
Does storing your car keys in a microwave prevent theft?
But a recent increase of motorists storing their car keys in a microwave has led to experts to express their concern.
Yes, the trusty microwave has seen an increase in key storage overnight as it appears it's not only used for a quick re-heat of a midnight snack.
Why do people store car keys in the microwave?
Ofcom states that it's all down to the latest methods that crafty thieves are taking advantage of with keyless fobs.
'These keyless fobs use radio frequencies to communicate with your car, allowing it to unlock and start it when you have it in your possession,' Ofcom says.
'Sadly for car owners, thieves are sometimes able to use bits of tech that capture and amplify these frequencies in a way that helps them to gain access to your car.
'And if they can get near enough to the fob, for example by lurking close to your home or in your driveway, they can do this while it is inside your house – where you might think it's safe.'
Does putting car keys in the microwave block signal?
Because a microwave uses high-power radio waves to heat food, these can block the signal between your keys and car – but they're not the most ideal or safe solution.
We spoke to experts from car leasing deals site LeaseLoco, who have been hearing about a rise in this peculiar trend.
John Wilmot, CEO and founder of LeaseLoco, said: 'Thieves are becoming increasingly savvy when it comes to keyless car theft.
'Many modern cars use radio frequency signals to communicate with key fobs, which means criminals can use relay devices to capture and amplify these signals - even when the key is inside your home - to unlock and steal your vehicle.
'While it's true that microwaves are designed to block electromagnetic signals, using one as a storage place for your car keys is far from practical - and potentially dangerous.
'Microwaves are not a safe or recommended alternative to a proper signal-blocking solution.'
What happens if you accidentally microwave your car keys?
It's easily done – you're in a rush and accidentally catch the timer on your microwave, or worse still, microwave a ready meal with your keys already inside.
Mr Wilmot continued: 'If you forget the keys are inside and accidentally turn it on, you risk seriously damaging the fob's delicate electronics.
Recommended reading:
'That could mean short circuits, melted components, or total failure, and repairs or replacements can run into the hundreds.
'Worse still, microwaving a key fob introduces a real fire hazard. The metal components inside could spark, potentially causing smoke, flames, or even damage to your microwave and home.
'The safer, more reliable option is a purpose-made RFID-blocking pouch or Faraday box. These are specifically designed to block key signals and protect your car from relay theft, without the risk of frying your keys!'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Dyson's new Airwrap hair styler with motor 'faster than F1 engine'
The leading haircare giant has announced its best hair tool for styling and drying with a faster motor and lighter attachments Dyson's most awarded hair styler is getting an upgrade later this year, launching Dyson Airwrap Co-anda 2x multi-styler and dryer with new motor that "spins nine times faster than a Formula 1 car engine". The new Airwrap, available in both Jasper Plum and Ceramic Pink, makes a styling routine easier while protecting hair from heat damage. The tool is embedded with smart sensor technology including an RFID chip in each attachment to instantly adapt to the best temperature and airflow settings. The new Dyson Airwrap Co-anda 2x multi-styler and dryer, priced at £579.99, will be made available to purchase in September and shoppers can sign up here to receive a notification when it becomes ready for sale. Comparing this to the Airwrap id styler (available at £479.99), the new invention is smaller and lighter and each set includes six premium attachments and presented in a Dyson-designed case. The Straight + Wavy set comes with a 30mm Co-anda2x curling barrel, 40mm Co-anda2x curling barrel, anti-snag loop brush 2x, round volumising brush 2x, AirSmooth2x attachment and fast dryer 2x. For the Curly + Coily set, shoppers will recieve a 40mm Co-anda2x curling barrel, anti-snag loop brush 2x, round volumising brush 2x, tension comb 2x, Wave+Curl diffuser 2x and fast dryer 2x. The new and improved motor shortens the time required to curl and it's faster to create tight, voluminous and loose curls with 30% more product power and two times more air pressure. The new anti-snag loop brush has new hook bristles mean for increased control nearer the root while providing comfort on the scalp. To straighten hair, shoppers can use the AirSmooth 2x attachment - two non-heated contact bars with two jets of high velocity air to create a hair straightening effect with less frizz. When a full tress pass is completed, the arms automatically unclamp to release hair. The trailer video has quickly drawn fans' attention as one view guessed: "Oh looks like a blow dryer, a new smooth brush, round brush, curler… and is that a straightener attachment?" Another joked: "I mean, three months ago I bought the Airstrait, I also own Airwrap and Supersonic, please stop, I have no more place in my flat." Meanwhile, those who want to spend less on a Dyson hair tool can look at the brand's Refurbished section online. The refurbished Dyson Airwrap with complete long volumise has been marked down from £399.99 to £349.99. Undoubtedly a Dyson hair tool is an investment, I bought the first generation Dyson airwrap five years ago and it's been performing amazingly. I was particularly impressed by the curling barrels, they attract the hair like a magnet and the curls stay for days. But for a more budget option, ghd's new triple barrel hair waver, Wave, is an easy tool to achieve loose beach waves that turn heads, costing £159. However, this doesn't dry the hair and can only be used as a styling tool. Bellissima's Prodigy Air Styler, £249.99, is relatively cheaper than the Dyson. The curling barrels also feature Coanda Technology while the Ion Technology helps keep hair hydrated. Sir James Dyson, founder and Chief Engineer of Dyson said: "Dyson has developed a new motor for our new Airwrap2x, which spins at 150,000rpm, delivering twice the air pressure, faster drying and less heat damage. "The high pressure creates a longer lasting curl or straighter styles. Traditional stylers can damage hair, but we have always focused on developing tools that protect hair health whilst enhancing without compromising precision and or performance. We harness our expertise in motors, fluid dynamics, and materials to continually improve."


