
Troops and federal agents briefly descend on LA's MacArthur Park in largely immigrant neighborhood
The Department of Homeland Security wouldn't say whether anyone had been arrested during the brief operation at MacArthur Park. Federal officials did not respond to requests for comment about why the park was targeted or why the raid ended abruptly.
About 90 members of the California National Guard were present to protect immigration officers, defense officials said.
'What I saw in the park today looked like a city under siege, under armed occupation,' said Mayor Karen Bass, who showed up at the park alongside activists.
She said there were children attending a day camp in the park who were quickly ushered inside to avoid seeing the troops. Still, Bass said an 8-year-old boy told her that 'he was fearful of ICE.'
The operation occurred at a park in a neighborhood with large Mexican, Central American and other immigrant populations and is lined by businesses with signs in Spanish and other languages that has been dubbed by local officials as the 'Ellis Island of the West Coast.'
Sprawling MacArthur Park has a murky lake ringed by palm trees, an amphitheater that hosts summer concerts and sports fields where immigrant families line up to play soccer in the evenings and on weekends. A thoroughfare on the east side is often crammed with food stands selling tacos and other delicacies, along with vendors speaking multiple languages and hawking T-shirts, toys, knickknacks and household items.
Among those who spoke with Bass were health care outreach workers who were working with homeless residents Monday when troops pointed guns at them and told them to get out of the park.
Photos show federal officers riding on horseback toward a mostly empty soccer field. Other heavily armed authorities stood guard around the area alongside armored vehicles.
'The world needs to see the troop formation on horses walking through the park, in search of what? In search of what? They're walking through the area where the children play,' Bass said.
Eunisses Hernandez, a council member whose district includes MacArthur Park said 'it was chosen as this administration's latest target precisely because of who lives there and what it represents.'
The operation in the large park about 2 miles west of downtown LA included 17 Humvees, four tactical vehicles, two ambulances and the armed soldiers, defense officials said. It came after President Donald Trump deployed thousands of Guard members and active duty Marines to the city last month following protests over previous immigration raids.
Trump has stepped up efforts to realize his campaign pledge of deporting millions of immigrants in the United States illegally and shown a willingness to use the nation's military might in ways other U.S. presidents have typically avoided.
In response to questions about the operation in MacArthur Park, the Department of Homeland Security said in an email that the agency would not comment on 'ongoing enforcement operations.'
More than 4,000 California National Guard and hundreds of U.S. Marines have been deployed in Los Angeles since June — against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Last week, the military announced about 200 of those troops would be returned to their units to fight wildfires.
Newsom called the events at the park 'a spectacle.'
Two defense officials told reporters that what happened at MacArthur Park on Monday was not a military operation but acknowledged that the size and scope of the Guard's participation could make it look like one to the public. That is why the officials spoke on condition of anonymity to provide details about the raid that were not announced publicly. The primary role of the service members would be to protect the immigration enforcement officers in case a hostile crowd gathered, one of the officials said.
'It's just going to be more overt and larger than we usually participate in,' that official said.
'This morning looked like a staging for a TikTok video,' said Marqueece Harris-Dawson, president of the Los Angeles City Council, adding if Border Patrol wants to film in LA, 'you should apply for a film permit like everybody else. And stop trying to scare the bejesus out of everybody who lives in this great city and disrupt our economy every day.'
Chris Newman, legal director for the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, said he received a credible tip about the operation Monday.
'It was a demonstration of escalation,' Newman said. 'This was a reality TV spectacle much more so than an actual enforcement operation.'
Since federal agents have been making arrests at Home Depot parking lots and elsewhere in Los Angeles, Newman said fewer people have been going to the park and immigrant neighborhoods near the city's downtown.
Betsy Bolte, who lives nearby, came to the park after seeing a military-style helicopter circling overhead.
