad, and Home at home. It's been just over a year since Apple unveiled its long-anticipated foray into generative AI, teasing the launch of a new brain for Siri that would take the iPhone experience to the next level. The company was already late, but at least it had gotten in the game with its own vision. Apple Intelligence, as they called it, would leverage its strength in consumer devices rather than copying the OpenAIs of the world. And yet, one year later, the AI game is still largely being played without Apple. The new Siri hasn't materialized, and the company was forced to announce an indefinite delay at its Worldwide Developers Conference in June. Senior execs said the new version of Siri hadn't met Apple's high standards, forcing them to go back to the drawing board. The story got even worse when Bloomberg reported that Apple had held internal talks about buying Perplexity and was considering using technology from Anthropic or OpenAI to power the new Siri, rather than its own large language models. For years, people have been concerned that Apple is losing its innovative edge–and they may be right. The company hasn't produced a truly groundbreaking product since the Apple Watch in 2015, and each new iPhone model seems less thrilling and more incremental than the last. Still, the news out of Cupertino may actually be a sign of progress. The fact that Apple reversed course on developing its own AI technology isn't necessarily a sign of weakness. Apple's leadership may be demonstrating a healthy amount of self-awareness and executing a strategy that plays to its strengths. The rest of us might be getting an essential lesson in how companies should manage innovation by focusing on what we're great at rather than wasting resources trying to be something we're not. The Three Big Jobs of Innovation Large-scale corporate innovation can be a complex beast, inviting all manner of methods and systems and metrics. But at its core, innovators need to do three things: 'Dream It,' 'Build It,' and 'Scale It.' The 'Dream It' job is all about exploration. It involves basic research and widespread exploration. It's about asking 'What if…?' 'Dream It' innovation is the kind of work that went on at Xerox PARC and Bell Labs: places where the internet was first invented. It's what Google X was established to do. Some Google X projects look like Project Loon, a short-lived initiative to provide internet connectivity to Africa by launching a fleet of broadcast balloons. Other projects become things like Waymo, the first successful driverless car service. 'Dream It' initiatives are usually too early-stage to worry about things like market share, product refinement, or shipping dates. Places with 'Dream It' cultures encourage freedom, curiosity, and permission to chase questions most firms would never fund. The 'Build It' job is about creating new things. It's about design and prototyping. If 'Dream It' looks like freeform writing, 'Build It' looks like ruthless editing. It's about asking 'How might we…?' 'Build It' innovation is the kind of work that goes on at Nike and IDEO. The best builders focus on a clear vision for their service or product and then iterate it until it delights the end user. Dyson does this in household products like fans and vacuums. The philosophy of its founder, Sir James Dyson, is that 'things should just work properly.' Dyson rejects the popular image of himself as a wild-haired inventor, saying: 'It undermines the testing and rigour of bringing an invention to life, of people working together to achieve something.' He doesn't want to be seen as a 'Dream It' guy… And then there's the 'Scale It' job. This part is critical, because an innovation is an invention that has socioeconomic impact. Scaling takes a finished concept and catapults it to wider success. The 'Scale It' job involves things like go-to-market strategies, channel relationships, staged investment plans, and relentless customer feedback loops. Many dreamers and builders stumble at this point because they don't know how to turn their brilliant ideas into reality. Microsoft is a master scaler. Whether it's Microsoft Office, Azure, Teams, or its OpenAI partnership, the company excels at rolling technology out to millions of enterprise users and making it the industry standard. When it comes to innovation, every company needs to Dream It, Build It, and Scale It. And each of these three jobs require very different types of people, processes, and cultures. Some companies manage to do it in-house by creating subsidiaries or divisions. Others build walls between different parts of the business and try to give each the freedom to focus on what they do best. Years ago, Frito-Lay exec Joe Ennen went so far as to divide his organization into three functions. The goal was to get each group to focus on one specific job, be it dreaming it, building it, or scaling it. Play Your Position Of course, the real challenge is that a company's overall culture will lend itself to only one of these jobs. Frito-Lay has always been best at scaling ideas, not dreaming them up. And when companies attempt to be something they're not, they're like quarterbacks trying to be linebackers. They run into frustration and costly dead ends that waste resources and divert attention from their true calling. It's better to play your position. Most pharmaceutical giants are scalers. Pfizer has been likened to a venture fund, identifying smaller firms that dreamt up promising drugs, then funding and scaling them with its massive marketing and distribution network. The company didn't invent the COVID vaccine – it partnered with the small German biotech firm, BioNTech, that pioneered mRNA-based therapies. And that brings us to Apple. Apple has always been the very best at the 'Build It' job. As Steve Jobs put it succinctly: 'Real artists ship.' And while Apple's era-defining products like the iPhone and iPad have given it a reputation as a genius inventor, its success is actually built on borrowing ideas and turning them into great products. Apple builds what other people dreamed up. Apple didn't dream up the multitouch technology crucial for the iPhone and iPad; it acquired it by buying FingerWorks in 2005. Neither did they invent the graphical user interface or the mouse that