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Children could be banned from social media for LIFE 'if they share classmates nudes'
Children could face a lifetime ban from social media if they share classmates' nudes, under new proposals. Ofcom is urging online platforms to block these classroom cyberbullies from using their sites ever again. Tech companies will be told to cover all bases to ensure offenders cannot re-register using a different name, by using identity verification systems and internet address tracking. The rules are also likely to apply to school kids who share nude images on group chats. More than half of 13 to 15-year-old children who have sent nude pictures of themselves online have had the images distributed to unintended recipients, according to Snapchat. The regulator said those who 'share, generate, or upload CSEA (child sexual exploitation and abuse) content… should be banned from the service and prevented from returning', the Telegraph reports. Ofcom admitted that it was a 'particularly difficult issue' to establish whether children should come under such online rules, including young people who were coerced into sending pictures of themselves. The intention is neither to penalise grooming victims nor those in consensual relationship, the body insisted, but images distributed to a wider group 'can have a significant impact on victims'. The body has considered more lenient options including banning children on a case-by-case basis or introducing an appeals process, but it fears taking an easier position against younger people would encourage adults to pretend to be children in a bid to escape punishment. Sharing or receiving sexual images of children is already against the law but children are not normally prosecuted for the crime if they are a victim or it is seen as non-abusive. The new rules would also apply to images produced by artificial intelligence. Some sites have existing zero tolerance policies for those who distribute such pictures but the new plans will enforce these in law. Tech giants with more than one service, including Meta which owns Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, would be required to ban people who break new rules from all of their platforms. The policy is part of a wider aim to protect children online and prevent illegal content going viral. The Internet Watch Foundation, Britain's child abuse imagery hotline, reported receiving an alert every 74 seconds in 2024 - a rise of eight per cent compared with the previous year. In June it was reported that ministers are considering proposals to hand children a social media curfew under measures to improve online safety. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated he was considering an 'app cap' to restrict how much time youths spend on their phones. The cap would limit access to apps to two hours a day, outside of school time and before 10pm. It came as Mr Kyle came under fire from the father of a teen who took her own life after viewing harmful content warned 'sticking plasters' will not be enough to strengthen online safety measures. The Online Safety Act has passed into law, and from this year will require tech platforms to follow new Ofcom-issued codes of practice to keep users safe online, particularly children. But Ian Russell, whose 14-year-old daughter Molly died in 2017, said it was not tough enough and urged the Prime Minister to 'act decisively' in toughening legislation to protect young people online. Mr Russell, who is chairman of the Molly Rose Foundation set up in his daughter's memory, said: 'Every day the Government has delayed bringing in tougher online safety laws we've seen more young lives lost and damaged because of weak regulation and inaction by big tech. 'Parents up and down the country would be delighted to see the Prime Minister act decisively to quell the tsunami of harm children face online, but sticking plasters will not do the job. 'Only a stronger and more effective Online Safety Act will finally change the dial on fundamentally unsafe products and business models that prioritise engagement over safety.' Hefty fines and site blockages are among the penalties for those caught breaking the rules, but many critics have argued the approach gives tech firms too much scope to regulate themselves.


Telegraph
3 days ago
- Telegraph
Children face lifetime social media bans for sharing classmates' nudes
Schoolchildren face lifetime social media bans for sharing nude images of their classmates under online safety proposals from Ofcom. The regulator is proposing that tech giants enforce permanent bans on users who share illegal images of underage nudity as part of plans to keep children safe. The crackdown may extend to children who share the images among friends on group chats, meaning classroom cyber bullies could be permanently blocked from social networks. Platforms will be required to take steps to ensure users cannot simply sign up under a new name, such as tracking their internet address or verifying their identity. Ofcom announced on Monday that it would consult on a range of new measures to protect children online and clamp down on illegal content going viral. It said those who 'share, generate, or upload CSEA (child sexual exploitation and abuse) content … should be banned from the service and prevented from returning'. The watchdog said there was a 'particularly difficult issue' in deciding whether to enforce this against children, including those who are coerced into sending images of themselves and children who receive an image but then share it with friends. Ofcom said that while it did not want to penalise children who were victims of grooming or were in consensual relationships, images being shared more widely 'can have a significant impact on victims'. Sharing and receiving child sexual imagery is a criminal offence but children are typically not prosecuted for it when they are the victim or if it is considered non-abusive. More than half of 13 to 15-year-olds who have sent nude images of themselves have had the pictures spread beyond the intended recipient, according to Snapchat. Ofcom is considering options such as an appeals process or banning children on a case-by-base basis, but says taking an easier stance against children would encourage adults to pose as teenagers to avoid punishment. Several large sites have zero-tolerance lifetime bans for users who share illegal images of children, but the rules would enforce this in law and apply to all 'user-to-user' services such as messaging apps and social media companies. The proposals also cover those who disseminate images generated by artificial intelligence. They come amid a set of measures designed to strengthen online safety laws, which will have to be voted on by Parliament and are likely to come into force next year. These measures include requiring social media firms to set up 'war rooms' during crises, such as last year's Southport riots, with police having a direct line to the companies. Adults will also be banned from commenting on live streams of children or sending virtual 'gifts'. Oliver Griffiths, Ofcom's online safety group director, said: 'Important online safety rules are already in force and change is happening. We're holding platforms to account and launching swift enforcement action where we have concerns. 'But technology and harms are constantly evolving, and we're always looking at how we can make life safer online. So today we're putting forward proposals for more protections that we want to see tech firms roll out.'