She said it was 'gut-wrenching' to witness what appeared to be a federal show of force on the streets of a U.S. city. 'It's terror and, you know, it's ripping the heart and soul out of Los Angeles,' she said. 'I am still in shock, disbelief, and so angry and terrified and heartbroken.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
22 minutes ago
- UPI
Judge orders mental evaluation in appeal for Laken Riley's convicted killer
The 2024 murder of 22-year-old Georgia university student Laken Riley received a lot of attention from President Donald Trump, who in January signed into law the Laken Riley Act (pictured). File Photo by Samuel Corum/UPI | License Photo July 8 (UPI) -- A Georgia judge ordered a mental evaluation for Jose Ibarra, the man convicted in the 2024 murder of 22-year-old university student Laken Riley. It will determine if Ibarra, a native of Venezuela, was mentally competent at the time of the crime and later at trial, including whether he understood the legal consequences of waiving a trial by jury and if he is mentally equipped to assist in his own appeal. In November, Ibarra was convicted of malice murder and other related charges in the February 2024 attack that left Riley, a nursing student, dead near a wooded trail on the campus of the University of Georgia. It was the impetus behind the Laken Riley Act, decried as a political move by opponents and which passed the Senate and was signed by U.S. President Donald Trump on January 29. The decision to call for the mental evaluation was issued last week by Athens-Clarke County Superior Court Judge H. Patrick Haggard, who sentenced Ibarra to life in prison with no chance of parole. Haggard's order filed on Thursday instructs officials to figure out if the undocumented migrant was "capable of understanding the nature and object of pretrial proceedings, including waiver of jury trial rights." Ibarra, 27, is hoping to vacate his guilty sentence or secure a new court trial after his attorneys filed a new-trial motion only weeks after his conviction late last year. His legal team argued that the guilty verdict was "contrary to law" and evidence. Ibarra, who speaks Spanish as a first language and possibly faced a language barrier, was characterized as "a slow learner" last month during a virtual hearing by defense attorney David Dodds. The state, for its part, did not oppose the evaluation request but filed a separate motion to seek public money to retain expert witnesses for a possible court appeal.


Boston Globe
32 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Feds allege detained migrant leader in Vermont sought to smuggle Mexican woman across Canadian border
An employee-owner of a green building cooperative and a former farmworker, De La Cruz is a leader of the Vermont-based advocacy group Advertisement But in a search warrant filed last month and made public in federal court proceedings, the government alleges that De La Cruz was paid to help smuggle a Mexican woman across the Canadian border to the U.S. in April. De La Cruz, known as 'Nacho,' has not had the opportunity to respond to the allegation in court. His attorney, Brett Stokes, did not return requests for comment Tuesday. Advertisement The government has not suggested that De La Cruz was engaged in human smuggling at the time of his arrest, nor that the Border Patrol agent who pulled him over was aware of the allegations. During a hearing related to Perez's case Monday in federal court in Burlington, Acting U.S. Attorney Michael Drescher said the government has no evidence that Perez, his stepdaughter, was involved in the alleged smuggling scheme. A search warrant application filed by a Border Patrol investigator and signed by a federal magistrate judge seeks access to De La Cruz's phone, which was seized during last month's traffic stop. It's not clear whether the phone has yet been searched. The document says Border Patrol agents detained a woman named Yoselin Gonzalez Florez in Richford on April 19 after she crossed the border, on foot, through the woods. Upon inspecting her phone, agents discovered text messages between Gonzalez and a number belonging to De La Cruz, as well as between Gonzalez and another U.S.-based associate identified as 'Armando.' The exchanges, which took place between April 9 and 11, describe Armando meeting up with a person named Nacho to pay him $5,000 for Gonzalez's trip across the border. Armando wrote that Nacho would pick her up once she made it to the U.S. After Armando provided Gonzalez with Nacho's phone number — which matches De La Cruz's — Nacho and Gonzalez communicated directly about logistics. 'The NACHO NUMBER responded to GONZALEZ by saying that he would contact the person smuggling GONZALEZ across the border for the location to pick her up,' according to the application. Advertisement The government suggests that Nacho planned to pay the person accompanying Gonzalez a portion of the $5,000 — and that such arrangements are common, to ensure that a smuggler is fully compensated only once the person being smuggled has arrived. It appears from the communications that Gonzalez planned to cross from Ontario into upstate New York late on the night of April 10, and that Nacho planned to meet her shortly thereafter and bring her to his home in the Burlington area. But for unspecified reasons that plan changed, and the next morning Gonzalez told Nacho she would instead attempt to cross through the woods closer to Montreal at a later date. What happened next is also unclear. Gonzalez was detained eight days later after walking from Quebec to Vermont. The government has not alleged that De La Cruz was involved with that crossing. The agent who filed the search warrant application, David Palczewski, wrote that, while he had previously determined that the phone number was associated with a Jose Ignacio De La Cruz, that knowledge had not led to his detention. Only after De La Cruz and Perez were pulled over in June did Palczewski make the connection, he wrote. Will Lambek, a spokesperson for Migrant Justice, said in a written statement Tuesday that the new allegationsdid not change 'the essential fact that Nacho and Heidi were detained without cause' while dropping off food at a nearby farm. 