became the foundation of the Mac. Those ideas were taken from Xerox after Apple executives visited its Palo Alto Research Center in the late 1970s. The PARC researchers were dreamers – they didn't see the world-changing nature of the cool stuff they'd envisioned. Jobs was a builder, later saying he realized within ten minutes the revolutionary potential of what he saw at PARC. Apple's genius was to edit those unpolished ideas into user-friendly products that could be manufactured at a low cost and sold at accessible prices. It edited down those dreams into tools that felt inevitable once you used them. The iPhone didn't create new technologies. It curated the most promising ones into a compelling experience. Even Siri isn't an Apple invention – the company bought it from Stanford Research International (SRI). That's why it's called Siri. In that light, Apple's search for external help with AI is a smart move. It isn't a betrayal of its innovative identity; it's a reaffirmation of its identity as the builder company archetype. If it can take Perplexity's or OpenAI's technology and mold it into the next great Apple products that delight customers, it will be doing precisely what it did with macOS, the iPhone, and Siri. Ironically, OpenAI has decided to do the inverse. The company just spent $6.5 billion to acquire iPhone designer Jony Ive's startup, IO, this year, with the aim of building 'amazing products that elevate humanity.' What Makes You Great? Any leader struggling with how to approach innovation should start with one fundamental question: Who are we? You should look back at all the things your company has done in the past and determine what you're best at. If you've done better at basic research and developing new ideas, you're likely a dreamer. If you've had more success at rapid prototyping and understanding market needs, you fit the builder mold. If you're excellent at formulating go-to-market strategies, developing sales channels, and engaging customers, you're a natural scaler. Once you have clarity about who you are, you can stop trying to be what you're not and start looking for partners who can fill the innovation gaps. True innovation isn't about doing everything yourself; it's about knowing what kind of innovator you are. Apple's search for a partner that can supercharge its AI capabilities will be fascinating to watch, but it shouldn't cause investors to lose sleep. The time for worry is when Apple stops exploring partnerships to build the next great innovation.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major bank axes Aussie jobs as 'human cost' of AI revolution exposed: 'Massive job losses'
Commonwealth Bank is axing dozens of roles in its customer call centres and has cited artificial intelligence as the reason behind the cull. The major bank introduced a new chatbot system to answer customer inquiries in June. A total of 90 jobs are due to be cut by the bank, according to the Finance Sector Union (FSU). That includes 45 roles in direct banking that are being impacted by the new voice bot system and local customer messaging specialist roles who interact with customers through the bank's online chat. A Commonwealth Bank spokesperson told Yahoo Finance it was currently investing more than $2 billion into its operations, including frontline teams and technology services. RELATED Millions of Aussies warned as Hungry Jack's replaces drive-thru workers with AI Rare 50 cent coin sells for $3,050 due to 'unique' reason Aussie couple reveal 'cheaper' $400,000 housing solution as CBA backs growing trend 'To meet the changing needs of our customers, like many organisations, we review the skills we need and how we're organised to deliver the best customer experiences and outcomes. That means some roles and work can change,' the spokesperson said. 'Our investment in technology, including AI, is making it easier and faster for customers to get help, especially in our call centres. 'By automating simple queries, our teams can focus on more complex customer queries that need empathy and experience.'CBA briefed the union on the cuts last week and revealed the new voice bot, which identifies and verifies customers and provides balance checks, had reduced the volume of calls by 2,000 a week. The FSU has criticised the Big Four bank for axing frontline roles in favour of automation. The union said while it supported the use of new technology and AI in banking, it must be done in partnership with workers, not at their expense. 'Workers want a tech savvy bank, but they expect to be part of the change, not replaced by it,' FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano said. 'There is a human cost to this. You can't just replace frontline jobs with a voice bot and expect the same service for customers.' The FSU has also claimed the Commonwealth Bank is offshoring jobs to India, however, the bank has denied this. Commonwealth Bank noted it was one of the country's biggest employers, hiring more than 9,000 people in the 2025 financial year. It said it was looking at other internal jobs and re-skilling opportunities for impacted staff. 'Our priority is to explore opportunities for redeployment and to support affected employees with care, dignity, and respect throughout the process,' the spokesperson said. The bank employs some 38,000 staff in Australia, with around 3,000 working in call centres. Unions push for tougher regulation on use of AI It comes as Australian Unions seek tougher regulations around the use of AI in workplaces. The Australian Council of Trade Unions said it would use next month's Economic Reform Roundtable to call for a new set of mandatory enforceable agreements that would force employers to consult with staff before new AI technologies can be introduced into workplaces. Employers would be required to reach agreements around guarantees for job security, skills development and retraining, transparency over technology use, privacy and data collection and use protections. 'We can realise the potential productivity benefits of AI while protecting the Australian fair go in the AI age,' ACTU assistant secretary Joseph Mitchell said. 'But we can't wish away the major disruptions and social risks that the bad use of AI and other new tech poses, through massive job losses and the theft of creative and intellectual property by big tech companies.'Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