'Border Patrol claims that Nacho had previously made a plan to give a ride to a woman who was planning on immigrating to the United States without authorization,' Lambek wrote. 'If true, this incident is wholly unrelated to the actual circumstances of their violent detainment on June 14th.' Advertisement Rather, Lambek alleged, Border Patrol had engaged in 'racial profiling' when making the traffic stop last month, coming up with 'flimsy pretexts' to justify it and violating the constitutional rights of De La Cruz and his stepdaughter. The new court filings provide additional details about the stop. At the time a Border Patrol agent noticed De La Cruz's vehicle, he and Perez were less than a mile from the border, on a road frequently associated with illegal crossings. Another passenger van had been spotted in the area earlier this year collecting people who had just crossed the border, though photographs in the filings make clear they are not the same vehicle. The agent, Brandon Parent, wrote that the pair 'became visibly nervous' once they saw him and failed to make a full stop at an intersection. He said he thought he saw other people through the van's tinted windows, though he later realized he was incorrect. After running a license check, he pulled them over. De La Cruz and Perez declined to roll down their windows more than a few inches, nor to identify themselves. After another agent and a supervisor arrived — and the pair continued to refuse their orders — the supervisor, Thomas Blaser Jr., smashed the driver's side window with his baton and pulled De La Cruz out of the van. Blaser later realized he had cut his right arm on the window glass, requiring a visit to the hospital and eight stitches. In their account of the incident, De La Cruz and Perez say the agents failed to say why they were being pulled over. At a nearby station, they wrote, an agent 'aggressively' bent Perez's arm when she refused to be fingerprinted. Both said they were prevented from calling an attorney. Advertisement At Monday's federal court hearing in Burlington, Stokes, who also represents Perez, argued that she should be released because the government had violated her rights to due process and against unreasonable search and seizure. He also claimed the government had violated her right to free speech, given her public advocacy with Migrant Justice. But US District Judge Christina Reiss appeared skeptical, noting that if Border Patrol had not known Perez's identity when pulling over the van, she could not have been targeted for her speech. As for whether Border Patrol was justified in stopping De La Cruz and Perez, Reiss said, 'We have these stops in our court a lot, and these facts are enough for reasonable suspicion.' The judge did not immediately rule on Stokes' request, instead asking for further briefs later this month.

Condé Nast Traveler
36 minutes ago
- Condé Nast Traveler
TSA Plans to End Its Shoes-Off Policy
Soon, you might not have to take your shoes off at the airport. At several major airports across the country, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will allow passengers to cross through all security screening lanes without taking off their shoes, according to reporting from CBS News and The New York Times. Updates regarding the end of the shoes-off policy were first reported by the Gate Access Substack on July 4, but has not yet been officially confirmed by the TSA. However, reports suggest that the change appears to be a phased approach that will eventually roll out to all US airports. Baltimore/Washington International Airport, Fort Lauderdale International Airport, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, Portland International Airport, Philadelphia International Airport, and Piedmont Triad International Airport in North Carolina, are expected to be among the first hubs to enact the change, two sources close to the matter shared with CBS. Various news sources have also confirmed that recent passengers at other airports not included on the list such as Los Angeles International Airport and New York City's LaGuardia Airport did not have to take off their shoes to pass through security in recent days. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to the news on X, writing that the retirement of the shoe removal policy nearly 20 years after its implementation was 'big news' from the Department of Homeland Security. The requirement for removing shoes originated in 2001, after Richard Reid, who later became known as the 'shoe bomber,' attempted to ignite explosives hidden in his shoes on a flight from Paris to Miami. The security measure was implemented five years later in 2006 due to 'intelligence pointing to a continuing threat' according to an official webpage on TSA history. As the shoe removal policy phases out, standard passengers will join travelers registered with TSA PreCheck who have long been able to keep their footwear on as they pass through security. In order to have PreCheck, applicants must submit an application which has an associated fee and undergo a background check. With security wait times often posing a major obstacle for time pressed travelers, the policy change may expedite standard security screenings—and the TSA's, 'shoes on, no service' rule may be another airport procedure of the past. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem is scheduled to speak on the new TSA screening security policy at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on July 8. Condé Nast Traveler has reached out to TSA for comment. This is a developing story and will be updated with more information.