33 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Providing Educators With Tools To Inspire Student Engagement
Verizon Foreign Language Academy in Kansas City builds student confidence through adaptable, tech-forward lesson plans. Verizon Innovative Learning Schools Coach Abigail Thompson collaborates with colleagues at Foreign Language Academy, teaching them how to implement Verizon Innovative Learning HQ lesson plans in their classrooms using available technology. Photo credit: Nicole Bissey When Abigail Thompson joined Foreign Language Academy in Kansas City, Missouri, as the Verizon Innovative Learning Schools Coach, she made it her personal mission to inspire teachers and students with technology and share ways that classroom tech could reshape learning. 'I had already been a teacher in Kansas City Public Schools, and I was really interested in technology and how it's best used in the classroom,' Thompson says. 'I like that I still get to work with kids in some capacity, but I love that I get to help other teachers be great.' In her role, Thompson has helped teachers successfully implement lesson plans from Verizon Innovative Learning HQ, which offers free to all educators more than 450 tech-based lessons, created by partners like McGraw Hill, Discovery Education and Arizona State University. The lesson plans cover subjects from game design to biology and beyond. Occasionally, Thompson finds an appealing lesson plan that suggests using a tool or app that the school doesn't have. 'The reality is maybe we don't always have that exact resource,' she says. But because the lesson plans on Verizon Innovative Learning HQ lay out exactly what is needed for each course of study, Thompson says she easily finds smart substitutions. 'Exploring what tools we have and can utilize instead has been big for us,' she says. One of the most popular Verizon Innovative Learning HQ resources at Thompson's school, for example, is the Stop-Motion Animation lesson, which gives students a fun, hands-on way to be creative while learning core STEM principles. The lesson plan recommends using the Stop Motion Studio app, but Thompson found a substitute app already available on school tablets with the same capabilities. Students find the technology both easy-to-use and engaging. 'After I take all the pictures, I go to the app where you can edit and add effects,' says fifth grader Gabriela. 'I feel like I'm learning when I use it. You're expanding your brain to learn about editing photography and video together.' The lesson also teaches physics (understanding motion and gravity), engineering (designing sets and props) and math (measuring time and frame rates). Thompson said another lesson plan that's a favorite across all grades levels is Emoji Design, which recommends using a graphic design software program that the school doesn't own. Thompson identified five alternate applications that worked with the material, however, giving students several options for creating their designs. The resulting emojis are as different as the students are. Kevin, a sixth grader, made a sports-themed emoji to symbolize his love of soccer and basketball; eighth grader Maria Jose taught herself how to create a gradient background to use in her design. The flexibility of the lesson plans on Verizon Innovative Learning HQ brings creative energy to the classroom, giving students the freedom to explore and innovate during lessons, which in turn builds their confidence. For some lesson plans, the students can choose which tools they will use to complete their work, and students will make selections based on their own interests and comfort level. 'One of the kids got so excited about [a popular music production app],' says Thompson. 'He said, 'I'm really good at keeping beats, so I'm working in percussion.' I just love that.' Having agency and authorship of their learning experience gives the students the confidence to develop new skills. 'Using technology for creation rather than consumption in the classroom is so important,' Thompson says. 'It helps students see technology as a tool and gives them so many options to show who they are and what they know. Creating choice has given voice to the students. It helps them gain both knowledge and confidence, so I just think that's awesome.' The students think it's awesome, too. 'We integrate our own ideas into our work,' says Gabriel, a seventh grader. Leo, also in seventh grade, puts it more simply: 'The lessons are more fun.' Tim Nash, a STEM and robotics teacher, says that his students are repurposing skills they learned in the Verizon Innovative Learning HQ lessons and bringing them to other subjects. 'We have a journalism class that does weekly video announcements using [readily available video production apps],' Nash says. 'It's something new that we're doing, because the kids now know how to use the tools in ways that can be implemented outside of the classroom.' Those video announcements are shared school-wide. And, as Nash points out, it's 'pretty cool' that middle-school students are stepping into these kinds of roles, inspired to branch out and apply what they've learned in real-life scenarios. For her colleagues, meanwhile, Thompson fosters ongoing creative usage of Verizon Innovative Learning HQ lessons at the school by sharing resources, lesson examples and project ideas with teachers, partly through a monthly newsletter and partly through one-to-one calls with her co-workers. And just like their students, the teachers are taking the ball and running with it, with creative and engaging results. 'The teachers see the resources and take them and they make them their own,' she says. Verizon Innovative Learning is a key part of the company's responsible business plan to help move the world forward for all. As part of the plan, Verizon has an ambitious goal of providing 10 million youth with digital skills training by 2030. Educators can access free lessons, professional development, and immersive learning experiences to help bring new ways of learning into the classroom by visiting Verizon Innovative Learning HQ. Visit 3BL Media to see more multimedia and stories from Verizon
